142 KM Mortonoocytes derived from adult and prepubertal animals.Alterations <strong>in</strong> the expression of several developmentallyimportant genes have been observed <strong>in</strong> embryos derivedfrom prepubertal cattle (Oropeza et al. 2004) and sheep(Leoni et al. 2006a). Gene expression and epigeneticstudies will undoubtedly elucidate differences <strong>in</strong> oocytesand embryos derived from adult and prepubertalanimals. Furthermore, this technology will be used tore-evaluate hormone stimulation and IVP systems, sothat prepubertal oocytes and embryos may haveimproved competence.Two new techniques have great potential for comb<strong>in</strong>ationwith JIVET. Further reductions <strong>in</strong> the generation<strong>in</strong>terval on the female side could be achieved by <strong>in</strong>corporat<strong>in</strong>gfoetal oocytes <strong>in</strong>to IVP systems. Yet, foetal calfoocytes display lower rates of maturation, fertilization,cleavage and embryo development compared with oocytesfrom adult animals (Chohan and Hunter 2004) andfurther research is required. Utilization of gametes fromprepubertal male animals could dramatically reduce thegeneration <strong>in</strong>terval on the male side. Spermatogenesiscan be <strong>in</strong>itiated <strong>in</strong> prepubertal ram lambs by adm<strong>in</strong>ister<strong>in</strong>geCG (Morton et al. 2004c). The <strong>in</strong>jection of gametesfrom prepubertal ram lambs <strong>in</strong>to IVM oocytes fromadult and prepubertal lambs resulted <strong>in</strong> the production of16–32 cell stage embryos (KM Morton, SL Catt, WMCMaxwell and G Evans, unpublished data). This technologyoffers, for the first time, a chance for producers toreduce the generation <strong>in</strong>terval on the paternal side. Whilethe potential of this method has been demonstrated, thebirth of lambs produced from both prepubertal ram andewe lambs, and further ref<strong>in</strong>ement of treatment regimesfor ram lambs are required.In conclusion, oocytes from prepubertal animalsdisplay a reduced developmental competence whencompared with oocytes derived from their adult counterparts,result<strong>in</strong>g from perturbations to cytoplasmic andnuclear maturation. Despite these perturbations, oocytesfrom prepubertal lambs as young as 3–4 weeks of age arecapable of develop<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>to viable offspr<strong>in</strong>g after transferto recipients. Recent advances <strong>in</strong> JIVET technology,which have significantly improved its efficiency, havebrought its commercialization closer and facilitated<strong>in</strong>corporation with other emerg<strong>in</strong>g reproductive technologiessuch as sperm sex<strong>in</strong>g. With the developments <strong>in</strong>genomic technologies cont<strong>in</strong>u<strong>in</strong>g to add to knowledgeregard<strong>in</strong>g the differences between oocytes derived fromadult and prepubertal animals and the improvements <strong>in</strong>the efficiency of JIVET this will br<strong>in</strong>g, commercializationof this technology is foreseeable.AcknowledgementsThe Australian Research Council (ARC), XY Inc, Bioniche AnimalHealth Australasia and Sydney IVF for fund<strong>in</strong>g and research support.Professor W.M.C. Maxwell is thanked for his <strong>in</strong>valuable editorialassistance.ReferencesArmstrong DT, 2001: Effects of maternal age on oocytedevelopmental