6 C Galli and G Lazzarioocyte fertilised by <strong>in</strong>tracytoplasmic <strong>in</strong>jection of a s<strong>in</strong>glepresumptive male sperm. Vet Rec 139, 494–495.Colleoni S, Barbac<strong>in</strong>i S, Necchi D, Duchi R, Lazzari G, GalliC, 2007: Application of ovum pick-up, <strong>in</strong>tracytoplasmicsperm <strong>in</strong>jection and embryo culture <strong>in</strong> equ<strong>in</strong>e practice. ProcAm Assoc Equ<strong>in</strong>e Pract (AAEP) 53, 554–559.Cran DG, 2007: XY sperm separation and use <strong>in</strong> artificial<strong>in</strong>sem<strong>in</strong>ation and other ARTs. Soc Reprod Fertil Suppl 65,475–491.Downs SM, Daniel SA, Eppig JJ, 1988: Induction of maturation<strong>in</strong> cumulus cell-enclosed mouse oocytes by folliclestimulat<strong>in</strong>ghormone and epidermal growth factor: evidencefor a positive stimulus of somatic cell orig<strong>in</strong>. J Exp Zool 245,86–96.Eggan K, Jurga S, Gosden R, M<strong>in</strong> IM, Wagers AJ, 2006:Ovulated oocytes <strong>in</strong> adult mice derive from non-circulat<strong>in</strong>ggerm cells. Nature 441, 1109–1114.Eppig JJ, O’Brien MJ, 1996: Development <strong>in</strong> vitro of mouseoocytes from primordial follicles. Biol Reprod 54, 197–207.Galli C, Lazzari G, 1996: Practical aspects of IVM ⁄ IVF <strong>in</strong>cattle. Anim Reprod Sci 42, 371–379.Galli C, Moor RM, 1991a: Development of immature bov<strong>in</strong>eoocytes <strong>in</strong>to viable embryos <strong>in</strong> vitro. Bull l’AssociationAnatom 228, 67–71.Galli C, Moor RM, 1991b: Gonadotroph<strong>in</strong> requirements forthe <strong>in</strong> vitro maturation of sheep oocytes and their subsequentembryonic development. Theriogenology 35, 1083–1093.Galli C, Laurie S, Lazzari G, Moor RM, 1991: Nucleartransplantation (by electrofusion) of cultured embryoniccells with Met II cytoplasts <strong>in</strong> the sheep. Annu Conf Ital SocVet Sci XLV, 299–303.Galli C, Lazzari G, Flechon JE, Moor RM, 1994: Embryonicstem cells <strong>in</strong> farm animals. Zygote 2, 385–389.Galli C, Duchi R, Crotti G, Lazzari G, 1998: Embryoproduction by Ovum Pick Up <strong>in</strong> Water Buffalo. Theriogenol49, 400.Galli C, Duchi R, Moor RM, Lazzari G, 1999: Mammalianleukocytes conta<strong>in</strong> all the genetic <strong>in</strong>formation necessary forthe development of a new <strong>in</strong>dividual. Clon<strong>in</strong>g 1, 161–170.Galli C, Crotti G, Notari C, Tur<strong>in</strong>i P, Duchi R, Lazzari G,2001: Embryo production by ovum pick up from livedonors. Theriogenology 55, 1341–1357.Galli C, Crotti G, Tur<strong>in</strong>i P, Duchi R, Mari G, Zavaglia G,Duchamp G, Daels P, Lazzari G, 2002: Frozen- thawedembryos produced by Ovum Pick Up of immature oocytesand ICSI are capable to establish pregnancies <strong>in</strong> the horse.Theriogenology 58, 705–708.Galli C, Vassiliev I, Lagut<strong>in</strong>a I, Galli A, Lazzari G, 2003a:Bov<strong>in</strong>e embryo development follow<strong>in</strong>g ICSI: effect ofactivation, sperm capacitation and pre-treatment with dithiothreitol.Theriogenology 60, 1467–1480.Galli C, Duchi R, Crotti G, Tur<strong>in</strong>i P, Ponderato N, Colleoni S,Lagut<strong>in</strong>a I, Lazzari G, 2003b: Bov<strong>in</strong>e embryo technologies.Theriogenology 59, 599–616.Galli C, Lagut<strong>in</strong>a I, Crotti G, Colleoni S, Tur<strong>in</strong>i P, PonderatoN, Duchi R, Lazzari G, 2003c: Pregnancy: a cloned horseborn to its dam tw<strong>in</strong>. Nature 424, 635.Galli C, Colleoni S, Duchi R, Lagut<strong>in</strong>a I, Lazzari