12.07.2015 Views

Reproduction in Domestic Animals

Reproduction in Domestic Animals

Reproduction in Domestic Animals

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

312 RC Bott, DT Clopton and AS CuppIn addition to the potential actions of Activ<strong>in</strong> B, XXgonads treated with bone morphogenic prote<strong>in</strong>s(BMP), anti-mullerian hormone (AMH) and Activ<strong>in</strong>A <strong>in</strong> vitro developed a sex-reversed phenotype withformation of an ectopic coelomic vessel; however,AMH deficient mice did not develop this same phenotype(Ross et al. 2003; Yao et al. 2004). Bone morphogenicprote<strong>in</strong>, AMH, Activ<strong>in</strong> A and Inhbb aremembers of the transform<strong>in</strong>g growth factor-beta(TGF-b) superfamily and directly regulate cell functionthrough <strong>in</strong>hibition or activation of the SMAD signaltransduction pathway. In the zebrafish, SMAD responseelements <strong>in</strong> the promoter region of Vegfa genealso appear to regulate expression of different isoforms(He and Chen 2005). Thus, the Vegfa gene may be adownstream gene regulated by members of the TGFfamily to regulate sex-specific vasculature <strong>in</strong> the develop<strong>in</strong>ggonad (Fig. 2).What is known about the vascular endothelial growthfactor family?The VEGF family is composed of five ligands: VEGF(VEGF-A), VEGF-B, VEGF-C, VEGF-D and placentagrowth factor. VEGF (VEGF-A) is the bestcharacterized and most potent VEGF molecule.VEGF works through both Fms-like tyros<strong>in</strong>e k<strong>in</strong>ase1 (FLT1) and K<strong>in</strong>ase doma<strong>in</strong> region receptor (KDR),to elicit its effects on endothelial cell migration,differentiation, proliferation and survival and apoptosis.The primary receptor <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> neovascularizationof organs with VEGF is KDR which conta<strong>in</strong>s atyros<strong>in</strong>e k<strong>in</strong>ase signal transduction doma<strong>in</strong> (Waltenbergeret al. 1994). There are conflict<strong>in</strong>g reports aboutthe role of FLT1 <strong>in</strong> regulation of VEGF’s actions. InFlt1 knockouts, the mice die due to vasculatureovergrowth suggest<strong>in</strong>g that FLT1 acts as a decoyreceptor to <strong>in</strong>hibit VEGF-dependent vascular development.Furthermore, FLT1 can also <strong>in</strong>hibit VEGF’sactions by dimeriz<strong>in</strong>g with KDR to <strong>in</strong>hibit signaltransduction. Thus, FLT1 appears to act as a negativeregulator of VEGF’s actions on endothelial cellmigration, survival and proliferation (Ferrara 2000;Olsson et al. 2006).Both mRNA and prote<strong>in</strong> for VEGF and KDR arepresent dur<strong>in</strong>g testis morphogenesis and are expressed<strong>in</strong> cells, like the Sertoli cell, that direct testis development.However, Flt1 is not expressed until after cordformation <strong>in</strong> the testis (Bott et al. 2006). The absenceof FLT1 dur<strong>in</strong>g mesonephric endothelial cell migrationand establishment of vasculature <strong>in</strong> the testis mayallow for endothelial cell migration through VEGF. Incontrast, the ovary, which does not have mesonephriccell migration, expresses both Flt1 and Kdr dur<strong>in</strong>gdevelopment (Pohlmann et al. 2004). Thus, VEGFangiogenic isoforms may be bound by FLT1 receptor<strong>in</strong> the ovary <strong>in</strong>hibit<strong>in</strong>g the ability of mesonephricendothelial cells to be recruited <strong>in</strong>to the develop<strong>in</strong>govary; thus provid<strong>in</strong>g a different endothelial cell orig<strong>in</strong>for ovarian vasculature.Vascular endothelial growth factor is transcribedfrom a s<strong>in</strong>gle gene that has eight exons and is alternativelyspliced <strong>in</strong>to different isoforms each conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g aVEGF 205VEGF 188VEGF 164VEGF 144VEGF 120VEGF 110VEGF 164bExons 1–5 6A 6B 7 8aExons 1–5 6A 7 8aExons 1–5 7 8aExons 1–5 6A 8aExons 1–5Exons 1–37Bdifferent number of am<strong>in</strong>o acids. The most commonangiogenic isoforms are VEGF205, 188, 164, 144 and120 (<strong>in</strong> humans the angiogenic isoforms are one am<strong>in</strong>oacid longer; Fig. 3). The predom<strong>in</strong>ant isoforms expressed<strong>in</strong> tissues are VEGF188, 164 and 120 (Veikkolaand Alitalo 1999).In 2002, an additional isoform, VEGF165b, wasidentified which conta<strong>in</strong>ed part of the 3’ UTR that isnow determ<strong>in</strong>ed to be exon 8b (Fig. 3). Furthermore,recent studies have demonstrated that the humanVEGF165b isoform is anti-angiogenic <strong>in</strong> function and<strong>in</strong>hibits signal transduction through KDR (Bates et al.2002; Woolard et al. 2004). Thus, this isoform is<strong>in</strong>hibitory to the actions of VEGF. Recently severalother <strong>in</strong>hibitory isoforms have been identified <strong>in</strong> thehuman and we have cloned several <strong>in</strong> both the rat andbov<strong>in</strong>e (VEGF165b accession number EU040284;VEGF189b accession number EU040285). Therefore,it appears that for every angiogenic isoform there is asister <strong>in</strong>hibitory isoform that is formed when exon 8ais replaced with exon 8b. (In rodents and cattle thesister <strong>in</strong>hibitory isoform is one am<strong>in</strong>o acid longer.)The primary functions of angiogenic VEGF isoformsare to <strong>in</strong>duce endothelial cell migration, survival,proliferation and differentiation to <strong>in</strong>itiate angiogenesiswith<strong>in</strong> develop<strong>in</strong>g organs and tumors. The <strong>in</strong>hibitoryVEGF isoforms appear to modulate thesefunctions.In addition to the multiple VEGF isoforms, two coreceptors,neuropil<strong>in</strong>1 (NRP1) and neuropil<strong>in</strong>2 (NRP2),that b<strong>in</strong>d to specific VEGF isoforms (i.e. VEGF164,VEGF188) have been identified. The predom<strong>in</strong>antfunction of NRP1 appears to be stabilization ofVEGF164 b<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g to KDR which augments signaltransduction. The two co-receptors can also stabilizeb<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g of VEGF isoforms to FLT1. In fact, FLT1 mayregulate VEGF actions by ty<strong>in</strong>g up NRP boundisoforms. While both NRP co-receptors can b<strong>in</strong>d toFLT1 it appears that only NRP1 can stabilize signaltransduction through KDR. Interest<strong>in</strong>gly, KDR, butnot FLT1 is expressed dur<strong>in</strong>g sem<strong>in</strong>iferous cord formation(Bott et al. 2006) thus the ability of NRP1 toenhance signal transduction upon b<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g of VEGFisoforms to KDR may be critical dur<strong>in</strong>g testis differentiation.8a8aExons 1–5 7 8bFig. 3. Exons <strong>in</strong> VEGF gene that compose each VEGF isoformÓ 2008 The Authors. Journal compilation Ó 2008 Blackwell Verlag

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!