Reproduction in Domestic Animals

More documents

Recommendations

Info

$(Microsoft PowerPoint - Lecci\363n 2_07.ppt)$

204 BMAO Pererarates are lower than those achieved in cattle. Thecollection of immature oocytes from slaughtered buffaloby aspiration of antral follicles can yield one to threeoocytes per ovary that are suitable for IVEP. The OPUtechnique can be used for repeatedly collecting oocytesin cycling buffalo once or twice every week (Boni et al.1996; Manik et al. 2006) or in prepubertal heifers andcyclic cows after treatment with follicle-stimulatinghormone (FSH) (Techakumphu et al. 2004). The yieldof cumulus–oocyte complexes using OPU in non-superovulatedbuffalo is approximately 1–2 per ovary percollection, whereas after FSH treatment it is approximately2–3 per ovary (Boni et al. 1997; Promdireg et al.2005). The cleavage rate of oocytes selected as suitablefor IVEP is approximately 50%, but only approximately10% develop into morulae and blastocysts (Manik et al.2006). Maturation of buffalo oocytes in vitro occursearlier than in cattle (Neglia et al. 2003).For the cryopreservation of buffalo oocytes, the slowfreezing procedure has been less successful than themethod of vitrification, and solid surface vitrificationappears to be superior to in-straw vitrification, usingethylene glycol as the cryoprotectant (Boonkusol et al.2007). Recent studies in Philippines on the transfer ofvitrified embryos derived from oocytes collected fromslaughtered river type animals resulted in a pregnancyrate of 16% and a calving rate of 11% in river typerecipients (Hufana-Duran et al. 2004), and a calvingrate of 10% in swamp type recipients (Hufana-Duranet al. 2007). In China, transfer of fresh embryos derivedfrom repeated OPU to recipients after natural oestrusresulted in 35% calvings, while transfer of embryosderived from abattoir ovaries to synchronized recipientsresulted in 15% calvings (Liang et al. 2007).CloningResearch on cloning by somatic cell nuclear transfer inbuffalo is still in its early stages, but some basicunderstanding has been achieved regarding parthenogenetic,in vitro and in vivo development of embryosreconstructed by transferring donor nuclei from foetaland adult fibroblast cells to enucleated buffalo oocytes.Embryos reconstructed using foetal fibroblasts werecapable of developing to blastocyst stage (Meena andDas 2006) and some pregnancies were detected after thetransfer of cloned blastocysts into recipients, but nonewere carried to term (Saikhun et al. 2004). Clonedembryos that are capable of developing to the morulaand blastocyst stages have also been constructed usingenucleated rabbit oocytes as recipient cytoplasm andcow, swamp buffalo, pig and elephant fibroblasts asdonor nuclei (Numchaisrika et al. 2007). When cloningtechnology does become established in the buffalo,problems that have been encountered in other species,such as high incidence of developmental abnormalities,will need to be addressed before it can have widepractical applications.ConclusionsDomestic buffalo are generally regarded as having lowreproductive efficiency. This is largely because of theconditions under which the majority of them are raised,being smallholder farming systems with harsh environments,poor nutrition and minimal managerial inputs.However, they can have good fertility when managedand fed properly. Modern methods in molecular geneticsare