366 ACO Evans, N Forde, GM O’Gorman, AE Zielak, P Lonergan and T FairCorcoran D, Fair T, Park S, Rizos D, Patel OV, Smith GW,Coussens PM, Ireland JJ, Boland MP, Evans ACO, LonerganP, 2006: Suppressed expression of genes <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong>transcription and translation <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong> vitro compared with <strong>in</strong>vivo cultured bov<strong>in</strong>e embryos. <strong>Reproduction</strong> 131, 651–660.Dalbies-Tran R, Mermillod P, 2003: Use of heterologouscomplementary DNA array screen<strong>in</strong>g to analyze bov<strong>in</strong>eoocyte transcriptome and its evolution dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> vitromaturation. Biol Reprod 68, 252–261.Dalma-Weiszhausz DD, Warr<strong>in</strong>gton J, Tanimoto EY, MiyadaCG, 2006: The affymetrix GeneChip platform: an overview.Methods Enzymol 410, 3–28.De Bruyne V, Al-Mulla F, Pot B, 2007: Methods formicroarray data analysis. Methods Mol Biol 382, 373–391.Dessie SW, R<strong>in</strong>gs F, Holker M, Gilles M, Jennen D, Tholen E,Havelicek V, Besenfelder U, Sukhorukov VL, ZimmermanU, Endter JM, Sirad MA, Schellander K, Tesfaye D, 2007:Dielectrophoretic behavior of <strong>in</strong> vitro-derived bov<strong>in</strong>e metaphaseII oocytes and zygotes and its relation to <strong>in</strong> vitroembryonic developmental competence and mRNA expressionpattern. <strong>Reproduction</strong> 133, 931–946.Disk<strong>in</strong> MG, Murphy JJ, Sreenan JM, 2006: Embryo survival<strong>in</strong> dairy cows managed under pastoral conditions. AnimReprod Sci 96, 297–311.Dunne LD, Disk<strong>in</strong> MG, Sreenan JM, 2000: Embryo and foetalloss <strong>in</strong> beef heifers between day 14 of gestation and full term.Anim Reprod Sci 58, 39–44.El-Sayed A, Hoelker M, R<strong>in</strong>gs F, Salilew D, Jennen D, TholenE, Sirard MA, Schellander K, Tesfaye D, 2006: Large-scaletranscriptional analysis of bov<strong>in</strong>e embryo biopsies <strong>in</strong> relationto pregnancy success after transfer to recipients. PhysiolGenomics 28, 84–96.Evans ACO, Ireland JLH, W<strong>in</strong>n ME, Lonergan P, Smith GW,Coussens PM, Ireland JJ, 2004: Identification of genes<strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> apoptosis and dom<strong>in</strong>ant follicle developmentdur<strong>in</strong>g follicular waves <strong>in</strong> cattle. Biol Reprod 70, 1475–1484.Everts RE, Band MR, Liu ZL, Kumar CG, Liu L, Loor JJ,Oliveira R, Lew<strong>in</strong> HA, 2005: A 7872 cDNA microarray andits use <strong>in</strong> bov<strong>in</strong>e functional genomics. Vet Immunol Immunopathol105, 235–245.Fair T, Murphy M, Rizos D, Moss C, Mart<strong>in</strong> F, Boland MP,Lonergan P, 2004: Analysis of differential maternal mRNAexpression <strong>in</strong> developmentally competent and <strong>in</strong>competentbov<strong>in</strong>e two-cell embryos. Mol Reprod Dev 67, 136–144.Fair T, Carter F, Park S, Evans ACO, Lonergan P, 2007:Global gene expression analysis dur<strong>in</strong>g bov<strong>in</strong>e oocyte <strong>in</strong>vitro maturation. Theriogenology 68(Suppl. 1), S91–S97.Fields S, 2007: Molecular biology. Site-see<strong>in</strong>g by sequenc<strong>in</strong>g.Science 316, 1441–1442.Forde N, Rogers M, Canty MJ, Lonergan P, Smith GW,Coussens PM, Ireland JJ, Evans ACO, 2007: Association ofthe prion prote<strong>in</strong> and its expression with ovarian follicledevelopment <strong>in</strong> cattle. Mol Reprod Dev 75, 248–249.Forde N, Mihm M, Canty M, Zielak A, Baker P, Park S,Lonergan P, Smith G, Coussens P, Ireland J, Evans A, 2008a:Differential expression of signal transduction factors <strong>in</strong>ovarian