372 JP Kastelic and JC Thundathilmembranes on sperm function assessed by a novel flowcytometric approach. Biol Reprod 67, 1125–1132.Brito LFC, Barth AD, Bilodeau-Goeseels S, Panich PL,Kastelic JP, 2003: Comparison of methods to evaluate theplasmalemma of bov<strong>in</strong>e sperm and their relationship with <strong>in</strong>vitro fertilization rate. Theriogenology 60, 1539–1551.Brow<strong>in</strong>g H, Strome S, 1996: A sperm-supplied factor requiredfor embryogenesis <strong>in</strong> C. elegans. Development 122, 391–404.Cancel AM, Chapman DA, Killian GJ, 1997: Osteopont<strong>in</strong> isthe 55-kilodalton fertility-associated prote<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong> Holste<strong>in</strong> bullsem<strong>in</strong>al plasma. Biol Reprod 57, 1293–1301.Cheng A, Le T, Palacios M, Bookb<strong>in</strong>der LH, Wassarman PM,Suzuki F, Bleil JD, 1994: Sperm-egg recognition <strong>in</strong> themouse: characterization of sp56, a sperm prote<strong>in</strong> hav<strong>in</strong>gspecific aff<strong>in</strong>ity for ZP3. J Cell Biol 125, 867–878.Chenoweth PJ, 2007: Influence of the male on embryo quality.Theriogenology 68, 308–315.Coe PH, Gibson CD, 1993: Adjusted 200-day scrotal size as apredictor of 365-day scrotal circumference. Theriogenology40, 1065–1072.Cormier N, Sirard MA, Bailey JL, 1997: Premature capacitationof bov<strong>in</strong>e spermatozoa is <strong>in</strong>itiated by cryopreservation.J Androl 18, 461–468.Coulter GH, 1988: Thermography of bull testes. In: Proceed<strong>in</strong>gsof the 12th Technical Conference on Artificial Insem<strong>in</strong>ationand <strong>Reproduction</strong>, National Association of AnimalBreeders, pp. 58–63.Enssl<strong>in</strong> M, Vogel T, Calvete JJ, Thole HH, Schmidtke J,Matsuda T, To¨pfer-Petersen E, 1998: Molecular clon<strong>in</strong>gand characterization of P47, a novel boar sperm-associatedzona pellucida-b<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g prote<strong>in</strong> homologous to afamily of mammalian secretory prote<strong>in</strong>s. Biol Reprod 58,1057–1064.Evans JP, Florman HM, 2002: The state of the union: the cellbiology of fertilization. Nat Cell Biol 4, S57–S63.Farrell PB, Presicce DA, Brockett CC, Foote RH, 1998:Quantification of bull sperm characteristics measured bycomputer assisted sperm analysis (CASA) and the relationshipto fertility. Theriogenology 49, 871–879.Fazeli AR, Steenweg W, Bevers MM, de Loos FA, van denBroek J, Colenbrander B, 1993: Development of a spermzona pellucida b<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g assay for bull semen. Vet Rec 2, 14–16.Fazeli AR, Zhang BR, Steenweg W, Larsson B, Bevers MM,van den Broek J, Rodriguez-Mart<strong>in</strong>ez H, Colenbrander B,1997: Relationship between sperm-zona pellucida b<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gassays and the 56-day nonreturn rate of cattle <strong>in</strong>sem<strong>in</strong>atedwith frozen-thawed bull semen. Theriogenology 48, 853–863.Gadea J, Selles E, Marco MA, 2004: The predictive value ofporc<strong>in</strong>e sem<strong>in</strong>al parameters on fertility outcome undercommercial conditions. Reprod Dom Anim 39, 303–308.Gillan L, Evans G, Maxwell WMC, 2005: Flow cytometricevaluation of sperm parameters <strong>in</strong> relation to fertilitypotential. Theriogenology 63, 445–457.Gwathmey TM, Ignotz GG, Mueller JL, Manjunath P, SuarezSS, 2006: Bov<strong>in</strong>e sem<strong>in</strong>al plasma prote<strong>in</strong>s PDC-109, BSP-A3, and BSP-30-kDa share functional roles <strong>in</strong> stor<strong>in</strong>g sperm<strong>in</strong> the oviduct. Biol Reprod 75, 