helping to unravel the evolutionary and geneticstatus of the river and swamp types of buffalo, but froma practical viewpoint, the disparity in the number ofchromosomes in the two types needs to be considered incross-breeding programmes in order to avoid decline infertility. Buffalo, cows and bulls are capable of breedingthroughout the year but often show seasonal fluctuationsin fertility because of climatic and nutritionalfactors that modulate ovarian and testicular functions.The physiology and endocrinology of reproduction inbuffalo are basically similar to those in cattle, but someimportant differences exist that must be considered inattempts to improve reproductive efficiency through theuse of modern reproductive technologies. A majorfactor limiting wider uptake of AI by buffalo farmersis the difficulty in detecting oestrus. Although improvedprotocols of oestrous synchronization can overcome thisproblem, there are many other factors such as nutritionalstatus, seasonality and reproductive managementthat need to be addressed to achieve success. Embryotechnologies that include MOET and IVEP have beenvigorously studied over the past two decades, but thesuccess rates remain below that achieved in cattlebecause of many inherent biological features that areunique to the buffalo. Once the technological problemsare overcome, the successful practical application ofthese methods will need to be preceded by measure toovercome the managerial and nutritional causes ofinfertility that are common in the majority of currentbuffalo farming systems.ReferencesAwasthi MK, Khare A, Kavani FS, Siddiquee GM, PanchalMT, Shah RR, 2006: Is one-wave follicular growth duringthe estrous cycle a usual phenomenon in water buffaloes(Bubalus bubalis)? Anim Reprod Sci 92, 241–253.Awasthi MK, Kavani FS, Siddiquee GM, Sarvaiya NP,Derashri HJ, 2007: Is slow follicular growth the cause ofsilent estrus in water buffaloes? Anim Reprod Sci 99, 258–268.Bahga CS, Khokar BS, 1991: Effect of different seasons onconcentration of plasma luteinizing hormone and seminalquality vis-a` -vis freezability of buffalo bulls (Bubalus bubalis).Int J Biometeorol 35, 222–224.Barile VL, 2005: Review article: improving reproductiveefficiency in female buffaloes. Livest Prod Sci 92, 183–194.Barile VL, Galasso A, Marchiori E, Pacelli C, Montemurro N,Borghese A, 2001: Effect of PRID treatment on conceptionrate in Mediterranean buffalo heifers. Livest Prod Sci 68,283–287.Baruselli PS, Mucciolo R, Visintin GA, Viana VC, Arruda RP,Madureira EH, 1997: Ovarian follicular dynamics duringthe estrous cycle in buffalo (Bubalus bubalis). Theriogenology47, 1531–1547.Baruselli PS, Madureira EH, Visintin JA, Barnabe RC,Amaral R, 1999: Timed insemination using synchronizationof ovulation in buffalo. Rev Bras Reprod Anim 23, 360–362.Baruselli PS, Madureira EH, Visintin JA, Porto-Filho R,Carvalho NAT, Campanile G, Zicarelli L, 2000: Failure ofÓ 2008 The Author. Journal compilation Ó 2008 Blackwell Verlag
