20.10.2014 Views

UNIVERSITY OF NOVA GORICA GRADUATE SCHOOL ...

UNIVERSITY OF NOVA GORICA GRADUATE SCHOOL ...

UNIVERSITY OF NOVA GORICA GRADUATE SCHOOL ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

home and folks more than ever. You say you work for 350 €, and I live here, work, study,<br />

buy clothes, eat and pay rent with 600 €.<br />

Bosancheros85 317<br />

What gremlinBG and Bosancheros85 communicate between themselves is a story of two<br />

migrants: one migrated in time, leaving his homeland behind, while the other migrated as well<br />

geographically. Both of them have lost their homeland, but they observe it from a different<br />

perspective, finding different solutions to their problems. And it seems it is this perspective that<br />

prevents them from finding a common ground. But what they communicate to 4MO visitors (and<br />

the apparatus) is a piece of a wider post-socialist problematic: displacement, bad living conditions,<br />

and general disappointment.<br />

We can see that digital memorials as examples of co-creative storytelling, apart from an<br />

externalisation of memory by the maker, also present a conduit to expressing very personal issues<br />

by visitors in a public space: unlike the ‗classic‘ memorials where little room is available for<br />

expressing disagreement or even debate about the contested part of history. Different ‗versions‘ of<br />

history or externalisations of memory are frequently materialised in different spaces: monuments,<br />

memorials, commemorations, and they may clash for instance in professional debates, political<br />

campaigns and round tables. 4MO on the other hand, ideally offers a space where divergent,<br />

opposing interpretations can meet and interact without ‗authorial mediation.‘ The reality, as I have<br />

shown, is usually not as ideal. Rather, ‗problematic‘ historical events/people/periods, or rather<br />

their cybertraces, provide fertile ground for radicalisation and affect around certain topics. Despite<br />

the potentialities offered by digital storytelling and the co-creative functionalities in 4MO, to a<br />

large extent the public debates seem not to go beyond the limits of pub-debates and fixed<br />

positions.<br />

With this in mind it can be said that a tendency of users/co-creators (makers and visitors) in digital<br />

memorials is not to discuss or debate a particular topic in very much detail. Despite the<br />

technological dispositions of the internet, and YouTube in particular, that at least in a utopian view<br />

should facilitate a world of knowledge, these are only to a limited extend used this way. From a<br />

techno-cultural point of view this may be an indication of the discrepancy between the intended<br />

use of a technology on the one hand and its actual, experiential application on the other. 318 The<br />

prevalent strategy seems to be a more on-the-fly connection to the posted content without lengthy<br />

or serious involvement into the topic. True, the short statements may not be totally disengaged. To<br />

317 See comments at http://www.youtube.com/all_comments?v=M7SorJzdBtc&page=4.<br />

318 See Gitelman, Always Already New on the gramophone; see also Friedrich Kittler, Gramophone, Film, Typewriter,<br />

Stanford, Stanford University Press, 1999.<br />

162

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!