501–507.Hallap T, Jaakma U, Rodriguez-Mart<strong>in</strong>ez H, 2006: Changes <strong>in</strong>semen quality <strong>in</strong> Estonian Holste<strong>in</strong> AI bulls at 3, 5 and7 years of age. Reprod Dom Anim 41, 214–218.Hardy DM, Garbers DL, 1995: A sperm membrane prote<strong>in</strong>that b<strong>in</strong>ds <strong>in</strong> a species-specific manner to the egg extracellularmatrix is homologous to von Willebrand factor. J BiolChem 270, 26025–26028.Henault MA, Killian GJ, 1995: Effects of sperm preparationand bull fertility on <strong>in</strong> vitro penetration of zona-free bov<strong>in</strong>eoocytes. Theriogenology 43, 739–749.Henault MA, Killian GJ, Kavanaugh JF, Griel LC Jr, 1995:Effect of accessory sex gland fluid from bulls of differ<strong>in</strong>gfertilities on the ability of cauda epididymal sperm topenetrate zona-free bov<strong>in</strong>e oocytes. Biol Reprod 52, 390–397.Hunter RHF, 2008: Sperm release from oviduct epithelialb<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g is controlled hormonally by peri-ovulatory graafianfollicles. Mol Reprod Dev 75, 167–174.Hunter RHF, Fléchon B, Fléchon JE, 1987: Pre- and periovulatorydistribution of viable spermatozoa <strong>in</strong> the pigoviduct: Scann<strong>in</strong>g electron microscope study. Tissue Cell 19,423–436.Hunter RHF, Fle´chon B, Fle´chon JE, 1991: Distribution,morphology and epithelial <strong>in</strong>teractions of bov<strong>in</strong>e spermatozoa<strong>in</strong> the oviduct before and after ovulation: A scann<strong>in</strong>gelectron microscope study. Tissue Cell 23, 641–656.Ignotz GG, Cho MY, Suarez SS, 2007: Annex<strong>in</strong>s are candidateoviductal receptors for bov<strong>in</strong>e sperm surface prote<strong>in</strong>s andthus may serve to hold bov<strong>in</strong>e sperm <strong>in</strong> the oviductalreservoir. Biol Reprod 77, 906–913.Inoue N, Ikawa M, Isotani A, Okabe M, 2005: The immunoglobul<strong>in</strong>superfamily prote<strong>in</strong> Izumo is required for sperm tofuse with eggs. Nature 434, 152–153.Januskauskas A, Johannisson A, So¨derquist L, Rodriguez-Mart<strong>in</strong>ez H, 2000: Assessment of the fertiliz<strong>in</strong>g potential offrozen-thawed bov<strong>in</strong>e spermatozoa by calcium ionophoreA23187-<strong>in</strong>duced acrosome reaction <strong>in</strong> vitro. Theriogenology53, 859–875.Januskauskas A, Johanmsson A, Rodriguez-Mart<strong>in</strong>ez H,2001: Assessment of sperm quality through fluorometryand sperm chromat<strong>in</strong> structure assay <strong>in</strong> relation to fieldfertility of frozen thawed semen from Swedish AI bulls.Theriogenology 55, 947–961.Januskauskas A, Johannisson A, Rodriguez-Mart<strong>in</strong>ez H,2003: Subtle membrane changes <strong>in</strong> cryopreserved bull semen<strong>in</strong> relation with sperm viability, chromat<strong>in</strong> structure, andfield fertility. Theriogenology 60, 743–758.Jeyendran RS, Van der Ven HH, Perez-Pelaez M, Crabo BG,Zaneveld LJD, 1984: Development of an assay to assess thefunctional <strong>in</strong>tegrity of the human sperm membrane and itsrelationship to other semen characteristics. J Reprod Fertil70, 219–228.Kamarudd<strong>in</strong> M, Kroetsch T, Basrur PK, Hansen PJ, K<strong>in</strong>gWA, 2004: Immunolocalization of heat shock prote<strong>in</strong> 70 <strong>in</strong>bov<strong>in</strong>e spermatozoa. Andrologia 36, 327–334.Karab<strong>in</strong>us DS, Vogler CJ, Saacke RG, Evenson DP, 1997:Chromat<strong>in</strong> structural changes <strong>in</strong> sperm after scrotal <strong>in</strong>sulationof Holste<strong>in</strong> bulls. J Androl 18, 