10.07.2015 Views

Governing the City State - Chief Minister and Treasury Directorate ...

Governing the City State - Chief Minister and Treasury Directorate ...

Governing the City State - Chief Minister and Treasury Directorate ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

LDA was praised for its central role in supporting <strong>the</strong> Government’s housing affordabilityagenda through innovative products like “Own Place” <strong>and</strong> l<strong>and</strong> rent.The Review has concluded that while it is entirely appropriate for <strong>the</strong> Government to selll<strong>and</strong>, to develop l<strong>and</strong> itself <strong>and</strong>/or to enter into joint ventures, <strong>the</strong> separate LDA commercialstructure is no longer warranted. The LDA should be abolished <strong>and</strong> its functions <strong>and</strong> staffabsorbed into <strong>the</strong> Economic Development <strong>Directorate</strong>. In this context, one contributor to <strong>the</strong>Review noted that <strong>the</strong> size of <strong>the</strong> current l<strong>and</strong> release program <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> required relationshipsinherent in delivering <strong>the</strong> program might be better served by a structure that can respondmore quickly to <strong>the</strong> Government’s priorities.The LDA Board might continue, but in an advisory capacity. It was argued during <strong>the</strong>Review that a Board structure is better suited to an environment where <strong>the</strong> entity is solelyfocussed on commercial activities <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> portfolio department is not required to manage orinfluence <strong>the</strong> outcomes <strong>and</strong> relationships across Government. Replacing <strong>the</strong> LDA Boardwith an advisory board eliminates <strong>the</strong> potential conflicts between <strong>the</strong> fiduciary duties of <strong>the</strong>governing board <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> public sector roles <strong>and</strong> accountabilities of officials. The currentarrangements are nei<strong>the</strong>r fully commercial nor fully integrated within <strong>the</strong> ACTPS. As such,<strong>the</strong>y create uncertainty <strong>and</strong> risk failings of governance <strong>and</strong> accountability.ACT Planning <strong>and</strong> L<strong>and</strong> AuthorityACTPLA performs a number of statutory roles, including development assessment <strong>and</strong>approval under <strong>the</strong> Planning <strong>and</strong> Development Act (2007). As well as being a statutoryregulatory agency for <strong>the</strong> purpose of development assessment, l<strong>and</strong> administration <strong>and</strong>building control it also oversees <strong>the</strong> development <strong>and</strong> implementation of government policyaround l<strong>and</strong> use. It has an integral role in <strong>the</strong> work of service agencies whose operations havespatial implications, reflected in its administration of <strong>the</strong> ACT’s l<strong>and</strong> information system.Due to <strong>the</strong> unique circumstances of <strong>the</strong> ACT, l<strong>and</strong> use planning <strong>and</strong> development take on amuch greater role in <strong>the</strong> ACT Government <strong>and</strong> ACTPS than in <strong>the</strong>ir state counterparts.ACTPLA was created in 2003 to establish a strategic planning <strong>and</strong> development assessmentcapacity that, where necessary, would be at arm’s length from <strong>the</strong> Government for <strong>the</strong>purpose of making certain statutory decisions. The alignment of ACTPLA’s work <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>contribution of o<strong>the</strong>r elements of <strong>the</strong> ACTPS that are responsible for planning <strong>and</strong>development related legislation <strong>and</strong> policy behind commonly understood Governmentpolicies <strong>and</strong> priorities, is central to <strong>the</strong> success of <strong>the</strong> Government <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> ACTPS in movingfrom <strong>the</strong> broadest level of strategic planning to <strong>the</strong> realisation of outcomes on <strong>the</strong> ground.Consultations revealed a shared belief that this necessary alignment <strong>and</strong> coherence of actionacross <strong>the</strong> ACTPS has been diluted, if not lost in fragmentation of roles <strong>and</strong> responsibilities.A common refrain was that <strong>the</strong> ACT should be taking advantage of its uniqueness tostreamline <strong>and</strong> align planning related decision-making, including through a reduction in <strong>the</strong>number of agencies <strong>and</strong> ministries with “fingers in <strong>the</strong> pie”.Administrative Arrangements Changes: 182

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!