12.07.2015 Views

Reproduction in Domestic Animals

Reproduction in Domestic Animals

Reproduction in Domestic Animals

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Supp. 2), 122–128 (2008); doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0531.2008.01151.xISSN 0936-6768Genetic Aspects of <strong>Reproduction</strong> <strong>in</strong> SheepDR NotterDepartment of Animal and Poultry Sciences, Virg<strong>in</strong>ia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, USAContentsMa<strong>in</strong>tenance of high levels of realized fertility (def<strong>in</strong>ed as thepercentage of ewes that lamb) and appropriate levels offecundity are critical for efficient sheep production. Theoptimal level of fecundity <strong>in</strong> most situations is well below themaximum atta<strong>in</strong>able level and can be targeted by comb<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>gselection among and with<strong>in</strong> breeds with use of an expand<strong>in</strong>garray of s<strong>in</strong>gle-gene mutations affect<strong>in</strong>g ovulation rate andlitter size. The heritability of litter size is approximately 0.10,allow<strong>in</strong>g changes of up to 2% ⁄ year from simple mass selection.Mutations <strong>in</strong> several genes associated with the transform<strong>in</strong>ggrowth factor b superfamily (BMPRIB, GDF9 and sex-l<strong>in</strong>kedBMP15) can <strong>in</strong>crease ovulation rates by 0.7–1.5 ova <strong>in</strong>heterozygous ewes. However, ewes that are homozygous forBMP15 or GDF9 mutations are sterile, so use of thesemutations requires carefully structured breed<strong>in</strong>g programmes.Improvements <strong>in</strong> fertility may be critical for autumn lamb<strong>in</strong>gor programmes that aspire to lamb throughout the year.Selection to improve fertility <strong>in</strong> spr<strong>in</strong>g mat<strong>in</strong>gs has beensuccessful; selected adult ewes have lamb<strong>in</strong>g rates of 80–85%<strong>in</strong> October and early November. The selected ewes have adramatically reduced seasonal anestrus, and many ewescont<strong>in</strong>ue to cycle dur<strong>in</strong>g spr<strong>in</strong>g and summer. Major genesaffect<strong>in</strong>g seasonal breed<strong>in</strong>g have not been identified <strong>in</strong> sheep.Polymorphisms <strong>in</strong> the melaton<strong>in</strong> receptor 1a gene appear to beassociated with seasonal breed<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> some, but not all breeds.However, functional genomic studies of genes associated withcircadian and circannual rhythms have potential to revealadditional candidate genes <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> seasonal breed<strong>in</strong>g.IntroductionImplementation of effective programmes of reproductivemanagement <strong>in</strong> commercial sheep production<strong>in</strong>volves synchronization of genetic potentials forreproductive ability with the production environment.The production objective <strong>in</strong> such situations is generallymaximization of farm profit. If meat is the ma<strong>in</strong> output,atta<strong>in</strong>ment of this objective commonly <strong>in</strong>volvesmaximiz<strong>in</strong>g the annual number and ⁄ or total weight oflambs marketed. Wool may make an additionalcontribution to <strong>in</strong>come, but unless wool quality is veryhigh, <strong>in</strong>creases <strong>in</strong> wool production cannot compensatefor even m<strong>in</strong>or losses <strong>in</strong> meat production. However,reproductive goals <strong>in</strong> sheep dairy<strong>in</strong>g, and particularlythe economic benefit from <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g litter size, may besecondary to the primary goal of <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g milkproduction.Opportunities to <strong>in</strong>crease ovulation rates <strong>in</strong> sheep arevast, <strong>in</strong>volv<strong>in</strong>g both well-established polygenic breeddifferences (Fahmy 1996) and access to a number ofs<strong>in</strong>gle-gene mutations with major effects on ovulationrate and litter size. Mutant alleles may be <strong>in</strong>trogressed<strong>in</strong>to different genetic backgrounds with relative ease,allow<strong>in</strong>g large <strong>in</strong>creases <strong>in</strong> ovulation rate without othermajor changes <strong>in</strong> genetic background or environmentaladaptation. Genetic management of ovulation rate andlitter size thus <strong>in</strong>volves def<strong>in</strong>ition of the optimum littersize (which is commonly well below the potentiallyatta<strong>in</strong>able maximum) and the development of breed<strong>in</strong>gschemes to establish and ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong> the desired level offecundity.Seasonal breed<strong>in</strong>g limits both diversification and<strong>in</strong>tensification of production. Under extensiveconditions, the breed<strong>in</strong>g season of established, locallyadapted breeds generally has evolved to compliment theenvironmental conditions and desired production calendarand serves to ensure that lamb<strong>in</strong>g occurs at appropriatetimes. However, <strong>in</strong>tensification of animalproduction to meet <strong>in</strong>creased consumer demands formeat and other animal products, both locally and <strong>in</strong>expand<strong>in</strong>g global markets, provides both motivation andopportunity to modify the traditional lamb<strong>in</strong>g schedules.In some cases, these modifications require only a shift <strong>in</strong>the breed<strong>in</strong>g season, but there is also an opportunity to<strong>in</strong>crease the frequency of lamb<strong>in</strong>g, with 7- to 9-monthlamb<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>tervals as an apparent practical m<strong>in</strong>imum. Amassive literature exists catalogu<strong>in</strong>g attempts to useexogenous hormone treatments or photoperiodic manipulationto <strong>in</strong>duce fertile mat<strong>in</strong>gs outside the normalbreed<strong>in</strong>g season. Correspond<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>formation now existsto show that useful levels of additive genetic variation <strong>in</strong>duration of the breed<strong>in</strong>g season are present among andwith<strong>in</strong> breeds, and the development of sheep with adramatically reduced breed<strong>in</strong>g season will be discussed.The understand<strong>in</strong>g of the genetic control of circadianand circannual timekeep<strong>in</strong>g is likewise expand<strong>in</strong>g rapidly,but access to quantitative trait loci (QTL) andfunctional mutations associated with seasonal breed<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong> sheep rema<strong>in</strong>s limited.This review will thus focus on genetic mechanismscontroll<strong>in</strong>g ovulation rate and seasonal breed<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>sheep, and on strategies to synchronize geneticpotentials for reproductive traits with the productionenvironment.Genetic Control of Ovulation Rate and LitterSizePolygenic associationsA summary of heritability estimates for several reproductivetraits is shown <strong>in</strong> Table 1 (Safari et al. 2005).Estimates of heritability for litter size are generallyconsistent <strong>in</strong> the literature, averag<strong>in</strong>g 0.11 (n = 102). Asdiscussed by Bradford (1985), these parameters wouldsuggest a maximum response to s<strong>in</strong>gle-trait mass selectionfor litter size of approximately 2% per year. Thus, agenetic ga<strong>in</strong> of 0.20 lambs born per ewe lamb<strong>in</strong>g froms<strong>in</strong>gle-trait mass selection would require approximatelyÓ 2008 The Author. Journal compilation Ó 2008 Blackwell Verlag

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!