10.07.2015 Views

Architecture and management of a geological repository - Andra

Architecture and management of a geological repository - Andra

Architecture and management of a geological repository - Andra

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

3 – High Level Long-Lived WasteQuantitative data relating to PWR fuels are found in Table 3.3.6.Table 3.3.6Number <strong>of</strong> PWR fuel assemblies"Short" UOX AFA-2GEassembly, type CU1"Long" UOX AFA-2LEassembly, type CU1Production sitesEDFScenarioS1aNumber <strong>of</strong> PWR fuel assembliesScenario ScenarioS1b S1cScenarioS20 0 0 27 2000 0 0 26 800Total UOX assemblies, type CU1 0 0 0 54 000"Short" MOX AFA-2GEassembly, type CU2EDF 0 5 400 5 400 4 000Total MOX assemblies, type CU2 0 5 400 5 400 4 000Furthermore, 5,810 primary claddings are to be considered for type CU3 fuels, if appropriate.3.4 Primary waste package reception flux hypothesisTo study operating resources in a potential <strong>repository</strong>, <strong>and</strong> the drifts <strong>and</strong> access shafts, flowhypotheses for packages received on a <strong>repository</strong> site have been established, consistent with the totalnumbers <strong>of</strong> packages listed.As a reference, an annual reception rate <strong>of</strong> 5,000 primary waste packages has been envisaged for Bwaste. This corresponds to emplacement <strong>of</strong> the waste packages inventory into the <strong>repository</strong> over aforty-year period. With the exception <strong>of</strong> some packages produced late, particularly the B1 referencepackage, note that all or the vast majority <strong>of</strong> the other reference packages will already have beenproduced by 2020.Chronologically, the C0 reference packages will be the first vitrified C waste packages availabletechnically for <strong>repository</strong> disposal in view <strong>of</strong> their heat rating. 400 packages per year is the rateadopted for the hypothesis, corresponding to a resorption <strong>of</strong> storage facilities over ten years or so.It is assumed that the other vitrified C waste packages (C1, C2, C3 <strong>and</strong> C4 in scenario S1a, C1 <strong>and</strong> C2in scenarios S1b <strong>and</strong> S2, C1 only in scenario S1c) will be stored temporarily before final disposal, toallow their heat rating to decrease. The studies presented in Chapter 5 suggest a reasonable temporarystorage period <strong>of</strong> 60 to 70 years under the concepts studied <strong>and</strong> heat transfer criteria currently beingconsidered.In any event, the hypothesis <strong>of</strong> an annual reception rate <strong>of</strong> 600 C1 to C4 reference packages (700packages per year for C1 reference packages under scenario S1c) will permit resorption <strong>of</strong> storagefacilities at a rate allowing for the packages contained therein to show a consistent heat rating, giventhe decrease in radioactivity. This corresponds to a resorption <strong>of</strong> storage facilities over about fiftyyears.CU2 fuels identified in scenarios S1b, S1c <strong>and</strong> S2 will be received as appropriate after a currentlyestimatedtemporary storage period <strong>of</strong> at least 90 years, at an annual rate <strong>of</strong> 150 assemblies. Theirresorption will take place over about forty years under scenarios S1b <strong>and</strong> S1c (or thirty for scenarioS2). Lastly, for CU1 fuels (scenario S1), the study considers the hypothesis <strong>of</strong> 1,650 assemblies peryear.Note that an annual reception rate <strong>of</strong> 400 primary claddings can be envisaged for CU3 fuels,corresponding to a resorption <strong>of</strong> storage facilities over about fifteen years.DOSSIER 2005 ARGILE -ARCHITECTURE AND MANAGEMENT OF A GEOLOGICAL DISPOSAL SYSTEM104/495

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!