10.07.2015 Views

Governing the City State - Chief Minister and Treasury Directorate ...

Governing the City State - Chief Minister and Treasury Directorate ...

Governing the City State - Chief Minister and Treasury Directorate ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

For officials seeking to deliver clarity of purpose <strong>and</strong> role, <strong>the</strong> OECD usefully outlines threemain forms of dialogue between governments <strong>and</strong> civil society: 79• Information – a one way process in which “government produces <strong>and</strong> delivers information for useby citizens”;• Consultation – a two way process in which “citizens provide feedback to government. It is basedon <strong>the</strong> prior definition by government of <strong>the</strong> issue on which citizens’ views are being sought <strong>and</strong>requires <strong>the</strong> provision of information; <strong>and</strong>• Citizens Active Participation – a deeper partnership based two way process in which “citizensactively engage in <strong>the</strong> policy making process. It acknowledges a role for citizens in proposingpolicy options <strong>and</strong> shaping <strong>the</strong> policy dialogue – although <strong>the</strong> responsibility for <strong>the</strong> final decisionor policy formulation rests with government”.These different levels of engagement are outlined in Figure 10 below with <strong>the</strong> addition ofsome useful layers of subtlety at <strong>the</strong> participation end of <strong>the</strong> spectrum. The collaboration <strong>and</strong>empowerment stages are <strong>the</strong> levels at which co-production of policy <strong>and</strong> programs occurs <strong>and</strong>at which <strong>the</strong> greatest benefits to policy <strong>and</strong> program outcomes lie. It is also at those stageswhere <strong>the</strong> greatest challenges to traditional ways of working are evident.Figure 10 - Levels of Public Engagement 80The risks of participatory decision making include criticism of unwarranted delay, or a failureby governments to make decisions:participatory practice is often a balance between improving <strong>and</strong> delaying a decision.Participation can on some occasions radically speed up <strong>the</strong> process through avoiding legaldisputes or <strong>the</strong> conflict that a more conventional approach can encourage; but it can alsocreate frustration as seemingly clear decisions are delayed by what is perceived by some asunnecessary discussion. 8179 Organisation for Economic Co-operation <strong>and</strong> Development (2003) p.14.80 Involve (2005) p.18.81 Involve (2005) p.22.<strong>Governing</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>City</strong> <strong>State</strong>: 66

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!