20.10.2014 Views

UNIVERSITY OF NOVA GORICA GRADUATE SCHOOL ...

UNIVERSITY OF NOVA GORICA GRADUATE SCHOOL ...

UNIVERSITY OF NOVA GORICA GRADUATE SCHOOL ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

create and communicate, via digital memorial, a very personal historical statement. 121 The<br />

research objects are investigated as paradigmatic cases of digital storytelling where multimodal<br />

discourse analysis focuses on visual and audio aspects and is combined with textual analysis of<br />

comments and posts.<br />

Finally, the third case study investigates memory and remembering in several Facebook profiles<br />

related to Yugoslavia, its lifelong president and a popular culture icon (Chapter 4). They are<br />

analysed as cases of collaborative digital storytelling and approached as co-created, underpermanent-construction<br />

digital memorials which are intrinsically related/networked to and<br />

between visitors, administrators and other similar Facebook profiles. The investigation is<br />

conducted through discourse analysis including text, video and audio.<br />

Methodology<br />

The three distinctly individual, yet also significantly interrelated case studies in which I<br />

investigate a selection of vernacular remediations and renarrativisations of the Yugoslav are<br />

approached, as mentioned above, as cases in digital storytelling. They are the result of a cocreative<br />

action undertaken by individual users and establish the core subject of analysis:<br />

multimodal mobile media objects. Particular attention is paid to the ways vernacular memory<br />

practices utilise digital technology and hence the 4MOs. The overarching methodological<br />

approach is decidedly qualitative and posits the cases studies as cases that essentially possess a<br />

narrative quality. Hence the methodology presupposes an approach adopting content and discourse<br />

analysis of digital storytelling in 4MOs. 122<br />

As DS is crucially enabled and conditioned by the technological and cultural implications of DME<br />

and the internet as an enabling technology, it importantly differs from the ‗analogue‘ narrative<br />

formation, consumption and dissemination. Yet, the main difference, as understood here lies in a)<br />

mobility of media objects and b) on-the-fly co-creative impetus. This makes the investigated<br />

4MOs the matter of co-creation and incessant permeability and not necessarily proves<br />

insurmountable obstacle in seeing 4MOs as discursive elements. To the contrary, to an important<br />

degree digital storytelling and digital narrativisations retain continuity with ‗classic‘ storytelling.<br />

The cases in digital storytelling and memorials are thus analysed qualitatively following the<br />

121 See Jean Burgess and Joshua Green, YouTube: Online Video and Participatory Culture, Cambridge, Polity Press,<br />

2009; see also Pelle Snickars and Patrick Vonderau (eds.), The YouTube Reader, Stockholm, National Library of<br />

Sweden, 2009.<br />

122 On digital storytelling see Knut Lundby (ed.), Digital Storytelling.<br />

47

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!