G, 2007:Developmental competence of equ<strong>in</strong>e oocytes and embryosobta<strong>in</strong>ed by <strong>in</strong> vitro procedures rang<strong>in</strong>g from <strong>in</strong> vitromaturation and ICSI to embryo culture, cryopreservationand somatic cell nuclear transfer. Anim Reprod Sci 98, 39–55.Gandolfi F, Moor RM, 1987: Stimulation of early embryonicdevelopment <strong>in</strong> the sheep by co-culture with oviductepithelial cells. J Reprod Fertil 81, 23–28.Gardner DK, Lane M, Spitzer A, Batt PA, 1994: Enhancedrates of cleavage and development for sheep zygotescultured to the blastocyst stage <strong>in</strong> vitro <strong>in</strong> the absence ofserum and somatic cells: am<strong>in</strong>o acids, vitam<strong>in</strong>s, and cultur<strong>in</strong>gembryos <strong>in</strong> groups stimulate development. Biol Reprod50, 390–400.Goto K, Yanagita K, 1995: Normality of calves obta<strong>in</strong>ed by<strong>in</strong>tracytoplasmic sperm <strong>in</strong>jection. Hum Reprod 10, 1554.Goto K, Kajihara Y, Kosaka S, Koba M, Nakanishi Y,Ogawa K, 1988: Pregnancies after co-culture of cumuluscells with bov<strong>in</strong>e embryos derived from <strong>in</strong>-vitro fertilizationof <strong>in</strong>-vitro matured follicular oocytes. J Reprod Fertil 83,753–758.Gurdon JB, 2006: From nuclear transfer to nuclear reprogramm<strong>in</strong>g:the reversal of cell differentiation. Annu Rev CellDev Biol 22, 1–22.Hasler JF, Henderson WB, Hurtgen PJ, J<strong>in</strong> ZQ, McCauleyAD, Mower SA, Neely B, Shuey LS, Stokes JE, TrimmerSA, 1995: Production, freez<strong>in</strong>g and transfer of bov<strong>in</strong>e IVFembryos and subsequent calv<strong>in</strong>g results. Theriogenology 43,141–152.Hubner K, Fuhrmann G, Christenson LK, Kehler J, Re<strong>in</strong>boldR, De La Fuente R, Wood J, Strauss JF III, Boiani M,Scholer HR, 2003: Derivation of oocytes from mouseembryonic stem cells. Science 300, 1251–1256.Iwasaki S, Campbell KH, Galli C, Akiyama K, 2000:Production of live calves derived from embryonic stem-likecells aggregated with tetraploid embryos. Biol Reprod 62,470–475.James D, Lev<strong>in</strong>e AJ, Besser D, Hemmati-Brivanlou A, 2005:TGFbeta ⁄ activ<strong>in</strong> ⁄ nodal signal<strong>in</strong>g is necessary for the ma<strong>in</strong>tenanceof pluripotency <strong>in</strong> human embryonic stem cells.Development 132, 1273–1282.Johnson J, Bagley J, Skaznik-Wikiel M, Lee HJ, Adams GB,Niikura Y, Tschudy KS, Tilly JC, Cortes ML, Forkert R,Spitzer T, Iacom<strong>in</strong>i J, Scadden DT, Tilly JL, 2005: Oocytegeneration <strong>in</strong> adult mammalian ovaries by putative germcells <strong>in</strong> bone marrow and peripheral blood. Cell 122, 303–315.Keefer CL, Pant D, Blomberg L, Talbot NC, 2007: Challengesand prospects for the establishment of embryonic stem celll<strong>in</strong>es of domesticated ungulates. Anim Reprod Sci 98, 147–168.Ko K, Scholer HR, 2006: Embryonic stem cells as a potentialsource of gametes. Sem<strong>in</strong> Reprod Med 24, 322–329.Kolbe T, Holtz W, 2000: Birth of a piglet derived from anoocyte fertilized by <strong>in</strong>tracytoplasmic sperm <strong>in</strong>jection (ICSI).Anim Reprod Sci 64, 97–101.Kuroiwa Y, Kas<strong>in</strong>athan P, Matsushita H, Sathiyaselan J,Sullivan EJ, Kakitani M, Tomizuka K, Ishida I, Robl JM,2004: Sequential target<strong>in</strong>g of the genes encod<strong>in</strong>g immunoglobul<strong>in</strong>-muand prion prote<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong> cattle. Nat Genet 36, 775–780.Lagut<strong>in</strong>a