10.07.2015 Views

Architecture and management of a geological repository - Andra

Architecture and management of a geological repository - Andra

Architecture and management of a geological repository - Andra

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

C.RP.ADP.04.000119/495Figure 10.4.8 Reconstructed cell B ...........................................................................................424Figure 10.4.9 Functional clearance between a package <strong>and</strong> the sleeve in a C cell ...................426Figure 10.4.10 C Cell at end <strong>of</strong> operation ...................................................................................427Figure 10.4.11 Example <strong>of</strong> a pulling robot used to retrieve packages ........................................428Figure 10.4.12Pickup <strong>and</strong> retrieval principles <strong>of</strong> disposed packages.........................................429Figure 10.4.13 C Cell sealed .......................................................................................................430Figure 10.4.14C Cell seal boring................................................................................................430Figure 10.4.15 Reconstructing C cell head .................................................................................431Figure 10.4.16 C Cell after reconstruction ..................................................................................432Figure 11.2.1Risk characterisation...........................................................................................443Figure 11.2.2 Honeycomb material crash test (Impact Speed 200 km/h) .................................449Figure 11.2.3 Schematic diagram <strong>of</strong> the devices envisaged to reduce risks during wastedisposal package transfer in shaft .......................................................................450Figure 11.4.1 St<strong>and</strong>ard total thermal powerfor a 30 MW fire...................................................458Figure 11.4.2 Smoke circulation <strong>and</strong> evacuation in the case <strong>of</strong> a fire in an operationaltype C (or CU) unit .............................................................................................459Figure 11.4.3 Qualification tests on the smoke control system in the Orelle tunnel(SFTRF <strong>and</strong> SETEC) – example <strong>of</strong> a fire with smoke stratification. .................459Figure 11.4.4 Case <strong>of</strong> a fire in a connecting drift:evacuation either side <strong>of</strong> the fire .................460Figure 11.4.5 Fire in a dead-end drift: personnel evacuation via an interconnecting driftinto an adjacent drift or sheltering in a mobile refuge ........................................461Figure 11.4.6 Spatio-temporal evolution <strong>of</strong> the air temperature (°C) in the case <strong>of</strong> a fire ina type C waste cell access drift during nuclear operation – Representation<strong>of</strong> the movement <strong>of</strong> personnel located downstream the fore ventilationairflow.................................................................................................................462Figure 11.5.1 Temperature distribution in the primary packages <strong>of</strong> bituminised sludge(B2.1) ..................................................................................................................467Figure 11.6.1 Temperature range at the primary packages <strong>of</strong> bituminised sludge (B2.1) inthe case <strong>of</strong> a fire in a disposal cell ......................................................................471Figure 11.7.1 3D representation <strong>of</strong> the lower section <strong>of</strong> the shaft equipped with the fallshock absorber system ........................................................................................472Figure 11.7.2 Energy balance <strong>of</strong> a fall in a shaft <strong>of</strong> a cage transporting a transfer caskwith C wastes ......................................................................................................474Figure 11.8.1 Installation <strong>of</strong> the drop-test demonstrator (package B5.2 - CEA/CESTATest Centre - Gironde) ........................................................................................478Figure 11.8.2 Appearance <strong>of</strong> the demonstration model after the drop (left, demonstrationmodel B2.1; right, demonstration model B5.2) ..................................................480Figure 11.8.3 Comparison between simulation <strong>and</strong> fall test in the case <strong>of</strong> the primarypackage close to the impacted corner <strong>of</strong> demonstration model B5.2..................480TablesTable 2.5.1 Emplacement <strong>of</strong> waste packages <strong>and</strong> <strong>repository</strong> components ..............................69Table 2.5.2 Long-term safety functions <strong>and</strong> <strong>repository</strong> components.......................................71DOSSIER 2005 ARGILE -ARCHITECTURE AND MANAGEMENT OF A GEOLOGICAL DISPOSAL SYSTEM19/495

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!