02.03.2015 Views

JP 3-01 Countering Air and Missile Threats - Defense Innovation ...

JP 3-01 Countering Air and Missile Threats - Defense Innovation ...

JP 3-01 Countering Air and Missile Threats - Defense Innovation ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chapter V<br />

(5) Firing Doctrine. Guidance should also be provided for inventory management<br />

to include threshold levels <strong>and</strong> modified procedures once those threshold levels are crossed.<br />

Factors include:<br />

(a) Determining the single shot P k for own force interceptors against threat<br />

missile types in the enemy missile order of battle.<br />

(b) Formulating the number of upper-<strong>and</strong>-lower tier interceptors required to<br />

achieve the designated levels of protection.<br />

(c) Equating threat BM impact point prediction with the designated level of<br />

protection for the threatened asset.<br />

(d) Establishing a firing policy (e.g., first interceptor to be able to intercept the<br />

threat MB being the first interceptor battery to engage <strong>and</strong> the next system being designated<br />

to cover the engagement should the initial system miss).<br />

(e) Firing lower-tier missiles in the last engagement window <strong>and</strong> factoring in<br />

their cumulative P k in determining the number of upper-tier interceptors to fire in the final<br />

salvo.<br />

c. Active <strong>Missile</strong> <strong>Defense</strong> Design. Based on an expected air <strong>and</strong> BM threat, the<br />

challenge for the AADC will be to balance competing air (including CMs) <strong>and</strong> BM<br />

(including short, -medium, -<strong>and</strong> long-range) defense dem<strong>and</strong>s. This could result in an<br />

economy of force issue: use l<strong>and</strong>-<strong>and</strong> sea-based SAMs that are capable of both active BM<br />

<strong>and</strong> AD only for missile defense, while using purely AD assets for defending against the<br />

enemy air threat. For example, against a formidable BM threat that could not be eliminated<br />

by OCA operations, the AADC may use SAMs only against BMs, not against air threats, <strong>and</strong><br />

increase reliance on fighter escorts <strong>and</strong> CAPs in a layered defense against air threats. A<br />

significant missile threat will have great impact on the AADP (i.e., the DAL, placement of<br />

WEZs, <strong>and</strong> types of defensive coverages). Flexibility will be required as there may not be<br />

enough resources to defend all assets.<br />

9. General<br />

SECTION B. DEFENSIVE COUNTERAIR OPERATIONS<br />

The AADC develops the AADP in coordination with the joint force components,<br />

integrating DCA operations throughout the theater/JOA (see Figure V-1). The AADP<br />

reflects the JFC’s objectives, priorities, <strong>and</strong> the specific need for air superiority <strong>and</strong><br />

protection, <strong>and</strong> the appropriate component comm<strong>and</strong>ers provide the surface-, air-, <strong>and</strong> seabased<br />

forces/capabilities for those DCA operations required to execute that plan.<br />

V-18 <strong>JP</strong> 3-<strong>01</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!