competence. Theriogenology 55, 1303–1322.Armstrong DT, Holm P, Irv<strong>in</strong>e B, Petersen BA, Stubb<strong>in</strong>gs RB,McLean D, Stevens R, Seamark RF, 1992: Pregnancies andlive birth from <strong>in</strong> vitro fertilization of calf oocytes collectedby laparoscopic follicular aspiration. Theriogenology 38,667–678.Armstrong DT, Irv<strong>in</strong>e BJ, Earl CR, 1994: In vitro fertilisationof follicular oocytes from juvenile lambs and their developmentalcompetence <strong>in</strong> vitro and <strong>in</strong> vivo. Biol Reprod50(Suppl.), 189.Armstrong DT, Kotaras PJ, Earl CR, 1997: Advances <strong>in</strong> theproduction of embryos <strong>in</strong> vitro from juvenile and prepubertaloocytes from the calf and lamb. Reprod Fertil Dev 9,333–339.Chohan KR, Hunter AG, 2004: In vitro maturation, fertilizationand early cleavage rates of bov<strong>in</strong>e fetal oocytes.Theriogenology 61, 373–380.Cognie Y, 1999: State of the art <strong>in</strong> sheep-goat embryo transfer.Theriogenology 51, 105–116.Dom<strong>in</strong>ko T, First NL, 1997: Tim<strong>in</strong>g of meiotic progression <strong>in</strong>bov<strong>in</strong>e oocytes and its effect of early embryonic development.Mol Reprod Dev 47, 456–467.Earl CR, Irv<strong>in</strong>e B, Armstrong DT, 1994: Development oftechniques for the production of viable embryos from sixto seven week old lambs. Proc Aust Soc Anim Prod 20,428.Earl CR, Irv<strong>in</strong>e BJ, Kelly JM, Rowe J, Armstrong DT, 1995a:Ovarian stimulation protocols for oocyte collection and<strong>in</strong> vitro embryo production from 8 to 9 week old lambs.Theriogenology 43, 203.Earl CR, Kotaras PJ, Rowe J, Kelly JM, DeBarro TM, 1995b:Laparoscopic selection of juvenile donors prior to stimulation.Proc Aust Soc Reprod Biol 26, 2.Howell CY, Bestor TH, D<strong>in</strong>g F, Latham KE, Mert<strong>in</strong>eit C,Trasler JM, Chaillet JR, 2001: Genomic impr<strong>in</strong>t<strong>in</strong>g disruptedby a maternal effect mutation <strong>in</strong> the Dnmt1 gene.Cell 104, 829–838.Kelly JM, Kleeman DO, Walker SK, 2005a: The effect ofnutrition dur<strong>in</strong>g pregnancy on the <strong>in</strong> vitro production ofembryos from result<strong>in</strong>g lambs. Theriogenology 63, 2020–2031.Kelly JM, Kleeman DO, Walker SK, 2005b: Enhancedefficiency <strong>in</strong> the production of offspr<strong>in</strong>g from 4- to 8-weekoldlambs. Theriogenology 63, 1876–1890.Kelly JM, Kleeman DO, Maxwell WMC, Walker SK, 2007:Effect of GnRH treatment on the maturation and <strong>in</strong> vitrodevelopment of oocytes collected from 4- to 6-week-oldMer<strong>in</strong>o lambs. Reprod Fertil Dev 19, 947–953.Kennedy JP, Worth<strong>in</strong>gton CA, Cole ER, 1974: The postnataldevelopment of the ovary and uterus <strong>in</strong> the Mer<strong>in</strong>o lamb. JReprod Fertil 36, 275–282.Kochhar HP, Wu B, Morris LH, Buckrell BC, Pollard JW,Basrur PK, K<strong>in</strong>g WA, 2002: Maturation status, prote<strong>in</strong>synthesis and developmental competence of oocytes derivedfrom lambs and ewes. Reprod Domest Anim 37, 19–25.Ledda S, Bogliolo L, Calvia P, Leoni G, Naitana S, 1996a:Developmental competence of follicular oocytes from juvenilelambs matured <strong>in</strong> vitro <strong>in</strong> different conditions. J ReprodFertil Abstr Ser 17, 28.Ledda S, Bogliolo L, Leoni G, Calvia P, Naitana S, 1996b:Influence of vasoactive <strong>in</strong>test<strong>in</strong>al peptide (VIP), atrialnatiuretic peptide (ANP) and <strong>in</strong>sul<strong>in</strong>-like growth factors-I(IGF-I) on <strong>in</strong> vitro maturation of prepubertal and adultsheep oocytes. Zygote 4, 343–348.Ledda S, Bogliolo L, Calvia P, Leoni G, Naitana S, 1997:Meiotic progression and developmental competence ofoocytes collected from juvenile and adult ewes. J ReprodFertil 109, 73–78.Ledda S, Bogliolo L, Leoni G, Naitana S, 1999: Productionand lamb<strong>in</strong>g rate of blastocysts derived from <strong>in</strong> vitromatured oocytes after gonadotrop<strong>in</strong> treatment of prepubertalewes. J Anim Sci 77, 2234–2239.Ó 2008 The Author. Journal compilation Ó 2008 Blackwell Verlag
Developmental Capabilities of Prepubertal Lamb Embryos 143Ledda S, Bogliolo L, Leoni G, Naitana S, 2001: Cell coupl<strong>in</strong>gand maturation-promot<strong>in</strong>g factor activity <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong> vitromaturedprepubertal and adult sheep oocytes. Biol Reprod65, 247–252.Leoni GG, Bebbere D, Succu S, Berl<strong>in</strong>guer F, Mossa F,Galioto M, Bogliolo L, Ledda S, Naitana S, 2006a:Relations between relative mRNA abundance and developmentalcompetence of ov<strong>in</strong>e oocytes. Mol Reprod Dev 74,249–257.Leoni GG, Succu S, Berl<strong>in</strong>guer F, Rosati I, Bebbere D,Bogliolo L, Ledda S, Naitana S, 2006b: Delay on the <strong>in</strong> vitrok<strong>in</strong>etic development of prepubertal ov<strong>in</strong>e embryos. AnimReprod Sci 92, 373–383.Leoni GG, Rosati I, Succu S, Bogliolo L, Bebbere L,Berl<strong>in</strong>guer F, Ledda S, Naitana S, 2007: A low oxygenatmosphere dur<strong>in</strong>g IVF accelerates the k<strong>in</strong>etic of formationof <strong>in</strong> vitro produced ov<strong>in</strong>e blastocysts. Reprod DomestAnim 42, 299–304.Maxwell WMC, Evans G, Holl<strong>in</strong>shead FK, Bathgate R, deGraaf SP, Eriksson B, Gillan L, Morton KM, O’Brien JK,2004: Integration of sperm sex<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>to the ART toolbox.Anim Reprod Sci 82–83, 79–95.McMillan WH, McDonald MF, 1985: Survival of fertilisedova from ewe lambs and adult ewes <strong>in</strong> the uteri of ewelambs. Anim Reprod Sci 8, 235–240.Moor RM, Crosby IM, 1986: Prote<strong>in</strong> requirements forgerm<strong>in</strong>al vesicle breakdown <strong>in</strong> ov<strong>in</strong>e oocytes. J EmbryolExp Morph 94, 207–220.Morton KM, Catt SL, Holl<strong>in</strong>shead FK, Maxwell WMC,Evans G, 2004a: Production of lambs after the transfer offresh and cryopreserved <strong>in</strong> vitro produced embryos fromprepubertal lamb oocytes and unsorted and sex-sortedfrozen-thawed spermatozoa. Reprod Domest Anim 39,454–461.Morton KM, Maxwell WMC, Evans G, 2004b: The effect ofFSH concentration dur<strong>in</strong>g IVM and gamete co-<strong>in</strong>cubationlength dur<strong>in</strong>g IVF on the development of unstimulatedprepubertal ewe oocytes. Reprod Fertil Dev 16, 205.Morton KM, Maxwell WMC, Evans G, 2004c: The effect ofPMSG adm<strong>in</strong>istration on the growth and development ofthe reproductive tract of prepubertal ram lambs. In:Proceed<strong>in</strong>gs of the 15th International Congress on Animal<strong>Reproduction</strong> Porto Seguro, Brazil, 1, 233.Morton KM, Catt SL, Holl<strong>in</strong>shead FK, Maxwell WMC,Evans G, 2005a: The effect of gamete co-<strong>in</strong>cubation