JP 3-01 Countering Air and Missile Threats - Defense Innovation ...
JP 3-01 Countering Air and Missile Threats - Defense Innovation ...
JP 3-01 Countering Air and Missile Threats - Defense Innovation ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Chapter V<br />
(5) Firing Doctrine. Guidance should also be provided for inventory management<br />
to include threshold levels <strong>and</strong> modified procedures once those threshold levels are crossed.<br />
Factors include:<br />
(a) Determining the single shot P k for own force interceptors against threat<br />
missile types in the enemy missile order of battle.<br />
(b) Formulating the number of upper-<strong>and</strong>-lower tier interceptors required to<br />
achieve the designated levels of protection.<br />
(c) Equating threat BM impact point prediction with the designated level of<br />
protection for the threatened asset.<br />
(d) Establishing a firing policy (e.g., first interceptor to be able to intercept the<br />
threat MB being the first interceptor battery to engage <strong>and</strong> the next system being designated<br />
to cover the engagement should the initial system miss).<br />
(e) Firing lower-tier missiles in the last engagement window <strong>and</strong> factoring in<br />
their cumulative P k in determining the number of upper-tier interceptors to fire in the final<br />
salvo.<br />
c. Active <strong>Missile</strong> <strong>Defense</strong> Design. Based on an expected air <strong>and</strong> BM threat, the<br />
challenge for the AADC will be to balance competing air (including CMs) <strong>and</strong> BM<br />
(including short, -medium, -<strong>and</strong> long-range) defense dem<strong>and</strong>s. This could result in an<br />
economy of force issue: use l<strong>and</strong>-<strong>and</strong> sea-based SAMs that are capable of both active BM<br />
<strong>and</strong> AD only for missile defense, while using purely AD assets for defending against the<br />
enemy air threat. For example, against a formidable BM threat that could not be eliminated<br />
by OCA operations, the AADC may use SAMs only against BMs, not against air threats, <strong>and</strong><br />
increase reliance on fighter escorts <strong>and</strong> CAPs in a layered defense against air threats. A<br />
significant missile threat will have great impact on the AADP (i.e., the DAL, placement of<br />
WEZs, <strong>and</strong> types of defensive coverages). Flexibility will be required as there may not be<br />
enough resources to defend all assets.<br />
9. General<br />
SECTION B. DEFENSIVE COUNTERAIR OPERATIONS<br />
The AADC develops the AADP in coordination with the joint force components,<br />
integrating DCA operations throughout the theater/JOA (see Figure V-1). The AADP<br />
reflects the JFC’s objectives, priorities, <strong>and</strong> the specific need for air superiority <strong>and</strong><br />
protection, <strong>and</strong> the appropriate component comm<strong>and</strong>ers provide the surface-, air-, <strong>and</strong> seabased<br />
forces/capabilities for those DCA operations required to execute that plan.<br />
V-18 <strong>JP</strong> 3-<strong>01</strong>