06.04.2015 Views

PDF(2.7mb) - 國家政策研究基金會

PDF(2.7mb) - 國家政策研究基金會

PDF(2.7mb) - 國家政策研究基金會

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Strategies for Cross-Strait Financial Exchange and Cooperation under Financial Tsunami 197<br />

II. Influence of Financial Tsunami on<br />

Cross-Strait Financial Development<br />

The international financial tsunami makes it clear<br />

that the consequence of supervisory failures might turn<br />

out to be disastrous. While financial liberalization had<br />

once become the prevailing thoughts for most of the<br />

policy makers in the Western economies, the United<br />

States and the United Kingdom were ever the most aggressive<br />

promoters of liberalization in trade, international<br />

capital movement, and direct investments by the<br />

financing industry. The rapid growth of the knowledge<br />

and Internet-based economy has made such financial<br />

strategy even more powerful and popular. Ironically,<br />

however, the victims who suffer most from the financial<br />

tsunami are fortuitously those countries that are zealous<br />

advocates for financial liberalization and internationalization.<br />

With regard to cross-strait financial integration,<br />

what influences of the financial tsunami will have<br />

on the strategy China and Taiwan must adopt to establish<br />

a regional financial center by their joint efforts as a<br />

result of the possible restoration of conservatism in the<br />

global market? What are the impacts on cross-strait<br />

financial development? This is a topic worth further<br />

exploring.<br />

First, many people are worried that the rescue of<br />

the endangered financial system by government intervention,<br />

such as currently evidenced in some industrialized<br />

economies such like the United States and some<br />

European countries, illustrates that the value system<br />

advocated by capitalism is being challenged again.<br />

Somehow, such concern makes sense. The current situation<br />

is quite similar to that which is evidenced before<br />

the Great Depression arrived in the 1930’s. As the<br />

United States stock market bubbles burst in 1929, the<br />

American Communist Party firmly believed in the<br />

principle of market self-adjustment, and the Hoover<br />

administration as well as Federal Reserve Board failed<br />

to identify and remedy the potential risks of the irrational<br />

exuberance in the stock market, resulting in a<br />

large-scale surge in bank financial distress, and tremendous<br />

panic over the entire financial market. Finally,<br />

the unprecedented Great Depression came as a consequence<br />

of the seemingly never-ending vicious economic<br />

cycles initiated by various mutually reinforced<br />

factors composed of the market breakdowns, credit<br />

crunch, deflation, national product decrease and increase<br />

of unemployment. Accordingly, we could learn<br />

that it is the erroneous monetary and financial policies<br />

that shall be blamed for the crisis of capitalism. Thanks<br />

to the lessons learnt from the Great Depression, as well<br />

as the breakthroughs in academic research in the areas<br />

of economy, monetary policy and finance market, the<br />

United States and European countries are now able to<br />

take decisive measures and make effective coordination<br />

to fight against the crisis in a timely manner. In the<br />

meantime, the growth of knowledge-based economy<br />

also helps ensure that banks have sufficient liquidity by<br />

smooth information exchange and a slack monetary<br />

policy effectively adopted on the basis of internationally<br />

consistent executions.<br />

Second, owing to the relative immaturity of financial<br />

market development in terms of globalization and<br />

the government’s rigid supervision and control over<br />

financial innovations, the impacts of financial crisis on<br />

Taiwan are less dramatic compared with the Western<br />

economies. As Taiwan’s financing industry has yet to<br />

be internationalized, banks can at most fund exporters,<br />

purchase overseas mutual funds or invest in other kinds<br />

of overseas financial securities, instead of designing<br />

and selling products globally. In other words, restricted<br />

by their capability constraints, banks in Taiwan have<br />

just a few business areas in the international market to<br />

survive. Among those few areas are investment banking,<br />

hedge funds, and mutual funds. All this explains why<br />

Taiwan still has a long way to go to evolve as a regional<br />

financial center.<br />

Third, financial internationalization in Taiwan and<br />

China is still immature, and as both are export-oriented<br />

economies, their trade surplus has infused more than a<br />

trillion of dollars into their foreign exchange reserves<br />

and private foreign exchange assets (including those<br />

owned by banks, insurance companies, retirement funds,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!