I, Lazzari G, Duchi R, Colleoni S, Ponderato N,Tur<strong>in</strong>i P, Crotti G, Galli C., 2005: Somatic cell nucleartransfer <strong>in</strong> horses: effect of oocyte morphology, embryoreconstruction method and donor cell type. <strong>Reproduction</strong>130, 559–567.Lagut<strong>in</strong>a I, Lazzari G, Galli C, 2006: Birth of cloned pigs fromzona-free nuclear transfer blastocysts developed <strong>in</strong> vitrobefore transfer. Clon<strong>in</strong>g Stem Cells 8, 283–293.Lazzari G, Galli C, Moor RM, 1992: Centrifugal elutriation ofporc<strong>in</strong>e oocytes isolated from the ovaries of newborn piglets.Anal Biochem 200, 31–35.Lazzari G, Wrenzycki C, Herrmann D, Duchi R, Kruip T,Niemann H, Galli C, 2002: Cellular and molecular deviations<strong>in</strong> bov<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong> vitro-produced embryos are related to thelarge offspr<strong>in</strong>g syndrome. Biol Reprod 67, 767–775.Lazzari G, Colleoni S, Giannelli SG, Brunetti D, Colombo E,Lagut<strong>in</strong>a I, Galli C, Broccoli V, 2006: Direct derivation ofneural rosettes from cloned bov<strong>in</strong>e blastocysts: a model ofearly neurulation events and neural crest specification <strong>in</strong>vitro. Stem Cells 24, 2514–2521.Ó 2008 The Authors. Journal compilation Ó 2008 Blackwell Verlag
Embryo Biotechnologies <strong>in</strong> Farm <strong>Animals</strong> 7Lombardo A, Genovese P, Beausejour CM, Colleoni S, LeeYL, Kim KA, Ando D, Urnov FD, Galli C, Gregory PD,Holmes MC, Nald<strong>in</strong>i L, 2007: Gene edit<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> human stemcells us<strong>in</strong>g z<strong>in</strong>c f<strong>in</strong>ger nucleases and <strong>in</strong>tegrase-defectivelentiviral vector delivery. Nat Biotechnol 25, 1298–1306.Lonergan P, Fair T, 2008: In vitro-produced bov<strong>in</strong>e embryos:deal<strong>in</strong>g with the warts. Theriogenology 69, 17–22.Lu K, Polge C, 1992: A summary of two-year’s results <strong>in</strong> largescale <strong>in</strong> vitro bov<strong>in</strong>e embryo production. Proceed<strong>in</strong>gs of the12th International Congress on Animal <strong>Reproduction</strong>, TheHague, pp. 1315–1317.Meirow D, Levron J, Eldar-Geva T, Hardan I, Fridman E,Yem<strong>in</strong>i Z, Dor J, 2007: Monitor<strong>in</strong>g the ovaries afterautotransplantation of cryopreserved ovarian tissue: endocr<strong>in</strong>estudies, <strong>in</strong> vitro fertilization cycles, and live birth. FertilSteril 87, 418 e417–418 e415.Miyano T, Manabe N, 2007: Oocyte growth and acquisition ofmeiotic competence. Soc Reprod Fertil Suppl 63, 531–538.Moor RM, Trounson AO, 1977: Hormonal and follicularfactors affect<strong>in</strong>g maturation of sheep oocytes <strong>in</strong> vitro andtheir subsequent developmental capacity. J Reprod Fertil49, 101–109.Moor RM, Osborn JC, Cran DG, Walters DE, 1981: Selectiveeffect of gonadotroph<strong>in</strong>s on cell coupl<strong>in</strong>g, nuclear maturationand prote<strong>in</strong> synthesis <strong>in</strong> mammalian oocytes. J EmbryolExp Morphol 61, 347–365.Moor RM, Mattioli M, D<strong>in</strong>g J, Nagai T, 1990: Maturation ofpig oocytes <strong>in</strong> vivo and <strong>in</strong> vitro. J Reprod Fertil Suppl 40,197–210.Notarianni E, Galli C, Laurie S, Moor RM, Evans MJ, 1991:Derivation of pluripotent, embryonic cell l<strong>in</strong>es from the pigand sheep. J Reprod Fertil Suppl 43, 255–260.Ogawa K, Saito A, Matsui H, Suzuki H, Ohtsuka S,Shimosato D, Morishita Y, Watabe T, Niwa H, MiyazonoK, 2007: Activ<strong>in</strong>-Nodal signal<strong>in</strong>g is <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> propagationof mouse embryonic stem cells. J Cell Sci 120, 55–65.Palermo G, Joris H, Devroey P, Van Steirteghem AC, 1992:Pregnancies after <strong>in</strong>tracytoplasmic <strong>in</strong>jection of s<strong>in</strong>gle spermatozoon<strong>in</strong>to an oocyte. Lancet 340, 17–18.Palmer E, Bezard J, Magistr<strong>in</strong>i M, Duchamp G, 1991: In vitrofertilization <strong>in</strong> the horse. A retrospective study. J ReprodFertil Suppl 44, 375–384.Parrish JJ, Susko-Parrish JL, Leibfried-Rutledge ML, CritserES, Eyestone WH, First NL, 1986: Bov<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong> vitro fertilizationwith frozen-thawed semen. Theriogenology 25, 591–600.Pieterse MC, Vos PL, Kruip TA, Wurth YA, van Beneden TH,Willemse AH, Taverne MA, 1991: Transvag<strong>in</strong>al ultrasoundguided follicular aspiration of bov<strong>in</strong>e oocytes. Theriogenology35, 857–862.Ponderato N, Lagut<strong>in</strong>a I, Crotti G, Tur<strong>in</strong>i P, Galli C, LazzariG, 2001: Bov<strong>in</strong>e oocytes treated prior to <strong>in</strong> vitro maturationwith a comb<strong>in</strong>ation of butyrolactone I and roscovit<strong>in</strong>e atlow doses ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong> a normal developmental capacity. MolReprod Dev 60, 579–585.Ponderato N, Crotti G, Tur<strong>in</strong>i P, Duchi R, Galli C, Lazzari G,2002: Embryonic and foetal development of bov<strong>in</strong>e oocytestreated with a comb<strong>in</strong>ation of butyrolactone I and roscovit<strong>in</strong>e<strong>in</strong> an enriched medium prior to IVM and IVF. MolReprod Dev 62, 513–518.Roy SK, Greenwald GS, 1985: An enzymatic method fordissociation of <strong>in</strong>tact follicles from the hamster ovary:histological and quantitative aspects. Biol Reprod 32, 203–215.Sasaki H, Matsui Y, 2008: Epigenetic events <strong>in</strong> mammaliangerm-cell development: reprogramm<strong>in</strong>g and beyond. NatRev Genet 9, 129–140.Seidel GE Jr, 2003: Sex<strong>in</strong>g mammalian sperm – <strong>in</strong>tertw<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g ofcommerce, technology, and biology. Anim Reprod Sci 79,145–156.Staigmiller R, Moor R, 1984: Effect of follicle cells on thematuration and developmental competence of ov<strong>in</strong>e oocytesmatured outside the follicle. Gamete Res 9, 221–229.Takahashi K, Yamanaka S, 2006: Induction of pluripotentstem cells from mouse embryonic and adult fibroblastcultures by def<strong>in</strong>ed factors. Cell 126, 663–676.Tervit HR, Whitt<strong>in</strong>gham DG, Rowson LE, 1972: Successfulculture <strong>in</strong> vitro of sheep and cattle ova. J Reprod Fertil 30,493–497.Tesar PJ, Chenoweth JG, Brook FA, Davies TJ, Evans EP,Mack DL, Gardner RL, McKay RD, 2007: New cell l<strong>in</strong>esfrom mouse epiblast share def<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g features with humanembryonic stem cells. Nature 448, 196–199.Vallier L, Alexander M, Pedersen RA, 2005: Activ<strong>in</strong> ⁄ Nodaland FGF pathways cooperate to ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong> pluripotency ofhuman embryonic stem cells. J Cell Sci 118, 4495–4509.van Wagtendonk-de Leeuw AM, Mullaart E, de Roos AP,Merton JS, den Daas JH, Kemp B, de Ruigh L, 2000: Effectsof different reproduction techniques: AI MOET or IVP, onhealth and welfare of bov<strong>in</strong>e offspr<strong>in</strong>g. Theriogenology 53,575–597.Wakayama T, Tabar V, Rodriguez I, Perry AC, Studer