Reproduction in Domestic Animals

More documents

Recommendations

Info

$(Microsoft PowerPoint - Lecci\363n 2_07.ppt)$

258 S Pyo¨ra¨lätreatment with pirlimycin hydrochloride on prevalence ofearly first-lactation mastitis in dairy heifers. J Am Vet MedAssoc 227, 1969–1974.Monfardini E, Paape MJ, Wang Y, Capuco AV, Husheem M,Wood L, Burvenich C, 2002: Evaluation of L-selectinexpression and assessment of protein tyrosinephosphorylation in bovine polymorphonuclear neutrophilleukocytes around parturition. Vet Res 33, 271–281.Myllys V, 1995: Staphylococci in heifer mastitis before andafter parturition. J Dairy Res 62, 51–60.Oliver SP, Sordillo LM, 1988: Udder health in the periparturientperiod. J Dairy Sci 71, 2584–2606.Oliver SP, Lewis TM, Lewis MJ, Dowlen HH, Maki JL, 1990:Persistence of antibiotics in bovine mammary secretionsfollowing intramammary infusion at cessation of milking.Prev Vet Med 9, 301–311.Oliver SP, Lewis MJ, Gillespie BE, Dowlen HH, Jaenicke EC,Roberts RK, 2003: Prepartum antibiotic treatment ofheifers: milk production, milk quality and economic benefit.J Dairy Sci 86, 1187–1193.Osteras O, Edge VL, Martin SW, 1999: Determinants of successor failure in the elimination of major mastitis pathogens inselective dry cow therapy. J Dairy Sci 82, 1221–1231.Paape MJ, Bannerman DD, Zhao X, Lee JW, 2003: Thebovine neutrophil: structure and function in blood and milk.Vet Res 34, 597–627.Pantoja J, Ruegg P, 2007: Somatic cell count and incidence ofnew intramammary infection across lactation. NMC AnnualMeeting, San Antonio, TX, USA, p. 226.Parker KI, Compton C, Anniss FM, Weir A, Heuer C,McDougall S, 2007: Subclinical and clinical mastitis inheifers following the use of a teat sealant precalving. J DairySci 90, 207–218.Persson WK, Hallen SC, Emanuelson U, Jensen SK, 2007:Supplementation of RRR-alpha-tocopheryl acetate to periparturientdairy cows in commercial herds with high mastitisincidence. J Dairy Sci 90, 3640–3646.Pyo¨rälä SH, Pyo¨ra¨la¨ EO, 1998: Efficacy of parenteral administrationof three antimicrobial agents in treatment ofclinical mastitis in lactating cows: 487 cases (1989–1995). JAm Vet Med Assoc 212, 407–412.Rainard P, 2003: The complement in milk and defense of thebovine mammary gland against infections. Vet Res 34, 647–670.Rainard P, Riollet C, 2006: Innate immunity of the bovinemammary gland. Vet Res 37, 369–400.Rajala-Schultz PJ, Hogan JS, Smith KL, 2005: Short communication:association between milk yield at dry-off andprobability of intramammary infections at calving. J DairySci 88, 577–579.Robert A, Seegers H, Bareille N, 2006: Incidence of intramammaryinfections during the dry period without or withantibiotic treatment in dairy cows – a quantitative analysisof published data. Vet Res 37, 25–48.Sargeant JM, Leslie KE, Shirley JE, Pulkrabek BJ, Lim GH,2001: Sensitivity and specificity of somatic cell count andCalifornia Mastitis Test for identifying intramammaryinfection in early lactation. J Dairy Sci 84, 2018–2024.Shafer-Weaver KA, Pighetti GM, Sordillo LM, 1996: Diminishedmammary gland lymphocyte functions parallel shiftsin trafficking patterns during the postpartum period. ProcSoc Exp Biol Med 212, 271–280.Smith KL, Schanbacher FL, 1977: Lactoferrin as a factor ofresistance to infection of the bovine mammary gland. J AmVet Med Assoc 170, 1224–1227.Smith KL, Harrison JH, Hancock DD, Todhunter DA,Conrad HR, 1984: Effect of vitamin E and seleniumsupplementation on incidence of clinical mastitis andduration of clinical symptoms. J Dairy Sci 67, 1293–1300.Smith KL, Todhunter DA, Schoenberger PS, 1985: Environmentalpathogens and intramammary infection during thedry period. J Dairy Sci 68, 402–417.Sol J, Sampimon OC, Barkema HW, Schukken YH, 2000:Factors