12.07.2015 Views

Reproduction in Domestic Animals

Reproduction in Domestic Animals

Reproduction in Domestic Animals

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

18 SM Rh<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gestion’ for these may be very different from that ofadults, e.g. mammalian foetuses are nourished viamaternal blood and develop<strong>in</strong>g birds by egg yolk andwhile young mammals consume milk, adults eat animalor plant material. Similarly, larval stages of <strong>in</strong>sects andother <strong>in</strong>vertebrates may have very different diets toadults. In addition to differences <strong>in</strong> food source,differences <strong>in</strong> metabolism with age mean that it isunwise to extrapolate from effects of exposure <strong>in</strong> adultsto those <strong>in</strong> immature animals, because the relationshipbetween the amounts of pollutants ‘<strong>in</strong>gested’ at thedifferent stages and the respective tissue concentrationsmay differ with differences <strong>in</strong> metabolism. Furthermore,<strong>in</strong>direct measures of exposure of immature animals topollutants, for example, through measurements <strong>in</strong>mammalian milk or umbilical cord blood may be ofless value than tissue concentrations <strong>in</strong> the foetus ⁄ immatureanimal for the prediction of physiological effectss<strong>in</strong>ce the former does not take account of effects ofmetabolism and excretion <strong>in</strong> the offspr<strong>in</strong>g.While concentrations of pollutants <strong>in</strong> human (Dekon<strong>in</strong>gand Karmaus 2000; Darnerud et al. 2001) andsheep milk (Rh<strong>in</strong>d et al. 2007b), and human umbilicalcord blood, amniotic fluid and meconium (Dallaireet al. 2003; Barr et al. 2007) have been measured, thereare relatively few reports of foetal tissue concentrations(Bosse et al. 1996; Dekon<strong>in</strong>g and Karmaus 2000) <strong>in</strong> anyspecies and so direct assessment of risk to the foetus isnot possible. Concentrations of PTMs (Rh<strong>in</strong>d 2005) andseveral PCBs and PBDEs (Rh<strong>in</strong>d et al. 2007a) have beenshown to be lower <strong>in</strong> fetal sheep than <strong>in</strong> the correspond<strong>in</strong>gmaternal tissue but <strong>in</strong>dividual concentrationsdiffer greatly with congener (PCB < 20 ng ⁄ kg to3.8 lg ⁄ kg; PBDE < 20 ng ⁄ kg to 30 lg ⁄ kg liver drymatter), as does the relationship between adult andfoetal levels. Schecter et al. (2007) provided the firstreport of PBDE levels <strong>in</strong> human foetuses; mean totalPBDE concentrations were 23 ng ⁄ kg lipid.Interest<strong>in</strong>gly, sheep maternal and foetal concentrationsof neither PTMs (Rh<strong>in</strong>d et al. 2005a) nor PCBsand PBDEs (SM Rh<strong>in</strong>d, unpublished observations) weresignificantly correlated. However, related studies havealso shown that very small <strong>in</strong>creases <strong>in</strong> maternalexposure to pastures fertilized with sewage sludge whichconta<strong>in</strong>s multiple pollutants, result <strong>in</strong> changes <strong>in</strong> structureand function of the foetal testis (Paul et al. 2005)and ovary (Fowler et al. 2008). Collectively, theseobservations show that the relationships between pollutantexposure and effect are highly complex, that foetalexposure cannot be extrapolated from adult profiles,and that small <strong>in</strong>creases <strong>in</strong> exposure to multiple pollutantscan adversely affect foetal reproductive development.Immediately after birth, the ma<strong>in</strong> source of nutrient <strong>in</strong>mammals is milk. The transfer of PTMs to the offspr<strong>in</strong>gthrough milk is probably relatively unimportant (Wilk<strong>in</strong>sonet al. 2003) but exposure to lipophilic organicpollutants through milk may be significant, particularly<strong>in</strong> species such as mar<strong>in</strong>e mammals which have a highmilk fat content (Du<strong>in</strong>ker and Hillebrand 1979). On theother hand, studies compar<strong>in</strong>g milk concentrations atearly and late stages of lactation <strong>in</strong> sheep (periods of fatmobilization and deposition respectively) <strong>in</strong>dicate thatmilk concentrations of phthalate and alkyl phenol arenot elevated by <strong>in</strong>creased maternal fat mobilizationdur<strong>in</strong>g early lactation (Rh<strong>in</strong>d et al. 2007b) suggest<strong>in</strong>gthat maternal fat may not be a significant contributor toneonatal pollutant exposure <strong>in</strong> this species.Food-related exposureWhile food is generally regarded as the major source ofexposure <strong>in</strong> vertebrates, <strong>in</strong> some circumstances foodrelatedroutes may also be important. There is a risk forall species (vertebrate and <strong>in</strong>vertebrate) of exposure tocontam<strong>in</strong>ated water or air as a result of the processes offood acquisition and <strong>in</strong>gestion. For example, dairy cowsdr<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g from canals <strong>in</strong> The Netherlands which arecontam<strong>in</strong>ated with sewage, and therefore a cocktail ofpollutants, have been shown to have reduced reproductiveefficiency and lower milk production (Meijer et al.1999). Most of the pollutants that are likely to bepresent <strong>in</strong> food are relatively <strong>in</strong>soluble <strong>in</strong> water and soare not normally <strong>in</strong>gested with dr<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g water. However,if bound to suspended solids <strong>in</strong> the water, suchpollutants could be <strong>in</strong>gested. In addition, these pollutantsmay <strong>in</strong>teract with steroids from the contraceptivepill and alkyl phenols which are typically present <strong>in</strong> theaqueous component of sewage (Institute for Environmentand Health 1999; Bowman et al. 2003).Similarly, surface application of sewage sludge topastures has been shown to be associated with compromisedfoetal testis and ovary development (Paul et al.2005; Fowler et al. 2008). S<strong>in</strong>ce systemic uptake ofpollutants by plants is very limited (Wild and Jones1992), it is likely that the associated exposure topollutants results from <strong>in</strong>gestion of soil along with theherbage, particularly when the herbage mass is small (upto 30% of dry matter <strong>in</strong>take of sheep may be soil;Thornton and Abrahams 1983), as a result of surfacecontam<strong>in</strong>ation of the herbage with soil particles.In specific circumstances, air-borne pollutants l<strong>in</strong>kedto the food source could, at least theoretically, contributeto the body burden of pollutants, e.g. domesticanimals may <strong>in</strong>hale additional pollutants when graz<strong>in</strong>gpastures fertilized with sewage sludge, ow<strong>in</strong>g to theretention of volatilized chemicals with<strong>in</strong> the sward.Concentrations of many pollutant classes <strong>in</strong> normal airare measurable (David and Sandra 2001; U.S. CentralPollution Control Board Newsletter 2001; Lee et al.2004) and there is evidence that urban air-bornepollution can cause DNA damage <strong>in</strong> humans (Whyattet al. 1998). Thus, the potential for additional exposures,result<strong>in</strong>g from the process of acquir<strong>in</strong>g food,should be taken <strong>in</strong>to account.Age-related effectsThe degree of pollutant accumulation through fooddepends on animal age not only because of the differenceswith age <strong>in</strong> diet type but also because olderanimals may be exposed to pollutants for longer and, asshown <strong>in</strong> some species of fish, may accumulate more(Darnerud et al. 2001). Furthermore, it has been shownthat when exposure is prolonged, low, and apparentlyharmless, pollutant concentrations can exert biologicalÓ 2008 Macaulay Land Use Research Institute

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!