10.07.2015 Views

Architecture and management of a geological repository - Andra

Architecture and management of a geological repository - Andra

Architecture and management of a geological repository - Andra

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

5 – Repository ModulesConnection between ground support <strong>and</strong> lining - summary <strong>of</strong> the problemThe role <strong>of</strong> the ground support is to ensure the safety <strong>of</strong> the worksite during the construction phase.The role <strong>of</strong> the lining is to ensure the stability <strong>of</strong> the structure throughout the period <strong>of</strong> operation.The dimensioning <strong>of</strong> the ground support must enable it to withst<strong>and</strong> instantaneous deformationsdirectly associated with the progress <strong>of</strong> excavating the drift, <strong>and</strong> deferred deformations due to theviscous behaviour <strong>of</strong> the rock, before the lining is installed. The dimensioning <strong>of</strong> the lining mustenable it to resist deferred deformations after its installation.Delaying fitting the lining <strong>of</strong>fers the advantage <strong>of</strong> encouraging the expansion <strong>of</strong> the terrain, thuslimiting the forces to be subsequently taken up by the lining, but the drawback <strong>of</strong> prolonging thefunctioning period <strong>of</strong> the ground support, which must consequently be reinforced. A compromise musttherefore be found.The viscoplastic law adopted means deferring fitting the lining in order to avoid using overly largeamounts <strong>of</strong> concrete. Fitting the lining 6 months after the excavation is proposed. The ground supportis dimensioned to last for a year, thus allowing a flexibility <strong>of</strong> several months for fitting the lining.Using a cautious approach, <strong>and</strong> following normal practice, the contribution <strong>of</strong> the ground support tothe long-term stability <strong>of</strong> the structure has not been taken into account in the dimensioning <strong>of</strong> thelining.Results for the ground supportThe results below apply to the following ground support options: for safety reasons the bolts are fittedjust behind the face, while the shotcrete is cast some ten metres from the face, since, according to thecalculations, the shotcrete is not stable if it is set very close to the face.The 2.4 m long rockbolts are installed close to the front in a 1.5 m x 1.5 metre pattern <strong>and</strong> arecombined with the welded mesh. They provide a shallow anchorage inside the micr<strong>of</strong>issured argillite.The length <strong>of</strong> these bolts must be finalized taking into account underground laboratory tests inparticular.The B40 shotcrete is designed with a thickness <strong>of</strong> 25 cm at the cell for a waiting time <strong>of</strong> one year. Thisthickness would only be 15 cm for a waiting time <strong>of</strong> 6 months.Results for the liningThe results given here correspond to a lining fitted at 6 months <strong>and</strong> dimensioned, like current largecivil engineering structures, for a lifetime <strong>of</strong> about a hundred years. For a drift with an excavateddiameter <strong>of</strong> 10.50 m (average value over all the cells), <strong>and</strong> in the shape <strong>of</strong> a horseshoe, using B60concrete, we obtain a thickness at the cell <strong>of</strong> 70 cm. The thickness is 95 cm in the side walls. Thethickness <strong>of</strong> the concrete reaches 1.40 m at the junction between the sidewalls <strong>and</strong> the base slab, whichis the most stressed zone.With the chosen shape, the lining is stressed only in compression <strong>and</strong> therefore does not need anyreinforcing bars.Analysis <strong>of</strong> the durability performance <strong>of</strong> the liningFigure 5.1.19 shows the change in the load exerted by the terrain on the lining as a function <strong>of</strong> time.We see that the pressure exerted by the terrain on the lining is <strong>of</strong> the order <strong>of</strong> 3.5 MPa at 100 years.The increase in pressure after this century is less than 0.5 MPa per century 73 . The lining couldtheoretically withst<strong>and</strong> a pressure <strong>of</strong> the order <strong>of</strong> 8 MPa. We find that the margins <strong>of</strong> safety <strong>and</strong>dimensioning used allow for the cell to be stable over several centuries, in association with the slowrate <strong>of</strong> increase in the pressure <strong>of</strong> the terrain on the lining.73The choice <strong>of</strong> conservative values to represent the deferred deformations <strong>of</strong> the argillites means overestimating the pressure undergoneby the lining at 100 years <strong>and</strong> its increase after that.DOSSIER 2005 ARGILE -ARCHITECTURE AND MANAGEMENT OF A GEOLOGICAL DISPOSAL SYSTEM179/495

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!