L,Mombaerts P, 2001: Differentiation of embryonic stem celll<strong>in</strong>es generated from adult somatic cells by nuclear transfer.Science 292, 740–743.Wall RJ, Powell AM, Paape MJ, Kerr DE, Bannerman DD,Pursel VG, Wells KD, Talbot N, Hawk HW, 2005:Genetically enhanced cows resist <strong>in</strong>tramammary Staphylococcusaureus <strong>in</strong>fection. Nat Biotechnol 23, 445–451.Willadsen SM, 1986: Nuclear transplantation <strong>in</strong> sheepembryos. Nature 320, 63–65.Wilmut I, Schnieke AE, McWhir J, K<strong>in</strong>d AJ, Campbell KH,1997: Viable offspr<strong>in</strong>g derived from fetal and adult mammaliancells. Nature 385, 810–813.Xu KP, Greve T, Callesen H, Hyttel P, 1987: Pregnancyresult<strong>in</strong>g from cattle oocytes matured and fertilized <strong>in</strong> vitro.J Reprod Fertil 81, 501–504.Yanagimachi R, Chang MC, 1964: In Vitro fertilization ofGolden Hamster Ova. J Exp Zool 156, 361–375.Y<strong>in</strong>g QL, Nichols J, Chambers I, Smith A, 2003a: BMP<strong>in</strong>duction of Id prote<strong>in</strong>s suppresses differentiation andsusta<strong>in</strong>s embryonic stem cell self-renewal <strong>in</strong> collaborationwith STAT3. Cell 115, 281–292.Y<strong>in</strong>g QL, Stavridis M, Griffiths D, Li M, Smith A, 2003b:Conversion of embryonic stem cells <strong>in</strong>to neuroectodermalprecursors <strong>in</strong> adherent monoculture. Nat Biotechnol 21,183–186.Young LE, S<strong>in</strong>clair KD, Wilmut I, 1998: Large offspr<strong>in</strong>gsyndrome <strong>in</strong> cattle and sheep. Rev Reprod 3, 155–163.Zhang JJ, Boyle MS, Allen WR, Galli C, 1989: Recent studieson <strong>in</strong> vivo fertilization of <strong>in</strong> vitro matured horse oocytes.Equ<strong>in</strong>e Veter<strong>in</strong> J 8, 101–104.Author’s address (for correspondence): C Galli, Laboratorio diTecnologie della, Riproduzione, Via Porcellasco 7 ⁄ f, 26100 Cremona,Italy. E-mail: cesaregalli@ltrciz.itConflict of <strong>in</strong>terest: All authors declare no conflict of <strong>in</strong>terests.Ó 2008 The Authors. Journal compilation Ó 2008 Blackwell Verlag
- Page 2 and 3: Reproduction in Domestic AnimalsOff
- Page 5 and 6: Reproductionin Domestic AnimalsTabl
- Page 7 and 8: Minitüb:ProductsforArtificial Inse
- Page 9 and 10: Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 1-7
- Page 11 and 12: Embryo Biotechnologies in Farm Anim
- Page 13: Embryo Biotechnologies in Farm Anim
- Page 17 and 18: Ethical Models for Studying Reprodu
- Page 19 and 20: Ethical Models for Studying Reprodu
- Page 21 and 22: Ethical Models for Studying Reprodu
- Page 23 and 24: Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 15-2
- Page 25 and 26: Dietary Pollutants as Risk Factors
- Page 27 and 28: Dietary Pollutants as Risk Factors
- Page 29 and 30: Dietary Pollutants as Risk Factors
- Page 31 and 32: Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Supp. 2), 23-30
- Page 33 and 34: Factors Influencing Reproduction in
- Page 35 and 36: Factors Influencing Reproduction in
- Page 37 and 38: Factors Influencing Reproduction in
- Page 39 and 40: Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 31-3
- Page 41 and 42: GH and IGF-I in Cattle and Pigs 33h
- Page 43 and 44: GH and IGF-I in Cattle and Pigs 35h
- Page 45 and 46: GH and IGF-I in Cattle and Pigs 37B
- Page 47: GH and IGF-I in Cattle and Pigs 39R
- Page 51 and 52: Seasonality of Reproduction in Mamm
- Page 53 and 54: Seasonality of Reproduction in Mamm
- Page 55 and 56: Seasonality of Reproduction in Mamm
- Page 57 and 58: Dominant Follicle Selection in Cows
