10.07.2015 Views

Architecture and management of a geological repository - Andra

Architecture and management of a geological repository - Andra

Architecture and management of a geological repository - Andra

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

7 – The shafts <strong>and</strong> the drifts7.7.2.4 Description <strong>and</strong> creation technique for support backfillLike the drift liner, the retaining plugs may ultimately be altered chemically. As indicated above, thesupport backfill will take over the role <strong>of</strong> mechanical containment <strong>of</strong> the swelling core.The principle adopted is to restrict the seal from moving by backfill friction on the drift wall. Thesupport backfill must therefore be given rigidity <strong>and</strong> friction. A 20 MPa modulus <strong>of</strong> deformation istherefore considered together with an angle <strong>of</strong> friction (internal or on concrete) <strong>of</strong> 40°. Theseproperties can be obtained with a mix, in near proportions, <strong>of</strong> excavated argillite <strong>and</strong> s<strong>and</strong>, with theexcavated argillite being ground <strong>and</strong> screened to 20 mm as for the st<strong>and</strong>ard backfill.The length <strong>of</strong> the support backfill allows the friction between the backfill <strong>and</strong> the drift wall to balancethe swelling pressure <strong>of</strong> the core. This length is about four times the excavated diameter 129 .The same basic techniques are used to install this support backfill as for the st<strong>and</strong>ard backfill. Thegrouting (filling) <strong>of</strong> the drift crown can be improved by clay powder injections.7.7.2.5 Treatment <strong>of</strong> the argillite zone damaged by the drift excavationThe argillite damaged zone around the seal engineered structure may limit its overall performance, ifthis zone shows inferior hydraulic properties to the rock or the swelling clay core. <strong>Andra</strong> hasconsidered two design options, based on the presence or otherwise <strong>of</strong> a more permeable damaged zone(particularly a fractured zone).• Design options consideredThe first option involves removing the liner the entire length <strong>of</strong> the argillite core <strong>and</strong> ensuring directcontact between the swelling clay in the seal <strong>and</strong> the argillite. This solution is appropriate if thedamaged zone is <strong>of</strong> limited extent <strong>and</strong> its evolution results in it recovering low permeability. Thepressure applied by the swelling <strong>of</strong> the core, the creep or relaxation <strong>of</strong> the argillite may restoreproperties close to the undamaged rock, by reclosing the fissuring. This type <strong>of</strong> process has beenobserved in the clay in the Mont Terri underground laboratory in Switzerl<strong>and</strong>. This can also be causedby the fissures being healed or clogged chemically.The second option can deal with the appearance <strong>of</strong> a far more extended fractured zone, for whichuncertainties exist on its ability to recover a permeability close to that <strong>of</strong> the undamaged rock. Itinvolves interrupting the fractured zone by thin grooves, filled subsequently with swelling clay. Thesehydraulic cut-<strong>of</strong>fs are effective when the potentially fractured argillite is replaced by a less permeablematerial. The technique envisaged to create these grooves limits the appearance <strong>of</strong> new damagedzones. Nevertheless, should a damaged zone be created, particularly at their extremity, checks havebeen made that the hydraulic cut-<strong>of</strong>fs retain their effectiveness, as these new damaged zones do notconnect with each other or with those already existing. The drift liner could also be maintained eitherside <strong>of</strong> the grooves.On the site studied, the appearance <strong>of</strong> a fractured zone is considered possible around the drifts. As aprecaution at the current state <strong>of</strong> knowledge, <strong>Andra</strong> is taking the second option as the reference fordrift seals: hydraulic cut-<strong>of</strong>fs, with localised liner removal.• DescriptionThe grooves in question are around 30 cm thick <strong>and</strong> 1.5 to 3.0 metres deep. This is deeper than theliner thickness <strong>and</strong> any argillite fractured zone. The groove can therefore anchor itself in an argillitezone that has not been micr<strong>of</strong>issured during creation <strong>of</strong> the drift.It is planned to space the grooves around 8 m apart; this could be modified in the light <strong>of</strong> the extent <strong>of</strong>the induced damaged zones, to optimise the hydraulic effectiveness <strong>of</strong> the cut-<strong>of</strong>fs.129 The excavated diameter, not the useful diameter, is considered here: when the backfill is applied as support, the surrounding liner canalso become degraded; it can then be considered an integral part <strong>of</strong> the support backfill <strong>and</strong> resist by its friction on the argillite on theexcavation wall.DOSSIER 2005 ARGILE -ARCHITECTURE AND MANAGEMENT OF A GEOLOGICAL DISPOSAL SYSTEM314/495

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!