549–555.Kastelic JP, Cook RB, Coulter GH, 2000: Scrotal ⁄ testicularthermoregulation <strong>in</strong> bulls. <strong>in</strong>: Chenoweth PJ (ed.), Topics <strong>in</strong>Bull Fertility. International Veter<strong>in</strong>ary Information Service.Available from http://www.ivis.org.Kastelic JP, Cook RB, Pierson RA, Coulter GH, 2001:Relationships among scrotal and testicular characteristics,sperm production, and sem<strong>in</strong>al quality <strong>in</strong> 129 beef bulls.Can J Vet Res 65, 111–115.Killian GJ, Chapman DA, Rogowski LA, 1993: Fertilityassociatedprote<strong>in</strong>s <strong>in</strong> Holste<strong>in</strong> bull sem<strong>in</strong>al plasma. BiolReprod 49, 1202–1207.Kondoh G, Tojo H, Nakatani Y, Komazawa N, Murata C,Yamagata K, Maeda Y, K<strong>in</strong>oshita T, Okabe M, Taguchi R,Takeda J, 2005: Angiotens<strong>in</strong>-convert<strong>in</strong>g enzyme is a GPIanchoredprote<strong>in</strong> releas<strong>in</strong>g factor crucial for fertilization.Nat Med 11, 160–166.Krawetz SA, 2005: Paternal contribution: new <strong>in</strong>sights andfuture challenges. Nat Rev Genet 6, 633–642.Larson JL, Miller DJ, 2000: Can relative spermatozoalgalactosyltransferase activity be predictive of dairy bullfertility? J Dairy Sci 83, 2473–2479.Ó 2008 The Authors. Journal compilation Ó 2008 Blackwell Verlag
Breed<strong>in</strong>g Soundness and Semen Analysis <strong>in</strong> Bulls 373Lewis SE, Aitken RJ, 2005: DNA damage to spermatozoa hasimpacts on fertilization and pregnancy. Cell Tissue Res 322,33–41.Lunstra DD, Coulter GH, 1997: Relationship between scrotal<strong>in</strong>frared temperature patterns and natural-mat<strong>in</strong>g fertility <strong>in</strong>beef bulls. J Anim Sci 75, 767–774.Marquant-Le Guienne B, Humblot P, Thibier M, Thibault C,1990: Evaluation of bull semen fertility by homologous <strong>in</strong>vitro fertilization tests. Reprod Nutr Dev 30, 259–266.Matwee C, Kamarudd<strong>in</strong> M, Betts DH, Basrur PK, K<strong>in</strong>g WA,2001: The effects of antibodies to heat shock prote<strong>in</strong> 70 <strong>in</strong>fertilization and embryo development. Mol Hum Reprod 7,829–837.McCauley TC, Zhang H, Bell<strong>in</strong> ME, Ax RL, 1999: Purificationand characterization of fertility-associated antigen(FAA) <strong>in</strong> bov<strong>in</strong>e sem<strong>in</strong>al fluid. Mol Reprod Dev 54, 145–153.McCauley TC, Zhang HM, Bell<strong>in</strong> ME, Ax RL, 2001:Identification of a hepar<strong>in</strong>-b<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g prote<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong> bov<strong>in</strong>e sem<strong>in</strong>alfluid as tissue <strong>in</strong>hibitor of metalloprote<strong>in</strong>ases-2. Mol ReprodDev 58, 336–341.Miller D, Ostermeier GC, 2006: Spermatozoal RNA: Why is itthere and what does it do? Gynecol Obstet Fertil 34, 840–846.Miller D, Ostermeier GC, Krawetz SA, 2005: The controversy,potential and roles of spermatozoal RNA. Trends Mol Med11, 156–163.Moura AA, Koc H, Chapman DA, Killian GJ, 2006:Identification of prote<strong>in</strong>s <strong>in</strong> the accessory sex gland fluidassociated with fertility <strong>in</strong>dexes of dairy bulls: a proteomicapproach. J Androl 27, 201–211.Moura AA, Chapman DA, Killian GJ, 2007: Prote<strong>in</strong>s of theaccessory sex glands associated with the oocyte-penetrat<strong>in</strong>gcapacity of cauda epididymal sperm from Holste<strong>in</strong> bulls ofdocumented fertility. Mol Reprod Dev 74, 214–222.Petrunk<strong>in</strong>a AM, Waberski D, Gunzel-Apel AR, Topfer-Petersen E, 2007: Determ<strong>in</strong>ants