JP 3-01 Countering Air and Missile Threats - Defense Innovation ...
JP 3-01 Countering Air and Missile Threats - Defense Innovation ...
JP 3-01 Countering Air and Missile Threats - Defense Innovation ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Chapter IV<br />
Refer to <strong>JP</strong> 3-60, Joint Targeting, for a discussion of targeting <strong>and</strong> TSTs.<br />
8. Suppression of Enemy <strong>Air</strong> <strong>Defense</strong>s<br />
a. SEAD is activity that neutralizes, destroys, or temporarily degrades surface-based<br />
enemy ADs by destructive or disruptive means. SEAD must be an integral part of all<br />
planning <strong>and</strong> air operations, but the SEAD requirement will vary according to mission<br />
objectives, system capabilities, <strong>and</strong> threat complexity. SEAD operations are based upon the<br />
JAOP <strong>and</strong> the components’ suppression needs, target priorities, <strong>and</strong> availability of SEAD<br />
assets.<br />
b. SEAD objectives are specified by the JFC, who will consider the unique capabilities<br />
of each component to contribute to counterair operations. Traditionally, there are three<br />
categories of SEAD, each of which reduces attrition <strong>and</strong> creates more favorable conditions<br />
for friendly air operations: AOR-/JOA-wide joint AD system suppression, localized<br />
suppression, <strong>and</strong> opportune suppression. For each category, there are two means of<br />
executing SEAD, destructive <strong>and</strong> disruptive.<br />
c. SEAD assets are often used in conjunction with other air operations/missions (i.e., air<br />
interdiction, OCA attack, airborne operations) when surface ADs are a factor. Specially<br />
trained aircrew <strong>and</strong> specially equipped aircraft are designed for SEAD missions, especially<br />
against an IADS. SEAD dedicated aircraft normally are equipped with special electronic<br />
detection <strong>and</strong> electronic countermeasures (ECM) equipment, deceptive expendables (chaff,<br />
flares, or decoys), <strong>and</strong> antiradiation missiles (ARMs) for use against emitting radars. During<br />
major operations, SEAD assets normally are too valuable to be used for missions without a<br />
SEAD requirement. Other fighter-attack <strong>and</strong> multi-role fighter crews normally are trained to<br />
support the SEAD mission, especially against the enemy AD infrastructure.<br />
d. Threat. AD threats can encompass many national or multinational systems normally<br />
integrated into an IADS. Potential adversaries’ IADSs have become increasingly complex<br />
<strong>and</strong> can differ widely from country to country in terms of organization, sophistication, <strong>and</strong><br />
operational procedures. An adversary’s IADS needs to be analyzed in-depth with an eye to<br />
potential strengths <strong>and</strong> weaknesses, especially seams in coverage. The goal is to identify<br />
comm<strong>and</strong> structure, AD doctrine, early warning <strong>and</strong> tracking capabilities, C2<br />
reliability/redundancy, <strong>and</strong> defensive weapons systems. SEAD operations target the<br />
following components of an IADS:<br />
(1) IADS C2 nodes/centers.<br />
(2) SAM sites.<br />
(3) AAA.<br />
(4) Early warning <strong>and</strong> fire control radars <strong>and</strong> GCI sites.<br />
(5) SAM carriers <strong>and</strong> storage bunkers.<br />
(6) AD operations <strong>and</strong> maintenance personnel.<br />
IV-12 <strong>JP</strong> 3-<strong>01</strong>