PDF(2.7mb) - 國家政策研究基金會
PDF(2.7mb) - 國家政策研究基金會
PDF(2.7mb) - 國家政策研究基金會
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
The Foreign and Cross-Strait Policies of the New AdministrationIn the Republic of China 153<br />
no’s: no contact, no negotiations, and no compromise,<br />
until President Chiang Ching-kuo decided in September<br />
1987 to allow veterans to visit the mainland for family<br />
reunions. Prior to this, world politics had already<br />
changed; on December 15, 1978, the US abruptly declared<br />
that it would switch diplomatic recognition from<br />
Taipei to Beijing on January 1, 1979. Taipei had to bite<br />
the bullet.<br />
The Changing Relationship across the Taiwan<br />
Strait<br />
Chiang Ching-kuo’s decision to allow army veterans<br />
to visit the mainland was far-reaching in its impact.<br />
Other citizens followed the veterans to the mainland for<br />
trade, investment, and tourism, with the government<br />
looking the other way. The exchanges increased so rapidly<br />
that in l992 both sides of the Strait sensed the need<br />
to hold talks for resolving emerging issues. As governments<br />
on both sides did not, as they still do not, recognize<br />
each other, proxy organizations had to be set up to<br />
conduct the talks.<br />
In the government structure, a separate cabinet-level<br />
agency handling mainland affairs, called the<br />
Mainland Affairs Council, was established. Under this<br />
agency, a proxy organization, the Straits Exchange<br />
Foundation, a non-profit corporation, was set up. Its<br />
counterpart, ARATS, the Association for Relations<br />
Across the Taiwan Strait, was also set up. The Legislative<br />
Yuan enacted a law titled “Statute Governing Relations<br />
of People across the Taiwan Strait.” We do not<br />
stamp visas on PRC passports, but issue a separate<br />
booklet titled “Permit for Mainland Compatriots to Visit<br />
Taiwan. Likewise, the PRC does not stamp visas on<br />
ROC passports and also issue similar booklets.<br />
For the purpose of a preliminary meeting, the two<br />
proxy organizations sent delegations to Hong Kong for<br />
a first-ever meeting in October 1992. They immediately<br />
hit snags over the definition of “One China.” For<br />
us, it is the Republic of China, and both Taiwan and the<br />
mainland constitute China. For them, it is the People’s<br />
Republic of China, and Taiwan is part of China. Finally,<br />
both sides agreed that, having respectively stated their<br />
interpretations, they should shelve the issue and proceed<br />
to the formal business talks in the future. That in<br />
essence was the “Consensus of 1992.” Indeed, the<br />
principals of the two organizations, C. F. Koo and<br />
Wang Taohan, were able to meet for talks in April 1993<br />
in Singapore. Four minor agreements were signed. Parity<br />
and dignity for both sides were meticulously observed<br />
at the meeting.<br />
A second meeting for Koo and Wang was scheduled<br />
for late 1995 in Taipei, but plans miscarried because<br />
of President Lee Teng-hui’s trip to the United<br />
States to visit his alma mater, Cornell University, was<br />
considered provocative by the PRC. The year 1996<br />
witnessed an unfortunate missile crisis across the Strait.<br />
After the ROC government assured the world that<br />
cross-Strait relations had not changed, Koo was finally<br />
able to visit Wang in Shanghai in 1998, but not for<br />
talks.<br />
Further exchanges were aborted following Lee<br />
Teng-hui’s “special state-to-state relationship” statement<br />
of July 1999 and his successor Chen Shui-bian’s<br />
pro-independence utterances and moves. Tensions<br />
mounted to such a point that the PRC enacted a law,<br />
titled “Anti-Secession Act” in March 2005. To reduce<br />
tension, Lien Chan, then chairman of the Kuomintang<br />
(KMT) Party, went to Beijing in April/May on a Journey<br />
of Peace at the invitation of Hu Jintao, General<br />
Secretary of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP).<br />
The KMT was in opposition then, so the two leaders<br />
issued only a joint vision statement on April 29,<br />
2005, which could be summarized as follows:<br />
(1) Resumption of talks on the basis of parity and the<br />
1992 consensus;<br />
(2) Reaching a peace agreement, including the establishment<br />
of a confidence-building mechanism;<br />
(3) Promoting full-scale economic cooperation across<br />
the Strait, leading eventually to a cross-Strait common<br />
market;