of sperm quality and fertility<strong>in</strong> domestic species. <strong>Reproduction</strong> 134, 3–17.Phillips NJ, Mcgowan MR, Johnston SD, Mayer DG, 2004:Relationship between thirty post-thaw spermatozoal characteristicsand the field fertility of 11 high-use Australiandairy AI sires. Anim Reprod Sci 81, 47–61.Puglisi R, Balduzzi D, Galli A, 2004: In vitro sperm penetrationspeed and its relationship with <strong>in</strong> vivo bull fertility.Reprod Dom Anim 39, 424–428.Rodriguez-Mart<strong>in</strong>ez H, 2003: Laboratory semen assessmentand prediction of fertility: still utopia? Reprod Dom Anim38, 312–318.Rodriguez-Mart<strong>in</strong>ez H, 2007: State of the art <strong>in</strong> farm animalsperm evaluation. Reprod Fertil Dev 19, 91–101.Roncoletta M, Morani Eda S, Esper CR, Barnabe VH,Francesch<strong>in</strong>i PH, 2006: Fertility-associated prote<strong>in</strong>s <strong>in</strong>Nelore bull sperm membranes. Anim Reprod Sci 91, 77–87.Saacke RG, Dalton JC, Nadir S, Nebel RL, Bame JH, 2000:Relationship of sem<strong>in</strong>al traits and <strong>in</strong>sem<strong>in</strong>ation time tofertilization rate and embryo quality. Anim Reprod Sci 2,663–677.Setchell BP, 1978: The scrotum and thermoregulation. In:Setchell BP (ed), The Mammalian Testis. Cornell UniversityPress, Ithaca, pp. 90–108.Suarez SS, 2002: Formation of a reservoir of sperm <strong>in</strong> theoviduct. Reprod Domest Anim 37, 140–143.Thundathil J, Gil J, Januskauskas A, Larsson B, So¨derquist L,Mapletoft R, Rodrıguez-Martınez H, 1999: Relationshipbetween the proportion of capacitated spermatozoa present<strong>in</strong> frozen-thawed semen and fertility with artificial <strong>in</strong>sem<strong>in</strong>ation.Int J Androl 22, 366–373.Thundathil J, Meyer R, Palasz AT, Barth AD, Mapletoft RJ,2000: Effect of the knobbed acrosome defect <strong>in</strong> bov<strong>in</strong>esperm on IVF and embryo production. Theriogenology 54,921–934.Thundathil J, Palom<strong>in</strong>o J, Barth A, Mapletoft R, Barros C,2001a: Fertiliz<strong>in</strong>g characteristics of bov<strong>in</strong>e sperm with flattenedor <strong>in</strong>dented acrosomes. Anim Reprod Sci 67, 231–243.Thundathil J, Palasz AT, Barth AD, Mapletoft RJ, 2001b: Theuse of <strong>in</strong> vitro fertilization techniques to <strong>in</strong>vestigate thefertiliz<strong>in</strong>g ability of bov<strong>in</strong>e sperm with proximal cytoplasmicdroplets. Anim Reprod Sci 65, 181–192.Thundathil JC, Anzar M, Buhr MM, 2006: Na + ⁄ K + ATPaseas a signal<strong>in</strong>g molecule dur<strong>in</strong>g bov<strong>in</strong>e sperm capacitation.Biol Reprod 75, 308–317.Truelson SL, Graham JK, Mortimer RG, Field TG, 1996: Invitro penetration <strong>in</strong>to bov<strong>in</strong>e oocytes and zona-free hamsteroocytes by bull spermatozoa treated with liposomes. J DairySci 79, 991–999.Walters AH, Eyestone WE, Saacke RG, Pearson RE, GwazdauskasFC, 2005: Bov<strong>in</strong>e embryo development after IVFwith spermatozoa hav<strong>in</strong>g abnormal morphology. Theriogenology63, 1925–1937.Walters AH, Saacke RG, Pearson RE, Gwazdauskas FC,2006: Assessment of pronuclear formation follow<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> vitrofertilization with bov<strong>in</strong>e spermatozoa obta<strong>in</strong>ed after thermal<strong>in</strong>sulation of the testis. Theriogenology 65, 1016–1028.Waterhouse KE, Haugan T, Kommisrud E, Tverdal A,Flatberg G, Farstad W, Evenson DP, De Angelis PM,2006: Sperm DNA damage is related to field fertility ofsemen from young Norwegian Red bulls. Reprod Fertil Dev18, 781–788.Watson PF, 2000: The causes of reduced fertility