06.04.2015 Views

PDF(2.7mb) - 國家政策研究基金會

PDF(2.7mb) - 國家政策研究基金會

PDF(2.7mb) - 國家政策研究基金會

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

146 Taiwan Development Perspectives 2009<br />

Grand Justices, the Legislative Yuan may exercise a<br />

power of investigation to help effectively exercise its<br />

constitutional power of legislation. The power of investigation<br />

is a subsidiary power necessary for the parliament<br />

to exercise its constitutional powers and authorities.<br />

If and when necessary, the Legislative Yuan may<br />

also, by resolution of its plenary session, request the<br />

presence of a civilian or government official related to<br />

the matter under investigation to give testimonies or<br />

express opinions, and may impose reasonably compulsory<br />

measures upon those who refuse to fulfill their<br />

obligations to assist in the investigation within the<br />

scope of pecuniary fines. However, the legalization of<br />

that subsidiary power has yet to be completed, though<br />

the interpretation was handed down in December 2004.<br />

Since the seventh Legislative Yuan was inaugurated, six<br />

proposals to legalize the parliamentary investigation<br />

power, including a hearing system and the offense of<br />

contempt of parliament, have been submitted. Five of<br />

them have passed the first reading. One of them, the<br />

proposal of administrative penalties for people who<br />

disobey the duty of presence, has passed the first committee<br />

examination. Another proposal for of investigation<br />

power was discussed in committee once. Efforts<br />

are being redoubled to legislate the parliamentary power<br />

of investigation in 2009.<br />

3. Cross-Strait Negotiation<br />

The Straits Exchange Foundation (SEF) and the<br />

Association for Relation across the Taiwan Straits<br />

(ARATS), both authorized to conduct relations between<br />

Taiwan and China, signed four agreements in Taipei on<br />

November 4, 2008. Under the agreements, direct flights<br />

and maritime shipping across the Taiwan Strait would<br />

start, postal service improved, and food safety strengthened.<br />

They were not treaties the Legislative Yuan has<br />

to ratify in accordance with the Constitution. However,<br />

there must be some mechanism to ratify these<br />

“non-diplomatic” agreements of utmost importance to<br />

the national interests. As a result, the Legislative Research<br />

Bureau of the Legislative Yuan proposed a draft<br />

Act Dealing with Cross-Strait Agreements. It stipulates<br />

parliamentary participation before agreements are<br />

signed and the parliamentary deliberation and oversight<br />

function over signed agreements. Opinion is divided.<br />

Those who support the bill argue that the Legislative<br />

Yuan, according to Article 63 of the Constitution<br />

which gives it the power to “decide by resolution<br />

…conclusion of peace or treaties,” has to ratify<br />

agreements between Taiwan and China which are just<br />

as important as “treaties.” Opponents doubt the constitutionality<br />

of the act as drafted and insist that the conclusion<br />

of such agreements including their ratification<br />

is stipulated in the Statute Governing the Relations<br />

Between the People of the Taiwan Area and the Mainland<br />

Area. They do not consider it necessary to adopt<br />

the draft act. Agreement will have to be reached on the<br />

act on oversight of the conclusion of agreements between<br />

the SEF and the ARATS.<br />

4. Congressional Aides<br />

Wu Cherng-dean was suspected of paying NT$5.9<br />

million to his non-existing congressional aides for six<br />

years until 2008 while he was a Member of the Legislative<br />

Yuan. Kinmen district prosecutors indicted him for<br />

forgery and corruption dollars, demanding 15 years in<br />

prison for the former legislator.<br />

Members of the Legislative Yuan are entitled to<br />

congressional aides, officially known as “assistants.”<br />

Article 32 of the Organic Law of the Legislative Yuan,<br />

each legislator may employ eight to 14 assistants at<br />

public expense. Paragraph 4 of its Article 33 stipulates<br />

each party caucus may select ten to 16 publicly<br />

funded assistants, and assign them to legislators who<br />

recommend them. Since these assistants are hired and<br />

fired by legislators, such abuse as Wu Cherng-dean was<br />

charged with is likely to occur. Moreover, congressional<br />

aides so employed are often not qualified for their work.<br />

Reform is needed.<br />

Legislators have demanded for reform for years<br />

but no action has been taken. Efforts must be made to<br />

establish a sound employment system for congressional<br />

aides.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!