JP 3-01 Countering Air and Missile Threats - Defense Innovation ...
JP 3-01 Countering Air and Missile Threats - Defense Innovation ...
JP 3-01 Countering Air and Missile Threats - Defense Innovation ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Counterair Planning<br />
Formation Assessment Spatial Relationship<br />
3 nautical miles<br />
Hostile<br />
Identification<br />
10,000 feet<br />
Velocity<br />
Vector<br />
Not Assessed Hostile<br />
Assessed Hostile<br />
Figure III-2. Formation Assessment Spatial Relationship<br />
friendly weapons platforms. The risk of friendly engagements <strong>and</strong> friendly protection to<br />
hostile aircraft is greater with formation assessment in effect, but to help mitigate this risk,<br />
care should be taken in the development of the spatial criteria used for the formation<br />
assessment.<br />
f. Formation Tracking. Formation tracking is the use of a single data link air track<br />
(with a strength field indicating the number or estimated number of aerial vehicles<br />
comprising the formation) to represent a formation of two or more aerial vehicles. To<br />
qualify for formation tracking, the aircraft in the formation must maintain a consistent<br />
relationship with each other (horizontal <strong>and</strong> vertical separation, speed, <strong>and</strong> course). <strong>Air</strong><br />
surveillance systems selectively employ formation tracking when displaying air tracks.<br />
Formation tracks are displayed to the operators <strong>and</strong> transmitted to other air surveillance <strong>and</strong><br />
AD systems via joint TDL. Formation tracking reduces operator workload, allows older C2<br />
systems to h<strong>and</strong>le larger surveillance responsibilities, <strong>and</strong> reduces the number of transmitted<br />
tracks required to represent the entire air picture.<br />
III-15