withcryopreserved semen. Anim Reprod Sci 60–61, 481–492.Wu TF, Chu DS, 2008: Epigenetic processes implementeddur<strong>in</strong>g spermatogenesis dist<strong>in</strong>guish the paternal pronucleus<strong>in</strong> the embryo. Reprod Biomed Onl<strong>in</strong>e 16, 13–22.Wu AT, Sutovsky P, Manandhar G, Xu W, Katayama M,Day BN, Park KW, Yi YJ, Xi YW, Prather RS, Oko R,2007: PAWP, a sperm-specific WW doma<strong>in</strong>-b<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g prote<strong>in</strong>,promotes meiotic resumption and pronuclear developmentdur<strong>in</strong>g fertilization. J Biol Chem 282, 12164–12175.Yanagimachi R, 1994: Mammalian fertilization. In: Knobil E,Neill JD (eds), The Physiology of <strong>Reproduction</strong>. RavenPress, New York, pp. 189–317.Zhang BR, Larsson B, Rodriguez-Mart<strong>in</strong>ez H, 1995: Influenceof batches of bov<strong>in</strong>e oocytes on the outcome of an <strong>in</strong>tactzona pellucida b<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g assay and <strong>in</strong> vitro fertilization. Int JAndrol 18, 213–220.Zhang BR, Larsson B, Lundeheim N, Rodriguez-Mart<strong>in</strong>ez H,1997: Relationship between embryo development <strong>in</strong> vitroand 56-day non return rates of cows <strong>in</strong>sem<strong>in</strong>ated withfrozen-thawed semen from dairy bulls. Theriogenology 48,221–231.Zhang BR, Larsson B, Lundeheim N, Håård MG, Rodriguez-Mart<strong>in</strong>ez H, 1999: Prediction of bull fertility by comb<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong>vitro assessments of frozen-thawed semen from young dairybulls enter<strong>in</strong>g an AI-programme. Int J Androl 22, 253–260.Zhao Y, Buhr MM, 1996: Localization of various ATPases <strong>in</strong>fresh and cryopreserved bov<strong>in</strong>e spermatozoa. Anim ReprodSci 44, 139–148.Author’s address (for correspondence): John Kastelic, LethbridgeResearch Centre, 5403-1st Ave South, P.O. Box 3000, Lethbridge, AB,Canada T1J 4B1. E-mail: kastelicj@agr.gc.caConflict of <strong>in</strong>terest: J Kastelic is the Co-Editor-<strong>in</strong>-Chief of the journalTheriogenology, published by Elsevier Science, Inc; J Thundthil hasreceived fund<strong>in</strong>g support from the University of Calgary; Agricultureand Food Council of Alberta and Alberta Livestock IndustryDevelopment Fund; Westgen Endowment Fund; and L’AllianceBoviteq Inc.Ó 2008 The Authors. Journal compilation Ó 2008 Blackwell Verlag
- Page 2 and 3:
Reproduction in Domestic AnimalsOff
- Page 5 and 6:
Reproductionin Domestic AnimalsTabl
- Page 7 and 8:
Minitüb:ProductsforArtificial Inse
- Page 9 and 10:
Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 1-7
- Page 11 and 12:
Embryo Biotechnologies in Farm Anim
- Page 13 and 14:
Embryo Biotechnologies in Farm Anim
- Page 15 and 16:
Embryo Biotechnologies in Farm Anim
- Page 17 and 18:
Ethical Models for Studying Reprodu
- Page 19 and 20:
Ethical Models for Studying Reprodu
- Page 21 and 22:
Ethical Models for Studying Reprodu
- Page 23 and 24:
Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 15-2
- Page 25 and 26:
Dietary Pollutants as Risk Factors
- Page 27 and 28:
Dietary Pollutants as Risk Factors
- Page 29 and 30:
Dietary Pollutants as Risk Factors
- Page 31 and 32:
Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Supp. 2), 23-30
- Page 33 and 34:
Factors Influencing Reproduction in
- Page 35 and 36:
Factors Influencing Reproduction in
- Page 37 and 38:
Factors Influencing Reproduction in
- Page 39 and 40:
Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 31-3
- Page 41 and 42:
GH and IGF-I in Cattle and Pigs 33h
- Page 43 and 44:
