10.07.2015 Views

Governing the City State - Chief Minister and Treasury Directorate ...

Governing the City State - Chief Minister and Treasury Directorate ...

Governing the City State - Chief Minister and Treasury Directorate ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

CHAPTER ONE: BACKGROUND TO THE REVIEWPublic administration reform will never be a simple, straightforward process because of <strong>the</strong>complexity of <strong>the</strong> environment in which we operate <strong>and</strong> because so much of <strong>the</strong> way weoperate is bound in custom <strong>and</strong> tradition. But it is also clear that doing business as usual willnot deliver <strong>the</strong> outcomes that <strong>the</strong> community rightly dem<strong>and</strong>s across all levels ofGovernment. 2In September 2010, <strong>the</strong> <strong>Chief</strong> <strong>Minister</strong> of <strong>the</strong> Australian Capital Territory (ACT),Mr Jon Stanhope MLA, commissioned a comprehensive review of <strong>the</strong> effectiveness, capacity<strong>and</strong> structure of <strong>the</strong> ACT Public Sector (<strong>the</strong> Review).The Terms of Reference (see Attachment A) canvassed:• <strong>the</strong> capacity of existing public-sector structures to support <strong>the</strong> government of <strong>the</strong> day withstrategic <strong>and</strong> direction-setting advice;• effectiveness in delivering on government policies <strong>and</strong> objectives;• performance <strong>and</strong> accountability mechanisms;• how existing structures differentiate between <strong>the</strong> roles of policy <strong>and</strong> regulation;• across-government coordination of service delivery; <strong>and</strong>• structures that would improve resilience <strong>and</strong> innovation across <strong>the</strong> public sector.The aim of <strong>the</strong> Review was to ensure that <strong>the</strong> configuration of <strong>the</strong> ACT public sector remainsappropriate for meeting <strong>the</strong> Government’s needs <strong>and</strong> delivering its agenda into <strong>the</strong> future,particularly in relation to <strong>the</strong> major priority issues of sustainability, housing affordability <strong>and</strong>transport, which cross traditional agency boundaries.The Review took place concurrently with a suite of o<strong>the</strong>r projects examining different aspectsof <strong>the</strong> ACT Government’s operations, including:• <strong>the</strong> review of taxation being conducted by former ACT Treasurer Mr Ted Quinlan;• Canberra 2030 – Time to Talk; <strong>and</strong>• continuation of <strong>the</strong> Expenditure Review <strong>and</strong> Evaluation Committee’s work.Government decisions following <strong>the</strong> Strategic <strong>and</strong> Functional Review of <strong>the</strong> ACT PublicSector <strong>and</strong> Services led by Mr Michael Costello AO in <strong>the</strong> lead up to <strong>the</strong> 2006–07 Budgetprovided a complementary background. Unlike that process, however, this Review was notfocused on <strong>the</strong> identification of savings. Instead, it aimed at maximising <strong>the</strong> ACT’s city stategovernment achievements including by overcoming structural <strong>and</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r impediments toperformance.2 Blacher, Y (2005) 'Changing <strong>the</strong> way government works'. Public Administration Today (Oct - Dec) pp:38 - 42, p.42.Background to <strong>the</strong> Review: 23

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!