204 BMAO Pererarates are lower than those achieved <strong>in</strong> cattle. Thecollection of immature oocytes from slaughtered buffaloby aspiration of antral follicles can yield one to threeoocytes per ovary that are suitable for IVEP. The OPUtechnique can be used for repeatedly collect<strong>in</strong>g oocytes<strong>in</strong> cycl<strong>in</strong>g buffalo once or twice every week (Boni et al.1996; Manik et al. 2006) or <strong>in</strong> prepubertal heifers andcyclic cows after treatment with follicle-stimulat<strong>in</strong>ghormone (FSH) (Techakumphu et al. 2004). The yieldof cumulus–oocyte complexes us<strong>in</strong>g OPU <strong>in</strong> non-superovulatedbuffalo is approximately 1–2 per ovary percollection, whereas after FSH treatment it is approximately2–3 per ovary (Boni et al. 1997; Promdireg et al.2005). The cleavage rate of oocytes selected as suitablefor IVEP is approximately 50%, but only approximately10% develop <strong>in</strong>to morulae and blastocysts (Manik et al.2006). Maturation of buffalo oocytes <strong>in</strong> vitro occursearlier than <strong>in</strong> cattle (Neglia et al. 2003).For the cryopreservation of buffalo oocytes, the slowfreez<strong>in</strong>g procedure has been less successful than themethod of vitrification, and solid surface vitrificationappears to be superior to <strong>in</strong>-straw vitrification, us<strong>in</strong>gethylene glycol as the cryoprotectant (Boonkusol et al.2007). Recent studies <strong>in</strong> Philipp<strong>in</strong>es on the transfer ofvitrified embryos derived from oocytes collected fromslaughtered river type animals resulted <strong>in</strong> a pregnancyrate of 16% and a calv<strong>in</strong>g rate of 11% <strong>in</strong> river typerecipients (Hufana-Duran et al. 2004), and a calv<strong>in</strong>grate of 10% <strong>in</strong> swamp type recipients (Hufana-Duranet al. 2007). In Ch<strong>in</strong>a, transfer of fresh embryos derivedfrom repeated OPU to recipients after natural oestrusresulted <strong>in</strong> 35% calv<strong>in</strong>gs, while transfer of embryosderived from abattoir ovaries to synchronized recipientsresulted <strong>in</strong> 15% calv<strong>in</strong>gs (Liang et al. 2007).Clon<strong>in</strong>gResearch on clon<strong>in</strong>g by somatic cell nuclear transfer <strong>in</strong>buffalo is still <strong>in</strong> its early stages, but some basicunderstand<strong>in</strong>g has been achieved regard<strong>in</strong>g parthenogenetic,<strong>in</strong> vitro and <strong>in</strong> vivo development of embryosreconstructed by transferr<strong>in</strong>g donor nuclei from foetaland adult fibroblast cells to enucleated buffalo oocytes.Embryos reconstructed us<strong>in</strong>g foetal fibroblasts werecapable of develop<strong>in</strong>g to blastocyst stage (Meena andDas 2006) and some pregnancies were detected after thetransfer of cloned blastocysts <strong>in</strong>to recipients, but nonewere carried to term (Saikhun et al. 2004). Clonedembryos that are capable of develop<strong>in</strong>g to the morulaand blastocyst stages have also been constructed us<strong>in</strong>genucleated rabbit oocytes as recipient cytoplasm andcow, swamp buffalo, pig and elephant fibroblasts asdonor nuclei (Numchaisrika et al. 2007). When clon<strong>in</strong>gtechnology does become established <strong>in</strong> the buffalo,problems that have been encountered <strong>in</strong> other species,such as high <strong>in</strong>cidence of developmental abnormalities,will need to be addressed before it can