GH and IGF-I in Cattle and Pigs 35h
- Page 45 and 46:
GH and IGF-I in Cattle and Pigs 37B
- Page 47:
GH and IGF-I in Cattle and Pigs 39R
- Page 51 and 52:
Seasonality of Reproduction in Mamm
- Page 53 and 54:
Seasonality of Reproduction in Mamm
- Page 55 and 56:
Seasonality of Reproduction in Mamm
- Page 57 and 58:
Dominant Follicle Selection in Cows
- Page 59 and 60:
Dominant Follicle Selection in Cows
- Page 61 and 62:
Dominant Follicle Selection in Cows
- Page 63 and 64:
Dominant Follicle Selection in Cows
- Page 65 and 66:
Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 57-6
- Page 67 and 68:
Regulation of Luteal Function 59and
- Page 69 and 70:
Regulation of Luteal Function 61bov
- Page 71 and 72:
Regulation of Luteal Function 63(+/
- Page 73 and 74:
Regulation of Luteal Function 65sys
- Page 75 and 76:
Captive Breeding of Cheetahs in Sou
- Page 77 and 78:
Captive Breeding of Cheetahs in Sou
- Page 79 and 80:
Captive Breeding of Cheetahs in Sou
- Page 81 and 82:
Captive Breeding of Cheetahs in Sou
- Page 83 and 84:
Non-invasive Monitoring of Hormones
- Page 85 and 86:
Non-invasive Monitoring of Hormones
- Page 87 and 88:
Non-invasive Monitoring of Hormones
- Page 89 and 90:
Non-invasive Monitoring of Hormones
- Page 91 and 92:
Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 83-8
- Page 93 and 94:
Biotechnology Methods for Preservin
- Page 95 and 96:
Biotechnology Methods for Preservin
- Page 97 and 98:
Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 89-9
- Page 99 and 100:
Genetic Improvement of Dairy Cow Re
- Page 101 and 102:
Genetic Improvement of Dairy Cow Re
- Page 103 and 104:
Genetic Improvement of Dairy Cow Re
- Page 105 and 106:
Nutrient Prioritization and Fertili
- Page 107 and 108:
Nutrient Prioritization and Fertili
- Page 109 and 110:
Nutrient Prioritization and Fertili
- Page 111 and 112:
Nutrient Prioritization and Fertili
- Page 113 and 114:
CL-Endometrium-Embryo Interactions
- Page 115 and 116:
CL-Endometrium-Embryo Interactions
- Page 117 and 118:
CL-Endometrium-Embryo Interactions
- Page 119 and 120:
CL-Endometrium-Embryo Interactions
- Page 121 and 122:
Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 113-
- Page 123 and 124:
Reproductive Status Assessed by Mil
- Page 125 and 126:
Reproductive Status Assessed by Mil
- Page 127 and 128:
Reproductive Status Assessed by Mil
- Page 129 and 130:
Reproductive Status Assessed by Mil
- Page 131 and 132:
Genetic Aspects of Reproduction in
- Page 133 and 134:
Genetic Aspects of Reproduction in
- Page 135 and 136:
Genetic Aspects of Reproduction in
- Page 137 and 138:
Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 129-
- Page 139 and 140:
Nutritional Interactions and Reprod
- Page 141 and 142:
Nutritional Interactions and Reprod
- Page 143 and 144:
Nutritional Interactions and Reprod
- Page 145 and 146:
Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 137-
- Page 147 and 148:
Developmental Capabilities of Prepu
- Page 149 and 150:
Developmental Capabilities of Prepu
- Page 151 and 152:
Developmental Capabilities of Prepu
- Page 153 and 154:
Reproductive Physiology, Pathology
- Page 155 and 156:
Reproductive Physiology, Pathology
- Page 157 and 158:
Reproductive Physiology, Pathology
- Page 159 and 160:
Reproduction of Domestic Ferret 151
- Page 161 and 162:
Reproduction of Domestic Ferret 153
- Page 163 and 164:
Reproduction of Domestic Ferret 155
- Page 165 and 166:
Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 157-
- Page 167 and 168:
Canine Anoestrus, Oestrous Inductio
- Page 169 and 170:
Canine Anoestrus, Oestrous Inductio
- Page 171 and 172:
Canine Anoestrus, Oestrous Inductio
- Page 173 and 174:
Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 165-
