10.07.2015 Views

Architecture and management of a geological repository - Andra

Architecture and management of a geological repository - Andra

Architecture and management of a geological repository - Andra

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

6 – Overall underground architectureThe mechanical properties <strong>of</strong> the median part are weaker than those <strong>of</strong> other parts <strong>of</strong> the Callovo-Oxfordian formation. This ensures the study takes a conservative approach as regards the geotechnicalfeasibility <strong>of</strong> the <strong>repository</strong>.As the maximum dip <strong>of</strong> the layer is 3%, the direction <strong>of</strong> this dip is not a determining factor in theoverall architectural design.6.2.4.2 Repository component topologyThe topology taken into account favours the long-term hydraulic functioning <strong>of</strong> the <strong>repository</strong>. The<strong>repository</strong> has a dead end type tree architecture from the cells to the shafts. On all levels <strong>of</strong> the treestructure, access to each element <strong>of</strong> the <strong>repository</strong> is via a small number <strong>of</strong> clustered access ways.At this stage in the studies, the incorporation <strong>of</strong> this architectural topology shows its feasibility despitethe inherent constraints from the point <strong>of</strong> view <strong>of</strong> ventilation in particular.6.2.4.3 Drift arrangementThe drifts <strong>and</strong> cells are arranged over a rectangular grid. Thus, all the drifts <strong>and</strong> cells to be sealed canbe oriented parallel to the main horizontal stress to limit damage to the argillite in the vicinity <strong>of</strong> theseals.6.2.5 Description <strong>of</strong> the B waste <strong>repository</strong> zoneFigure 6.2.2Layout <strong>of</strong> B <strong>repository</strong> zoneB packages whose physical <strong>and</strong> chemical properties differ are disposed in different modules (seeChapter 5). In Figure 6.2.2, packages containing no organic matter have been grouped together in subzone1.The space between the cells is defined by geotechnical dimensioning. The centre-to-centre distancebetween the cells used here is 72 meters which leaves a pillar <strong>of</strong> at least 5 times the diameter <strong>of</strong> thecells between two cells whose excavated diameter is 12 meters in order to ensure good stability.DOSSIER 2005 ARGILE -ARCHITECTURE AND MANAGEMENT OF A GEOLOGICAL DISPOSAL SYSTEM261/495

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!