follicle development; a role for betaglycan andFIBP <strong>in</strong> granulosa cells <strong>in</strong> cattle. Physiol Genomics 33,193–204.Forde N, Carter F, Fair T, Crowe MA, Evans ACO, SpencerTE, Bazer FW, O’Gaora P, McBride R, Boland MP,Lonergan P, Roche JF, 2008b: Effect of pregnancy andprogesterone on gene expression <strong>in</strong> the uter<strong>in</strong>e endometriumof cattle. Annual Meet<strong>in</strong>g of the Society for the Study of<strong>Reproduction</strong>, Hawaii, USA (27 to 30 May 2008). Biologyof <strong>Reproduction</strong>, Special Issue, Abstract #37.Fortune JE, Rivera GM, Yang MY, 2004: Follicular development:the role of the follicular microenvironment <strong>in</strong> selectionof the dom<strong>in</strong>ant follicle. Anim Reprod Sci 82–83, 109–126.Garrett JE, Geisert RD, Zavy MT, Morgan GL, 1988:Evidence for maternal regulation of early conceptus growthand development <strong>in</strong> beef cattle. J Reprod Fertil 84, 437–446.Ghanem N, Holker M, R<strong>in</strong>gs F, Jennen D, Tholen E, SirardMA, Torner H, Kanitz W, Schellander K, Tesfaye D, 2007:Alterations <strong>in</strong> transcript abundance of bov<strong>in</strong>e oocytesrecovered at growth and dom<strong>in</strong>ance phases of the firstfollicular wave. BMC Dev Biol 7, 90.Grant GR, Manduchi E, Stoeckert CJ Jr, 2007: Analysis andmanagement of microarray gene expression data. CurrProtoc Mol Biol (Suppl. 77) Chapter 19.6, 1–30.Hager J, 2006: Mak<strong>in</strong>g and us<strong>in</strong>g spotted DNA microarrays <strong>in</strong>an academic core laboratory. Methods Enzymol 410, 135–168.Heyman Y, Chavatte-Palmer P, LeBourhis D, Camous S,Vignon X, Renard JP, 2002: Frequency and occurrence oflate-gestation losses from cattle cloned embryos. BiolReprod 66, 6–13.Hill JR, Burghardt RC, Jones K, Long CR, Looney CR, Sh<strong>in</strong>T, Spencer TE, Thompson JA, W<strong>in</strong>ger QA, Westhus<strong>in</strong> ME,2000: Evidence for placental abnormality as the major causeof mortality <strong>in</strong> first-trimester somatic cell cloned bov<strong>in</strong>efetuses. Biol Reprod 63, 1787–1794.Holloway AJ, van Laar RK, Tothill RW, Bowtell DD, 2002:Options available – from start to f<strong>in</strong>ish – for obta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g datafrom DNA microarrays II. Nat Genet 32(Suppl.), 481–489.Horcajadas JA, Sharkey AM, Catalano RD, Sherw<strong>in</strong> JR,Dom<strong>in</strong>guez F, Burgos LA, Castro A, Peraza MR, PellicerA, Simon C, 2006: Effect of an <strong>in</strong>trauter<strong>in</strong>e device on thegene expression profile of the endometrium. J Cl<strong>in</strong> Endocr<strong>in</strong>olMetab 91, 3199–3207.Hughes TR, Mao M, Jones AR, Burchard J, Marton MJ,Shannon KW, Lefkowitz SM, Ziman M, Schelter JM, MeyerMB, Kobayashi S, Davis C, Dai H, He YD, Stephaniants SB,Cavet G, Walker WL, West A, Coffey E, Shoemaker DD,Stoughton R, Blanchard AP, Friend SH, L<strong>in</strong>sley PS, 2001:Expression profil<strong>in</strong>g us<strong>in</strong>g microarrays fabricated by an <strong>in</strong>kjetoligonucleotide synthesizer. Nat Biotechnol 19, 342–347.Humblot P, 2001: Use of pregnancy specific prote<strong>in</strong>s andprogesterone assays to monitor pregnancy and determ<strong>in</strong>ethe tim<strong>in</strong>g, frequencies and sources of embryonic mortality<strong>in</strong> rum<strong>in</strong>ants. Theriogenology 56, 1417–1433.Johnson GA, Spencer TE, Burghardt RC, Joyce MM, BazerFW, 2000: Interferon-tau and progesterone regulate ubiquit<strong>in</strong>cross-reactive prote<strong>in</strong> expression <strong>in</strong> the ov<strong>in</strong>e uterus.Biol Reprod 62, 622–627.Joyce M, Burghardt R, Bazer F, Zaunbrecher G, Johnson G,2003: Interferon-stimulated genes (ISGs) are <strong>in</strong>duced <strong>in</strong> theendometrium of pregnant but not pseudopregnant pigs. BiolReprod 68 (Suppl. 