15.11.2014 Views

capitalism

capitalism

capitalism

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

498 Szasz, Thomas (1920– )<br />

understanding Dr. Szasz’s point of view, is that the expression<br />

mental illness and its relatives are metaphors not for<br />

problems special to medicine, but for problems of living<br />

concerned with internal and external conflict involving<br />

roles or games. In his 1990 book The Untamed Tongue, he<br />

describes how he believes the concept of mental illness is<br />

connected to social norms or expectations:<br />

When a person fails to follow rules of conduct—that is, the<br />

rules most people follow—we say that he is mentally ill,<br />

and when he does not respond to conventional rewards and<br />

punishments as we want him to respond—we say he is<br />

seriously mentally ill.<br />

He holds that, although real illness is physical and<br />

defined by such bodily criteria as lesions and organic malfunctions,<br />

what qualifies as mental illness can be almost<br />

any behavior that is perceived as unpleasant, obnoxious,<br />

or threatening to its author, others, or both. Historically,<br />

behavior classified as mental illness or a form of mental<br />

disorder has been wide ranging, including refusal to support<br />

oneself through work, reckless gambling, drug habits,<br />

unconventional sexual practices, dissatisfaction with one’s<br />

physical appearance, impulsive violence, and political nonconformity<br />

(as in the former Soviet Union).<br />

“Classifying thoughts, feelings, and behaviors as diseases<br />

is a logical and semantic error, like classifying the<br />

whale as a fish,” he writes on his Web site (www.szasz<br />

.com). For him, mental illness no more describes a species<br />

of illness than decoy duck describes a species of duck. He<br />

would contend, however, that although everybody knows<br />

that decoy ducks are not ducks, people commonly think<br />

that mental illness describes a species of illness. The<br />

unquestioning belief in mental illness has profound social<br />

consequences because it provides the justification for what<br />

Dr. Szasz would describe as state-sponsored social control,<br />

as when people labeled mentally ill are involuntarily hospitalized.<br />

Although Dr. Szasz never denies that people can<br />

have real problems coping with life and dealing with others,<br />

he denies that those problems are properly regarded as<br />

a form of illness. What is more, although he acknowledges<br />

that some organic conditions, such as Alzheimer’s disease,<br />

can influence thought and behavior, he argues that the<br />

behavior is never a disease.<br />

By asserting that the concept of mental illness is a myth,<br />

Dr. Szasz intends, among other things, to reject a medical<br />

frame of reference for describing, understanding, and<br />

attempting to control people’s actions and habits. When<br />

people regard actions and habits as illness, they are, he<br />

insists, rejecting the conception of people as free and responsible<br />

moral agents and accepting instead the conception of<br />

people as patients and victims needing the intervention, at<br />

times forced, of medical professionals. Because most people<br />

have uncritically accepted the appropriateness of applying<br />

medical concepts to disapproved behavior, we, as a society,<br />

have replaced a moral-theological outlook with a therapeutic<br />

one. By treating habits, actions, and complex social performances<br />

as illnesses, we increase the power of psychiatrists<br />

and other health care professionals while we devalue personal<br />

freedom and responsibility. (Dr. Szasz’s influential<br />

writings on drug prohibition illustrate his central thesis well.)<br />

Because of his work and the actions of civil libertarians<br />

and other social critics, there has been a growing uneasiness<br />

about coercive psychiatry, leading to legal reforms that<br />

have made it more difficult to hospitalize involuntarily<br />

those labeled mentally ill. His writings are important not<br />

only because they require people to question foundational<br />

definitions in psychiatry, but also because they provide a<br />

point of view for defending personal freedom and responsibility<br />

against therapeutic paternalism.<br />

See also Coercion; Drug Prohibition; Foucault, Michel; Psychiatry<br />

Further Readings<br />

RoE<br />

Szasz, Thomas. Ceremonial Chemistry: The Ritual Persecution of<br />

Drugs, Addicts, and Pushers. Rev. ed. Holmes Beach, FL:<br />

Learning Publications, 1985 [1974].<br />

———. Cruel Compassion: Psychiatric Control of Society’s<br />

Unwanted. New York: Wiley, 1994.<br />

———. The Myth of Mental Illness: Foundations of a Theory of<br />

Personal Conduct. New York: Harper, 1961.<br />

———. Our Right to Drugs: The Case for a Free Market. New<br />

York: Praeger, 1992.<br />

———. The Untamed Tongue: A Dissenting Dictionary. LaSalle, IL:<br />

Open Court, 1990.<br />

Vatz, Richard, and Lee Weinberg. Thomas Szasz: Primary Values<br />

and Major Contentions. Buffalo, NY: Prometheus Books, 1982.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!