20.10.2014 Views

UNIVERSITY OF NOVA GORICA GRADUATE SCHOOL ...

UNIVERSITY OF NOVA GORICA GRADUATE SCHOOL ...

UNIVERSITY OF NOVA GORICA GRADUATE SCHOOL ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Milošević giving a speech is embedded. In the following shot the I with no internal borders drawn<br />

is split up, and Croatia and Serbia are coloured in red and yellow, respectively. In both ‗territories‘<br />

footage is embedded showing rallying masses waving flags (I still contains the red star). Then the<br />

visitor sees Milošević again at a rally, followed immediately by tanks and I National Army<br />

soldiers at a military parade. This shoot is followed by a delegation visiting Tito‘s grave,<br />

switching swiftly to out-of-the-car shots of a demolished village with bodies in the street and<br />

interspersed with people crying. The video ends with a long ‗procession‘ of people leaving, left<br />

without a country, a home, a past and a future. The way the ending is edited suggests a reading<br />

that the country‘s collapse started with Tito‘s death and the ensuing nationalist independence<br />

projects, wars and struggles over the country‘s legacy were in fact the wake. Tito‘s funeral in 1980<br />

was attended by world‘s leaders, yet this reference is entirely absent from this narrativisation.<br />

Instead, the attendants are the people walking in the long line in the streets of a war-torn town.<br />

Much like mejerchold‘s, SerbianGhost‘s digital memorial uses the song in reference to SFRY,<br />

rather than the NATO bombing. And while both videos use the same shot of Mostar Bridge being<br />

torn down, the respective placements prove illustrating: in mejerchold‘s, the scene is placed at the<br />

end of the video, thus in a way subsuming the wars and the collapse (although the bridge was torn<br />

down in 1992, and the war did not end until at least 1995) as presented in the video; the end of the<br />

bridge, the end of ‗bridges.‘ In SerbianGhost on the other hand, the footage of tearing down the<br />

bridge comes right at the beginning of the war as presented in the narrative, which than acts as<br />

another in line of events that brought the people apart. Yet, the ‗war-torn destinies‘ in<br />

mejerchold‘s video seem to have a future (open ending; the girls running away), while in the<br />

SerbianGhost‘s the people are bound to the ruins in a collective despair.<br />

These three ‗renditions‘ are digital memorials to the I wars with only fleeting references to SFRY.<br />

Using the same song that was created in early 2000s they each give the song in the memorial a<br />

different role and meaning. And it seems this is the advantage of digital memorial landscapes:<br />

giving room for voicing/videoing different interpretations using similar material, i.e. the song and<br />

the bridge scene.<br />

127

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!