timedur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> vitro fertilisation with frozen-thawed unsorted andsex-sorted ram spermatozoa on the development of <strong>in</strong> vitromatured adult and prepubertal ewe oocytes. Theriogenology64, 363–377.Morton KM, Catt SL, Maxwell WMC, Evans G, 2005b:Effects of lamb age, hormone stimulation and response tohormone stimulation on the yield and <strong>in</strong> vitro developmentalcompetence of prepubertal lamb oocytes. Reprod FertilDev 17, 593–601.Morton KM, Catt SL, Maxwell WMC, Evans G, 2005c: Anefficient method of ovarian stimulation and <strong>in</strong> vitro embryoproduction from prepubertal lambs. Reprod Fertil Dev 17,701–706.Morton KM, Catt SL, Maxwell WMC, Evans G, 2005d: Invitro and <strong>in</strong> vivo developmental capabilities and k<strong>in</strong>etics of<strong>in</strong> vitro development of <strong>in</strong> vitro matured oocytes from adult,unstimulated and hormone stimulated prepubertal ewes.Theriogenology 64, 1320–1332.Nicholas FW, 1996: Genetic improvement through reproductivetechnology. Anim Reprod Sci 42, 205–214.O’Brien JK, Dwarte D, Ryan JP, Maxwell WMC, Evans G,1996: Developmental capacity, energy metabolism andultrastructure of mature oocytes from prepubertal and adultsheep. Reprod Fertil Dev 8, 1029–1037.O’Brien JK, Beck NFG, Maxwell WMC, Evans G, 1997a:Effect of hormone pre-treatment of prepubertal sheep on theproduction and developmental capacity of oocytes <strong>in</strong> vitroand <strong>in</strong> vivo. Reprod Fertil Dev 9, 625–631.O’Brien JK, Catt SL, Ireland KA, Maxwell WMC, Evans G,1997b: In vitro and <strong>in</strong> vivo developmental capacity ofoocytes from prepubertal and adult sheep. Theriogenology47, 1433–1443.Oropeza A, Wrenzycki C, Herrmann D, Hadeler K-G,Niemann H, 2004: Improvement of the developmentalcapacity of oocytes from prepubertal cattle by <strong>in</strong>traovarianIGF-I application. Biol Reprod 70, 1634–1643.Presicce GA, Jiang S, Simk<strong>in</strong> M, Yang X, 1995: Oocyte qualityand embryo development <strong>in</strong> prepubertal calves. Biol Reprod52(Suppl.), 127.Ptak G, Loi P, Dattena M, Tischner M, Cappai P, 1999:Offspr<strong>in</strong>g from one-month-old lambs: Studies on the developmentalcapability of prepubertal oocytes. Biol Reprod 61,1568–1574.Ptak G, Tischner M, Bernabo N, Loi P, 2003: Donordependantdevelopmental competence of oocytes fromlambs subjected to repeated hormonal stimulation. BiolReprod 69, 278–285.Ptak G, Matsukawa K, Palmieri C, Salda LD, Scapolo PA,Loi P, 2006: Developmental and functional evidence ofnuclear immaturity <strong>in</strong> prepubertal oocytes. Hum Reprod 21,2228–2237.Quirke JF, Hanrahan JP, 1977: Comparison of the survival <strong>in</strong>the uteri of adult ewes of cleaved ova from adult ewes andewe lambs. J Reprod Fertil 51, 487–489.Tassell R, Chamley AW, Kennedy JP, 1978: Gonadotroph<strong>in</strong>levels and ovarian development <strong>in</strong> the neonatal ewe lamb.Aust J Biol Sci 31, 267–273.Tervit HR, McMillan WH, McGowan LT, Smith JF, HallDR, Donnison MJ, 1997: Effect of juvenile calf age onfollicular dynamics and <strong>in</strong> vitro embryo production. Theriogenology47, 300.Trounson AO, Willadsen SM, Moor RM, 1977: Reproductivefunction <strong>in</strong> prepubertal lambs: ovulation, embryo developmentand ovarian steroidogenesis. J Reprod Fertil 49, 69–75.Van Soom A, Ysebaert MT, de Kruif A, 1997: Relationshipbetween