1), Abstract 230, 206.Kashiwagi A, DiGirolamo CM, Kanda Y, Niikura Y, EsmonCT, Hansen TR, Shioda T, Pru JK, 2007: The postimplantationembryo differentially regulates endometrial gene expressionand decidualization. Endocr<strong>in</strong>ology 148, 4173–4184.Kle<strong>in</strong> C, Bauersachs S, Ulbrich SE, E<strong>in</strong>spanier R, Meyer HH,Schmidt SE, Reichenbach HD, Vermehren M, S<strong>in</strong>owatz F,Blum H, Wolf E, 2006: Monozygotic tw<strong>in</strong> model reveals novelembryo-<strong>in</strong>duced transcriptome changes of bov<strong>in</strong>e endometrium<strong>in</strong> the preattachment period. Biol Reprod 74, 253–264.Kreil DP, Russell RR, Russell S, 2006: Microarray oligonucleotideprobes. Methods Enzymol 410, 73–98.L<strong>in</strong>genfelter BM, Dailey RA, Inskeep EK, Vernon MW, PooleDH, Rh<strong>in</strong>ehart JD, Yao J, 2008: Microarray analysis ofgene expression <strong>in</strong> granulosal cells from persistent follicles <strong>in</strong>cattle. Anim Reprod Sci 104, 405–413.Lonergan P, Rizos D, Gutierrez-Adan A, Fair T, Boland MP,2003: Oocyte and embryo quality: effect of orig<strong>in</strong>, cultureconditions and gene expression patterns. Reprod DomestAnim 38, 259–267.Ó 2008 The Authors. Journal compilation Ó 2008 Blackwell Verlag
Use of Microarray Technology for <strong>Reproduction</strong> <strong>in</strong> Cattle 367Lonergan P, Pedersen HG, Rizos D, Greve T, Thomsen PD,Fair T, Evans A, Boland MP, 2004: Effect of the postfertilizationculture environment on the <strong>in</strong>cidence of chromosomeaberrations <strong>in</strong> bov<strong>in</strong>e blastocysts. Biol Reprod 71,1096–1100.Lonergan P, Fair T, Corcoran D, Evans ACO, 2006: Effect ofculture environment on gene expression and developmentalcharacteristics <strong>in</strong> IVF-derived embryos. Theriogenology 65,137–152.Lyons P, 2003: Advances <strong>in</strong> spotted microarray resources forexpression profil<strong>in</strong>g. Brief Funct Genomic Proteomic 2, 21–30.McGall GH, Christians FC, 2002: High-density geneChipoligonucleotide probe arrays. Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol77, 21–42.McKusick VA, Ruddle FH, 1987: A new discipl<strong>in</strong>e, a newname, a new journal. Genomics 1, 1–2.Mihm M, Bleach EC, 2003: Endocr<strong>in</strong>e regulation of ovarianantral follicle development <strong>in</strong> cattle. Anim Reprod Sci 78,217–237.Mihm M, Evans ACO, 2008: Mechanisms for dom<strong>in</strong>ant follicleselection <strong>in</strong> monovulatory species: a comparison of morphological,endocr<strong>in</strong>e and <strong>in</strong>traovarian events <strong>in</strong> cows, maresand women. Reprod Domest Anim 43(Suppl. 2), 48–56.Mihm M, Baker PJ, Ireland JL, Smith GW, Coussens PM,Evans ACO, Ireland JJ, 2006: Molecular evidence that growthof dom<strong>in</strong>ant follicles <strong>in</strong>volves a reduction <strong>in</strong> follicle-stimulat<strong>in</strong>ghormone dependence and an <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> lute<strong>in</strong>iz<strong>in</strong>ghormone dependence <strong>in</strong> cattle. Biol Reprod 74, 1051–1059.Mihm M, Baker PJ, Flem<strong>in</strong>g LM, Monteiro AM, O’ShaughnessyPJ, 2008: Differentiation of the bov<strong>in</strong>e dom<strong>in</strong>antfollicle from the cohort upregulates mRNA expression fornew tissue development genes. <strong>Reproduction</strong> 135, 253–265.Misirlioglu M, Page GP, Sagirkaya H, Kaya A, Parrish JJ,First NL, Memili E, 2006: Dynamics of global transcriptome<strong>in</strong> bov<strong>in</strong>e matured oocytes and preimplantationembryos. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103, 18905–18910.Mitko K, Ulbrich SE, Wenigerk<strong>in</strong>d H, S<strong>in</strong>owatz F, Blum H,Wolf E, Bauersachs S, 2008: Dynamic changes <strong>in</strong> messengerRNA profiles of bov<strong>in</strong>e endometrium dur<strong>in</strong>g the oestrouscycle. <strong>Reproduction</strong> 135, 225–240.Mourot M, Dufort I, Gravel C, Algriany O, Dieleman S, SirardMA, 2006: The <strong>in</strong>fluence of follicle size, FSH-enrichedmaturation medium, and early cleavage on bov<strong>in</strong>e oocytematernal mRNA levels. Mol Reprod Dev 73, 1367–1379.Niemann H, Carnwath JW, Kues W, 2007: Application ofDNA array technology to mammalian embryos. Theriogenology68(Suppl. 1), S165–S177.Patel OV, Bettegowda A, Ireland JJ, Coussens PM, LonerganP, Smith GW, 2007: Functional genomics studies of oocytecompetence: evidence that reduced transcript abundance forfollistat<strong>in</strong> is associated with poor developmental competenceof bov<strong>in</strong>e oocytes. <strong>Reproduction</strong> 133, 95–106.Pfister-Genskow M, Myers C, Childs LA, Lacson JC, PattersonT, Betthauser JM, Goueleke PJ, Koppang RW, LangeG, Fisher P, Watt SR, Forsberg EJ, Zheng Y, Leno GH,Schultz RM, Liu B, Chetia C, Yang X, Hoeschele I,Eilertsen KJ, 2005: Identification of differentially expressedgenes <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>dividual bov<strong>in</strong>e preimplantation embryos producedby nuclear transfer: improper reprogramm<strong>in</strong>g ofgenes required for development. Biol Reprod 72, 546–555.Quackenbush J, 2002: Microarray data normalization andtransformation. Nat Genet 32(Suppl.), 496–501.Rizos D, Ward F, Duffy P, Boland MP, Lonergan P, 2002:Consequences of bov<strong>in</strong>e oocyte maturation, fertilization orearly embryo development <strong>in</strong> vitro versus <strong>in</strong> vivo: implicationsfor blastocyst yield and blastocyst quality. MolReprod Dev 61, 234–248.Ross JW, Ashworth MD, White FJ, Johnson GA, Ayoubi PJ,DeSilva U, Whitworth KM, Prather RS, Geisert RD, 2007:Premature estrogen exposure alters endometrial gene expressionto disrupt pregnancy <strong>in</strong> the pig. Endocr<strong>in</strong>ology 148,4761–4773.Schena M, Shalon D, Davis RW, Brown PO, 1995: Quantitativemonitor<strong>in</strong>g of gene expression patterns with acomplementary DNA microarray. Science 270, 467–470.Schulze A, Downward J, 2001: Navigat<strong>in</strong>g gene expressionus<strong>in</strong>g microarrays – a technology review. Nat Cell Biol 3,E190–E195.Sirard MA, Richard F, Blond<strong>in</strong> P, Robert C, 2006: Contributionof the oocyte to embryo quality. Theriogenology 65,126–136.Sisco B, Hagemann LJ, Shell<strong>in</strong>g AN, Pfeffer PL, 2003:Isolation of genes differentially expressed <strong>in</strong> dom<strong>in</strong>ant andsubord<strong>in</strong>ate bov<strong>in</strong>e follicles. Endocr<strong>in</strong>ology 144, 3904–3913.Smith GW, Rosa GJ, 2007: Interpretation of microarray data:trudg<strong>in</strong>g out of the abyss towards elucidation of biologicalsignificance. J Anim Sci 85, E20–E23.Smith SL, Everts RE, Tian XC, Du F, Sung LY, Rodriguez-Zas SL, Jeong BS, Renard JP, Lew<strong>in</strong> HA, Yang X, 2005:Global gene expression profiles reveal significant nuclearreprogramm<strong>in</strong>g by the blastocyst stage after clon<strong>in</strong>g. ProcNatl Acad Sci U S A 102, 17582–17587.Somers J, Smith C, Donnison M, Wells DN, Henderson H,McLeay L, Pfeffer PL, 2006: Gene expression profil<strong>in</strong>g of<strong>in</strong>dividual bov<strong>in</strong>e