associated with cure after therapy of clinical mastitiscaused by Staphylococcus aureus. J Dairy Sci 83, 278–284.Sordillo LM, 2005: Factors affecting mammary gland immunityand mastitis susceptibility. Livestock Prod Sci 98,89–99.Sordillo LM, Pighetti GM, Davis MR, 1995: Enhancedproduction of bovine tumor necrosis factor-alpha duringthe periparturient period. Vet Immunol Immunopathol 49,263–270.Spain JN, Scheer WA, 2006: Transition cow nutrition andmastitis – balancing all the factors. NMC Annual Meeting,Tampa, FL, USA, pp. 172–174.Svensson C, Nyman AK, Persson WK, Emanuelson U, 2006:Effects of housing, management, and health of dairy heiferson first-lactation udder health in southwest Sweden. J DairySci 89, 1990–1999.Talbot BG, Lacasse P, 2005: Progress in the development ofmastitis vaccines. Livestock Prod Sci 98, 101–113.Taponen S, Simojoki H, Haveri M, Larsen HD, Pyorala S,2006: Clinical characteristics and persistence of bovinemastitis caused by different species of coagulase-negativestaphylococci identified with API or AFLP. Vet Microbiol115, 199–207.Taponen S, Koort J, Bjo¨rkroth J, Saloniemi H, Pyo¨rälä S,2007: Bovine intramammary infections caused by coagulasenegativestaphylococci may persist throughout lactationaccording to amplified fragment length polymorphismbasedanalysis. J Dairy Sci 90, 3301–3307.Todhunter DA, Smith KL, Hogan JS, Schoenberger PS, 1991:Gram-negative bacterial infections of the mammary gland incows. Am J Vet Res 52, 184–188.Tomita GM, Ray CH, Nickerson SC, Owens WE, Gallo GF,2000: A comparison of two commercially available Escherichiacoli J5 vaccines against E. coli intramammary challenge.J Dairy Sci 83, 2276–2281.Valde JP, Lawson LG, Lindberg A, Agger JF, Saloniemi H,Osteras O, 2004: Cumulative risk of bovine mastitis treatmentsin Denmark, Finland, Norway and Sweden. Acta VetScand 45, 201–210.Vandeputte-Van Messom G, Burvenich C, Roets E, Massart-Leen AM, Heyneman R, Kremer WD, Brand A, 1993:Classification of newly calved cows into moderate and severeresponders to experimentally induced Escherichia coli mastitis.J Dairy Res 60, 19–29.Vangroenweghe F, Duchateau L, Burvenich C, 2004: Moderateinflammatory reaction during experimental Escherichiacoli mastitis in primiparous cows. J Dairy Sci 87, 886–895.Waage S, Mork T, Roros A, Aasland D, Hunshamar A,Odegaard SA, 1999: Bacteria associated with clinical mastitisin dairy heifers. J Dairy Sci 82, 712–719.Weber PS, Toelboell T, Chang LC, Tirrell JD, Saama PM,Smith GW, Burton JL, 2004: Mechanisms of glucocorticoid-induceddown-regulation of neutrophil L-selectin incattle: evidence for effects at the gene-expression level andprimarily on blood neutrophils. J Leukoc Biol 75, 815–827.Whist AC, Osteras O, Solverod L, 2006: Clinical mastitis inNorwegian herds after a combined selective dry-cow therapyand teat-dipping trial. J Dairy Sci 89, 4649–4659.Williamson JH, Woolford MW, Day AM, 1995: The prophylacticeffect of a dry-cow antibiotic against Streptococcusuberis. NZ Vet J 43, 228–234.Wilson DJ, Grohn YT, Bennett GJ, Gonzalez RN, SchukkenYH, Spatz J, 2007a: Comparison of J5 vaccinates andcontrols for incidence, etiologic agent, clinical severity, andÓ 2008 The Author. Journal compilation Ó 2008 Blackwell Verlag
