11.07.2015 Views

Transforming and Supporting Patient Care - Health Professions ...

Transforming and Supporting Patient Care - Health Professions ...

Transforming and Supporting Patient Care - Health Professions ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

144Chapter 6 – Scope of Practice of Medical Radiation TechnologyNew Zeal<strong>and</strong> has a “controlled acts” model, which identifies six acts thatmust be restricted to qualified individuals; however, none of these applydirectly to MRTs. The scope of practice of MRTs, as defined by the NewZeal<strong>and</strong> Medical Radiation Technology Board, is very similar to that ofOntario, Alberta <strong>and</strong> Quebec.In Australia, there is not a single regulatory model across the country asvariations are found in state legislation in definitions of MRT <strong>and</strong> thedisciplines that fall within the practice of the profession.In Great Britain, medical radiation technology is a self-regulated profession<strong>and</strong> MRTs fall under the regulatory purview of the <strong>Health</strong> <strong>Professions</strong>Council. The <strong>Health</strong> <strong>Professions</strong> Council establishes educational <strong>and</strong> trainingrequirements <strong>and</strong> st<strong>and</strong>ards of conduct <strong>and</strong> performance. The Society ofRadiographers 56 supports the profession by developing scope of practicedocuments <strong>and</strong> other information for the safe practice of radiography.Perspectives from the ConsultationsConsultations were designed to gain additional information, perspectives<strong>and</strong> underst<strong>and</strong>ing of issues, benefits <strong>and</strong> risks associated with the changesproposed to the scope of practice of medical radiation technology.HPRAC received comments from various organizations <strong>and</strong> individuals,either through written submissions or consultation meetings.Six written responses were submitted – from the Canadian Association ofMedical Radiology Technologists, the Ontario Association of RadiologyManagers, the College of Respiratory Therapists of Ontario, the OntarioHospital Association, the Ontario Medical Association <strong>and</strong> a practising MRT.In general, the submissions indicated support for the proposed changes.Some submissions offered qualified support pending clarification of someproposals, while others indicated support specific to certain controlled actsthat impact on their professions. HPRAC has considered these responses inits analysis <strong>and</strong> recommendations. All of the written responses are availableon HPRAC’s website.At the beginning of the consultations, a meeting was convened with theCollege <strong>and</strong> Association to review their joint submission <strong>and</strong> gain a betterunderst<strong>and</strong>ing of the role that MRTs play in the provincial health system, aswell as the rationale for the request <strong>and</strong> the consequences of the proposedchanges.Meetings were held with educators on the implications of the proposedscope enhancements for provincial teaching programs <strong>and</strong> on the teachinginstitutions’ capacity to address any gaps in the current curriculum.Representatives of hospitals <strong>and</strong> independent health facilities wereconsulted to obtain their perspective on how the changes would affect theprovision of diagnostic services to their patients. Radiologists <strong>and</strong> other56MRTs are referred to as radiographers in Great Britain.HPRAC Critical Links January 2009

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!