nuclear transfer blastocysts. <strong>Reproduction</strong>131, 1073–1084.Suchyta SP, Sipkovsky S, Kruska R, Jeffers A, McNulty A,Coussens MJ, Tempelman RJ, Halgren RG, Saama PM,Bauman DE, Boisclair YR, Burton JL, Collier RJ, DePetersEJ, Ferris TA, Lucy MC, McGuire MA, Medrano JF,Overton TR, Smith TP, Smith GW, Sonstegard TS, Spa<strong>in</strong>JN, Spiers DE, Yao J, Coussens PM, 2003: Developmentand test<strong>in</strong>g of a high-density cDNA microarray resource forcattle. Physiol. Genomics 15, 158–164.Ushizawa K, Herath CB, Kaneyama K, Shiojima S, HirasawaA, Takahashi T, Imai K, Ochiai K, Tokunaga T, TsunodaY, Tsujimoto G, Hashizume K, 2004: cDNA microarrayanalysis of bov<strong>in</strong>e embryo gene expression profiles dur<strong>in</strong>gthe pre-implantation period. Reprod Biol Endocr<strong>in</strong>ol 2, 77.Webb R, Campbell BK, 2007: Development of the dom<strong>in</strong>antfollicle: mechanisms of selection and ma<strong>in</strong>tenance of oocytequality. Soc Reprod Fertil Suppl 64, 141–163.Wrenzycki C, Herrmann D, Lucas-Hahn A, Korsawe K,Lemme E, Niemann H, 2005: Messenger RNA expressionpatterns <strong>in</strong> bov<strong>in</strong>e embryos derived from <strong>in</strong> vitro proceduresand their implications for development. Reprod Fertil Dev17, 23–35.Wrenzycki C, Herrmann D, Niemann H, 2007: MessengerRNA <strong>in</strong> oocytes and embryos <strong>in</strong> relation to embryoviability. Theriogenology 68(Suppl. 1), S77–S83.Yang X, Smith SL, Tian XC, Lew<strong>in</strong> HA, Renard JP,Wakayama T, 2007: Nuclear reprogramm<strong>in</strong>g of clonedembryos and its implications for therapeutic clon<strong>in</strong>g. NatGenet 39, 295–302.Zielak AE, Canty MJ, Forde N, Coussens PM, Smith GW,Lonergan P, Ireland JJ, Evans ACO, 2007a: Differentialexpression of genes for transcription factors <strong>in</strong> theca andgranulosa cells follow<strong>in</strong>g selection of a dom<strong>in</strong>ant follicle <strong>in</strong>cattle. Mol Reprod Dev 19, 967–975.Zielak AE, Forde N, Park SDE, Doohan F, Coussens PM,Smith GW, Ireland JJ, Lonergan P, Evans ACO, 2007b:Identification of novel genes associated with dom<strong>in</strong>antfollicle development <strong>in</strong> cattle. Reprod Fertil Dev 19, 967–975.Author’s address (for correspondence): ACO Evans, UCD Veter<strong>in</strong>arySciences Centre, Belfield, Dubl<strong>in</strong> 4, Ireland. E-mail: alex.evans@ucd.ieConflict of <strong>in</strong>terest: All authors declare no conflict of <strong>in</strong>terests.Ó 2008 The Authors. Journal compilation Ó 2008 Blackwell Verlag
- Page 2 and 3:
Reproduction in Domestic AnimalsOff
- Page 5 and 6:
Reproductionin Domestic AnimalsTabl
- Page 7 and 8:
Minitüb:ProductsforArtificial Inse
- Page 9 and 10:
Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 1-7
- Page 11 and 12:
Embryo Biotechnologies in Farm Anim
- Page 13 and 14:
Embryo Biotechnologies in Farm Anim
- Page 15 and 16:
Embryo Biotechnologies in Farm Anim
- Page 17 and 18:
Ethical Models for Studying Reprodu
- Page 19 and 20:
Ethical Models for Studying Reprodu
- Page 21 and 22:
Ethical Models for Studying Reprodu
- Page 23 and 24:
Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 15-2
- Page 25 and 26:
Dietary Pollutants as Risk Factors
- Page 27 and 28:
Dietary Pollutants as Risk Factors
- Page 29 and 30:
Dietary Pollutants as Risk Factors
- Page 31 and 32:
Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Supp. 2), 23-30
- Page 33 and 34:
Factors Influencing Reproduction in
- Page 35 and 36:
Factors Influencing Reproduction in
- Page 37 and 38:
Factors Influencing Reproduction in
- Page 39 and 40:
Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 31-3