tim<strong>in</strong>g of development, morula morphology andcell allocation to <strong>in</strong>ner cell mass and trophectoderm <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>vitro produced bov<strong>in</strong>e embryos. Mol Reprod Dev 47, 47–56.van der Werf J, 2005: Apply<strong>in</strong>g new technologies <strong>in</strong> sheepbreed<strong>in</strong>g programs. Mer<strong>in</strong>otech Best Practice Sheep Breed<strong>in</strong>gForum Kojonup, Western Australia, 17–23.Worth<strong>in</strong>gton CA, Kennedy JP, 1979: Ovarian response toexogenous hormones <strong>in</strong> six-week-old lambs. Aust J Biol Sci32, 91–95.Wrenzycki C, Herrmann D, Lucas-Hahn A, Korsawe K,Lemme E, Niemann H, 2005: Messenger RNA expressionpatterns <strong>in</strong> bov<strong>in</strong>e embryos derived from <strong>in</strong> vitro proceduresand their implications for development. Reprod Fertil Dev17, 23–35.Wright RW, Anderson GB, Cupps PT, Drost M, BradforsGE, 1976: In vitro culture of embryos from adult andprepubertal ewes. J Anim Sci 42, 912–917.Yang X, Presicce GA, Du F, Jiang S, 1997: Pregnancies andcalves derived from pre-pubertal calf oocytes. Theriogenology47, 163.Author’s address (for correspondence): Kather<strong>in</strong>e M. Morton, TheCamel <strong>Reproduction</strong> Centre, P.O. Box 79914, Dubai, United ArabEmirates. E-mail: kmorton@vetsci.usyd.edu.auConflict of <strong>in</strong>terest: The author declares no conflict of <strong>in</strong>terest.Ó 2008 The Author. Journal compilation Ó 2008 Blackwell Verlag
- Page 2 and 3:
Reproduction in Domestic AnimalsOff
- Page 5 and 6:
Reproductionin Domestic AnimalsTabl
- Page 7 and 8:
Minitüb:ProductsforArtificial Inse
- Page 9 and 10:
Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 1-7
- Page 11 and 12:
Embryo Biotechnologies in Farm Anim
- Page 13 and 14:
Embryo Biotechnologies in Farm Anim
- Page 15 and 16:
Embryo Biotechnologies in Farm Anim
- Page 17 and 18:
Ethical Models for Studying Reprodu
- Page 19 and 20:
Ethical Models for Studying Reprodu
- Page 21 and 22:
Ethical Models for Studying Reprodu
- Page 23 and 24:
Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 15-2
- Page 25 and 26:
Dietary Pollutants as Risk Factors
- Page 27 and 28:
Dietary Pollutants as Risk Factors
- Page 29 and 30:
Dietary Pollutants as Risk Factors
- Page 31 and 32:
Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Supp. 2), 23-30
- Page 33 and 34:
Factors Influencing Reproduction in
- Page 35 and 36:
Factors Influencing Reproduction in
- Page 37 and 38:
Factors Influencing Reproduction in
- Page 39 and 40:
Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 31-3
- Page 41 and 42:
GH and IGF-I in Cattle and Pigs 33h
- Page 43 and 44:
GH and IGF-I in Cattle and Pigs 35h
- Page 45 and 46:
GH and IGF-I in Cattle and Pigs 37B
- Page 47:
GH and IGF-I in Cattle and Pigs 39R
- Page 51 and 52:
Seasonality of Reproduction in Mamm
- Page 53 and 54:
Seasonality of Reproduction in Mamm
- Page 55 and 56:
Seasonality of Reproduction in Mamm
- Page 57 and 58:
Dominant Follicle Selection in Cows
- Page 59 and 60:
Dominant Follicle Selection in Cows
- Page 61 and 62:
Dominant Follicle Selection in Cows
- Page 63 and 64:
Dominant Follicle Selection in Cows
- Page 65 and 66:
Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 57-6
- Page 67 and 68:
Regulation of Luteal Function 59and
- Page 69 and 70:
Regulation of Luteal Function 61bov
- Page 71 and 72:
Regulation of Luteal Function 63(+/
