12.07.2015 Views

Reproduction in Domestic Animals

Reproduction in Domestic Animals

Reproduction in Domestic Animals

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Mastitis <strong>in</strong> Post-Partum Dairy Cows 255mammary gland to endotox<strong>in</strong> was shown to be significantlymore severe <strong>in</strong> cows <strong>in</strong> early lactation than <strong>in</strong> thesame cows close to dry<strong>in</strong>g-off (Lehtola<strong>in</strong>en et al. 2003).The greater severity of coliform mastitis after calv<strong>in</strong>ghas been expla<strong>in</strong>ed by the dysfunction of PMN (Vandeputte-VanMessom et al. 1993). The number of circulat<strong>in</strong>gPMN has been shown to correlate with theseverity of E. coli mastitis (Kremer et al. 1993a). Acutephase mediators produced dur<strong>in</strong>g E. coli mastitis cantrigger an extensive ROS production which damageshost tissues; cells from periparturient dairy cattle havebeen shown to produce significantly more TNF-a thancells from mid-lactat<strong>in</strong>g cows (Sordillo et al. 1995).Multiparous cows have shown to develop more severeE. coli mastitis (Vangroenweghe et al. 2004) as comparedwith young cows. Blood PMN function seems tobe more efficient <strong>in</strong> young cows than <strong>in</strong> older cows(Burvenich et al. 2003). The viability and production ofROS of the milk neutrophils to kill bacteria was foundto be depressed <strong>in</strong> multiparous cows (Mehrzad et al.2002).In the UK, studies have shown that enterobacteria areable to <strong>in</strong>fect the udder dur<strong>in</strong>g the dry period and persistthere until parturition (Bradley and Green 2000). Thishas not been confirmed <strong>in</strong> other countries. For example,<strong>in</strong> a recent US study, the proportion of coliforms asmastitis caus<strong>in</strong>g agents was less than 1% at dry<strong>in</strong>g-offand after calv<strong>in</strong>g (Pantoja and Ruegg 2007). In the studyby Smith et al. (1985), a relatively high proportion ofudder <strong>in</strong>fections at the beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g and at the end of thedry period was found to be due to Gram-negativebacteria. Dried manure with high counts of coliformbacteria was used as bedd<strong>in</strong>g, which may have affectedthe results.Diagnosis of Mastitis After Calv<strong>in</strong>gUdder health of a dairy cow should be assessed as soonas possible after calv<strong>in</strong>g. Diagnosis of cl<strong>in</strong>ical mastitis <strong>in</strong>early lactation must be adjusted accord<strong>in</strong>g to thephysical properties of milk dur<strong>in</strong>g that period. Somaticcell count is <strong>in</strong>creased at parturition, but decreases tonormal levels with<strong>in</strong> 3–4 days. The difference between<strong>in</strong>fected and healthy quarters is significant at both times(Barkema et al. 1999a). California mastitis test (CMT)was found to have sensitivity and specificity high enoughfor detect<strong>in</strong>g IMI caused by major pathogens at day 3post-partum (Sargeant et al. 2001). Regular monitor<strong>in</strong>gof the udder of the cows around calv<strong>in</strong>g is mostimportant, and milk should be exam<strong>in</strong>ed as soon aspossible after calv<strong>in</strong>g (Green et al. 2007).Effect of Dry Cow Management on theOccurrence of Mastitis Post-PartumDry cow management, such as environment, feed<strong>in</strong>gand tim<strong>in</strong>g of transfer to the calv<strong>in</strong>g unit, significantlyaffect the susceptibility of heifers or dairy cows topuerperal mastitis. Generally, the <strong>in</strong>cidence of cl<strong>in</strong>icalmastitis after calv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>creases with parity (Whist et al.2006; Green et al. 2007). Dry and transition dietsshould conta<strong>in</strong> the recommended levels of vitam<strong>in</strong>s andtrace elements (Spa<strong>in</strong> and Scheer 2006). The mostcritical are vitam<strong>in</strong> E and selenium, but also vitam<strong>in</strong> A,copper and z<strong>in</strong>c have a role <strong>in</strong> the defence of the hostaga<strong>in</strong>st <strong>in</strong>fections (Godden et al. 2006). Decades ago,supplementation