PDF(2.7mb) - 國家政策研究基金會
PDF(2.7mb) - 國家政策研究基金會
PDF(2.7mb) - 國家政策研究基金會
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
A Synthesis of Energy Tax, Carbon Tax and Emission Trading in Taiwan 245<br />
Table 5 Comparison of Carbon Tax and Energy Prices in 1998<br />
NT/LOE<br />
Coal Gasoline Diesel Fuel LPG<br />
Natural<br />
Gas<br />
Electricity<br />
Price in 1998<br />
4.51 19.15 12.07 3.77 7.14 7.34 19.37<br />
(100) (100) (100) (100) (100) (100) (100)<br />
Dutch Carbon Tax<br />
Amount<br />
[U.S.$ 2.24/CO 2 (Ton)]<br />
0.261<br />
(5.787)<br />
0.214<br />
(1.117)<br />
0.214<br />
(1.773)<br />
0.214<br />
(5.676)<br />
0.214<br />
(2.997)<br />
0.154<br />
(2.098)<br />
0.174<br />
(0.898)<br />
Finnish Carbon Tax<br />
Amount<br />
[U.S.$ 3.93/CO 2 (Ton)]<br />
0.458<br />
(10.155)<br />
0.375<br />
(1.958)<br />
0.375<br />
(3.107)<br />
0.375<br />
(9.947)<br />
0.375<br />
(5.252)<br />
0.271<br />
(3.692)<br />
0.306<br />
(1.580)<br />
Danish Carbon Tax<br />
Amount<br />
[U.S.$ 14.88/ CO 2 (Ton)]<br />
1.733<br />
(38.426)<br />
1.419<br />
(7.410)<br />
1.419<br />
(11.756)<br />
1.419<br />
(37.639)<br />
1.419<br />
(19.874)<br />
1.026<br />
(13.978)<br />
1.159<br />
(5.983)<br />
Swedish Carbon Tax<br />
Amount<br />
[U.S.$ 22.2/ CO 2 (Ton)]<br />
2.586<br />
(57.339)<br />
2.117<br />
(11.055)<br />
2.117<br />
(17.539)<br />
2.117<br />
(56.154)<br />
2.117<br />
(29.650)<br />
1.531<br />
(20.858)<br />
1.729<br />
(8.926)<br />
Note 1:LOE stands for liter oil equivalent.<br />
Effect on Energy Demand and CO 2 Emissions<br />
By imposing the highest carbon tax<br />
(US$22.2/CO 2 (Ton)) on the 22-year progressive tax<br />
rate, CO 2 emissions will decline by 25.31 percent by<br />
2020. (See Table 5). This is almost the same as the rate<br />
of reduction when a one-step approach was employed<br />
for 1999.<br />
The energy demanded in relation to coal has the<br />
largest decrease, which is by –33.38 percent, followed<br />
by oil products by –25.08 percent, natural gas<br />
by –15.52 percent, and electricity by–14.82 percent.<br />
Effect on Prices<br />
We found that the progressive tax approach can<br />
effectively reduce the negative effect on the price level.<br />
For instance, at the same carbon tax rate of<br />
US$22.2/CO 2 (Ton), the one-step approach will increase<br />
the GDP deflator by 2.26 percent, while the increase is<br />
1.01 percent when the 22-year progressive approach is<br />
applied.<br />
If the 22-year progressive approach is applied, the<br />
water, electricity and gas sector (14.42%) will be affected<br />
the most in terms of a price increase among the<br />
seven one-digit sectors. It is followed by mining<br />
(11.88%), construction (1.79%), manufacturing<br />
(1.75%), transportation (1.12%) and agriculture<br />
(0.80%). The top five manufacturing sectors in terms of<br />
respective price increases are oil refining (35.58%),<br />
non-metallic minerals (3.72%), basic metals (3.39%),<br />
chemicals and plastics (2.57%) and paper & printing<br />
(2.08%).<br />
To sum up, sectoral ranking in terms of the impact<br />
of price increases as a result of imposing the 22-year<br />
progressive carbon tax rate is identical with the case<br />
where the one-step carbon tax approach is applied.<br />
(See Tables 6).