02.03.2015 Views

JP 3-01 Countering Air and Missile Threats - Defense Innovation ...

JP 3-01 Countering Air and Missile Threats - Defense Innovation ...

JP 3-01 Countering Air and Missile Threats - Defense Innovation ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

CHAPTER IV<br />

OFFENSIVE COUNTERAIR PLANNING AND OPERATIONS<br />

“After all, the great defense against aerial menace is to attack the enemy’s aircraft<br />

as near as possible to their point of departure.”<br />

1. General<br />

OCA operations normally have a high priority as long as the enemy has the air <strong>and</strong><br />

missile capability to threaten friendly forces <strong>and</strong> the JFC does not have the degree of air<br />

superiority desired to accomplish the objectives required for the end state. OCA operations<br />

reduce the risk of air <strong>and</strong> missile attacks, allowing friendly forces to focus on their mission<br />

objectives. The preferred method of countering air <strong>and</strong> missile threats is to destroy or disrupt<br />

them prior to launch using OCA operations.<br />

2. General<br />

Winston Churchill<br />

Memo of 5 September 1914<br />

SECTION A. OFFENSIVE COUNTERAIR PLANNING<br />

a. OCA planning begins with JIPOE <strong>and</strong> IPB <strong>and</strong> considers the JFC’s assessment of the<br />

overall air <strong>and</strong> missile threat, the predicted effectiveness of the defense design, target<br />

database, ROE, objectives, priorities, missions, available friendly capabilities, <strong>and</strong> the weight<br />

of effort or force apportionment decision. IPB enhances the comm<strong>and</strong>ers’ ability to find<br />

targets, task attack forces, <strong>and</strong> assess their effectiveness. Considerations include the enemy’s<br />

air <strong>and</strong> missile operating areas, signatures, capabilities, <strong>and</strong> deployment <strong>and</strong> employment<br />

procedures. IPB attempts to provide a comprehensive picture of the enemy activity, terrain,<br />

<strong>and</strong> weather within the theater/JOA <strong>and</strong> generally requires planning for surveillance <strong>and</strong><br />

reconnaissance in support of intelligence collection.<br />

b. Through centralized planning <strong>and</strong> direction, the JFACC synchronizes OCA<br />

operations with DCA <strong>and</strong> other joint operations <strong>and</strong> relies on robust C2 systems for<br />

decentralized execution. Decentralized execution allows components <strong>and</strong> units to exercise<br />

initiative, responsiveness, <strong>and</strong> flexibility within their comm<strong>and</strong> authorities to accomplish<br />

their tasks. Operations against fixed targets require emphasis on preplanning, accurate <strong>and</strong><br />

timely intelligence, target selection, time over target, <strong>and</strong> published ROE. OCA operations<br />

against mobile targets or TSTs (e.g., SAMs, BM or CM launchers) also require preplanned<br />

procedures that can be implemented or modified quickly to assign the optimum weapon<br />

system relying on integrated C2 systems for as close to real time control as possible. This<br />

emphasis on planning enhances mission effectiveness while minimizing potential for<br />

fratricide <strong>and</strong> interference with other operations.<br />

c. Reliable <strong>and</strong> secure C2 systems are needed to ensure timely <strong>and</strong> accurate integration,<br />

planning, responsiveness, <strong>and</strong> close coordination. These systems represent the collective<br />

IV-1

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!