10.07.2015 Views

Architecture and management of a geological repository - Andra

Architecture and management of a geological repository - Andra

Architecture and management of a geological repository - Andra

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

6 – Overall underground architectureTotal flow:A few metrescubed per yearin the absence<strong>of</strong> sealsFigure 6.3.5Dead end type tree architectureThe flow <strong>of</strong> water drained into each dead end is limited to the flow that this element can exchangewith the argillite. As the elements <strong>of</strong> the same tree structure level run parallel to the trajectory <strong>of</strong> thewater, inflow from other elements is avoided in each case. Thus, the flows circulating in the structures<strong>and</strong>, consequently, the rates <strong>of</strong> advection are low closest to the cells. The flows drained are onlycombined progressively towards the main connecting drifts <strong>and</strong> the shafts.It should be noted that, this principle allows a certain degree <strong>of</strong> flexibility in the detailed configuration<strong>of</strong> the structures compared with the architecture presented.6.3.3.3 Water flows trapped by the shafts in overlying formationsDepending on the direction <strong>of</strong> the hydraulic head gradient between the Oxfordian <strong>and</strong> the Dogger,connecting shafts could capture the water flows in <strong>geological</strong> formations passed through <strong>and</strong> carrythem into the <strong>repository</strong>. These flows would then be added to those drained into the argillite. The sealsplanned for these shafts, <strong>and</strong> present also in the drifts, prevent this process by the hydraulic resistancethat they provide against the circulation <strong>of</strong> the water.If the role <strong>of</strong> these seals is not taken into account (failure situation), the grouped arrangement <strong>of</strong> theshafts <strong>and</strong> their location away from <strong>repository</strong> zones would, however, make it possible to limit theflow <strong>of</strong> water that would be trapped in the overlying formations <strong>and</strong> which could flow into thedrifts [80].This option can be compared with that <strong>of</strong> distant shafts as illustrated in the diagram in Figure 6.3.6. Adifference in hydraulic head between the distant shafts could induce a U-shaped flow passing throughthe <strong>repository</strong> <strong>and</strong> would bring it into contact with the overlying formations. In this situation, the flows<strong>of</strong> water trapped by the shafts would not be limited by the low permeability <strong>of</strong> the argillite.DOSSIER 2005 ARGILE -ARCHITECTURE AND MANAGEMENT OF A GEOLOGICAL DISPOSAL SYSTEM269/495

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!