1E9Ct5D

j) Not comply with regulations regarding the identification, classification, packaging,and labeling of hazardous wastes;k) Not comply with the requirements that the Wastes Law has established regardingthe importation and exportation of hazardous wastes;l) As generator of hazardous waste, not provide to service providers the informationnecessary for its integrated management;m) As a generator of hazardous waste, not give notice to the competent authority incase of emergencies, accidents, or loss of such waste;n) Not comply with environmental protection measures regarding the transportationof hazardous waste.In imposing penalties for violations of the Wastes Law, the provisions of the LGEEPAwith regard to wastes apply.3.8. Private Party Defense against Actions Taken by Governmental AuthoritiesIndividuals or entities affected by acts or rulings of the administrative authorities thatterminate an administrative proceeding or an instance, or that resolve a case, may filea motion for review or, when appropriate, a court appeal.The time period for filing the motion for review is 15 days from the day following thedate on which the notification of the ruling to be challenged takes effect. The review willbe conducted according to the Federal Law of Administrative Procedure (Ley Federal deProcedimiento Administrativo).The motion for review is an administrative appeal filed before the authority that issued theruling that is being challenged; the motion is heard by that authority’s superior. On theother hand, a private party can choose to file a nullity claim directly before the FederalTax and Administrative Court instead of a motion for review, or it can apply for a nullityproceeding after receiving an unfavorable ruling in the motion for review. Said proceedingis a claim that is filed before the Federal Tax and Administrative Court and is regulatedby the Federal Law of Administrative Law Court Procedure (Ley Federal deProcedimiento Contencioso Administrativo). As a final option, there is the amparo proceedingthat can be filed to claim the rulings issued by the environmental authorities wereunconstitutional because they violate the individual rights of the private parties.The LGEEPA establishes that a motion for review can also be filed with respect to worksor activities that violate the LGEEPA or other environmental provisions. In this case, themotion for review can be filed by any individual or entity of the communities affectedby the violation of the LGEEPA. It is also possible for any person, group, or associationthat is not directly affected by a violation of the environmental provisions to report sucha violation to the appropriate environmental authority.293Environmental Law