05.01.2015 Views

Bulletin - John Jay College Of Criminal Justice - CUNY

Bulletin - John Jay College Of Criminal Justice - CUNY

Bulletin - John Jay College Of Criminal Justice - CUNY

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

APPENDIX<br />

assistance of the campus ombudsman or other appropriate person<br />

to facilitate informal resolution.<br />

D. If resolution is not possible, and the Fact Finder concludes that<br />

the facts alleged by the student, taken as true and viewed in the<br />

light most favorable to the student, establish that the conduct<br />

complained of is clearly protected by academic freedom, he or she<br />

shall issue a written report dismissing the complaint and setting<br />

forth the reasons for dismissal and send a copy to the complaining<br />

student, the faculty member, the chief academic officer and the<br />

chief student affairs officer. Otherwise, the Fact Finder shall<br />

conduct an investigation. The Fact Finder shall separately<br />

interview the complaining student, the faculty member and other<br />

persons with relevant knowledge and information and shall also<br />

consult with the chief student affairs officer and, if appropriate, the<br />

college ombudsman. The Fact Finder shall not reveal the identity<br />

of the complaining student and the faculty member to others except<br />

to the extent necessary to conduct the investigation. If the Fact<br />

Finder believes it would be helpful, he or she may meet again with<br />

the student and faculty member after completing the investigation<br />

in an effort to resolve the matter. The complaining student and the<br />

faculty member shall have the right to have a representative<br />

(including a union representative, student government<br />

representative or attorney) present during the initial meeting, the<br />

interview and any post-investigation meeting.<br />

E. At the end of the investigation, the Fact Finder shall issue a<br />

written report setting forth his or her findings and<br />

recommendations, with particular focus on whether the conduct in<br />

question is protected by academic freedom, and send a copy to the<br />

complaining student, the faculty member, the chief academic<br />

officer and the chief student affairs officer. In ordinary cases, it is<br />

expected that the investigation and written report should be<br />

completed within 30 calendar days of the date the complaint was<br />

filed.<br />

V. Appeals Procedure. If either the student or the faculty member is not<br />

satisfied with the report of the Fact Finder, the student or faculty member<br />

may file a written appeal to the chief academic officer within 10 calendar<br />

days of receiving the report. The chief academic officer shall convene and<br />

serve as the chairperson of an Appeals Committee, which shall also<br />

include the chief student affairs officer, two faculty members elected<br />

annually by the faculty council or senate and one student elected annually<br />

by the student senate. The Appeals Committee shall review the findings<br />

and recommendations of the report, with particular focus on whether the<br />

conduct in question is protected by academic freedom. The Appeals<br />

Committee shall not conduct a new factual investigation or overturn any<br />

factual findings contained in the report unless they are clearly erroneous.<br />

If the Appeals Committee decides to reverse the Fact Finder in a case<br />

where there has not been an investigation because the Fact Finder<br />

erroneously found that the alleged conduct was protected by academic<br />

freedom, it may remand to the Fact Finder for further proceedings. The<br />

committee shall issue a written decision within 20 calendar days of<br />

receiving the appeal. A copy of the decision shall be sent to the student,<br />

the faculty member, the department chairperson and the president.<br />

VI. Subsequent Action. Following the completion of these procedures,<br />

the appropriate college official shall decide the appropriate action, if any,<br />

to take. For example, the department chairperson may decide to place a<br />

report in the faculty member's personnel file or the president may bring<br />

disciplinary charges against the faculty member. Disciplinary charges<br />

may also be brought in extremely serious cases even though the college<br />

has not completed the entire investigative process described above; in that<br />

case, the bringing of disciplinary charges shall automatically suspend that<br />

process. Any action taken by a college must comply with the bylaws of<br />

the University and the collective bargaining agreement between the<br />

University and the Professional Staff Congress.<br />

VII. Campus Implementation. Each campus shall implement these<br />

procedures and shall distribute them widely to administrators, faculty<br />

members and students and post them on the college website.<br />

VIII. Board Review. During the spring 2009 semester, the Chancellery<br />

shall conduct a review of the experience of the colleges with these<br />

procedures, including consultation with administrators, faculty and<br />

students, and shall report the results of that review to the Board of<br />

Trustees, along with any recommended changes.<br />

SECTION 504 OF THE REHABILITATION ACT OF<br />

1973 AND THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES<br />

ACT OF 1990<br />

In accordance with Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973,<br />

“The Civil Rights Act” for the people with disabilities and the<br />

Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, the <strong>College</strong> adheres to the<br />

law that states in part that: “No otherwise qualified individual ...<br />

299

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!