JP 3-01 Countering Air and Missile Threats - Defense Innovation ...
JP 3-01 Countering Air and Missile Threats - Defense Innovation ...
JP 3-01 Countering Air and Missile Threats - Defense Innovation ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>Defense</strong> Counterair Planning <strong>and</strong> Operations<br />
5. Early Engagement. Sensors <strong>and</strong> weapons are positioned to maximize<br />
early warning <strong>and</strong> to engage <strong>and</strong> destroy aircraft <strong>and</strong> missiles before they acquire <strong>and</strong> fire on<br />
or damage the defended asset.<br />
6. <strong>Defense</strong> in Depth. AMD sensors <strong>and</strong> weapons are positioned to enable<br />
multiple engagement opportunities <strong>and</strong> deliver an increasing volume of fire as an enemy air<br />
or missile threat approaches the protected asset. <strong>Defense</strong> in depth reduces the probability<br />
that “leakers” will reach the defended asset or force.<br />
(c) Plan a MEZ. Proper sequencing in the establishment of WEZs is critical<br />
to an effective IADS <strong>and</strong> DCA operations. MEZs established for surface defense are based<br />
on specific boundaries <strong>and</strong> weapons system capabilities. For the organic SAM capability of<br />
a surface force, the MEZ boundaries should be within the component AO, <strong>and</strong> for direct<br />
support the MEZ should cover the defended asset/area. The MEZ area should be large<br />
enough to allow early engagement of threats: ASM launch platforms should be destroyed or<br />
neutralized before they can launch st<strong>and</strong>off munitions, UA before they reach sensor/weapon<br />
range of defended assets, <strong>and</strong> BMs prior to maneuver or submunitions release. To the<br />
maximum extent possible, all targets should have multiple, layered engagement opportunities<br />
to ensure an effective defense. The AADP, ACMs, <strong>and</strong> SPINS should specify what targets<br />
can be engaged in the MEZ <strong>and</strong> the weapons to be used.<br />
(d) Consider the fact that maritime forces are not “static” <strong>and</strong> they usually<br />
employ a “moving MEZ” with separate operational areas for air operations. In a littoral<br />
environment, amphibious operations may encompass a portion of the l<strong>and</strong> AO <strong>and</strong> function<br />
as a MEZ. In this case, maritime combatants may be restricted by geography when<br />
defending selected coastal assets. Linking l<strong>and</strong>-based SAM systems with maritime force<br />
generated search <strong>and</strong> fire control data <strong>and</strong> vice versa can result in improved ability to defend<br />
the littoral areas.<br />
(e) Determine Surface-Based <strong>Defense</strong>s C2 Coverage <strong>and</strong> Fire Control.<br />
DCA operations depend upon effective <strong>and</strong> redundant C2 planning. The IADS should<br />
integrate the ground- <strong>and</strong> sea-based C2 nodes, airborne C2 platforms, <strong>and</strong> the surface force<br />
AD fire direction centers. As a minimum, the following is required:<br />
architecture.<br />
1. Designate RADCs/SADCs as required <strong>and</strong> incorporate into the IADS<br />
2. Specify required data links between C2 nodes <strong>and</strong> forces.<br />
3. Designate primary <strong>and</strong> secondary C2 centers for all active AMD forces.<br />
4. Align control centers with their operational forces whenever possible.<br />
5. Establish an intelligence <strong>and</strong> warning architecture; ensure remote units<br />
<strong>and</strong> separate forces are addressed.<br />
V-13