Mastitis in Post-Partum Dairy Cows 259survival in the herd following naturally occurring cases ofclinical mastitis. J Dairy Sci 90, 4282–4288.Wilson DJ, Mallard BA, Burton JL, Schukken YH, GrohnYT, 2007b: Milk and serum J5-specific antibodyresponses, milk production change, and clinical effectsfollowing intramammary Escherichia coli challenge for J5vaccinate and control cows. Clin Vaccine Immunol 14,693–699.Zerbe H, Schneider N, Leibold W, Wensing T, Kruip TA,Schuberth HJ, 2000: Altered functional and immunophenotypicalproperties of neutrophilic granulocytes in postpartumcows associated with fatty liver. Theriogenology 54,771–786.Author’s address (for correspondence): S Pyörälä, Department ofProduction Animal Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Universityof Helsinki, Saarentaus, FI-07920, Finland. E-mail: satu.pyorala@helsinki.fiConflict of interest: The author declares no conflict of interest.Ó 2008 The Author. Journal compilation Ó 2008 Blackwell Verlag
Page 2 and 3:
Reproduction in Domestic AnimalsOff
Page 5 and 6:
Reproductionin Domestic AnimalsTabl
Page 7 and 8:
Minitüb:ProductsforArtificial Inse
Page 9 and 10:
Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 1-7
Page 11 and 12:
Embryo Biotechnologies in Farm Anim
Page 13 and 14:
Page 15 and 16:
Page 17 and 18:
Ethical Models for Studying Reprodu
Page 19 and 20:
Page 21 and 22:
Page 23 and 24:
Page 25 and 26:
Dietary Pollutants as Risk Factors
Page 27 and 28:
Page 29 and 30:
Page 31 and 32:
Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Supp. 2), 23-30
Page 33 and 34:
Factors Influencing Reproduction in
Page 35 and 36:
Page 37 and 38:
Page 39 and 40:
Page 41 and 42:
GH and IGF-I in Cattle and Pigs 33h
Page 43 and 44:
GH and IGF-I in Cattle and Pigs 35h
Page 45 and 46:
GH and IGF-I in Cattle and Pigs 37B
Page 47:
GH and IGF-I in Cattle and Pigs 39R
Page 51 and 52:
Seasonality of Reproduction in Mamm
Page 53 and 54:
Page 55 and 56:
Page 57 and 58:
Dominant Follicle Selection in Cows
Page 59 and 60:
Page 61 and 62:
Page 63 and 64:
Page 65 and 66:
Page 67 and 68:
Regulation of Luteal Function 59and
Page 69 and 70:
Regulation of Luteal Function 61bov
Page 71 and 72:
Regulation of Luteal Function 63(+/
Page 73 and 74:
Regulation of Luteal Function 65sys
Page 75 and 76:
Captive Breeding of Cheetahs in Sou
Page 77 and 78:
Page 79 and 80:
Page 81 and 82:
Page 83 and 84:
Non-invasive Monitoring of Hormones
Page 85 and 86:
Page 87 and 88:
Page 89 and 90:
Page 91 and 92:
Page 93 and 94:
Biotechnology Methods for Preservin
Page 95 and 96:
Biotechnology Methods for Preservin
Page 97 and 98:
Page 99 and 100:
Genetic Improvement of Dairy Cow Re
Page 101 and 102:
Page 103 and 104:
Page 105 and 106:
Nutrient Prioritization and Fertili
Page 107 and 108:
Page 109 and 110:
Page 111 and 112:
Page 113 and 114:
CL-Endometrium-Embryo Interactions
Page 115 and 116:
Page 117 and 118:
Page 119 and 120:
Page 121 and 122:
Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 113-
Page 123 and 124:
Reproductive Status Assessed by Mil
Page 125 and 126:
Page 127 and 128:
Page 129 and 130:
Page 131 and 132:
Genetic Aspects of Reproduction in
Page 133 and 134:
Page 135 and 136:
Page 137 and 138:
Page 139 and 140:
Nutritional Interactions and Reprod
Page 141 and 142:
Page 143 and 144:
Page 145 and 146:
Page 147 and 148:
Developmental Capabilities of Prepu
Page 149 and 150:
Page 151 and 152:
Page 153 and 154:
Reproductive Physiology, Pathology
Page 155 and 156:
Page 157 and 158:
Page 159 and 160:
Reproduction of Domestic Ferret 151
Page 161 and 162:
Page 163 and 164:
Page 165 and 166:
Page 167 and 168:
Canine Anoestrus, Oestrous Inductio
Page 169 and 170:
Page 171 and 172:
Page 173 and 174:
Page 175 and 176:
The Ethics and Role of AI in Dogs 1
Page 177 and 178:
Page 179 and 180:
Page 181 and 182:
Control of Fertility in Females by
Page 183 and 184:
Page 185 and 186:
Page 187 and 188:
Page 189 and 190:
Controlling Animal Populations Usin
Page 191 and 192:
Page 193 and 194:
Page 195 and 196:
Recombinant Gonadotropins in Assist
Page 197 and 198:
Page 199 and 200:
Page 201 and 202:
Page 203 and 204:
Farm Animals Embryonic Stem Cells 1
Page 205 and 206:
Page 207 and 208:
Page 209 and 210:
Reproduction in Domestic Buffalo 20
