PDF(2.7mb) - 國家政策研究基金會

More documents

Recommendations

Info

212 Taiwan Development Perspectives 2009 Jordan, Meagan M., and Merl M. Hackbart. 1999. Performance Budgeting and Performance Funding in the States: A Status Assessment. Public Budgeting and Finance 19(1):68-88. Joyce, Philip. 1993. The Reiterative Nature of Budget Reform: Is there Anything New in Federal Budgeting? Public Budgeting and Finance (Fall). Lee, Robert D., and Robert C. Burns. 2000. Performance Measurement in State Budgeting: Advancement and Backsliding from 1990 to 1995. Public Budgeting and Finance 20(1): 38-54. Lee, Yun-jie. 1999. Congress and the Budget: Empirical Study of Budgetary Process in Taiwan(in Chinese). Taipei: Shine Ting Press. Lee, Yun-jie. 2004. ”The Theory and Practice of Performance-Based Budgeting: A Comparative Analysis” Paper presented at The 1 st International Conference of Public Management. Beijing: China Remin University. Melkers, Julia, and Katherine Willoughby. 1998. The State of the States: Performance-Based Budgeting Requirements in 47 Out of 50. Public Administration Review 58(1): 66-73. National Association of State Budget Officers. 2002. Budget Processes in the States. Washington, D.C.: National Association of State Budget Officers. Newcomer, Kathryn, (2007). How Does Program Performance Assessment Affect Program Management in the Federal Government? Public Performance & Management Review, 30 (3): 332-350. Niu, Meili, Ho, A. and Ma Jun. 2006. Performance-Based Budgeting in China: A Case Study of Guangdong. Paper Presented at 2nd International Conference on “Public Management: In 21 st Century Opportunities and Challenges”. Macau: University of Macau. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. 2001. Results-Based Management in the Development Co-operation Agencies: A Review of Experience. Paris: Development Assistance Committee Working Party on Aid Evaluation, OECD. ———. 2002. Developing Performance Measures for Public Financial Management. Paris: OECD. ———. 2005a. Challenges for China’s Public Spending: toward Greater Effectiveness and Equity. OECD publication. ———. 2005b. Economic Survey of China 2005. Reforming Public Finances to Better Serve Growth. Economic Survey of China 2005. OECD publication. http://www.oecd.org/document/31/0,3343,en_2649_345 95_35343711_1_1_1_1,00.html. (accessed August 21 st 2008) Peckenpaugh, Jason. 2002. A First: Bush Budget Links Funding to Program Performance. www.govexec.com/ dailyfed/0202/020402p1.htm (accessed 4 February 2002). Perrin, B. 2003. Implementing the Vision: Addressing Challenges to Results-Focused Management and Budgeting. Paris: Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. Poister, Theodore H., and Gregory Streib. 1999. Performance Measurement in Municipal Government: Assessing the State of the Practice. Public Administration Review 59(4): 325–335. Ridley, Clarence E., and Herbert A. Simon. 1938. Measuring Municipal Activities: A Survey of Suggested Criteria and Reporting Forms for Appraising Administration. Chicago: The International City Managers Association. Schick, Allen. 1966. The Road to PPB: The Stages of Budget Reform. Public Administration Review 26(6): 243–258. ———. 1990. Budgeting for Results: Recent Developments in Five Industrialized Countries. Public Administration Review 50(1): 26–34.