have widepractical applications.Conclusions<strong>Domestic</strong> buffalo are generally regarded as hav<strong>in</strong>g lowreproductive efficiency. This is largely because of theconditions under which the majority of them are raised,be<strong>in</strong>g smallholder farm<strong>in</strong>g systems with harsh environments,poor nutrition and m<strong>in</strong>imal managerial <strong>in</strong>puts.However, they can have good fertility when managedand fed properly. Modern methods <strong>in</strong> molecular geneticsare help<strong>in</strong>g to unravel the evolutionary and geneticstatus of the river and swamp types of buffalo, but froma practical viewpo<strong>in</strong>t, the disparity <strong>in</strong> the number ofchromosomes <strong>in</strong> the two types needs to be considered <strong>in</strong>cross-breed<strong>in</strong>g programmes <strong>in</strong> order to avoid decl<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong>fertility. Buffalo, cows and bulls are capable of breed<strong>in</strong>gthroughout the year but often show seasonal fluctuations<strong>in</strong> fertility because of climatic and nutritionalfactors that modulate ovarian and testicular functions.The physiology and endocr<strong>in</strong>ology of reproduction <strong>in</strong>buffalo are basically similar to those <strong>in</strong> cattle, but someimportant differences exist that must be considered <strong>in</strong>attempts to improve reproductive efficiency through theuse of modern reproductive technologies. A majorfactor limit<strong>in</strong>g wider uptake of AI by buffalo farmersis the difficulty <strong>in</strong> detect<strong>in</strong>g oestrus. Although improvedprotocols of oestrous synchronization can overcome thisproblem, there are many other factors such as nutritionalstatus, seasonality and reproductive managementthat need to be addressed to achieve success. Embryotechnologies that <strong>in</strong>clude MOET and IVEP have beenvigorously studied over the past two decades, but thesuccess rates rema<strong>in</strong> below that achieved <strong>in</strong> cattlebecause of many <strong>in</strong>herent biological features that areunique to the buffalo. Once the technological problemsare overcome, the successful practical application ofthese methods will need to be preceded by measure toovercome the managerial and nutritional causes of<strong>in</strong>fertility that are common <strong>in</strong> the majority of currentbuffalo farm<strong>in</strong>g systems.ReferencesAwasthi MK, Khare A, Kavani FS, Siddiquee GM, PanchalMT, Shah RR, 2006: Is one-wave follicular growth dur<strong>in</strong>gthe estrous cycle a usual phenomenon <strong>in</strong> water buffaloes(Bubalus bubalis)? Anim Reprod Sci 92, 241–253.Awasthi MK, Kavani FS, Siddiquee GM, Sarvaiya NP,Derashri HJ, 2007: Is slow follicular growth the cause ofsilent estrus <strong>in</strong> water buffaloes? Anim Reprod Sci 99, 258–268.Bahga CS, Khokar BS, 1991: Effect of different seasons onconcentration of plasma lute<strong>in</strong>iz<strong>in</strong>g hormone and sem<strong>in</strong>alquality vis-a` -vis freezability of buffalo bulls (Bubalus bubalis).Int J Biometeorol 35, 222–224.Barile VL, 2005: Review article: improv<strong>in</strong>g reproductiveefficiency <strong>in</strong> female buffaloes. Livest Prod Sci 92, 183–194.Barile VL, Galasso A, Marchiori E, Pacelli C, Montemurro N,Borghese A, 2001: Effect of PRID treatment on conceptionrate <strong>in</strong> Mediterranean buffalo heifers. Livest Prod Sci 68,283–287.Baruselli PS, Mucciolo