Reproduction in Domestic Buffalo 205oocytes entry into oviduct in superovulated buffalo. Theriogenology53, 491.Baruselli PS, Barnabe VH, Barnabe RC, Visintin JA, Molero-Filho JR, Porto R, 2001: Effect of body condition score atcalving on postpartum reproductive performance in buffalo.Buffalo J 17, 53–65.Boni R, Roviello S, Zicarelli L, 1996: Repeated ovum-pick-upin Italian Mediterranean buffalo cows. Theriogenology 46,899–909.Boni R, Rovello S, Gasparrini B, Zicarelli L, 1997: Pregnanciesestablished after transferring embryos yielded by ovumpick-up and in vitro embryo production in Italian buffalocows. In: Proceedings of the Fifth World Buffalo Congress,Caserta, Italy, pp. 787–792.Boonkusol D, Faisaikarm T, Dinnyes A, Kitiyanant Y, 2007:Effects of vitrification procedures on subsequent developmentand ultrastructure of in vitro-matured swamp buffalo(Bubalus bubalis) oocytes. Reprod Fertil Dev 19, 383–391.Borghese A(ed.), 2005: Buffalo Production and Research.FAO Regional Office for Europe, Technical Series 67, Foodand Agriculture Organization, Rome.Brito LF, Satrapa R, Marson EP, Kastelic JP, 2002: Efficacyof PGF(2alpha) to synchronize estrus in water buffalo cows(Bubalus bubalis) is dependent upon plasma progesteroneconcentration, corpus luteum size and ovarian follicularstatus before treatment. Anim Reprod Sci 73, 23–35.Campanile G, Boni R, Esposito L, Spadetta M, Zicarelli L,1995: Embryo transfer in mediterranean buffalo cow bred inItaly. Bubalus bubalis 3, 63.Danell B, 1987: Oestrus Behaviour, Ovarian Morphology andCyclical Variation in Follicular System and EndocrinePattern in Water Buffalo Heifers. PhD Thesis, SwedishUniversity of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala.De Rensis F, Lo´pez-Gatius F, 2007: Protocols for synchronizingestrus and ovulation in buffalo (Bubalus bubalis): areview. Theriogenology 67, 209–216.Dobson H, Kamonpatana M, 1986: A review of female cattlereproduction with special reference to a comparison betweenbuffaloes, cows and zebu. J Reprod Fertil 77, 1–36.Drost M, 2007: Advanced reproductive technology in thewater buffalo. Theriogenology 68, 450–453.El-Wishy AB, 2007: The postpartum buffalo. II. Acyclicity andanestrus. Anim Reprod Sci 97, 216–36.Harisah M, Azmi TI, Hilmi M, Vidyadaran MK, Bongso TA,Nava ZM, Momongan V, Basrur PK, 1989: Identification ofcrossbred buffalo genotypes and their chromosome segregationpatterns. Genome 32, 999–1002.Huang YJ, Shang JH, Liang MM, Zhang XF, Huang FX,2003: Studies of chromosomal heredity and fertility ofprogenies (2n = 49) crossed between river and swampbuffalo [in Chinese]. Yi Chuan 25, 155–159.Hufana-Duran D, Pedro PB, Venturina HV, Hufana RD,Salazar AL, Duran PG, Cruz LC, 2004: Post-warminghatching and birth of live calves following transfer of invitro-derived vitrified water buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) embryos.Theriogenology 61, 1429–1439.Hufana-Duran D, Pedro PB, Venturina HV, Duran PG, CruzLC, 2007: Full-term delivery of river buffalo calves(2n = 50) from in vitro-derived vitrified embryos by swampbuffalo recipients (2n = 48). Livest Sci 107, 213–219.IAEA, 2005: Improving Artificial Breeding of Cattle andBuffalo in Asia: Guidelines and Recommendations. IAEA-TECDOC 1480, International Atomic Energy Agency,Vienna. (http://www-pub.iaea.org/MTCD/publications/PDF/TE_1480_web.pdf)Kierstein G, Vallinoto M, Silva A, Schneider MP, Iannuzzi L,Brenig B, 2004: Analysis of mitochondrial D-loop regioncasts new light on domestic water buffalo (Bubalus bubalis)phylogeny. Mol Phylogenet Evol 30, 308–324.Kumar S, Nagarajan M, Sandhu JS, Kumar N, Behl V,Nishanth G, 2007: Mitochondrial DNA analyses of Indianwater buffalo support a distinct genetic origin of river andswamp buffalo. Anim Genet 38, 227–232.Kumaresan A, Ansari MR, Garg A, 