Budget Efficiency and Performance-Based Budgeting: Implementation in the United States and Taiwan 213 Sung, Yu-Hsieh. 2008. “Economy Experience Sharing—Chinese Taipei” Presentation of 2008 APEC Workshop on Government Performance & Results Management Report. Thompson, Fred. 1994. Mission-Driven, Results-Oriented Budgeting: Fiscal Administration and the New Public Management. Public Budgeting and Finance 14(3): 90–105. ———. 2001. Performance Budgeting in the States. In Ouicker, Better, Cheaper? Managing Performance in American Government, edited by Dall Forsythe, 335-64. Albany, NY: Rockefeller Institute Press. ———.2005. ”Models of Performance-Measurement Use in Local Governments: Understanding Budgeting, Communication, and Lasting Effects” Public Administration Review 65(2): 180-190. U. S. Department of Treasury. 2007. Treasury Bulletin. Washington D.C. US General Accounting Office (US GAO). 1997. Performance Budgeting: Past Initiatives Offer Insights for GPRA Implementation. GAO report GAO/AIMD-97-46. Washington, D.C.: US General Accounting Office. ———. 2000. Managing for Results: Emerging Benefits from Selected Agencies’ Use of Performance Agreements. GAO report GAO-01-115. Washington, D.C.: US General Accounting Office. ———. 2001. Results-Oriented Budget Practices in Federal Agencies. GAO report GAO-01-1084SP. Washington, D.C.: U.S. General Accounting Office. Wholey, Joseph S. 2002. Making Results Count in Public and Nonprofit Organizations: Balancing Performance with Other Values. In Meeting the Challenges of Performance-Oriented Government (pages 13–35), edited by K. E. Newcomer, E. Jennings, C. Broom, and A. Lomax, Washington, D.C.: The American Society for Public Administration. Wang, XiaoHu. 2008. Convincing Legislators with Performance Measures. International Journal of Public Administration 31(6): 654-667. ———. 2000. Performance Measurement in Budgeting: A Study in County Government. Public Budgeting and Finance 20(3):102-18. Willoughby, Katherine G., and Julia E. Melkers. 2000. Implementing PBB: Conflicting Views of Success. Public Budgeting and Finance 20(1):105-20.
Page 1 and 2:
CONTENTS Preface Overview ix xi Foc
Page 3:
Agriculture and Fisheries Impact of
Page 6 and 7:
CHUANG, Yih-chyi( 莊奕琦 ) Pro
Page 8 and 9:
TAN, Ching-yu( 譚瑾瑜 ) Associ
Page 10 and 11:
enth effort on the part of the Foun
Page 12 and 13:
ills pertinent to parliamentary ref
Page 14 and 15:
xiv
Page 16 and 17:
2 Taiwan Development Perspectives 2
Page 18 and 19:
Page 20 and 21:
Page 22 and 23:
Page 24 and 25:
10 Taiwan Development Perspectives
Page 26 and 27:
Page 28 and 29:
Page 30 and 31:
Page 32 and 33:
Page 34 and 35:
Page 36 and 37:
Page 38 and 39:
Page 40 and 41:
Page 42 and 43:
Page 44 and 45:
Page 46 and 47:
Page 48 and 49:
Page 50 and 51:
Page 52 and 53:
Page 54 and 55:
Page 56 and 57:
Page 58 and 59:
Page 60 and 61:
Page 62 and 63:
Page 64 and 65:
Page 66 and 67:
Page 68 and 69:
Page 70 and 71:
Page 72 and 73:
Page 74 and 75:
Page 76 and 77:
Page 78 and 79:
Page 80 and 81:
Page 82 and 83:
Page 84 and 85:
Page 86 and 87:
Page 88 and 89:
Page 90 and 91:
Page 92 and 93:
Page 94 and 95:
Page 96 and 97:
Page 98 and 99:
Page 100 and 101:
Page 102 and 103:
Page 104 and 105:
Page 106 and 107:
Page 108 and 109:
Page 110 and 111:
Page 112 and 113:
Page 114 and 115:
Page 116 and 117:
Page 118 and 119:
Page 120 and 121:
Page 122 and 123:
Page 124 and 125:
Page 126 and 127:
Page 128 and 129:
Page 130 and 131:
Page 132 and 133:
Page 134 and 135:
Page 136 and 137:
Page 138 and 139:
Page 140 and 141:
Page 142 and 143:
Page 144 and 145:
Page 146 and 147:
Page 148 and 149:
Page 150 and 151:
Page 152 and 153:
Page 154 and 155:
Page 156 and 157:
Page 158 and 159:
Page 160 and 161:
Page 162 and 163:
Page 164 and 165:
Page 166 and 167:
Page 168 and 169:
Page 170 and 171:
Page 172 and 173:
Page 174 and 175:
Page 176 and 177: 162 Taiwan Development Perspectives
Page 276 and 277:
Page 278 and 279:
Page 280 and 281:
Page 282 and 283:
Page 284 and 285:
Page 286 and 287:
Page 288 and 289:
Page 290 and 291:
Page 292 and 293:
Page 294 and 295:
Page 296 and 297:
Page 298 and 299:
Page 300 and 301:
Page 302 and 303:
show all

PDF(2.7mb) - 國家政策研究基金會

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?