JP 3-01 Countering Air and Missile Threats - Defense Innovation ...
JP 3-01 Countering Air and Missile Threats - Defense Innovation ...
JP 3-01 Countering Air and Missile Threats - Defense Innovation ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>Defense</strong> Counterair Planning <strong>and</strong> Operations<br />
2. Unit Security/Counter-Surveillance. Local unit security is an<br />
important element in denying accurate targeting data to enemy SOF or other enemy agents.<br />
Patrolling <strong>and</strong> ground forces support is important to keep enemy threat forces of Level I<br />
(agents, saboteurs, <strong>and</strong> terrorists) <strong>and</strong> Level II (small tactical units) from conducting<br />
harassment or interdiction attacks against DCA assets.<br />
3. Nighttime Support Operations. Consider nighttime for conducting<br />
time-consuming resupply or other operations that could highlight units’ visibility <strong>and</strong><br />
increase their vulnerability.<br />
4. Camouflage <strong>and</strong> Concealment. Practice visual signature reduction<br />
measures that can “hide” or deny accuracy in locating friendly targets/target systems. These<br />
measures may be conducted continuously or in response to specific warnings. Timely<br />
intelligence concerning the overflight by enemy satellite <strong>and</strong> aircraft collection systems is<br />
important to the effort. Those measures also may be coupled with deception measures to<br />
further complicate chances of effective enemy attacks. The employment of obscurants can<br />
negate the effectiveness <strong>and</strong> accuracy of attack threats during DCA operations.<br />
Refer to <strong>JP</strong> 3-13.3, Operations Security, for additional discussion regarding OPSEC.<br />
Refer to <strong>JP</strong> 3-13.4, Military Deception, for more details regarding deception operations.<br />
(3) Reducing Vulnerability. There are four measures that may enable friendly<br />
assets to survive enemy attacks by reducing their vulnerability.<br />
(a) Hardening. Valuable assets <strong>and</strong> their shelters are hardened to protect<br />
against physical attack, electromagnetic pulse (EMP), <strong>and</strong> transient radiation. Hardening<br />
measures should be accomplished during peacetime whenever possible. Hardening reduces<br />
the effect of attack on systems <strong>and</strong> facilities (i.e., aircraft, missiles, air base support<br />
equipment <strong>and</strong> facilities, nuclear delivery systems, nuclear storage areas, C2 facilities,<br />
communications nodes, <strong>and</strong> logistic facilities). When EMP hardening is not feasible, an<br />
EMP vulnerability assessment should be made to identify suitable preparatory <strong>and</strong> defensive<br />
measures.<br />
(b) Redundancy. A principal means of preserving combat power is<br />
duplication of critical nodes, capabilities, <strong>and</strong> systems that are particularly vulnerable to air<br />
<strong>and</strong> missile attack <strong>and</strong> for which other passive measures may be less appropriate.<br />
Redundancy includes dual, contingency, or backup capabilities that can assume primary<br />
mission functions (in whole or in part) upon failure or degradation of the primary system. Of<br />
primary concern are “soft” targets such as C2 nodes <strong>and</strong> sensors (antenne) <strong>and</strong> fixed sites<br />
such as airfields <strong>and</strong> ground stations for airborne sensors.<br />
(c) Dispersal. Dispersal reduces target vulnerability by decreasing<br />
concentration <strong>and</strong> making a target system less lucrative. Combined with mobility <strong>and</strong><br />
deception, dispersal increases enemy uncertainty as to whether a particular location is<br />
occupied <strong>and</strong>, if so, whether it will be occupied when the attack is executed.<br />
V-21