2005: Modulation ofpost-thaw sperm functions with oviductal proteins inbuffaloes. Anim Reprod Sci 90, 73–84.Lei CZ, Zhang W, Chen H, Lu F, Liu RY, Yang XY, ZhangHC, Liu ZG, Yao LB, Lu ZF, Zhao ZL, 2007: Independentmaternal origin of Chinese swamp buffalo (Bubalus bubalis).Anim Genet 38, 97–102.Liang X, Zhang X, Yang B, Cheng M, Huang F, Pang C, QingG, Liao C, Wei S, Senatore EM, Bella A, Presicce GA, 2007:Pregnancy and calving rates following transfer of in-vitroproducedriver and F1 (river x swamp) buffalo (Bubalusbubalis) embryos in recipients on natural oestrus or synchronisedfor ovulation. Reprod Fertil Dev 19, 670–676.Lohan IS, Malik RK, Kaker ML, 2004: Uterine involutionand ovarian follicular growth during early postpartumperiod of Murrah buffaloes (Bubalus bubalis). Asian-australasJ Anim Sci 17, 313–316.Lu YQ, Liang XW, Zhang M, Wang WL, Kitiyanant Y, LuSS, Meng B, Lu KH, 2007: Birth of twins after in vitrofertilization with flow-cytometric sorted buffalo (Bubalusbubalis) sperm. Anim Reprod Sci 100, 192–196.Madan ML, Das SK, Palta P, 1996: Application of reproductivetechnology to buffaloes. Anim Reprod Sci 42,299–306.Malfatti A, Barbato O, Todini L, Terzano GM, DebenedettiA, Borghese A, 2006: Blood testosterone levels in ItalianMediterranean buffalo bulls managed in two differentbreeding conditions. Theriogenology 65, 1137–1144.Manik RS, Palta P, Singla SK, Sharma V, 2002: Folliculogenesisin buffalo (Bubalus bubalis): a review. Reprod FertilDev 14, 315–325.Manik RS, Chauhan MS, Gupta V, Singla SK, Palta P, 2006:In vitro fertilization of oocytes obtained through transvaginaloocyte retrieval from cyclic Murrah buffaloes (Bubalusbubalis). Reprod Fertil Dev 18, 219–219.Meena CR, Das SK, 2006: Development of water buffalo(Bubalus bubalis) embryos from in vitro matured oocytesreconstructed with fetal skin fibroblast cells as donor nuclei.Anim Reprod Sci 93, 258–267.Misra AK, Kasiraj R, Rao MM, Reddy NSR, Joshi BV1994:Embryo transfer in buffalo in India: Progress in the last fiveyears. In: Proceedings of the IVth World Buffalo Congress,Sao Paulo, Brazil, 3, 501–504.Moioli BM, Napolitano F, Puppo S, Barile VL, Terzano GM,Borghese A, Malfatti A, Catalano A, Pilla AM, 1998:Patterns of oestrus, time of LH release and ovulation andeffects of time of artificial insemination in Mediterraneanbuffalo cows. Anim Sci 66, 87–91.Nanda AS, Brar PS, Prabhakar S, 2003: Enhancing reproductiveperformance in dairy buffalo: major constraints andachievements. Reprod Suppl 61, 27–36.Neglia G, Gasparrini B, Di Palo R, De Rosa C, Zicarelli L,Campanile G, 2003: Comparison of pregnancy rates withtwo estrus synchronization protocols in Italian Mediterraneanbuffalo cows. Theriogenology 60, 125–133.Numchaisrika P, Thongphakdee A, Rungsiwiwut R, PruksananondaK, Virutamasen P, Techakumphu M, 2007: Thedevelopment of intra- and inter-species cloned embryosderived from rabbit oocytes: the effect of donor cell sources.Reprod Fertil Dev 19, 153–153.Paul V, Prakash BS, 2005: Efficacy of the ovsynch protocol forsynchronization of ovulation and fixed-time artificial inseminationin Murrah buffaloes (Bubalus bubalis). Theriogenology64, 1049–1060.Ó 2008 The Author. Journal compilation Ó 2008 Blackwell Verlag
Page 2 and 3:
Reproduction in Domestic AnimalsOff
Page 5 and 6:
Reproductionin Domestic AnimalsTabl
Page 7 and 8:
Minitüb:ProductsforArtificial Inse
Page 9 and 10:
Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 1-7
Page 11 and 12:
Embryo Biotechnologies in Farm Anim
Page 13 and 14:
Page 15 and 16:
Page 17 and 18:
Ethical Models for Studying Reprodu
Page 19 and 20:
Page 21 and 22:
Page 23 and 24:
Page 25 and 26:
Dietary Pollutants as Risk Factors
Page 27 and 28:
Page 29 and 30:
Page 31 and 32:
Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Supp. 2), 23-30
Page 33 and 34:
Factors Influencing Reproduction in
Page 35 and 36:
Page 37 and 38:
Page 39 and 40:
Page 41 and 42:
GH and IGF-I in Cattle and Pigs 33h
Page 43 and 44:
GH and IGF-I in Cattle and Pigs 35h
Page 45 and 46:
GH and IGF-I in Cattle and Pigs 37B
Page 47:
GH and IGF-I in Cattle and Pigs 39R
Page 51 and 52:
Seasonality of Reproduction in Mamm
Page 53 and 54:
Page 55 and 56:
Page 57 and 58:
Dominant Follicle Selection in Cows
Page 59 and 60:
Page 61 and 62:
Page 63 and 64:
Page 65 and 66:
Page 67 and 68:
Regulation of Luteal Function 59and
Page 69 and 70:
Regulation of Luteal Function 61bov
Page 71 and 72:
Regulation of Luteal Function 63(+/
Page 73 and 74:
Regulation of Luteal Function 65sys
Page 75 and 76:
Captive Breeding of Cheetahs in Sou
Page 77 and 78:
Page 79 and 80:
Page 81 and 82:
Page 83 and 84:
Non-invasive Monitoring of Hormones
Page 85 and 86:
Page 87 and 88:
Page 89 and 90:
Page 91 and 92:
Page 93 and 94:
Biotechnology Methods for Preservin
Page 95 and 96:
Biotechnology Methods for Preservin
Page 97 and 98:
Page 99 and 100:
Genetic Improvement of Dairy Cow Re
Page 101 and 102:
Page 103 and 104:
Page 105 and 106:
Nutrient Prioritization and Fertili
Page 107 and 108:
Page 109 and 110:
Page 111 and 112:
Page 113 and 114:
CL-Endometrium-Embryo Interactions
Page 115 and 116:
Page 117 and 118:
Page 119 and 120:
Page 121 and 122:
Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 113-
Page 123 and 124:
Reproductive Status Assessed by Mil
Page 125 and 126:
Page 127 and 128:
Page 129 and 130:
Page 131 and 132:
Genetic Aspects of Reproduction in
Page 133 and 134:
Page 135 and 136:
Page 137 and 138:
Page 139 and 140:
Nutritional Interactions and Reprod
Page 141 and 142:
Page 143 and 144:
Page 145 and 146:
Page 147 and 148:
Developmental Capabilities of Prepu
Page 149 and 150:
Page 151 and 152:
Page 153 and 154:
Reproductive Physiology, Pathology
Page 155 and 156:
Page 157 and 158:
Page 159 and 160:
Reproduction of Domestic Ferret 151
Page 161 and 162: Reproduction of Domestic Ferret 153
Page 163 and 164: Reproduction of Domestic Ferret 155
Page 165 and 166: Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 157-
Page 167 and 168: Canine Anoestrus, Oestrous Inductio
Page 175 and 176: The Ethics and Role of AI in Dogs 1
Page 181 and 182: Control of Fertility in Females by
Page 189 and 190: Controlling Animal Populations Usin
Page 195 and 196: Recombinant Gonadotropins in Assist
Page 203 and 204: Farm Animals Embryonic Stem Cells 1
Page 209 and 210: Reproduction in Domestic Buffalo 20
Page 211: Reproduction in Domestic Buffalo 20
Page 217 and 218: Postpartum Ovarian Activity in Sout
Page 219 and 220: Postpartum Ovarian Activity in Sout
Page 223 and 224: Mother-Offspring Interactions 215an
Page 227 and 228: Reproduction Augmentation in Yak an
Page 233 and 234: Follicles and Mares 2251982). Simil
Page 235 and 236: Follicles and Mares 227Studies invo
Page 237 and 238: Follicles and Mares 229dominant fol