of dairy cows with selenium andvitam<strong>in</strong> E was shown to have a positive effect onudder health (Smith et al. 1984; Hogan et al. 1993).The effect has mostly been seen <strong>in</strong> herds fed withdeficient or low levels of these elements. In herds fedwith normal diets, daily vitam<strong>in</strong> E supplementationdur<strong>in</strong>g the puerperal period did not affect the <strong>in</strong>cidenceof cl<strong>in</strong>ical mastitis or other puerperal diseases (Perssonet al. 2007).Dry matter <strong>in</strong>take should not be restricted dur<strong>in</strong>g thedry and transition period, but overfeed<strong>in</strong>g of dry cowsshould be avoided. Regular body condition scor<strong>in</strong>g is agood tool <strong>in</strong> monitor<strong>in</strong>g the efficiency of feed<strong>in</strong>g. In arecent study, it was associated with less risk of cl<strong>in</strong>icalmastitis (Green et al. 2007). In a Swedish study, factorswhich <strong>in</strong>creased the risk of elevated SCC after calv<strong>in</strong>gwere <strong>in</strong>tensive concentrate feed<strong>in</strong>g to heifers, andmov<strong>in</strong>g to conf<strong>in</strong>ed hous<strong>in</strong>g on the day of calv<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>stead of earlier (Svensson et al. 2006). The resultsfrom an Estonian study agreed with the Swedish results,as mov<strong>in</strong>g heifers from separate hous<strong>in</strong>g to the tie stallless than 2 weeks before parturition significantly<strong>in</strong>creased the risk for cl<strong>in</strong>ical mastitis around parturition(Kalmus et al. 2007). An <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g risk of cl<strong>in</strong>icalmastitis was found <strong>in</strong> herds which housed heifers witholder cows (Barkema et al. 1999b). In pasture-grazedconditions, risk factors for peripartum mastitis maydiffer from those <strong>in</strong> housed herds (Compton et al. 2007).Significant risk factors for cl<strong>in</strong>ical and subcl<strong>in</strong>icalmastitis post-calv<strong>in</strong>g were pre-calv<strong>in</strong>g subcl<strong>in</strong>ical mastitis,low teat height above the ground, Friesian breed andudder edema.Provid<strong>in</strong>g a clean, dry environment, good cowcomfort and ventilation are extremely important <strong>in</strong>prevention of mastitis <strong>in</strong> dry and calv<strong>in</strong>g cows andheifers. A recent study from the UK demonstrated theimportance of these factors <strong>in</strong> protect<strong>in</strong>g cows fromcl<strong>in</strong>ical mastitis after calv<strong>in</strong>g (Green et al. 2007). Gooddra<strong>in</strong>age of the dry cow accommodation, use ofmattresses on dry cow cubicle surfaces and dis<strong>in</strong>fectionof cubicle beds were some of the factors found to beprotective aga<strong>in</strong>st mastitis (Fig. 2). Thickness of bedd<strong>in</strong>gof the calv<strong>in</strong>g box was found to be negativelycorrelated with <strong>in</strong>cidence rate of cl<strong>in</strong>ical mastitis(Barkema et al. 1999b). In a Belgian study (DeVliegher et al. 2004) <strong>in</strong> herds with heifers calv<strong>in</strong>g onslatted floors, heifers had lower SCC, probably becausethose calv<strong>in</strong>g places were cleaner than premises withnon-slatted floors. If possible, dry cows and pregnantheifers should not be housed <strong>in</strong> the same barn, nor thetransition cows together with the milk<strong>in</strong>g cows (Barkemaet al. 1999b; Green et al. 2007).Development of vacc<strong>in</strong>es aga<strong>in</strong>st mastitis has beendifficult, because even natural <strong>in</strong>tramammary <strong>in</strong>fectiondoes not provide protection aga<strong>in</strong>st subsequent <strong>in</strong>fections(Talbot and Lacasse 2005). The high number ofmastitis pathogens further complicates the task. Commercialcommon core antigen vacc<strong>in</strong>es aga<strong>in</strong>st coliformmastitis have been available <strong>in</strong> some countries for years.These so-called J5 vacc<strong>in</strong>es are based on the wholeÓ 2008 The Author. Journal compilation Ó 2008 Blackwell Verlag

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!