12.07.2015 Views

Reproduction in Domestic Animals

Reproduction in Domestic Animals

Reproduction in Domestic Animals

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

34 MC Lucybe 18–21 days (North American systems) or closer to28 days (European systems). After wean<strong>in</strong>g, sows arereturned to a lower level of <strong>in</strong>take (approximately onehalfto one-third of their lactation ration).The preced<strong>in</strong>g paragraph illustrates the complexity ofthe question when an attempt is made to understand theimpact of nutrition on the somatotropic axis <strong>in</strong> alactat<strong>in</strong>g sow. Feed<strong>in</strong>g and management practices havea major effect on the outcomes of studies of metabolichormones. It is necessary to exam<strong>in</strong>e managementdetails carefully when <strong>in</strong>spect<strong>in</strong>g the scientific literatureon the somatotropic axis <strong>in</strong> sows.Growth hormone, IGF-I and <strong>in</strong>sul<strong>in</strong>Few studies have exam<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong>tensively the concentrationsof GH, IGF-I, IGFBP and <strong>in</strong>sul<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong> the sowdur<strong>in</strong>g lactation. There is an <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> blood GHconcentrations after farrow<strong>in</strong>g (Schams et al. 1994;Mejia-Guadarrama et al. 2002; Govoni et al. 2007).The <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> blood GH is associated with an <strong>in</strong>crease<strong>in</strong> blood NEFA concentrations dur<strong>in</strong>g lactation. The<strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> NEFA implies that GH is mediat<strong>in</strong>g lipidcatabolism dur<strong>in</strong>g lactation. The <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> GH dur<strong>in</strong>glactation is caused partly by the suckl<strong>in</strong>g stimulus fromthe piglets (Rushen et al. 1993). The suckl<strong>in</strong>g-<strong>in</strong>ducedGH release expla<strong>in</strong>s why a relatively high blood GHconcentration is susta<strong>in</strong>ed throughout lactation even <strong>in</strong>well-fed sows. With regard to GH, the lactat<strong>in</strong>g sow issimilar to the lactat<strong>in</strong>g dairy cow because both specieshave elevated GH dur<strong>in</strong>g lactation. The causes ofelevated GH may be different (lactat<strong>in</strong>g dairy cows arenot suckled) but they may also share some commonmechanisms because catabolic states typically elevateGH.One apparent difference between cows and sows<strong>in</strong>volves the recoupl<strong>in</strong>g of the somatotropic axis postpartum(Fig. 1). Post-partum sows have elevated IGF-Iafter farrow<strong>in</strong>g (Schams et al. 1994; Govoni et al. 2007)and this endocr<strong>in</strong>e state suggests that the <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> GHafter farrow<strong>in</strong>g can stimulate the liver to synthesize andsecrete IGF-I. In the dairy cow there is a large decrease<strong>in</strong> IGF-I after calv<strong>in</strong>g that is associated with anuncoupl<strong>in</strong>g of the somatotropic axis (Radcliff et al.2003a; b). Little is known about changes <strong>in</strong> IGF-I <strong>in</strong>beef cattle around calv<strong>in</strong>g but there appears to be atleast some reduction <strong>in</strong> IGF-I on day 3 post-partumrelative to day 6 post-partum (Lake et al. 2006).There are discrepancies with respect to <strong>in</strong>sul<strong>in</strong> concentrations<strong>in</strong> lactat<strong>in</strong>g sows. Some studies reportgreater <strong>in</strong>sul<strong>in</strong> concentrations <strong>in</strong> sows after farrow<strong>in</strong>g(Guedes and Nogueira 2001), whereas others reportlower <strong>in</strong>sul<strong>in</strong> concentrations after farrow<strong>in</strong>g (Revellet al. 1998). The latter case (lower <strong>in</strong>sul<strong>in</strong>) is similar towhat is reported for cattle after calv<strong>in</strong>g and this lower<strong>in</strong>sul<strong>in</strong> appears to be a consequence of metabolic glucoseconsumption dur<strong>in</strong>g lactation. Sows may become <strong>in</strong>sul<strong>in</strong>-resistantdur<strong>in</strong>g lactation (Quesnel et al. 2007).Sows fed more energy have greater blood IGF-I postpartum(de Braganca and Prunier 1999; van den Brandet al. 2001). The <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> IGF-I post-partum may bepartly expla<strong>in</strong>ed by the fact that gestat<strong>in</strong>g sows are fedma<strong>in</strong>tenance diets dur<strong>in</strong>g late pregnancy. In the gestat<strong>in</strong>gsow, therefore, feed<strong>in</strong>g level may limit liver IGF-Iproduction. The comb<strong>in</strong>ation of elevated GH andad libitum feed<strong>in</strong>g after farrow<strong>in</strong>g drives the somatotropicaxis and <strong>in</strong>creases liver IGF-I production. The<strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> IGF-I may be a consequence of elevated GHbut also may arise from feed-dependent mechanismssuch as greater liver GHR concentration, an enhancedcapacity for GH to signal through the GHR orGH-<strong>in</strong>dependent mechanism through which feed<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>creases IGF-I.Dur<strong>in</strong>g lactation, IGF-I concentration may rema<strong>in</strong>high (well-fed sows) or may decrease over time (underfedsows) (van den Brand et al. 2001). Presumably, <strong>in</strong>the underfed sow, IGF-I concentrations decrease dur<strong>in</strong>glactation because the somatotropic axis becomes uncoupled.The uncoupl<strong>in</strong>g may occur <strong>in</strong> the second and thirdweek of lactation when litter milk consumption and sowmilk production are greater (Noblet and Etienne 1989).The sow enters <strong>in</strong>to negative energy balance because sheFig. 1. Conceptual diagram for changes <strong>in</strong> blood GH, blood IGF-I and liver GHR after parturition (P; farrow<strong>in</strong>g or calv<strong>in</strong>g) <strong>in</strong> sows (leftdiagram) and dairy cows (right diagram). In sows, the somatotropic axis rema<strong>in</strong>s coupled after farrow<strong>in</strong>g and GH concentrations <strong>in</strong>creasebecause of suckl<strong>in</strong>g. This leads to elevated GH and IGF-I dur<strong>in</strong>g lactation. Dur<strong>in</strong>g the latter half of lactation, the somatotropic axis becomesuncoupled perhaps because there is negative energy balance and the amount of GHR <strong>in</strong> liver is less. Wean<strong>in</strong>g (W) causes a decrease <strong>in</strong> GH andIGF-I. The blood IGF-I concentration <strong>in</strong>crease after wean<strong>in</strong>g as the sow approaches breed<strong>in</strong>g (B). In dairy cows, the liver GHR decreases aftercalv<strong>in</strong>g and this causes uncoupl<strong>in</strong>g of the somatotropic axis. Loss of the GHR leads to a decrease <strong>in</strong> blood IGF-I. The decrease <strong>in</strong> blood IGF-Imay alleviate GH negative feedback and cause elevated GH <strong>in</strong> early lactation. Improved energy balance and <strong>in</strong>sul<strong>in</strong> may <strong>in</strong>crease the GHR andIGF-I and reduce GH concentrations as cows approach the breed<strong>in</strong>g period (B).Ó 2008 The Author. Journal compilation Ó 2008 Blackwell Verlag

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!