- Page 73 and 74:
Regulation of Luteal Function 65sys
- Page 75 and 76:
Captive Breeding of Cheetahs in Sou
- Page 77 and 78:
Captive Breeding of Cheetahs in Sou
- Page 79 and 80:
Captive Breeding of Cheetahs in Sou
- Page 81 and 82:
Captive Breeding of Cheetahs in Sou
- Page 83 and 84:
Non-invasive Monitoring of Hormones
- Page 85 and 86:
Non-invasive Monitoring of Hormones
- Page 87 and 88:
Non-invasive Monitoring of Hormones
- Page 89 and 90:
Non-invasive Monitoring of Hormones
- Page 91 and 92:
Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 83-8
- Page 93 and 94:
Biotechnology Methods for Preservin
- Page 95 and 96:
Biotechnology Methods for Preservin
- Page 97 and 98:
Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 89-9
- Page 99 and 100: Genetic Improvement of Dairy Cow Re
- Page 101 and 102: Genetic Improvement of Dairy Cow Re
- Page 103 and 104: Genetic Improvement of Dairy Cow Re
- Page 105 and 106: Nutrient Prioritization and Fertili
- Page 107 and 108: Nutrient Prioritization and Fertili
- Page 109 and 110: Nutrient Prioritization and Fertili
- Page 111 and 112: Nutrient Prioritization and Fertili
- Page 113 and 114: CL-Endometrium-Embryo Interactions
- Page 115 and 116: CL-Endometrium-Embryo Interactions
- Page 117 and 118: CL-Endometrium-Embryo Interactions
- Page 119 and 120: CL-Endometrium-Embryo Interactions
- Page 121 and 122: Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 113-
- Page 123 and 124: Reproductive Status Assessed by Mil
- Page 125 and 126: Reproductive Status Assessed by Mil
- Page 127 and 128: Reproductive Status Assessed by Mil
- Page 129 and 130: Reproductive Status Assessed by Mil
- Page 131 and 132: Genetic Aspects of Reproduction in
- Page 133 and 134: Genetic Aspects of Reproduction in
- Page 135 and 136: Genetic Aspects of Reproduction in
- Page 137 and 138: Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 129-
- Page 139 and 140: Nutritional Interactions and Reprod
- Page 141 and 142: Nutritional Interactions and Reprod
- Page 143 and 144: Nutritional Interactions and Reprod
- Page 145 and 146: Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 137-
- Page 147 and 148: Developmental Capabilities of Prepu
- Page 149: Developmental Capabilities of Prepu
- Page 153 and 154: Reproductive Physiology, Pathology
- Page 155 and 156: Reproductive Physiology, Pathology
- Page 157 and 158: Reproductive Physiology, Pathology
- Page 159 and 160: Reproduction of Domestic Ferret 151
- Page 161 and 162: Reproduction of Domestic Ferret 153
- Page 163 and 164: Reproduction of Domestic Ferret 155
- Page 165 and 166: Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 157-
- Page 167 and 168: Canine Anoestrus, Oestrous Inductio
- Page 169 and 170: Canine Anoestrus, Oestrous Inductio
- Page 171 and 172: Canine Anoestrus, Oestrous Inductio
- Page 173 and 174: Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 165-
- Page 175 and 176: The Ethics and Role of AI in Dogs 1
- Page 177 and 178: The Ethics and Role of AI in Dogs 1
- Page 179 and 180: The Ethics and Role of AI in Dogs 1
- Page 181 and 182: Control of Fertility in Females by
- Page 183 and 184: Control of Fertility in Females by
- Page 185 and 186: Control of Fertility in Females by
- Page 187 and 188: Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 179-
- Page 189 and 190: Controlling Animal Populations Usin
- Page 191 and 192: Controlling Animal Populations Usin
- Page 193 and 194: Controlling Animal Populations Usin
