02.03.2015 Views

JP 3-01 Countering Air and Missile Threats - Defense Innovation ...

JP 3-01 Countering Air and Missile Threats - Defense Innovation ...

JP 3-01 Countering Air and Missile Threats - Defense Innovation ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

CHAPTER III<br />

COUNTERAIR PLANNING<br />

“If you know the enemy <strong>and</strong> know yourself, you need not fear the result of a<br />

hundred battles.”<br />

1. General<br />

a. The JFC develops an operation/campaign plan focused on the enemy centers of<br />

gravity (COGs) while ensuring that friendly COGs are protected. Counterair operations<br />

strive for the degree of air superiority <strong>and</strong> protection required by the JFC’s COA to attain the<br />

desired objectives.<br />

b. Counterair requires a combination of OCA <strong>and</strong> DCA operations based on the JFC’s<br />

air apportionment decisions <strong>and</strong> balanced against the enemy’s potential COAs <strong>and</strong> air <strong>and</strong><br />

missile threats. The integration <strong>and</strong> synchronization of OCA <strong>and</strong> DCA, in conjunction with<br />

the other joint missions supporting the JFC, are the basis for counterair planning.<br />

c. This chapter discusses counterair planning in the context of preparation, major<br />

considerations, <strong>and</strong> enabling capabilities that support both OCA <strong>and</strong> DCA. This discussion<br />

assumes a JFACC is responsible for counterair (specifically OCA operations) <strong>and</strong> an AADC<br />

is responsible for DCA operations, whether or not the JFACC is designated as both the<br />

AADC <strong>and</strong> ACA. The joint air operations plan (JAOP) <strong>and</strong> the AADP, as well as other<br />

detailed planning factors, will be discussed in the respective chapters for OCA <strong>and</strong> DCA.<br />

d. Counterair planning considerations include accurate joint intelligence preparation of<br />

the operational environment (JIPOE) <strong>and</strong> intelligence preparation of the battlespace (IPB),<br />

airspace control, ROE, ID <strong>and</strong> CID requirements, <strong>and</strong> some major enabling capabilities.<br />

e. GBMD planning complements coordination of cross-AOR aspects of counterair<br />

operations. This process enhances a GCC’s ability to employ forces <strong>and</strong> capabilities within<br />

their AOR in support of another GCC. Planners must balance competing requirements for<br />

potentially scarce resources. GBMD planning tools assist planners in both preparing <strong>and</strong><br />

validating defense designs. See Appendix E, “Global Ballistic <strong>Missile</strong> <strong>Defense</strong><br />

Synchronization.”<br />

2. General<br />

SECTION A. INTELLIGENCE PREPARATION<br />

Sun Tzu, The Art of War<br />

Knowledge of the potential enemy is one of the fundamentals of joint warfare. JIPOE<br />

<strong>and</strong> IPB are the analytical processes <strong>and</strong> methodologies employed by joint comm<strong>and</strong>s <strong>and</strong><br />

Services to produce intelligence assessments, estimates, <strong>and</strong> other intelligence products to<br />

support the comm<strong>and</strong>er’s decision making. JIPOE <strong>and</strong> IPB generally differ in terms of their<br />

relative purpose, focus, <strong>and</strong> level of detail. JIPOE is focused at the JFC level, while IPB is<br />

focused at the joint force component comm<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> Service level. To support the decision-<br />

III-1

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!