Page 211 and 212:
Page 213 and 214:
Page 215 and 216: Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 207-
Page 217 and 218: Postpartum Ovarian Activity in Sout
Page 219 and 220: Postpartum Ovarian Activity in Sout
Page 223 and 224: Mother-Offspring Interactions 215an
Page 227 and 228: Reproduction Augmentation in Yak an
Page 233 and 234: Follicles and Mares 2251982). Simil
Page 235 and 236: Follicles and Mares 227Studies invo
Page 237 and 238: Follicles and Mares 229dominant fol
Page 239 and 240: Follicles and Mares 231trus, spring
Page 241 and 242: Proteins in Early Equine Conceptuse
Page 247 and 248: Follicular and Oocyte Competence un
Page 255 and 256: Fertilization in the Porcine Fallop
Page 261 and 262: Mastitis in Post-Partum Dairy Cows
Page 263 and 264: Mastitis in Post-Partum Dairy Cows
Page 265: Mastitis in Post-Partum Dairy Cows
Page 269 and 270: Embryo ⁄ Foetal Losses in Ruminan
Page 277 and 278: Death Ligand and Receptor Pig Ovari
Page 279 and 280: Death Ligand and Receptor Pig Ovari
Page 283: Lactocrine Programming of Uterine D
Page 286 and 287: 278 FF Bartol, AA Wiley and CA Bagn
Page 290 and 291: 282 KC Caires, JA Schmidt, AP Olive
Page 298 and 299: 290 I Dobrinskisuccessful also betw
Page 300 and 301: 292 I DobrinskiCreemers LB, Meng X,
Page 302 and 303: 294 I DobrinskiOkutsu T, Suzuki K,
Page 304 and 305: 296 N Rawlings, ACO Evans, RK Chand
Page 312 and 313: 304 A Dinnyes, XC Tian and X Yanggr
Page 314 and 315: 306 A Dinnyes, XC Tian and X YangIn
Page 316 and 317:
308 A Dinnyes, XC Tian and X YangHo
Page 318 and 319:
Page 320 and 321:
312 RC Bott, DT Clopton and AS Cupp
Page 322 and 323:
Page 324 and 325:
Page 326 and 327:
318 BK Whitlock, JA Daniel, RR Wilb
Page 328 and 329:
Page 330 and 331:
Page 332 and 333:
Page 334 and 335:
326 CR Barb, GJ Hausman and CA Lent
Page 336 and 337:
Page 338 and 339:
Page 340 and 341:
332 C Galli, I Lagutina, R Duchi, S
Page 342 and 343:
Page 344 and 345:
Page 346 and 347:
Page 348 and 349:
340 D Rath and LA JohnsonCommercial
Page 350 and 351:
342 D Rath and LA JohnsonThe Commer
Page 352 and 353:
344 D Rath and LA JohnsonX- and Y-b
Page 354 and 355:
346 D Rath and LA JohnsonWalker SK,
Page 356 and 357:
348 JM Vazquez, J Roca, MA Gil, C C
Page 358 and 359:
Page 360 and 361:
Page 362 and 363:
Page 364 and 365:
356 CBA Whitelaw, SG Lillico and T
Page 366 and 367:
358 CBA Whitelaw, SG Lillico and T
Page 368 and 369:
360 ACO Evans, N Forde, GM O’Gorm
Page 370 and 371:
Page 372 and 373:
Page 374 and 375:
Page 376 and 377:
Page 378 and 379:
370 JP Kastelic and JC Thundathilsp
Page 380 and 381:
372 JP Kastelic and JC Thundathilme
Page 382 and 383:
Page 384 and 385:
376 GC AlthouseTable 1. Potential s
Page 386 and 387:
378 GC Althousesemen to the domesti
Page 388 and 389:
380 B Leboeuf, JA Delgadillo, E Man
Page 390 and 391:
Page 392 and 393:
Page 394 and 395:
Page 396 and 397:
388 N Kostereva and M-C HofmannFig.
Page 398 and 399:
390 N Kostereva and M-C HofmannMMPs
Page 400 and 401:
392 N Kostereva and M-C HofmannTado
Page 402 and 403:
394 P Mermillod, R Dalbie` s-Tran,
Page 404 and 405:
Page 406 and 407:
Page 408 and 409:
Page 410 and 411:
402 K Kikuchi, N Kashiwazaki, T Nag
Page 412 and 413:
Page 414 and 415:
Page 416 and 417:
408 B ObackNumber of publications20
Page 418 and 419:
410 B ObackReprogramming Ability of
Page 420 and 421:
412 B Obackstudies have shown that
Page 422 and 423:
414 B ObackFig. 4. Climbing mount e
Page 424 and 425:
416 B ObackRenard JP, Maruotti J, J
Page 426 and 427:
418 P Loi, K Matzukawa, G Ptak, Y N
Page 428 and 429:
Page 430 and 431:
Page 434:
Table of Contents Volume 43 · Supp
show all

Reproduction in Domestic Animals

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?