Page 239 and 240: Follicles and Mares 231trus, spring
Page 241 and 242: Proteins in Early Equine Conceptuse
Page 247 and 248: Follicular and Oocyte Competence un
Page 255 and 256: Fertilization in the Porcine Fallop
Page 261 and 262: Mastitis in Post-Partum Dairy Cows
Page 263 and 264:
Mastitis in Post-Partum Dairy Cows
Page 265 and 266:
Page 267 and 268:
Page 269 and 270:
Embryo ⁄ Foetal Losses in Ruminan
Page 271 and 272:
Page 273 and 274:
Page 275 and 276:
Page 277 and 278:
Death Ligand and Receptor Pig Ovari
Page 279 and 280:
Death Ligand and Receptor Pig Ovari
Page 281 and 282:
Page 283:
Lactocrine Programming of Uterine D
Page 286 and 287:
278 FF Bartol, AA Wiley and CA Bagn
Page 288 and 289:
Page 290 and 291:
282 KC Caires, JA Schmidt, AP Olive
Page 292 and 293:
Page 294 and 295:
Page 296 and 297:
Page 298 and 299:
290 I Dobrinskisuccessful also betw
Page 300 and 301:
292 I DobrinskiCreemers LB, Meng X,
Page 302 and 303:
294 I DobrinskiOkutsu T, Suzuki K,
Page 304 and 305:
296 N Rawlings, ACO Evans, RK Chand
Page 306 and 307:
Page 308 and 309:
Page 310 and 311:
Page 312 and 313:
304 A Dinnyes, XC Tian and X Yanggr
Page 314 and 315:
306 A Dinnyes, XC Tian and X YangIn
Page 316 and 317:
308 A Dinnyes, XC Tian and X YangHo
Page 318 and 319:
Page 320 and 321:
312 RC Bott, DT Clopton and AS Cupp
Page 322 and 323:
Page 324 and 325:
Page 326 and 327:
318 BK Whitlock, JA Daniel, RR Wilb
Page 328 and 329:
Page 330 and 331:
Page 332 and 333:
Page 334 and 335:
326 CR Barb, GJ Hausman and CA Lent
Page 336 and 337:
Page 338 and 339:
Page 340 and 341:
332 C Galli, I Lagutina, R Duchi, S
Page 342 and 343:
Page 344 and 345:
Page 346 and 347:
Page 348 and 349:
340 D Rath and LA JohnsonCommercial
Page 350 and 351:
342 D Rath and LA JohnsonThe Commer
Page 352 and 353:
344 D Rath and LA JohnsonX- and Y-b
Page 354 and 355:
346 D Rath and LA JohnsonWalker SK,
Page 356 and 357:
348 JM Vazquez, J Roca, MA Gil, C C
Page 358 and 359:
Page 360 and 361:
Page 362 and 363:
Page 364 and 365:
356 CBA Whitelaw, SG Lillico and T
Page 366 and 367:
358 CBA Whitelaw, SG Lillico and T
Page 368 and 369:
360 ACO Evans, N Forde, GM O’Gorm
Page 370 and 371:
Page 372 and 373:
Page 374 and 375:
Page 376 and 377:
Page 378 and 379:
370 JP Kastelic and JC Thundathilsp
Page 380 and 381:
372 JP Kastelic and JC Thundathilme
Page 382 and 383:
Page 384 and 385:
376 GC AlthouseTable 1. Potential s
Page 386 and 387:
378 GC Althousesemen to the domesti
Page 388 and 389:
380 B Leboeuf, JA Delgadillo, E Man
Page 390 and 391:
Page 392 and 393:
Page 394 and 395:
Page 396 and 397:
388 N Kostereva and M-C HofmannFig.
Page 398 and 399:
390 N Kostereva and M-C HofmannMMPs
Page 400 and 401:
392 N Kostereva and M-C HofmannTado
Page 402 and 403:
394 P Mermillod, R Dalbie` s-Tran,
Page 404 and 405:
Page 406 and 407:
Page 408 and 409:
Page 410 and 411:
402 K Kikuchi, N Kashiwazaki, T Nag
Page 412 and 413:
Page 414 and 415:
Page 416 and 417:
408 B ObackNumber of publications20
Page 418 and 419:
410 B ObackReprogramming Ability of
Page 420 and 421:
412 B Obackstudies have shown that
Page 422 and 423:
414 B ObackFig. 4. Climbing mount e
Page 424 and 425:
416 B ObackRenard JP, Maruotti J, J
Page 426 and 427:
418 P Loi, K Matzukawa, G Ptak, Y N
Page 428 and 429:
Page 430 and 431:
Page 434:
Table of Contents Volume 43 · Supp
show all

Reproduction in Domestic Animals

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?