15.11.2014 Views

capitalism

capitalism

capitalism

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Declaration of Independence 113<br />

computer-generated reply, or I may cast a vote in the next<br />

federal election: impersonal and probably futile acts.<br />

The devitalizing, dispiriting effect of centralization was captured<br />

by novelist Norman Mailer, who in his 1969 campaign<br />

for the mayoralty of New York City proposed that the city<br />

become an independent state and that this new state devolve all<br />

political power to the neighborhood level. Mailer wrote:<br />

Our authority has been handed over to the federal power. We<br />

expect our economic solutions, our habitats, yes, even our<br />

entertainments, to derive from that remote abstract power,<br />

remote as the other end of a television tube. We are like wards<br />

in an orphan asylum. The shaping of the style of our lives is<br />

removed from us—we pay for huge military adventures and<br />

social experiments so separated from our direct control that .<br />

. . our condition is spiritless. We wait for abstract impersonal<br />

powers to save us, we despise the abstractness of those powers,<br />

we loathe ourselves for our own apathy.<br />

From Thomas Jefferson to Norman Mailer, the faces<br />

change, the styles too, but decentralists endure.<br />

See also Federalism; Hess, Karl; Jefferson, Thomas; Subsidiarity;<br />

Urban Planning<br />

Further Readings<br />

BK<br />

Agar, Herbert, and Allen Tate, eds. Who Owns America? A New<br />

Declaration of Independence. Wilmington, DE: ISI Books, 1999<br />

[1936].<br />

Berry, Wendell. Home Economics. San Francisco: North Point Press,<br />

1987.<br />

Bryan, Frank, and John McClaughry. The Vermont Papers.<br />

Colchester, VT: Chelsea Green, 1989.<br />

Chesterton, G. K. The Napoleon of Notting Hill. Mineola, NY:<br />

Dover, 1991 [1904].<br />

Davidson, Donald. The Attack on Leviathan. Chapel Hill: University<br />

of North Carolina Press, 1938.<br />

Hess, Karl. Dear America. New York: Morrow, 1975.<br />

Jefferson, Thomas. Writings. New York: Viking, 1984.<br />

Mailer, Norman. “An Instrument for the City.” Existential Errands.<br />

Boston: Little, Brown, 1972.<br />

Naylor, Thomas, and William H. Willimon. Downsizing the U.S.A.<br />

Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1997.<br />

DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE<br />

Adopted on July 4, 1776, by the Second Continental<br />

Congress, meeting in Philadelphia, the Declaration of<br />

Independence is the founding document of the United<br />

States of America. In addition to the Congress’s official<br />

explanation of “the causes which impel” Americans to declare<br />

their independence from Great Britain, the document also<br />

identifies the founders’ political philosophy of limited government<br />

dedicated to the protection of individual rights.<br />

On June 11, 1776, anticipating a vote on Virginia delegate<br />

Richard Henry Lee’s resolution calling for independence,<br />

Congress appointed a five-man committee to draft a declaration<br />

justifying that momentous step. The committee members<br />

were John Adams of Massachusetts, Benjamin Franklin<br />

of Pennsylvania, Roger Sherman of Connecticut, Robert<br />

Livingston of New York, and Thomas Jefferson of Virginia.<br />

Jefferson was assigned the task of drafting the document.<br />

Late in life, Jefferson wrote that the purpose of the<br />

Declaration was “to place before mankind the common sense<br />

of the subject, in terms so plain and firm as to command their<br />

assent, and to justify” American independence. In drafting<br />

the document, he sought to express “the harmonizing sentiments<br />

of the day,” the views of Americans’ rights, and their<br />

violation by the British government—subjects, he maintained,<br />

on which “all American whigs thought alike.”<br />

“Neither aiming at originality of principle or sentiment, nor<br />

yet copied from any particular and previous writing, it was<br />

intended to be an expression of the American mind.”<br />

In making the case for American independence,<br />

Jefferson employed the language of 18th-century logic and<br />

rhetoric. The argument of the Declaration is in the form of<br />

a syllogism, with a major premise, a minor premise, and a<br />

conclusion. Jefferson supplemented those basic components<br />

of the syllogism with corollary principles that reinforced<br />

the overall argument.<br />

The second paragraph, which states the major premise,<br />

posed the greatest difficulty for Jefferson as the many changes<br />

he marked in his “original rough draught” attest. “We hold<br />

these truths to be sacred & undeniable,” he originally wrote,<br />

“that all men are created equal & independent, and from that<br />

equal creation they derive rights inherent & inalienable,<br />

among which are the preservation of life, & liberty, & the pursuit<br />

of happiness.” After Jefferson substituted the more precise<br />

term self-evident for the phrase sacred & undeniable, he<br />

made further changes suggested by Franklin and Adams,<br />

resulting in the familiar language: “We hold these truths to be<br />

self-evident: that all men are created equal; that they are<br />

endowed by their creator with certain unalienable rights; that<br />

among these are life, liberty, & the pursuit of happiness.”<br />

The concept that all men equally enjoyed certain natural<br />

rights was one of the “harmonizing sentiments of the day”<br />

to which Jefferson later alluded; it reflected the influence<br />

on Jefferson and other American Patriots of a variety of<br />

sources, including 17th- and 18th-century Enlightenment<br />

treatises and English radical Whig writings, particularly<br />

John Locke’s Second Treatise on Government. Although<br />

much of the language in the second paragraph of the<br />

Declaration closely paraphrases passages from Locke’s<br />

work, Jefferson departed from Locke’s identification of<br />

“life, liberty, and property” as the three fundamental natural<br />

rights. Contrary to what some modern scholars have

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!