JP 3-01 Countering Air and Missile Threats - Defense Innovation ...
JP 3-01 Countering Air and Missile Threats - Defense Innovation ...
JP 3-01 Countering Air and Missile Threats - Defense Innovation ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Counterair Planning<br />
corridors/routes, procedural controls, reference points, restricted operations zones, <strong>and</strong><br />
special use airspace.<br />
d. A good example of the use of ACMs for integrating procedural airspace control with<br />
DCA operations is the WEZ. In AD, a WEZ is airspace of defined dimensions within which<br />
the responsibility for engagement of air threats normally rests with a particular weapons<br />
system. WEZs include fighter engagement zone (FEZ), high-altitude missile engagement<br />
zone (HIMEZ), low-altitude missile engagement zone (LOMEZ), <strong>and</strong> short-range AD<br />
engagement zone (SHORADEZ), each of which is established by an ACM. WEZs are<br />
discussed in more detail in Chapter V, “Defensive Counterair Planning <strong>and</strong> Operations.”<br />
Refer to <strong>JP</strong> 3-52, Joint <strong>Air</strong>space Control, for more details regarding ACMs, including a<br />
representative airspace control request format for a procedural ACM, <strong>and</strong> for the list of the<br />
most common ACMs.<br />
7. Other Considerations<br />
a. Maritime strike groups are not static; they are usually a “moving JEZ.” In a littoral<br />
environment, an amphibious operations area may encompass a sector of a l<strong>and</strong> AO <strong>and</strong><br />
include a MEZ. In this case, maritime combatants may be restricted by geography when<br />
defending selected coastal assets. Linking l<strong>and</strong>-based SAM systems with search <strong>and</strong> fire<br />
control data from maritime forces, or vice versa, can result in improved ability to<br />
defend littoral areas of the theater. Without that kind of close coordination between l<strong>and</strong><br />
<strong>and</strong> maritime air defenders, a seam may be found in the AMDs.<br />
b. Operations along the edges of WEZs, sectors, or other geographically defined areas<br />
of airspace with separate controlling units/comm<strong>and</strong>s may create seams <strong>and</strong> present<br />
comm<strong>and</strong>ers with extensive coordination challenges. Enemy aircraft may cross into adjacent<br />
sectors during engagement or may fly through friendly corridors or attack targets in one<br />
sector or WEZ from an adjacent area. The following are some considerations that may<br />
facilitate coordination:<br />
(1) Establish procedures to coordinate h<strong>and</strong>offs of flight operations between sectors<br />
<strong>and</strong> regions that grant permissions to enter <strong>and</strong> depart airspace <strong>and</strong> coordinate combat zone<br />
control activities with HN ATC services. A dedicated communications network/line for the<br />
regions/sectors is a must if real-time h<strong>and</strong>offs are required.<br />
(2) Liaison officers should be located at ATC centers that provide positive control<br />
for areas overlapping or adjacent to AD areas.<br />
(3) Designate buffer zones in which one AD region/sector can authorize<br />
engagement in an adjacent area.<br />
(4) Whenever possible, establish friendly air corridors outside the ranges of<br />
friendly AD forces that rely only on visual ID to reduce the risk of fratricide, since visually<br />
aimed surface weapons often have no capability to readily identify airspace boundaries or<br />
control measures in their portion of the operational environment. The ACA <strong>and</strong> AADC must<br />
collectively plan to address the issue.<br />
III-9