R, Vis<strong>in</strong>t<strong>in</strong> GA, Viana VC, Arruda RP,Madureira EH, 1997: Ovarian follicular dynamics dur<strong>in</strong>gthe estrous cycle <strong>in</strong> buffalo (Bubalus bubalis). Theriogenology47, 1531–1547.Baruselli PS, Madureira EH, Vis<strong>in</strong>t<strong>in</strong> JA, Barnabe RC,Amaral R, 1999: Timed <strong>in</strong>sem<strong>in</strong>ation us<strong>in</strong>g synchronizationof ovulation <strong>in</strong> buffalo. Rev Bras Reprod Anim 23, 360–362.Baruselli PS, Madureira EH, Vis<strong>in</strong>t<strong>in</strong> JA, Porto-Filho R,Carvalho NAT, Campanile G, Zicarelli L, 2000: Failure ofÓ 2008 The Author. Journal compilation Ó 2008 Blackwell Verlag
<strong>Reproduction</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Domestic</strong> Buffalo 205oocytes entry <strong>in</strong>to oviduct <strong>in</strong> superovulated buffalo. Theriogenology53, 491.Baruselli PS, Barnabe VH, Barnabe RC, Vis<strong>in</strong>t<strong>in</strong> JA, Molero-Filho JR, Porto R, 2001: Effect of body condition score atcalv<strong>in</strong>g on postpartum reproductive performance <strong>in</strong> buffalo.Buffalo J 17, 53–65.Boni R, Roviello S, Zicarelli L, 1996: Repeated ovum-pick-up<strong>in</strong> Italian Mediterranean buffalo cows. Theriogenology 46,899–909.Boni R, Rovello S, Gasparr<strong>in</strong>i B, Zicarelli L, 1997: Pregnanciesestablished after transferr<strong>in</strong>g embryos yielded by ovumpick-up and <strong>in</strong> vitro embryo production <strong>in</strong> Italian buffalocows. In: Proceed<strong>in</strong>gs of the Fifth World Buffalo Congress,Caserta, Italy, pp. 787–792.Boonkusol D, Faisaikarm T, D<strong>in</strong>nyes A, Kitiyanant Y, 2007:Effects of vitrification procedures on subsequent developmentand ultrastructure of <strong>in</strong> vitro-matured swamp buffalo(Bubalus bubalis) oocytes. Reprod Fertil Dev 19, 383–391.Borghese A(ed.), 2005: Buffalo Production and Research.FAO Regional Office for Europe, Technical Series 67, Foodand Agriculture Organization, Rome.Brito LF, Satrapa R, Marson EP, Kastelic JP, 2002: Efficacyof PGF(2alpha) to synchronize estrus <strong>in</strong> water buffalo cows(Bubalus bubalis) is dependent upon plasma progesteroneconcentration, corpus luteum size and ovarian follicularstatus before treatment. Anim Reprod Sci 73, 23–35.Campanile G, Boni R, Esposito L, Spadetta M, Zicarelli L,1995: Embryo transfer <strong>in</strong> mediterranean buffalo cow bred <strong>in</strong>Italy. Bubalus bubalis 3, 63.Danell B, 1987: Oestrus Behaviour, Ovarian Morphology andCyclical Variation <strong>in</strong> Follicular System and Endocr<strong>in</strong>ePattern <strong>in</strong> Water Buffalo Heifers. PhD Thesis, SwedishUniversity of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala.De Rensis F, Lo´pez-Gatius F, 2007: Protocols for synchroniz<strong>in</strong>gestrus and ovulation <strong>in</strong> buffalo (Bubalus bubalis): areview. Theriogenology 67, 209–216.Dobson H, Kamonpatana M, 1986: A review of female cattlereproduction with special reference to a comparison betweenbuffaloes, cows and zebu. J Reprod Fertil 77, 1–36.Drost M, 2007: Advanced reproductive technology <strong>in</strong> thewater buffalo. Theriogenology 68, 450–453.El-Wishy AB, 2007: The postpartum buffalo. II. Acyclicity andanestrus. Anim Reprod Sci 97, 216–36.Harisah M, Azmi TI, Hilmi M, Vidyadaran MK, Bongso TA,Nava ZM, Momongan V, Basrur PK, 1989: Identification ofcrossbred buffalo genotypes and their chromosome segregationpatterns. Genome 32, 999–1002.Huang