- Page 59 and 60: Dominant Follicle Selection in Cows
- Page 61 and 62: Dominant Follicle Selection in Cows
- Page 63 and 64: Dominant Follicle Selection in Cows
- Page 65 and 66:
Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 57-6
- Page 67 and 68:
Regulation of Luteal Function 59and
- Page 69 and 70:
Regulation of Luteal Function 61bov
- Page 71 and 72:
Regulation of Luteal Function 63(+/
- Page 73 and 74:
Regulation of Luteal Function 65sys
- Page 75 and 76:
Captive Breeding of Cheetahs in Sou
- Page 77 and 78:
Captive Breeding of Cheetahs in Sou
- Page 79 and 80:
Captive Breeding of Cheetahs in Sou
- Page 81 and 82:
Captive Breeding of Cheetahs in Sou
- Page 83 and 84:
Non-invasive Monitoring of Hormones
- Page 85 and 86:
Non-invasive Monitoring of Hormones
- Page 87 and 88:
Non-invasive Monitoring of Hormones
- Page 89 and 90:
Non-invasive Monitoring of Hormones
- Page 91 and 92:
Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 83-8
- Page 93 and 94:
Biotechnology Methods for Preservin
- Page 95 and 96:
Biotechnology Methods for Preservin
- Page 97 and 98:
Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 89-9
- Page 99 and 100:
Genetic Improvement of Dairy Cow Re
- Page 101 and 102:
Genetic Improvement of Dairy Cow Re
- Page 103 and 104:
Genetic Improvement of Dairy Cow Re
- Page 105 and 106:
Nutrient Prioritization and Fertili
- Page 107 and 108:
Nutrient Prioritization and Fertili
- Page 109 and 110:
Nutrient Prioritization and Fertili
- Page 111 and 112:
Nutrient Prioritization and Fertili
- Page 113 and 114:
CL-Endometrium-Embryo Interactions
- Page 115 and 116:
CL-Endometrium-Embryo Interactions
- Page 117 and 118:
CL-Endometrium-Embryo Interactions
- Page 119 and 120:
CL-Endometrium-Embryo Interactions
- Page 121 and 122:
Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 113-
- Page 123 and 124:
Reproductive Status Assessed by Mil
- Page 125 and 126:
Reproductive Status Assessed by Mil
- Page 127 and 128:
Reproductive Status Assessed by Mil
- Page 129 and 130:
Reproductive Status Assessed by Mil
- Page 131 and 132:
Genetic Aspects of Reproduction in
- Page 133 and 134:
Genetic Aspects of Reproduction in
- Page 135 and 136:
Genetic Aspects of Reproduction in
- Page 137 and 138:
Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 129-
- Page 139 and 140:
Nutritional Interactions and Reprod
- Page 141 and 142:
Nutritional Interactions and Reprod
- Page 143 and 144:
Nutritional Interactions and Reprod
- Page 145 and 146:
Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 137-
- Page 147 and 148:
Developmental Capabilities of Prepu
- Page 149 and 150:
Developmental Capabilities of Prepu
- Page 151 and 152:
Developmental Capabilities of Prepu
- Page 153 and 154:
Reproductive Physiology, Pathology
- Page 155 and 156:
Reproductive Physiology, Pathology
- Page 157 and 158:
Reproductive Physiology, Pathology
- Page 159 and 160:
Reproduction of Domestic Ferret 151
- Page 161 and 162:
Reproduction of Domestic Ferret 153
- Page 163 and 164:
Reproduction of Domestic Ferret 155
- Page 165 and 166:
Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 157-
- Page 167 and 168:
Canine Anoestrus, Oestrous Inductio
- Page 169 and 170:
Canine Anoestrus, Oestrous Inductio
- Page 171 and 172:
Canine Anoestrus, Oestrous Inductio
- Page 173 and 174:
Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 165-
- Page 175 and 176:
The Ethics and Role of AI in Dogs 1
- Page 177 and 178:
The Ethics and Role of AI in Dogs 1
- Page 179 and 180:
The Ethics and Role of AI in Dogs 1
- Page 181 and 182:
Control of Fertility in Females by
- Page 183 and 184:
Control of Fertility in Females by
