10.07.2015 Views

Governing the City State - Chief Minister and Treasury Directorate ...

Governing the City State - Chief Minister and Treasury Directorate ...

Governing the City State - Chief Minister and Treasury Directorate ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Many of <strong>the</strong> benefits of <strong>the</strong> single agency model might be achieved simply throughreorganisation of <strong>the</strong> existing structure of separate departments, coupled with greateremphasis <strong>and</strong> application of systems <strong>and</strong> structures to drive coordination <strong>and</strong> alignmentincluding <strong>the</strong> creation of a Strategic Board comprising <strong>Chief</strong> Executives of Departments.What is lost in this approach, however, are <strong>the</strong> opportunities for flexibility, cultural change,<strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> unity of identity <strong>and</strong> purpose that would come through a single organisation under asingle <strong>Chief</strong> Executive <strong>and</strong> Head of <strong>the</strong> ACTPS.Even in <strong>the</strong> recommended structure, <strong>the</strong> issue of a Portfolio’s voice at <strong>the</strong> Cabinet table willremain an issue while <strong>the</strong> Cabinet remains capped at five <strong>Minister</strong>s. It is inevitable <strong>and</strong>underst<strong>and</strong>able that a <strong>Minister</strong> wearing two Portfolio hats will internalise at least some of <strong>the</strong>arguments between <strong>the</strong>ir portfolios. One of <strong>the</strong> strengths of <strong>the</strong> preferred option is its biastowards one-to-one alignment of Ministries <strong>and</strong> <strong>Directorate</strong>s. In <strong>the</strong> proposed <strong>Chief</strong><strong>Minister</strong>’s Department, <strong>the</strong> recommended structure would facilitate <strong>the</strong> provision of <strong>the</strong>Finance <strong>Directorate</strong> briefing to <strong>the</strong> <strong>Chief</strong> <strong>Minister</strong> in circumstances where <strong>the</strong> Treasurer isbringing forward a Submission wearing ano<strong>the</strong>r portfolio hat. This situation also highlights<strong>the</strong> importance of <strong>Directorate</strong>s’ comments on Cabinet papers in drawing to <strong>the</strong> attention of<strong>Minister</strong>s <strong>and</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r <strong>Directorate</strong>s <strong>the</strong> range of views of a proposal.Figure 12 – Recommended Structure – One ACTPS<strong>Chief</strong> <strong>Minister</strong>’s DepartmentCulture <strong>and</strong>Communications, People<strong>and</strong> Performance, <strong>and</strong>EconomicPolicy DivisionsDevelopmentFinanceTerritory <strong>and</strong>MunicipalServicesCABINETCommunityServicesSustainableDevelopmentEducationJusticeHealth<strong>Governing</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>City</strong> <strong>State</strong>: 83

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!