YJ, Shang JH, Liang MM, Zhang XF, Huang FX,2003: Studies of chromosomal heredity and fertility ofprogenies (2n = 49) crossed between river and swampbuffalo [<strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>ese]. Yi Chuan 25, 155–159.Hufana-Duran D, Pedro PB, Ventur<strong>in</strong>a HV, Hufana RD,Salazar AL, Duran PG, Cruz LC, 2004: Post-warm<strong>in</strong>ghatch<strong>in</strong>g and birth of live calves follow<strong>in</strong>g transfer of <strong>in</strong>vitro-derived vitrified water buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) embryos.Theriogenology 61, 1429–1439.Hufana-Duran D, Pedro PB, Ventur<strong>in</strong>a HV, Duran PG, CruzLC, 2007: Full-term delivery of river buffalo calves(2n = 50) from <strong>in</strong> vitro-derived vitrified embryos by swampbuffalo recipients (2n = 48). Livest Sci 107, 213–219.IAEA, 2005: Improv<strong>in</strong>g Artificial Breed<strong>in</strong>g of Cattle andBuffalo <strong>in</strong> Asia: Guidel<strong>in</strong>es and Recommendations. IAEA-TECDOC 1480, International Atomic Energy Agency,Vienna. (http://www-pub.iaea.org/MTCD/publications/PDF/TE_1480_web.pdf)Kierste<strong>in</strong> G, Vall<strong>in</strong>oto M, Silva A, Schneider MP, Iannuzzi L,Brenig B, 2004: Analysis of mitochondrial D-loop regioncasts new light on domestic water buffalo (Bubalus bubalis)phylogeny. Mol Phylogenet Evol 30, 308–324.Kumar S, Nagarajan M, Sandhu JS, Kumar N, Behl V,Nishanth G, 2007: Mitochondrial DNA analyses of Indianwater buffalo support a dist<strong>in</strong>ct genetic orig<strong>in</strong> of river andswamp buffalo. Anim Genet 38, 227–232.Kumaresan A, Ansari MR, Garg A, 2005: Modulation ofpost-thaw sperm functions with oviductal prote<strong>in</strong>s <strong>in</strong>buffaloes. Anim Reprod Sci 90, 73–84.Lei CZ, Zhang W, Chen H, Lu F, Liu RY, Yang XY, ZhangHC, Liu ZG, Yao LB, Lu ZF, Zhao ZL, 2007: Independentmaternal orig<strong>in</strong> of Ch<strong>in</strong>ese swamp buffalo (Bubalus bubalis).Anim Genet 38, 97–102.Liang X, Zhang X, Yang B, Cheng M, Huang F, Pang C, Q<strong>in</strong>gG, Liao C, Wei S, Senatore EM, Bella A, Presicce GA, 2007:Pregnancy and calv<strong>in</strong>g rates follow<strong>in</strong>g transfer of <strong>in</strong>-vitroproducedriver and F1 (river x swamp) buffalo (Bubalusbubalis) embryos <strong>in</strong> recipients on natural oestrus or synchronisedfor ovulation. Reprod Fertil Dev 19, 670–676.Lohan IS, Malik RK, Kaker ML, 2004: Uter<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong>volutionand ovarian follicular growth dur<strong>in</strong>g early postpartumperiod of Murrah buffaloes (Bubalus bubalis). Asian-australasJ Anim Sci 17, 313–316.Lu YQ, Liang XW, Zhang M, Wang WL, Kitiyanant Y, LuSS, Meng B, Lu KH, 2007: Birth of tw<strong>in</strong>s after <strong>in</strong> vitrofertilization with flow-cytometric sorted buffalo (Bubalusbubalis) sperm. Anim Reprod Sci 100, 192–196.Madan ML, Das SK, Palta P, 1996: Application of reproductivetechnology to buffaloes. Anim Reprod Sci 42,299–306.Malfatti A, Barbato O, Tod<strong>in</strong>i L, Terzano GM, DebenedettiA, Borghese A, 2006: Blood testosterone levels <strong>in</strong> ItalianMediterranean buffalo bulls managed <strong>in</strong> two differentbreed<strong>in</strong>g conditions. Theriogenology 65, 1137–1144.Manik RS, Palta P, S<strong>in</strong>gla SK, Sharma V, 2002: Folliculogenesis<strong>in</strong> buffalo (Bubalus bubalis): a review. Reprod FertilDev 14, 315–325.Manik RS, Chauhan MS, Gupta V, S<strong>in</strong>gla SK, Palta P, 2006:In vitro fertilization