- Page 185 and 186:
Control of Fertility in Females by
- Page 187 and 188:
Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 179-
- Page 189 and 190:
Controlling Animal Populations Usin
- Page 191 and 192:
Controlling Animal Populations Usin
- Page 193 and 194:
Controlling Animal Populations Usin
- Page 195 and 196:
Recombinant Gonadotropins in Assist
- Page 197 and 198:
Recombinant Gonadotropins in Assist
- Page 199 and 200:
Recombinant Gonadotropins in Assist
- Page 201 and 202:
Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 193-
- Page 203 and 204:
Farm Animals Embryonic Stem Cells 1
- Page 205 and 206:
Farm Animals Embryonic Stem Cells 1
- Page 207 and 208:
Farm Animals Embryonic Stem Cells 1
- Page 209 and 210:
Reproduction in Domestic Buffalo 20
- Page 211 and 212:
Reproduction in Domestic Buffalo 20
- Page 213 and 214:
Reproduction in Domestic Buffalo 20
- Page 215 and 216:
Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 207-
- Page 217 and 218:
Postpartum Ovarian Activity in Sout
- Page 219 and 220:
Postpartum Ovarian Activity in Sout
- Page 221 and 222:
Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 213-
- Page 223 and 224:
Mother-Offspring Interactions 215an
- Page 225 and 226:
Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 217-
- Page 227 and 228:
Reproduction Augmentation in Yak an
- Page 229 and 230:
Reproduction Augmentation in Yak an
- Page 231 and 232:
Reproduction Augmentation in Yak an
- Page 233 and 234:
Follicles and Mares 2251982). Simil
- Page 235 and 236:
Follicles and Mares 227Studies invo
- Page 237 and 238:
Follicles and Mares 229dominant fol
- Page 239 and 240:
Follicles and Mares 231trus, spring
- Page 241 and 242:
Proteins in Early Equine Conceptuse
- Page 243 and 244:
Proteins in Early Equine Conceptuse
- Page 245 and 246:
Proteins in Early Equine Conceptuse
- Page 247 and 248:
Follicular and Oocyte Competence un
- Page 249 and 250:
Follicular and Oocyte Competence un
- Page 251 and 252:
Follicular and Oocyte Competence un
- Page 253 and 254:
Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 245-
- Page 255 and 256:
Fertilization in the Porcine Fallop
- Page 257 and 258:
Fertilization in the Porcine Fallop
- Page 259 and 260:
Fertilization in the Porcine Fallop
- Page 261 and 262:
Mastitis in Post-Partum Dairy Cows
- Page 263 and 264:
Mastitis in Post-Partum Dairy Cows
- Page 265 and 266:
Mastitis in Post-Partum Dairy Cows
- Page 267 and 268:
Mastitis in Post-Partum Dairy Cows
- Page 269 and 270:
Embryo ⁄ Foetal Losses in Ruminan
- Page 271 and 272:
Embryo ⁄ Foetal Losses in Ruminan
- Page 273 and 274:
Embryo ⁄ Foetal Losses in Ruminan
- Page 275 and 276:
Embryo ⁄ Foetal Losses in Ruminan
- Page 277 and 278:
Death Ligand and Receptor Pig Ovari
- Page 279 and 280:
Death Ligand and Receptor Pig Ovari
- Page 281 and 282:
Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 273-
- Page 283:
Lactocrine Programming of Uterine D
- Page 286 and 287:
278 FF Bartol, AA Wiley and CA Bagn
- Page 288 and 289:
Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 280-
- Page 290 and 291:
282 KC Caires, JA Schmidt, AP Olive
- Page 292 and 293:
284 KC Caires, JA Schmidt, AP Olive
- Page 294 and 295:
286 KC Caires, JA Schmidt, AP Olive
- Page 296 and 297:
Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 288-
- Page 298 and 299:
290 I Dobrinskisuccessful also betw
- Page 300 and 301:
292 I DobrinskiCreemers LB, Meng X,
- Page 302 and 303:
294 I DobrinskiOkutsu T, Suzuki K,
- Page 304 and 305:
296 N Rawlings, ACO Evans, RK Chand
- Page 306 and 307:
298 N Rawlings, ACO Evans, RK Chand
- Page 308 and 309:
