10.07.2015 Views

Governing the City State - Chief Minister and Treasury Directorate ...

Governing the City State - Chief Minister and Treasury Directorate ...

Governing the City State - Chief Minister and Treasury Directorate ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

CHAPTER THREE: GOVERNING THE CITY STATE:“ONE ACT GOVERNMENT – ONE ACTPS”IntroductionA traditional bureaucracy, divided into vertical silos, in which most of <strong>the</strong> authority forresolving problems rests at <strong>the</strong> top of <strong>the</strong> organisation, is not well-adapted to support<strong>the</strong> kinds of process necessary for addressing <strong>the</strong> complexity <strong>and</strong> ambiguity of wickedproblems. Bureaucracies tend to be risk averse, <strong>and</strong> are intolerant of messy processes.They excel at managing issues with clear boundaries ra<strong>the</strong>r than ambiguous, complexissues that may require experimental <strong>and</strong> innovative approaches. 36Structural change is not a panacea for <strong>the</strong> problems facing <strong>the</strong> <strong>State</strong> sector today,<strong>and</strong> it can be a blunt <strong>and</strong> expensive instrument. 37The capacity of <strong>the</strong> ACT Public Service (ACTPS) to “support <strong>the</strong> government of <strong>the</strong> day withstrategic <strong>and</strong> direction-setting advice” <strong>and</strong> its “effectiveness in delivering governmentpolicies <strong>and</strong> objectives” are central to <strong>the</strong> Review’s Terms of Reference. This Chapteranalyses <strong>the</strong> broad governance framework within which <strong>the</strong> ACTPS operates, followed by areview of contemporary academic thinking about <strong>and</strong> leading practice of o<strong>the</strong>r jurisdictions inpublic administration.Against this backdrop, <strong>the</strong> Review’s recommendations for how <strong>the</strong> ACTPS should bestructured are <strong>the</strong>n presented. The detail of possible reform options <strong>and</strong> a finer-grainedrendering of <strong>the</strong> proposed allocation of functional responsibilities are set out in Chapter 4.The Chapter concludes with a discussion of <strong>the</strong> role of Government Boards <strong>and</strong> Committees,<strong>and</strong> Statutory Office Holders in <strong>the</strong> ACT’s governance framework.OverviewTraditional public service departments <strong>and</strong> hierarchies are not well suited to dealing with <strong>the</strong>complex <strong>and</strong> interrelated issues to which governments around <strong>the</strong> world are increasinglybeing required to turn <strong>the</strong>ir minds, but structural change alone is a blunt instrument forimproving <strong>the</strong>ir performance. The ACTPS is never<strong>the</strong>less uniquely (<strong>and</strong> fortunately) placedto be a leader in innovation in public policy design <strong>and</strong> service delivery. The size of <strong>the</strong>ACTPS, <strong>the</strong> size <strong>and</strong> contained geographic scope of Canberra, <strong>the</strong> presence of leadingacademic institutions, <strong>and</strong> collocation of <strong>the</strong> Australian Public Service (APS) create fertile36 Australian Public Service Commission (2007a) Tackling Wicked Problems: A Public Policy Perspective. Canberra, p.13.37 <strong>State</strong> Services Commission (2001) Report of <strong>the</strong> Advisory Group on <strong>the</strong> Review of <strong>the</strong> Centre. New Zeal<strong>and</strong> Government,Wellington, p.27.<strong>Governing</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>City</strong> <strong>State</strong>: 53

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!