of oocytes obta<strong>in</strong>ed through transvag<strong>in</strong>aloocyte retrieval from cyclic Murrah buffaloes (Bubalusbubalis). Reprod Fertil Dev 18, 219–219.Meena CR, Das SK, 2006: Development of water buffalo(Bubalus bubalis) embryos from <strong>in</strong> vitro matured oocytesreconstructed with fetal sk<strong>in</strong> fibroblast cells as donor nuclei.Anim Reprod Sci 93, 258–267.Misra AK, Kasiraj R, Rao MM, Reddy NSR, Joshi BV1994:Embryo transfer <strong>in</strong> buffalo <strong>in</strong> India: Progress <strong>in</strong> the last fiveyears. In: Proceed<strong>in</strong>gs of the IVth World Buffalo Congress,Sao Paulo, Brazil, 3, 501–504.Moioli BM, Napolitano F, Puppo S, Barile VL, Terzano GM,Borghese A, Malfatti A, Catalano A, Pilla AM, 1998:Patterns of oestrus, time of LH release and ovulation andeffects of time of artificial <strong>in</strong>sem<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>in</strong> Mediterraneanbuffalo cows. Anim Sci 66, 87–91.Nanda AS, Brar PS, Prabhakar S, 2003: Enhanc<strong>in</strong>g reproductiveperformance <strong>in</strong> dairy buffalo: major constra<strong>in</strong>ts andachievements. Reprod Suppl 61, 27–36.Neglia G, Gasparr<strong>in</strong>i B, Di Palo R, De Rosa C, Zicarelli L,Campanile G, 2003: Comparison of pregnancy rates withtwo estrus synchronization protocols <strong>in</strong> Italian Mediterraneanbuffalo cows. Theriogenology 60, 125–133.Numchaisrika P, Thongphakdee A, Rungsiwiwut R, PruksananondaK, Virutamasen P, Techakumphu M, 2007: Thedevelopment of <strong>in</strong>tra- and <strong>in</strong>ter-species cloned embryosderived from rabbit oocytes: the effect of donor cell sources.Reprod Fertil Dev 19, 153–153.Paul V, Prakash BS, 2005: Efficacy of the ovsynch protocol forsynchronization of ovulation and fixed-time artificial <strong>in</strong>sem<strong>in</strong>ation<strong>in</strong> Murrah buffaloes (Bubalus bubalis). Theriogenology64, 1049–1060.Ó 2008 The Author. Journal compilation Ó 2008 Blackwell Verlag
- Page 2 and 3:
Reproduction in Domestic AnimalsOff
- Page 5 and 6:
Reproductionin Domestic AnimalsTabl
- Page 7 and 8:
Minitüb:ProductsforArtificial Inse
- Page 9 and 10:
Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 1-7
- Page 11 and 12:
Embryo Biotechnologies in Farm Anim
- Page 13 and 14:
Embryo Biotechnologies in Farm Anim
- Page 15 and 16:
Embryo Biotechnologies in Farm Anim
- Page 17 and 18:
Ethical Models for Studying Reprodu
- Page 19 and 20:
Ethical Models for Studying Reprodu
- Page 21 and 22:
Ethical Models for Studying Reprodu
- Page 23 and 24:
Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 15-2
- Page 25 and 26:
Dietary Pollutants as Risk Factors
- Page 27 and 28:
Dietary Pollutants as Risk Factors
- Page 29 and 30:
Dietary Pollutants as Risk Factors
- Page 31 and 32:
Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Supp. 2), 23-30
- Page 33 and 34:
Factors Influencing Reproduction in
- Page 35 and 36:
Factors Influencing Reproduction in
- Page 37 and 38:
Factors Influencing Reproduction in
- Page 39 and 40:
Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 31-3
- Page 41 and 42:
GH and IGF-I in Cattle and Pigs 33h
- Page 43 and 44:
GH and IGF-I in Cattle and Pigs 35h
- Page 45 and 46:
GH and IGF-I in Cattle and Pigs 37B
- Page 47:
GH and IGF-I in Cattle and Pigs 39R
- Page 51 and 52:
Seasonality of Reproduction in Mamm
- Page 53 and 54:
Seasonality of Reproduction in Mamm
- Page 55 and 56:
Seasonality of Reproduction in Mamm
- Page 57 and 58:
Dominant Follicle Selection in Cows
- Page 59 and 60:
Dominant Follicle Selection in Cows
- Page 61 and 62:
Dominant Follicle Selection in Cows
- Page 63 and 64:
Dominant Follicle Selection in Cows
- Page 65 and 66:
Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 57-6
- Page 67 and 68:
Regulation of Luteal Function 59and
- Page 69 and 70:
Regulation of Luteal Function 61bov
- Page 71 and 72:
Regulation of Luteal Function 63(+/
- Page 73 and 74:
Regulation of Luteal Function 65sys
- Page 75 and 76:
Captive Breeding of Cheetahs in Sou
- Page 77 and 78:
Captive Breeding of Cheetahs in Sou
- Page 79 and 80:
Captive Breeding of Cheetahs in Sou
- Page 81 and 82:
Captive Breeding of Cheetahs in Sou
- Page 83 and 84:
Non-invasive Monitoring of Hormones
- Page 85 and 86:
Non-invasive Monitoring of Hormones
- Page 87 and 88:
Non-invasive Monitoring of Hormones
- Page 89 and 90:
Non-invasive Monitoring of Hormones
- Page 91 and 92:
Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 83-8
- Page 93 and 94:
Biotechnology Methods for Preservin
- Page 95 and 96:
Biotechnology Methods for Preservin
- Page 97 and 98:
Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 89-9
- Page 99 and 100:
Genetic Improvement of Dairy Cow Re
- Page 101 and 102:
Genetic Improvement of Dairy Cow Re
- Page 103 and 104:
Genetic Improvement of Dairy Cow Re
- Page 105 and 106:
Nutrient Prioritization and Fertili
- Page 107 and 108:
Nutrient Prioritization and Fertili
- Page 109 and 110:
Nutrient Prioritization and Fertili
- Page 111 and 112:
Nutrient Prioritization and Fertili
- Page 113 and 114:
CL-Endometrium-Embryo Interactions
- Page 115 and 116:
CL-Endometrium-Embryo Interactions
- Page 117 and 118:
CL-Endometrium-Embryo Interactions
- Page 119 and 120:
CL-Endometrium-Embryo Interactions
- Page 121 and 122:
Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 113-
- Page 123 and 124:
Reproductive Status Assessed by Mil
- Page 125 and 126:
Reproductive Status Assessed by Mil
- Page 127 and 128:
Reproductive Status Assessed by Mil
- Page 129 and 130:
Reproductive Status Assessed by Mil
- Page 131 and 132:
Genetic Aspects of Reproduction in
- Page 133 and 134:
Genetic Aspects of Reproduction in
- Page 135 and 136:
Genetic Aspects of Reproduction in
- Page 137 and 138:
Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 129-
- Page 139 and 140:
Nutritional Interactions and Reprod
- Page 141 and 142:
Nutritional Interactions and Reprod
- Page 143 and 144:
Nutritional Interactions and Reprod
- Page 145 and 146:
Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 137-
- Page 147 and 148:
Developmental Capabilities of Prepu
- Page 149 and 150:
Developmental Capabilities of Prepu
- Page 151 and 152:
Developmental Capabilities of Prepu
- Page 153 and 154:
Reproductive Physiology, Pathology
- Page 155 and 156:
Reproductive Physiology, Pathology
- Page 157 and 158:
Reproductive Physiology, Pathology
- Page 159 and 160:
Reproduction of Domestic Ferret 151
- Page 161 and 162: Reproduction of Domestic Ferret 153
- Page 163 and 164: Reproduction of Domestic Ferret 155
- Page 165 and 166: Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 157-
- Page 167 and 168: Canine Anoestrus, Oestrous Inductio
- Page 169 and 170: Canine Anoestrus, Oestrous Inductio
- Page 171 and 172: Canine Anoestrus, Oestrous Inductio
- Page 173 and 174: Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 165-
- Page 175 and 176: The Ethics and Role of AI in Dogs 1
- Page 177 and 178: The Ethics and Role of AI in Dogs 1
- Page 179 and 180: The Ethics and Role of AI in Dogs 1
- Page 181 and 182: Control of Fertility in Females by
- Page 183 and 184: Control of Fertility in Females by