- Page 195 and 196: Recombinant Gonadotropins in Assist
- Page 197 and 198: Recombinant Gonadotropins in Assist
- Page 199 and 200: Recombinant Gonadotropins in Assist
- Page 201 and 202:
Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 193-
- Page 203 and 204:
Farm Animals Embryonic Stem Cells 1
- Page 205 and 206:
Farm Animals Embryonic Stem Cells 1
- Page 207 and 208:
Farm Animals Embryonic Stem Cells 1
- Page 209 and 210:
Reproduction in Domestic Buffalo 20
- Page 211 and 212:
Reproduction in Domestic Buffalo 20
- Page 213 and 214:
Reproduction in Domestic Buffalo 20
- Page 215 and 216:
Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 207-
- Page 217 and 218:
Postpartum Ovarian Activity in Sout
- Page 219 and 220:
Postpartum Ovarian Activity in Sout
- Page 221 and 222:
Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 213-
- Page 223 and 224:
Mother-Offspring Interactions 215an
- Page 225 and 226:
Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 217-
- Page 227 and 228:
Reproduction Augmentation in Yak an
- Page 229 and 230:
Reproduction Augmentation in Yak an
- Page 231 and 232:
Reproduction Augmentation in Yak an
- Page 233 and 234:
Follicles and Mares 2251982). Simil
- Page 235 and 236:
Follicles and Mares 227Studies invo
- Page 237 and 238:
Follicles and Mares 229dominant fol
- Page 239 and 240:
Follicles and Mares 231trus, spring
- Page 241 and 242:
Proteins in Early Equine Conceptuse
- Page 243 and 244:
Proteins in Early Equine Conceptuse
- Page 245 and 246:
Proteins in Early Equine Conceptuse
- Page 247 and 248:
Follicular and Oocyte Competence un
- Page 249 and 250:
Follicular and Oocyte Competence un
- Page 251 and 252:
Follicular and Oocyte Competence un
- Page 253 and 254:
Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 245-
- Page 255 and 256:
Fertilization in the Porcine Fallop
- Page 257 and 258:
Fertilization in the Porcine Fallop
- Page 259 and 260:
Fertilization in the Porcine Fallop
- Page 261 and 262:
Mastitis in Post-Partum Dairy Cows
- Page 263 and 264:
Mastitis in Post-Partum Dairy Cows
- Page 265 and 266:
Mastitis in Post-Partum Dairy Cows
- Page 267 and 268:
Mastitis in Post-Partum Dairy Cows
- Page 269 and 270:
Embryo ⁄ Foetal Losses in Ruminan
- Page 271 and 272:
Embryo ⁄ Foetal Losses in Ruminan
- Page 273 and 274:
Embryo ⁄ Foetal Losses in Ruminan
- Page 275 and 276:
Embryo ⁄ Foetal Losses in Ruminan
- Page 277 and 278:
Death Ligand and Receptor Pig Ovari
- Page 279 and 280:
Death Ligand and Receptor Pig Ovari
- Page 281 and 282:
Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 273-
- Page 283:
Lactocrine Programming of Uterine D
- Page 286 and 287:
278 FF Bartol, AA Wiley and CA Bagn
- Page 288 and 289:
Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 280-
- Page 290 and 291:
282 KC Caires, JA Schmidt, AP Olive
- Page 292 and 293:
284 KC Caires, JA Schmidt, AP Olive
- Page 294 and 295:
286 KC Caires, JA Schmidt, AP Olive
- Page 296 and 297:
Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 288-
- Page 298 and 299:
290 I Dobrinskisuccessful also betw
- Page 300 and 301:
292 I DobrinskiCreemers LB, Meng X,
- Page 302 and 303:
294 I DobrinskiOkutsu T, Suzuki K,
- Page 304 and 305:
296 N Rawlings, ACO Evans, RK Chand
- Page 306 and 307:
298 N Rawlings, ACO Evans, RK Chand
- Page 308 and 309:
300 N Rawlings, ACO Evans, RK Chand
- Page 310 and 311:
Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 302-
- Page 312 and 313:
304 A Dinnyes, XC Tian and X Yanggr
