PDF(2.7mb) - 國家政策研究基金會

282 Taiwan Development Perspectives 2009
Table 6
Attitude of Labor Unions toward Dispatched Workers
Question
Disagree Uncertain Agree Total
Freq. % Freq. % Freq. % Freq. %
1 8 24.2 10 30.3 15 45.5 33 100
2 4 12.1 13 39.4 16 48.5 33 100
3 12 36.4 6 18.2 15 45.5 33 100
4 11 33.3 8 24.2 14 42.4 33 100
5 12 36.4 5 15.1 16 48.5 33 100
6 12 36.4 11 33.3 10 30.3 33 100
7 12 36.4 7 21.2 14 42.4 33 100
8 13 39.4 9 27.3 11 33.3 33 100
9 9 27.3 6 18.2 18 54.5 33 100
10 4 12.1 7 21.2 22 66.7 33 100
Source: The author.
Note: Although 62 labor unions returned their questionnaire, only 33 of them replied their companies have
employed dispatched workers. The analysis is based upon the responses from the 33 labor unions.
Even though labor unions in general are not
clannish, their industry and size attributes may
make difference. A cross-examination of industry
attributes with the attitude of labor unions shows
those manufacturing and construction companies
are more inclined to be exclusive-minded. Table 7
indicates labor unions in manufacturing and construction
industries tend to disagree on Question 3
(dispatched workers likely to affect the right of
work of employees of the company), Question 4
(dispatched workers unlikely to affect the terms
and working conditions of employees of the company),
and Question 5 (dispatched workers unlikely
to affect the fringe benefits of employees of
the company).
Size attributes of labor unions also makes
difference. Table 8 shows small-sized labor unions
disagree on the employment of dispatched likely
to meet the need of the company (Question 1) and
agree on labor unions being clannish (Question 6).