- Page 185 and 186: Control of Fertility in Females by
- Page 187 and 188: Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 179-
- Page 189 and 190: Controlling Animal Populations Usin
- Page 191 and 192: Controlling Animal Populations Usin
- Page 193 and 194: Controlling Animal Populations Usin
- Page 195 and 196: Recombinant Gonadotropins in Assist
- Page 197 and 198: Recombinant Gonadotropins in Assist
- Page 199 and 200: Recombinant Gonadotropins in Assist
- Page 201 and 202: Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 193-
- Page 203 and 204: Farm Animals Embryonic Stem Cells 1
- Page 205 and 206: Farm Animals Embryonic Stem Cells 1
- Page 207 and 208: Farm Animals Embryonic Stem Cells 1
- Page 209 and 210: Reproduction in Domestic Buffalo 20
- Page 211: Reproduction in Domestic Buffalo 20
- Page 215 and 216: Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 207-
- Page 217 and 218: Postpartum Ovarian Activity in Sout
- Page 219 and 220: Postpartum Ovarian Activity in Sout
- Page 221 and 222: Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 213-
- Page 223 and 224: Mother-Offspring Interactions 215an
- Page 225 and 226: Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 217-
- Page 227 and 228: Reproduction Augmentation in Yak an
- Page 229 and 230: Reproduction Augmentation in Yak an
- Page 231 and 232: Reproduction Augmentation in Yak an
- Page 233 and 234: Follicles and Mares 2251982). Simil
- Page 235 and 236: Follicles and Mares 227Studies invo
- Page 237 and 238: Follicles and Mares 229dominant fol
- Page 239 and 240: Follicles and Mares 231trus, spring
- Page 241 and 242: Proteins in Early Equine Conceptuse
- Page 243 and 244: Proteins in Early Equine Conceptuse
- Page 245 and 246: Proteins in Early Equine Conceptuse
- Page 247 and 248: Follicular and Oocyte Competence un
- Page 249 and 250: Follicular and Oocyte Competence un
- Page 251 and 252: Follicular and Oocyte Competence un
- Page 253 and 254: Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 245-
- Page 255 and 256: Fertilization in the Porcine Fallop
- Page 257 and 258: Fertilization in the Porcine Fallop
- Page 259 and 260: Fertilization in the Porcine Fallop
- Page 261 and 262: Mastitis in Post-Partum Dairy Cows
- Page 263 and 264:
Mastitis in Post-Partum Dairy Cows
- Page 265 and 266:
Mastitis in Post-Partum Dairy Cows
- Page 267 and 268:
Mastitis in Post-Partum Dairy Cows
- Page 269 and 270:
Embryo ⁄ Foetal Losses in Ruminan
- Page 271 and 272:
Embryo ⁄ Foetal Losses in Ruminan
- Page 273 and 274:
Embryo ⁄ Foetal Losses in Ruminan
- Page 275 and 276:
Embryo ⁄ Foetal Losses in Ruminan
- Page 277 and 278:
Death Ligand and Receptor Pig Ovari
- Page 279 and 280:
Death Ligand and Receptor Pig Ovari
- Page 281 and 282:
Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 273-
- Page 283:
Lactocrine Programming of Uterine D
- Page 286 and 287:
278 FF Bartol, AA Wiley and CA Bagn
- Page 288 and 289:
Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 280-
- Page 290 and 291:
282 KC Caires, JA Schmidt, AP Olive
- Page 292 and 293:
284 KC Caires, JA Schmidt, AP Olive
- Page 294 and 295:
286 KC Caires, JA Schmidt, AP Olive
- Page 296 and 297:
Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 288-
- Page 298 and 299:
290 I Dobrinskisuccessful also betw
- Page 300 and 301:
292 I DobrinskiCreemers LB, Meng X,
- Page 302 and 303:
294 I DobrinskiOkutsu T, Suzuki K,
- Page 304 and 305:
296 N Rawlings, ACO Evans, RK Chand
- Page 306 and 307:
298 N Rawlings, ACO Evans, RK Chand
- Page 308 and 309:
300 N Rawlings, ACO Evans, RK Chand