300 N Rawlings, ACO Evans, RK Chand
- Page 310 and 311:
Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 302-
- Page 312 and 313:
304 A Dinnyes, XC Tian and X Yanggr
- Page 314 and 315:
306 A Dinnyes, XC Tian and X YangIn
- Page 316 and 317:
308 A Dinnyes, XC Tian and X YangHo
- Page 318 and 319:
Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 310-
- Page 320 and 321:
312 RC Bott, DT Clopton and AS Cupp
- Page 322 and 323:
314 RC Bott, DT Clopton and AS Cupp
- Page 324 and 325:
316 RC Bott, DT Clopton and AS Cupp
- Page 326 and 327:
318 BK Whitlock, JA Daniel, RR Wilb
- Page 328 and 329:
320 BK Whitlock, JA Daniel, RR Wilb
- Page 330 and 331:
322 BK Whitlock, JA Daniel, RR Wilb
- Page 332 and 333:
Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 324-
- Page 334 and 335:
326 CR Barb, GJ Hausman and CA Lent
- Page 336 and 337:
328 CR Barb, GJ Hausman and CA Lent
- Page 338 and 339:
330 CR Barb, GJ Hausman and CA Lent
- Page 340 and 341:
332 C Galli, I Lagutina, R Duchi, S
- Page 342 and 343:
334 C Galli, I Lagutina, R Duchi, S
- Page 344 and 345:
336 C Galli, I Lagutina, R Duchi, S
- Page 346 and 347:
Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 338-
- Page 348 and 349:
340 D Rath and LA JohnsonCommercial
- Page 350 and 351:
342 D Rath and LA JohnsonThe Commer
- Page 352 and 353:
344 D Rath and LA JohnsonX- and Y-b
- Page 354 and 355:
346 D Rath and LA JohnsonWalker SK,
- Page 356 and 357:
348 JM Vazquez, J Roca, MA Gil, C C
- Page 358 and 359:
350 JM Vazquez, J Roca, MA Gil, C C
- Page 360 and 361:
352 JM Vazquez, J Roca, MA Gil, C C
- Page 362 and 363:
354 JM Vazquez, J Roca, MA Gil, C C
- Page 364 and 365:
356 CBA Whitelaw, SG Lillico and T
- Page 366 and 367:
358 CBA Whitelaw, SG Lillico and T
- Page 368 and 369:
360 ACO Evans, N Forde, GM O’Gorm
- Page 370 and 371:
362 ACO Evans, N Forde, GM O’Gorm
- Page 372 and 373:
364 ACO Evans, N Forde, GM O’Gorm
- Page 374 and 375:
366 ACO Evans, N Forde, GM O’Gorm
- Page 376 and 377:
Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 368-
- Page 378 and 379:
370 JP Kastelic and JC Thundathilsp
- Page 380 and 381:
372 JP Kastelic and JC Thundathilme
- Page 382 and 383:
Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 374-
- Page 384 and 385:
376 GC AlthouseTable 1. Potential s
- Page 386 and 387:
378 GC Althousesemen to the domesti
- Page 388 and 389:
380 B Leboeuf, JA Delgadillo, E Man
- Page 390 and 391:
382 B Leboeuf, JA Delgadillo, E Man
- Page 392 and 393:
384 B Leboeuf, JA Delgadillo, E Man
- Page 394 and 395:
Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 386-
- Page 396 and 397:
388 N Kostereva and M-C HofmannFig.
- Page 398 and 399:
390 N Kostereva and M-C HofmannMMPs
- Page 400 and 401:
392 N Kostereva and M-C HofmannTado
- Page 402 and 403:
394 P Mermillod, R Dalbie` s-Tran,
- Page 404 and 405:
396 P Mermillod, R Dalbie` s-Tran,
- Page 406 and 407:
398 P Mermillod, R Dalbie` s-Tran,
- Page 408 and 409:
400 P Mermillod, R Dalbie` s-Tran,
- Page 410 and 411:
402 K Kikuchi, N Kashiwazaki, T Nag
- Page 412 and 413:
404 K Kikuchi, N Kashiwazaki, T Nag
- Page 414 and 415:
406 K Kikuchi, N Kashiwazaki, T Nag
- Page 416 and 417:
408 B ObackNumber of publications20
- Page 418 and 419:
410 B ObackReprogramming Ability of
- Page 420 and 421:
412 B Obackstudies have shown that
- Page 422 and 423:
414 B ObackFig. 4. Climbing mount e
- Page 424 and 425:
416 B ObackRenard JP, Maruotti J, J
- Page 426 and 427:
418 P Loi, K Matzukawa, G Ptak, Y N
- Page 428 and 429:
420 P Loi, K Matzukawa, G Ptak, Y N
- Page 430 and 431:
422 P Loi, K Matzukawa, G Ptak, Y N
- Page 434:
Table of Contents Volume 43 · Supp