10.07.2015 Views

Architecture and management of a geological repository - Andra

Architecture and management of a geological repository - Andra

Architecture and management of a geological repository - Andra

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

11 – Operational SafetyOn the surface, the transport transfer cask vehicle leaves the waste reception area as soon as thetransfer cask has been set down which limits the presence <strong>of</strong> the main cause <strong>of</strong> the risk. Furthermore,the transport transfer cask is designed to resist fire up to 800°C for 30 minutes in accordance withtransport regulations [110].In underground facilities, there is no industrial reference directly applicable to the transfer vehicle aswell as to the B waste emplacement equipment. It has therefore been necessary to make simulations onthe basis <strong>of</strong> assumptions regarding the heat ratings involved <strong>and</strong> the nature <strong>of</strong> the exchanges in thecourse <strong>of</strong> the fire. These studies are presented in Sections 11.5 (Transfer transfer cask transporter) <strong>and</strong>11.6 (B Waste emplacement h<strong>and</strong>ling equipment).• Primary package falling in surface nuclear installationsPrimary packages could be dropped <strong>and</strong> damaged during h<strong>and</strong>ling. The foreseeable consequences <strong>of</strong>this could be a breach <strong>of</strong> one or more <strong>of</strong> the primary packages <strong>and</strong> the dispersion <strong>of</strong> radioactivematerial in the installations <strong>and</strong> subsequently into the environment via the ventilation. A fall could alsoresult in the surface contamination <strong>of</strong> a package missed during other inspections becoming airborne(cf. 11.1.1.4).Preventive measures are specific to each type <strong>of</strong> equipment. Equipment systems must be sized forloads greater than those envisaged, must ensure a degree <strong>of</strong> redundancy in some components <strong>and</strong>intrinsically safe devices must be designed for the possibility <strong>of</strong> malfunction (for example, keeping thegrab closed in the event <strong>of</strong> a power failure). Training <strong>of</strong> personnel <strong>and</strong> maintenance are also veryimportant in countering this risk. In addition, the mechanical procedure used must give priority toh<strong>and</strong>ling packages at a height lower than the height from which they are known to withst<strong>and</strong> beingdropped.As the protective measure to be used to take care <strong>of</strong> a potential release <strong>of</strong> radioactive materials, afiltered ventilation system could be installed on the ventilation circuit <strong>of</strong> the primary packagereception <strong>and</strong> disposal package manufacturing cells.This measure might be justified for some primary B waste packages, such as the bituminised sludgepackage, which is not totally protected from the possibility <strong>of</strong> the crimping <strong>of</strong> its lid failing <strong>and</strong>opening in the event <strong>of</strong> impact.This measure would also apply to installations receiveing bare spent fuel assemblies which, if droppedduring the h<strong>and</strong>ling operations that are necessary until they are placed in disposal packages, couldresult in the rupture <strong>of</strong> the cladding <strong>of</strong> the fuel rods. The main provisions for the <strong>management</strong> <strong>of</strong> thistype <strong>of</strong> risk could be similar to those used for the dry unloading <strong>of</strong> this type <strong>of</strong> fuel in the reprocessingplant (Cogema T0 facility in La Hague).• B Waste disposal package drop during emplacement 157Carring the waste disposal package in the low position over the whole length <strong>of</strong> the disposal cell limitsthe risk <strong>of</strong> it falling during the package lifting <strong>and</strong> emplacement. During this operation, an error in thepositionning <strong>of</strong> the expected position <strong>of</strong> the package to be emplaced, or the malfunction <strong>of</strong> the liftingsystem, could result in a fall from a height <strong>of</strong> 4 to 6 m in the case <strong>of</strong> packages placed on the highestlevels <strong>of</strong> the stacks.Several provisions are envisaged to limit the occurrence <strong>of</strong> this risk <strong>and</strong> its consequences:- The emplacement procedure with a row <strong>of</strong> waste disposal packages placed on the ground followedby a second layer <strong>and</strong> so forth limits the risk to a case in which a package might tip on its side;- Monitoring the package emplacement cycle (validated step by step by the operator, visualinspection using cameras) <strong>and</strong> checking that the emplacement position matches the cell mapbeforeh<strong>and</strong> should prevent any error in positioning when the package is being set down;157 The procedures envisaged for emplacement in the cell <strong>of</strong> C <strong>and</strong> SF packages (cf. Section 9.3) require a h<strong>and</strong>ling height <strong>of</strong> less than2 meters. Because <strong>of</strong> this, these drop cases are not dealt with.DOSSIER 2005 ARGILE -ARCHITECTURE AND MANAGEMENT OF A GEOLOGICAL DISPOSAL SYSTEM447/495

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!