- Page 41 and 42:
GH and IGF-I in Cattle and Pigs 33h
- Page 43 and 44:
GH and IGF-I in Cattle and Pigs 35h
- Page 45 and 46:
GH and IGF-I in Cattle and Pigs 37B
- Page 47:
GH and IGF-I in Cattle and Pigs 39R
- Page 51 and 52:
Seasonality of Reproduction in Mamm
- Page 53 and 54:
Seasonality of Reproduction in Mamm
- Page 55 and 56:
Seasonality of Reproduction in Mamm
- Page 57 and 58:
Dominant Follicle Selection in Cows
- Page 59 and 60:
Dominant Follicle Selection in Cows
- Page 61 and 62:
Dominant Follicle Selection in Cows
- Page 63 and 64:
Dominant Follicle Selection in Cows
- Page 65 and 66:
Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 57-6
- Page 67 and 68:
Regulation of Luteal Function 59and
- Page 69 and 70:
Regulation of Luteal Function 61bov
- Page 71 and 72:
Regulation of Luteal Function 63(+/
- Page 73 and 74:
Regulation of Luteal Function 65sys
- Page 75 and 76:
Captive Breeding of Cheetahs in Sou
- Page 77 and 78:
Captive Breeding of Cheetahs in Sou
- Page 79 and 80:
Captive Breeding of Cheetahs in Sou
- Page 81 and 82:
Captive Breeding of Cheetahs in Sou
- Page 83 and 84:
Non-invasive Monitoring of Hormones
- Page 85 and 86:
Non-invasive Monitoring of Hormones
- Page 87 and 88:
Non-invasive Monitoring of Hormones
- Page 89 and 90:
Non-invasive Monitoring of Hormones
- Page 91 and 92:
Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 83-8
- Page 93 and 94:
Biotechnology Methods for Preservin
- Page 95 and 96:
Biotechnology Methods for Preservin
- Page 97 and 98:
Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 89-9
- Page 99 and 100:
Genetic Improvement of Dairy Cow Re
- Page 101 and 102:
Genetic Improvement of Dairy Cow Re
- Page 103 and 104:
Genetic Improvement of Dairy Cow Re
- Page 105 and 106:
Nutrient Prioritization and Fertili
- Page 107 and 108:
Nutrient Prioritization and Fertili
- Page 109 and 110:
Nutrient Prioritization and Fertili
- Page 111 and 112:
Nutrient Prioritization and Fertili
- Page 113 and 114:
CL-Endometrium-Embryo Interactions
- Page 115 and 116:
CL-Endometrium-Embryo Interactions
- Page 117 and 118:
CL-Endometrium-Embryo Interactions
- Page 119 and 120:
CL-Endometrium-Embryo Interactions
- Page 121 and 122:
Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 113-
- Page 123 and 124:
Reproductive Status Assessed by Mil
- Page 125 and 126:
Reproductive Status Assessed by Mil
- Page 127 and 128:
Reproductive Status Assessed by Mil
- Page 129 and 130:
Reproductive Status Assessed by Mil
- Page 131 and 132:
Genetic Aspects of Reproduction in
- Page 133 and 134:
Genetic Aspects of Reproduction in
- Page 135 and 136:
Genetic Aspects of Reproduction in
- Page 137 and 138:
Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 129-
- Page 139 and 140:
Nutritional Interactions and Reprod
- Page 141 and 142:
Nutritional Interactions and Reprod
- Page 143 and 144:
Nutritional Interactions and Reprod
- Page 145 and 146:
Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 137-
- Page 147 and 148:
Developmental Capabilities of Prepu
- Page 149 and 150:
Developmental Capabilities of Prepu
- Page 151 and 152:
Developmental Capabilities of Prepu
- Page 153 and 154:
Reproductive Physiology, Pathology
- Page 155 and 156:
Reproductive Physiology, Pathology
- Page 157 and 158:
Reproductive Physiology, Pathology
- Page 159 and 160:
Reproduction of Domestic Ferret 151
- Page 161 and 162:
Reproduction of Domestic Ferret 153
- Page 163 and 164:
Reproduction of Domestic Ferret 155
- Page 165 and 166:
Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 157-
- Page 167 and 168:
Canine Anoestrus, Oestrous Inductio
- Page 169 and 170:
Canine Anoestrus, Oestrous Inductio
- Page 171 and 172:
Canine Anoestrus, Oestrous Inductio
- Page 173 and 174:
Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 165-
- Page 175 and 176:
The Ethics and Role of AI in Dogs 1
- Page 177 and 178:
The Ethics and Role of AI in Dogs 1
- Page 179 and 180:
The Ethics and Role of AI in Dogs 1
- Page 181 and 182:
Control of Fertility in Females by
- Page 183 and 184:
Control of Fertility in Females by
- Page 185 and 186:
Control of Fertility in Females by
- Page 187 and 188:
Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 179-
- Page 189 and 190:
Controlling Animal Populations Usin
- Page 191 and 192:
Controlling Animal Populations Usin
- Page 193 and 194:
Controlling Animal Populations Usin
- Page 195 and 196:
Recombinant Gonadotropins in Assist
- Page 197 and 198:
Recombinant Gonadotropins in Assist
- Page 199 and 200:
Recombinant Gonadotropins in Assist
- Page 201 and 202:
Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 193-
- Page 203 and 204:
Farm Animals Embryonic Stem Cells 1
- Page 205 and 206:
Farm Animals Embryonic Stem Cells 1
- Page 207 and 208:
Farm Animals Embryonic Stem Cells 1
- Page 209 and 210:
Reproduction in Domestic Buffalo 20
- Page 211 and 212:
Reproduction in Domestic Buffalo 20
- Page 213 and 214:
Reproduction in Domestic Buffalo 20
- Page 215 and 216:
Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 207-
- Page 217 and 218:
Postpartum Ovarian Activity in Sout
- Page 219 and 220:
Postpartum Ovarian Activity in Sout
- Page 221 and 222:
Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 213-
- Page 223 and 224:
Mother-Offspring Interactions 215an
- Page 225 and 226:
Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 217-
- Page 227 and 228:
Reproduction Augmentation in Yak an
- Page 229 and 230:
Reproduction Augmentation in Yak an
- Page 231 and 232:
Reproduction Augmentation in Yak an
- Page 233 and 234:
Follicles and Mares 2251982). Simil
- Page 235 and 236:
Follicles and Mares 227Studies invo
- Page 237 and 238:
Follicles and Mares 229dominant fol
- Page 239 and 240:
Follicles and Mares 231trus, spring
- Page 241 and 242:
Proteins in Early Equine Conceptuse
- Page 243 and 244:
Proteins in Early Equine Conceptuse
- Page 245 and 246:
Proteins in Early Equine Conceptuse
- Page 247 and 248:
Follicular and Oocyte Competence un
- Page 249 and 250:
Follicular and Oocyte Competence un
- Page 251 and 252:
Follicular and Oocyte Competence un
- Page 253 and 254:
Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 245-
- Page 255 and 256:
Fertilization in the Porcine Fallop
- Page 257 and 258:
Fertilization in the Porcine Fallop
- Page 259 and 260:
Fertilization in the Porcine Fallop
- Page 261 and 262:
Mastitis in Post-Partum Dairy Cows
- Page 263 and 264:
Mastitis in Post-Partum Dairy Cows
- Page 265 and 266:
Mastitis in Post-Partum Dairy Cows
- Page 267 and 268:
Mastitis in Post-Partum Dairy Cows
- Page 269 and 270:
Embryo ⁄ Foetal Losses in Ruminan
- Page 271 and 272:
Embryo ⁄ Foetal Losses in Ruminan
- Page 273 and 274:
Embryo ⁄ Foetal Losses in Ruminan
- Page 275 and 276:
Embryo ⁄ Foetal Losses in Ruminan
- Page 277 and 278:
Death Ligand and Receptor Pig Ovari
- Page 279 and 280:
Death Ligand and Receptor Pig Ovari
- Page 281 and 282:
Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 273-
- Page 283:
Lactocrine Programming of Uterine D
- Page 286 and 287:
278 FF Bartol, AA Wiley and CA Bagn
- Page 288 and 289:
Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 280-
- Page 290 and 291:
282 KC Caires, JA Schmidt, AP Olive
- Page 292 and 293:
284 KC Caires, JA Schmidt, AP Olive
- Page 294 and 295:
286 KC Caires, JA Schmidt, AP Olive
- Page 296 and 297:
Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 288-
- Page 298 and 299:
290 I Dobrinskisuccessful also betw
- Page 300 and 301:
292 I DobrinskiCreemers LB, Meng X,
- Page 302 and 303:
294 I DobrinskiOkutsu T, Suzuki K,
- Page 304 and 305:
296 N Rawlings, ACO Evans, RK Chand
- Page 306 and 307:
298 N Rawlings, ACO Evans, RK Chand
- Page 308 and 309:
300 N Rawlings, ACO Evans, RK Chand
- Page 310 and 311:
Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 302-
- Page 312 and 313:
304 A Dinnyes, XC Tian and X Yanggr
- Page 314 and 315:
306 A Dinnyes, XC Tian and X YangIn
- Page 316 and 317:
308 A Dinnyes, XC Tian and X YangHo
- Page 318 and 319:
Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 310-
- Page 320 and 321:
312 RC Bott, DT Clopton and AS Cupp
- Page 322 and 323:
314 RC Bott, DT Clopton and AS Cupp
- Page 324 and 325: 316 RC Bott, DT Clopton and AS Cupp
- Page 326 and 327: 318 BK Whitlock, JA Daniel, RR Wilb
- Page 328 and 329: 320 BK Whitlock, JA Daniel, RR Wilb
- Page 330 and 331: 322 BK Whitlock, JA Daniel, RR Wilb
- Page 332 and 333: Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 324-
- Page 334 and 335: 326 CR Barb, GJ Hausman and CA Lent
- Page 336 and 337: 328 CR Barb, GJ Hausman and CA Lent
- Page 338 and 339: 330 CR Barb, GJ Hausman and CA Lent
- Page 340 and 341: 332 C Galli, I Lagutina, R Duchi, S
- Page 342 and 343: 334 C Galli, I Lagutina, R Duchi, S
- Page 344 and 345: 336 C Galli, I Lagutina, R Duchi, S
- Page 346 and 347: Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 338-
- Page 348 and 349: 340 D Rath and LA JohnsonCommercial
- Page 350 and 351: 342 D Rath and LA JohnsonThe Commer
- Page 352 and 353: 344 D Rath and LA JohnsonX- and Y-b
- Page 354 and 355: 346 D Rath and LA JohnsonWalker SK,
- Page 356 and 357: 348 JM Vazquez, J Roca, MA Gil, C C
- Page 358 and 359: 350 JM Vazquez, J Roca, MA Gil, C C
- Page 360 and 361: 352 JM Vazquez, J Roca, MA Gil, C C
- Page 362 and 363: 354 JM Vazquez, J Roca, MA Gil, C C
- Page 364 and 365: 356 CBA Whitelaw, SG Lillico and T
- Page 366 and 367: 358 CBA Whitelaw, SG Lillico and T
- Page 368 and 369: 360 ACO Evans, N Forde, GM O’Gorm
- Page 370 and 371: 362 ACO Evans, N Forde, GM O’Gorm
- Page 372 and 373: 364 ACO Evans, N Forde, GM O’Gorm
- Page 376 and 377: Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 368-
- Page 378 and 379: 370 JP Kastelic and JC Thundathilsp
- Page 380 and 381: 372 JP Kastelic and JC Thundathilme
- Page 382 and 383: Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 374-
- Page 384 and 385: 376 GC AlthouseTable 1. Potential s
- Page 386 and 387: 378 GC Althousesemen to the domesti
- Page 388 and 389: 380 B Leboeuf, JA Delgadillo, E Man
- Page 390 and 391: 382 B Leboeuf, JA Delgadillo, E Man
- Page 392 and 393: 384 B Leboeuf, JA Delgadillo, E Man
- Page 394 and 395: Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 386-
- Page 396 and 397: 388 N Kostereva and M-C HofmannFig.
- Page 398 and 399: 390 N Kostereva and M-C HofmannMMPs
- Page 400 and 401: 392 N Kostereva and M-C HofmannTado
- Page 402 and 403: 394 P Mermillod, R Dalbie` s-Tran,
- Page 404 and 405: 396 P Mermillod, R Dalbie` s-Tran,
- Page 406 and 407: 398 P Mermillod, R Dalbie` s-Tran,
- Page 408 and 409: 400 P Mermillod, R Dalbie` s-Tran,
- Page 410 and 411: 402 K Kikuchi, N Kashiwazaki, T Nag
- Page 412 and 413: 404 K Kikuchi, N Kashiwazaki, T Nag
- Page 414 and 415: 406 K Kikuchi, N Kashiwazaki, T Nag
- Page 416 and 417: 408 B ObackNumber of publications20
- Page 418 and 419: 410 B ObackReprogramming Ability of
- Page 420 and 421: 412 B Obackstudies have shown that
- Page 422 and 423: 414 B ObackFig. 4. Climbing mount e
- Page 424 and 425:
416 B ObackRenard JP, Maruotti J, J
- Page 426 and 427:
418 P Loi, K Matzukawa, G Ptak, Y N
- Page 428 and 429:
420 P Loi, K Matzukawa, G Ptak, Y N
- Page 430 and 431:
422 P Loi, K Matzukawa, G Ptak, Y N
- Page 434:
Table of Contents Volume 43 · Supp