12.07.2015 Views

Reproduction in Domestic Animals

Reproduction in Domestic Animals

Reproduction in Domestic Animals

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

182 R Fayrer-Hoskenvacc<strong>in</strong>e duration and efficacy is the magnitude andduration of serum antibody levels. For the nativeantigen, to all <strong>in</strong>tents and purposes, its antigenicstructure is similar for preparations from the samelaboratory. This is not the case <strong>in</strong> synthetic preparationswhere the selected DNA sequence and expressionsystem affect the product.Duration of immunocontraceptionMost of the above-mentioned adjuvants provide at least12 months of immunocontraception with one or twoboosters. Some reports <strong>in</strong>dicate longer effects with otherpreparations (Liu et al. 2005) with no booster<strong>in</strong>g or onebooster. The 1-year duration vacc<strong>in</strong>es can be adm<strong>in</strong>isteredfor several years without any side-effect. However,after multiple seasons of adm<strong>in</strong>istration, there areovarian effects as seen with the horses on AssateagueIslands. These cases that have an oestrogen phase ofoestrus, but did not appear to <strong>in</strong>itiate a luteal orprogesterone phase. The <strong>in</strong>itial (>5 years) effect oncyclicity of mares is reversed after several years when novacc<strong>in</strong>es have been re-adm<strong>in</strong>istered. Pregnant animals(Fayrer-Hosken et al. 2000b; Kirkpatrick and Turner2002) can be vacc<strong>in</strong>ated with no deleterious effects onthe foetus and growth of the offspr<strong>in</strong>g. These offspr<strong>in</strong>ghave been shown to grow normally and are fertile asadults.Current vacc<strong>in</strong>esCurrent vacc<strong>in</strong>es use synthetic or recomb<strong>in</strong>ant ZPfragments with or without glycosylation, DNA vacc<strong>in</strong>esor virally vectored vacc<strong>in</strong>es. How does the structure ofthese antigens affect fertility and by what mechanism dothey function? The selection of the specific portions ofthe DNA for the production of ZP glycoprote<strong>in</strong>s is thecurrent optimal technology. The selection of the ZPsequence is very important when an expression systemis selected. Immunocontraceptive antigens can beexpressed <strong>in</strong> bacterial systems (Hardy et al. 2008), yeastsystems (Tang et al. 2003), Ch<strong>in</strong>ese hamster ovary(CHO) systems (Zhao et al. 2004), plant systems (Tacket2005), viral systems (Hardy et al. 2003), <strong>in</strong>sect systems(Hardy et al. 2003; Choudhury et al. 2007) and mammaliancell l<strong>in</strong>es. The recomb<strong>in</strong>ant products of thesesystems have several excit<strong>in</strong>g properties. The antigenpurity and structure are optimized. The purity (Tanget al. 2003) of purified native prote<strong>in</strong>s has been aconcern and the effect of contam<strong>in</strong>at<strong>in</strong>g antigens has notbeen clearly documented. Once the appropriate antigenand expression system has been discovered for a specificspecies, abundant amounts of the antigen could beproduced <strong>in</strong> a cost-effective and repeatable process.These antigens and their production systems will be thefuture zenith of fertility control vacc<strong>in</strong>es. Anotherstrategy is to use a species-specific antigen with aspecies-specific virus to produce a virally vectoredimmunocontraceptive (Redwood et al. 2007). Thevirally vectored immunocontraceptive would solvemany of the practical problems of fertility control ofpopulations. Nevertheless, there is a concern that viralor antigen mutation could lead to the doomsday virus.SummaryThe ZP vacc<strong>in</strong>e is the most tested antigen fromlaboratory to field application. The vacc<strong>in</strong>e appearssafe and effective. The fertility control vacc<strong>in</strong>e does notappear to adversely affect the sociobiology of the targetspecies.Role of hormonal targets for vacc<strong>in</strong>es to control fertilityFertility control can also be achieved by the vacc<strong>in</strong>ationof male or female animals with antigens that arehormones. Several successful studies have been reportedus<strong>in</strong>g gonadotrop<strong>in</strong>-releas<strong>in</strong>g hormone (GnRH) orlute<strong>in</strong>iz<strong>in</strong>g hormone releas<strong>in</strong>g hormone (LHRH),human chorionic gonadotrop<strong>in</strong> (hCG) and folliclestimulat<strong>in</strong>ghormone (FSH).GnRH ⁄ LHRHThe hormonal vacc<strong>in</strong>es can be used as fertility controls,and also as therapeutic agents. Treatment of endocr<strong>in</strong>edisorders and neoplasms is an important facet ofhormonal vacc<strong>in</strong>es. A GnRH vacc<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong> humans as atherapeutic agent is <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>gly important. The classicalGnRH or GnRH-I is the ma<strong>in</strong> hormone and alterationsto its secretions will affect ovaries, testis, prostate andplacenta. The GnRH vacc<strong>in</strong>e has been used successfully<strong>in</strong> multiple species. The GnRH vacc<strong>in</strong>e must be conjugatedto a hapten or produced as a recomb<strong>in</strong>ant vacc<strong>in</strong>econta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g an immunogenic moiety <strong>in</strong> order to amplifythe antigenicity of the decapeptide. Conjugation toKLH, ovalbum<strong>in</strong>, more potent adjuvants or otheramplify<strong>in</strong>g agents is the essential for efficacy. It hasworked for variable periods of time <strong>in</strong> both sexes <strong>in</strong> pigs(Killian et al. 2006), sheep (Earl et al. 2006), horses(Turkstra et al. 2005; Imboden et al. 2006; Elhay et al.2007), deer (Curtis et al. 2002) and bison (Miller et al.2004). The primary problem associated with GnRHvacc<strong>in</strong>es is to produce durable titres.Over the years, several commercial preparations havebeen developed and marketed with greater or lesserfunctional product. Current preparations <strong>in</strong>clude GonaConÔ,ImprovacÔ (Dunshea et al. 2001), Equity andRepro-BlocÔ. The GnRH-analogue, GnRH-d6-Lys,was conjugated to recomb<strong>in</strong>ant Mycobacterium tuberculosishsp70 and adjuvanted with RIBI (STDCM) orIncomplete Freund’s was used <strong>in</strong> pre-pubertal mice.There was a statistically significant effect on the size ofthe urogenital complex and testosterone levels (RIBI).One of the most important animal uses of the GnRH-D6-Lys vacc<strong>in</strong>e is <strong>in</strong> beef production. This product is animportant alternative to hormonal growth promotersand their side-effects. The vacc<strong>in</strong>es have the desiredeffects through multiple treatments on both sexes withm<strong>in</strong>imal side-effects. This is a quality product for thecaptive environment, but for wild populations, themultiple adm<strong>in</strong>istrations pose the same problems aspZP vacc<strong>in</strong>es. Depend<strong>in</strong>g on the presentation andadjuvantation, GnRH vacc<strong>in</strong>es last from 1 to 2 years(Miller et al. 2000). The return to fertility with GnRHvacc<strong>in</strong>es is more rapid than pZP vacc<strong>in</strong>es. In the shortterm with GnRH vacc<strong>in</strong>es, there is a cessation ofÓ 2008 The Author. Journal compilation Ó 2008 Blackwell Verlag

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!