- Page 314 and 315:
306 A Dinnyes, XC Tian and X YangIn
- Page 316 and 317:
308 A Dinnyes, XC Tian and X YangHo
- Page 318 and 319:
Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 310-
- Page 320 and 321:
312 RC Bott, DT Clopton and AS Cupp
- Page 322 and 323:
314 RC Bott, DT Clopton and AS Cupp
- Page 324 and 325:
316 RC Bott, DT Clopton and AS Cupp
- Page 326 and 327:
318 BK Whitlock, JA Daniel, RR Wilb
- Page 328 and 329:
320 BK Whitlock, JA Daniel, RR Wilb
- Page 330 and 331:
322 BK Whitlock, JA Daniel, RR Wilb
- Page 332 and 333:
Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 324-
- Page 334 and 335:
326 CR Barb, GJ Hausman and CA Lent
- Page 336 and 337:
328 CR Barb, GJ Hausman and CA Lent
- Page 338 and 339:
330 CR Barb, GJ Hausman and CA Lent
- Page 340 and 341:
332 C Galli, I Lagutina, R Duchi, S
- Page 342 and 343:
334 C Galli, I Lagutina, R Duchi, S
- Page 344 and 345:
336 C Galli, I Lagutina, R Duchi, S
- Page 346 and 347:
Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 338-
- Page 348 and 349:
340 D Rath and LA JohnsonCommercial
- Page 350 and 351:
342 D Rath and LA JohnsonThe Commer
- Page 352 and 353:
344 D Rath and LA JohnsonX- and Y-b
- Page 354 and 355:
346 D Rath and LA JohnsonWalker SK,
- Page 356 and 357:
348 JM Vazquez, J Roca, MA Gil, C C
- Page 358 and 359:
350 JM Vazquez, J Roca, MA Gil, C C
- Page 360 and 361:
352 JM Vazquez, J Roca, MA Gil, C C
- Page 362 and 363:
354 JM Vazquez, J Roca, MA Gil, C C
- Page 364 and 365:
356 CBA Whitelaw, SG Lillico and T
- Page 366 and 367:
358 CBA Whitelaw, SG Lillico and T
- Page 368 and 369:
360 ACO Evans, N Forde, GM O’Gorm
- Page 370 and 371:
362 ACO Evans, N Forde, GM O’Gorm
- Page 372 and 373:
364 ACO Evans, N Forde, GM O’Gorm
- Page 374 and 375:
366 ACO Evans, N Forde, GM O’Gorm
- Page 376 and 377:
Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 368-
- Page 378 and 379:
370 JP Kastelic and JC Thundathilsp
- Page 380 and 381:
372 JP Kastelic and JC Thundathilme
- Page 382 and 383:
Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 374-
- Page 384 and 385:
376 GC AlthouseTable 1. Potential s
- Page 386 and 387:
378 GC Althousesemen to the domesti
- Page 388 and 389:
380 B Leboeuf, JA Delgadillo, E Man
- Page 390 and 391:
382 B Leboeuf, JA Delgadillo, E Man
- Page 392 and 393:
384 B Leboeuf, JA Delgadillo, E Man
- Page 394 and 395:
Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 386-
- Page 396 and 397:
388 N Kostereva and M-C HofmannFig.
- Page 398 and 399:
390 N Kostereva and M-C HofmannMMPs
- Page 400 and 401:
392 N Kostereva and M-C HofmannTado
- Page 402 and 403:
394 P Mermillod, R Dalbie` s-Tran,
- Page 404 and 405:
396 P Mermillod, R Dalbie` s-Tran,
- Page 406 and 407:
398 P Mermillod, R Dalbie` s-Tran,
- Page 408 and 409:
400 P Mermillod, R Dalbie` s-Tran,
- Page 410 and 411:
402 K Kikuchi, N Kashiwazaki, T Nag
- Page 412 and 413:
404 K Kikuchi, N Kashiwazaki, T Nag
- Page 414 and 415:
406 K Kikuchi, N Kashiwazaki, T Nag
- Page 416 and 417:
408 B ObackNumber of publications20
- Page 418 and 419:
410 B ObackReprogramming Ability of
- Page 420 and 421:
412 B Obackstudies have shown that
- Page 422 and 423:
414 B ObackFig. 4. Climbing mount e
- Page 424 and 425:
416 B ObackRenard JP, Maruotti J, J
- Page 426 and 427:
418 P Loi, K Matzukawa, G Ptak, Y N
- Page 428 and 429:
420 P Loi, K Matzukawa, G Ptak, Y N
- Page 430 and 431:
422 P Loi, K Matzukawa, G Ptak, Y N
- Page 434:
Table of Contents Volume 43 · Supp