02.03.2015 Views

JP 3-01 Countering Air and Missile Threats - Defense Innovation ...

JP 3-01 Countering Air and Missile Threats - Defense Innovation ...

JP 3-01 Countering Air and Missile Threats - Defense Innovation ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Counterair Planning<br />

(2) When developing the ACP, combine familiarity with the basic OPLAN or<br />

operation order, knowledge of host <strong>and</strong> multinational constraints <strong>and</strong> restraints, capabilities<br />

<strong>and</strong> procedures of HN civil <strong>and</strong> military airspace management systems, <strong>and</strong> general locations<br />

of friendly <strong>and</strong> enemy forces.<br />

(3) The ACP needs to support an orderly transition between peacetime <strong>and</strong> combat<br />

operations. Such a transition could occur during a period of increasing tensions or suddenly<br />

without warning.<br />

(4) The ACP specifies ACMs to be used in the operational area <strong>and</strong> how these<br />

measures will be distributed <strong>and</strong> implemented. The ACP should provide guidance on what<br />

FSCMs will be placed on the ACO. The ACP also should provide guidance on componentunique<br />

ACMs, terms, or graphics that may be included in the ACO.<br />

(5) The ACP provides procedures to fully integrate the resources of military ATC<br />

facilities responsible for terminal area airspace control or en route ATC. ATC facilities<br />

should be interfaced <strong>and</strong> linked with ACS communications to form a system that ensures the<br />

safe <strong>and</strong> efficient flow of air traffic.<br />

(6) The ACP should include processes for establishing procedural ACMs, including<br />

activating/deactivating weapon engagement zones (WEZs) <strong>and</strong> minimum-risk routes<br />

(MRRs) <strong>and</strong> procedures for AD <strong>and</strong> air control operations in a degraded communications<br />

environment. Detailed engagement procedures <strong>and</strong> decentralized weapons control<br />

procedures (as applied to AD) are key to counterair operations in a degraded environment.<br />

The geographic placement of weapons, the location of specific AD operations, <strong>and</strong> specific<br />

procedures for ID of aircraft <strong>and</strong> missiles are critical factors to include in the ACP.<br />

(7) The ACP <strong>and</strong> AADP must be distributed to all joint force components,<br />

applicable HN, MNF, <strong>and</strong> interagency partners, as well as those comm<strong>and</strong>s providing direct<br />

delivery (intertheater) <strong>and</strong>/or intratheater support to the theater/JOA. Not underst<strong>and</strong>ing or<br />

following the ACP <strong>and</strong> AADP may result in hazardous air traffic situations, cause<br />

confusion between aircraft <strong>and</strong> control agencies, <strong>and</strong> increase the risk of fratricide.<br />

d. Some specific counterair requirements that must be accounted for in the ACP or<br />

through ACMs include:<br />

(1) General orbit locations for DCA combat air patrols (CAPs), airborne warning<br />

<strong>and</strong> control, C2, surveillance, reconnaissance, air refueling (AR), <strong>and</strong> EW platforms.<br />

(2) Coordinating authorities for controlled airspace <strong>and</strong> their responsibilities <strong>and</strong><br />

coverage areas, including the RADCs/SADCs <strong>and</strong> other C2 nodes.<br />

(3) WEZs <strong>and</strong> their activation procedures.<br />

(4) Procedures for positive <strong>and</strong> procedural airspace controls.<br />

(5) Positive ID <strong>and</strong> procedural ID criteria <strong>and</strong> procedures.<br />

III-7

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!