- Page 310 and 311:
Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 302-
- Page 312 and 313:
304 A Dinnyes, XC Tian and X Yanggr
- Page 314 and 315:
306 A Dinnyes, XC Tian and X YangIn
- Page 316 and 317:
308 A Dinnyes, XC Tian and X YangHo
- Page 318 and 319:
Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 310-
- Page 320 and 321:
312 RC Bott, DT Clopton and AS Cupp
- Page 322 and 323:
314 RC Bott, DT Clopton and AS Cupp
- Page 324 and 325:
316 RC Bott, DT Clopton and AS Cupp
- Page 326 and 327:
318 BK Whitlock, JA Daniel, RR Wilb
- Page 328 and 329:
320 BK Whitlock, JA Daniel, RR Wilb
- Page 330 and 331:
322 BK Whitlock, JA Daniel, RR Wilb
- Page 332 and 333:
Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 324-
- Page 334 and 335:
326 CR Barb, GJ Hausman and CA Lent
- Page 336 and 337:
328 CR Barb, GJ Hausman and CA Lent
- Page 338 and 339:
330 CR Barb, GJ Hausman and CA Lent
- Page 340 and 341:
332 C Galli, I Lagutina, R Duchi, S
- Page 342 and 343:
334 C Galli, I Lagutina, R Duchi, S
- Page 344 and 345:
336 C Galli, I Lagutina, R Duchi, S
- Page 346 and 347:
Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 338-
- Page 348 and 349:
340 D Rath and LA JohnsonCommercial
- Page 350 and 351:
342 D Rath and LA JohnsonThe Commer
- Page 352 and 353:
344 D Rath and LA JohnsonX- and Y-b
- Page 354 and 355:
346 D Rath and LA JohnsonWalker SK,
- Page 356 and 357:
348 JM Vazquez, J Roca, MA Gil, C C
- Page 358 and 359:
350 JM Vazquez, J Roca, MA Gil, C C
- Page 360 and 361:
352 JM Vazquez, J Roca, MA Gil, C C
- Page 362 and 363:
354 JM Vazquez, J Roca, MA Gil, C C
- Page 364 and 365:
356 CBA Whitelaw, SG Lillico and T
- Page 366 and 367:
358 CBA Whitelaw, SG Lillico and T
- Page 368 and 369:
360 ACO Evans, N Forde, GM O’Gorm
- Page 370 and 371:
362 ACO Evans, N Forde, GM O’Gorm
- Page 372 and 373:
364 ACO Evans, N Forde, GM O’Gorm
- Page 374 and 375:
366 ACO Evans, N Forde, GM O’Gorm
- Page 376 and 377:
Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 368-
- Page 378 and 379:
370 JP Kastelic and JC Thundathilsp
- Page 380 and 381:
372 JP Kastelic and JC Thundathilme
- Page 382 and 383:
Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 374-
- Page 384 and 385:
376 GC AlthouseTable 1. Potential s
- Page 386 and 387:
378 GC Althousesemen to the domesti
- Page 388 and 389:
380 B Leboeuf, JA Delgadillo, E Man
- Page 390 and 391:
382 B Leboeuf, JA Delgadillo, E Man
- Page 392 and 393:
384 B Leboeuf, JA Delgadillo, E Man
- Page 394 and 395:
Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 386-
- Page 396 and 397:
388 N Kostereva and M-C HofmannFig.
- Page 398 and 399:
390 N Kostereva and M-C HofmannMMPs
- Page 400 and 401:
392 N Kostereva and M-C HofmannTado
- Page 402 and 403:
394 P Mermillod, R Dalbie` s-Tran,
- Page 404 and 405:
396 P Mermillod, R Dalbie` s-Tran,
- Page 406 and 407:
398 P Mermillod, R Dalbie` s-Tran,
- Page 408 and 409:
400 P Mermillod, R Dalbie` s-Tran,
- Page 410 and 411:
402 K Kikuchi, N Kashiwazaki, T Nag
- Page 412 and 413:
404 K Kikuchi, N Kashiwazaki, T Nag
- Page 414 and 415:
406 K Kikuchi, N Kashiwazaki, T Nag
- Page 416 and 417:
408 B ObackNumber of publications20
- Page 418 and 419:
410 B ObackReprogramming Ability of
- Page 420 and 421:
412 B Obackstudies have shown that
- Page 422 and 423:
414 B ObackFig. 4. Climbing mount e
- Page 424 and 425:
416 B ObackRenard JP, Maruotti J, J
- Page 426 and 427:
418 P Loi, K Matzukawa, G Ptak, Y N
- Page 428 and 429:
420 P Loi, K Matzukawa, G Ptak, Y N
- Page 430 and 431:
422 P Loi, K Matzukawa, G Ptak, Y N
- Page 434:
Table of Contents Volume 43 · Supp