10.07.2015 Views

Architecture and management of a geological repository - Andra

Architecture and management of a geological repository - Andra

Architecture and management of a geological repository - Andra

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

2 – General Description2.4.2.3 Waste disposal packages <strong>and</strong> cells for spent fuelThe disposal packages designed for spent fuel comprise a cylindrical envelope <strong>of</strong> non-alloy steel. Thethickness <strong>of</strong> this envelope must guarantee leaktightness during the thermal phase. For fuel types CU1(UOX) <strong>and</strong> CU2 (MOX) discharged from electricity-generating pressurised water reactors (PWR), aminimum leaktightness period <strong>of</strong> the order <strong>of</strong> 10 000 years has been adopted. The thickness has beenconservatively determined (approximately 110 mm for container CU1).The number <strong>of</strong> assemblies in each package depends on the type <strong>of</strong> spent fuel <strong>and</strong>, in particular, theheat released – see section 4.3. For PWR fuels, the packages studied contain one (in the case <strong>of</strong> MOX– package type CU2) or four assemblies (in the case <strong>of</strong> UOX – package type CU1). Moreover, thedisposal package design ensures that the risk <strong>of</strong> criticality is controlled over the various time scales.Figure 2.4.8 (inset) illustrates the largest disposal package studied (43 tonnes, outer diameterapproximately 1.3 metres, length 5.4 metres).Like C waste disposal cells, the spent fuel cell design is dependent on thermal design criteria. Thesecells are horizontal tunnels, some 45 metres long, in which the disposal packages are emplaced – seesection 5.3. In the case <strong>of</strong> PWR fuels releasing considerable heat (1000 to 1500 watts per packageafter pre-disposal storage <strong>of</strong> 60 to 90 years), the disposal packages are spaced apart with spacers <strong>and</strong>each tunnel contains three <strong>of</strong> four packages.For the design <strong>of</strong> spent PWR fuel disposal cells, the insertion <strong>of</strong> a swelling clay buffer (engineeredbarrier) between the packages <strong>and</strong> the <strong>geological</strong> formation has been adopted. The aim is to safeguardagainst uncertainties in the thermomechanical behaviour <strong>of</strong> the cell, caused by a relatively slowdecrease in the heat released from the spent fuel. Where water resaturates the cell, this option enables acontinuous, low-permeability medium to be formed around the packages by exploiting the capability<strong>of</strong> certain clays to swell considerably in the presence <strong>of</strong> water, <strong>and</strong> accept a high deformation rate.This barrier will limit, locally, the transport <strong>of</strong> dissolved species <strong>and</strong> thereby favour the control thephysical <strong>and</strong> chemical environment <strong>of</strong> the fuel. It makes it possible to manage the uncertaintiesexisting at this stage regarding the thermo-hydro-mechanical evolution <strong>of</strong> the argillites located inproximity during the thermal phase. The excavated diameter <strong>of</strong> the disposal cell corresponding to thisconfiguration is around 3 metres. The engineered swelling clay barrier is provided with an axialinternal sleeve to enable the introduction <strong>and</strong> possible future withdrawal <strong>of</strong> the packages.DOSSIER 2005 ARGILE -ARCHITECTURE AND MANAGEMENT OF A GEOLOGICAL DISPOSAL SYSTEM63/495

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!