- Page 175 and 176:
The Ethics and Role of AI in Dogs 1
- Page 177 and 178:
The Ethics and Role of AI in Dogs 1
- Page 179 and 180:
The Ethics and Role of AI in Dogs 1
- Page 181 and 182:
Control of Fertility in Females by
- Page 183 and 184:
Control of Fertility in Females by
- Page 185 and 186:
Control of Fertility in Females by
- Page 187 and 188:
Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 179-
- Page 189 and 190:
Controlling Animal Populations Usin
- Page 191 and 192:
Controlling Animal Populations Usin
- Page 193 and 194:
Controlling Animal Populations Usin
- Page 195 and 196:
Recombinant Gonadotropins in Assist
- Page 197 and 198:
Recombinant Gonadotropins in Assist
- Page 199 and 200:
Recombinant Gonadotropins in Assist
- Page 201 and 202:
Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 193-
- Page 203 and 204:
Farm Animals Embryonic Stem Cells 1
- Page 205 and 206:
Farm Animals Embryonic Stem Cells 1
- Page 207 and 208:
Farm Animals Embryonic Stem Cells 1
- Page 209 and 210:
Reproduction in Domestic Buffalo 20
- Page 211 and 212:
Reproduction in Domestic Buffalo 20
- Page 213 and 214:
Reproduction in Domestic Buffalo 20
- Page 215 and 216:
Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 207-
- Page 217 and 218:
Postpartum Ovarian Activity in Sout
- Page 219 and 220:
Postpartum Ovarian Activity in Sout
- Page 221 and 222:
Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 213-
- Page 223 and 224:
Mother-Offspring Interactions 215an
- Page 225 and 226:
Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 217-
- Page 227 and 228:
Reproduction Augmentation in Yak an
- Page 229 and 230:
Reproduction Augmentation in Yak an
- Page 231 and 232:
Reproduction Augmentation in Yak an
- Page 233 and 234:
Follicles and Mares 2251982). Simil
- Page 235 and 236:
Follicles and Mares 227Studies invo
- Page 237 and 238:
Follicles and Mares 229dominant fol
- Page 239 and 240:
Follicles and Mares 231trus, spring
- Page 241 and 242:
Proteins in Early Equine Conceptuse
- Page 243 and 244:
Proteins in Early Equine Conceptuse
- Page 245 and 246:
Proteins in Early Equine Conceptuse
- Page 247 and 248:
Follicular and Oocyte Competence un
- Page 249 and 250:
Follicular and Oocyte Competence un
- Page 251 and 252:
Follicular and Oocyte Competence un
- Page 253 and 254:
Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 245-
- Page 255 and 256:
Fertilization in the Porcine Fallop
- Page 257 and 258:
Fertilization in the Porcine Fallop
- Page 259 and 260:
Fertilization in the Porcine Fallop
- Page 261 and 262:
Mastitis in Post-Partum Dairy Cows
- Page 263 and 264:
Mastitis in Post-Partum Dairy Cows
- Page 265 and 266:
Mastitis in Post-Partum Dairy Cows
- Page 267 and 268:
Mastitis in Post-Partum Dairy Cows
- Page 269 and 270:
Embryo ⁄ Foetal Losses in Ruminan
- Page 271 and 272:
Embryo ⁄ Foetal Losses in Ruminan
- Page 273 and 274:
Embryo ⁄ Foetal Losses in Ruminan
- Page 275 and 276:
Embryo ⁄ Foetal Losses in Ruminan
- Page 277 and 278:
Death Ligand and Receptor Pig Ovari
- Page 279 and 280:
Death Ligand and Receptor Pig Ovari
- Page 281 and 282:
Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 273-
- Page 283:
Lactocrine Programming of Uterine D
- Page 286 and 287:
278 FF Bartol, AA Wiley and CA Bagn
- Page 288 and 289:
Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 280-
- Page 290 and 291:
282 KC Caires, JA Schmidt, AP Olive
- Page 292 and 293:
284 KC Caires, JA Schmidt, AP Olive
- Page 294 and 295:
286 KC Caires, JA Schmidt, AP Olive
- Page 296 and 297:
Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 288-
- Page 298 and 299:
290 I Dobrinskisuccessful also betw
- Page 300 and 301:
292 I DobrinskiCreemers LB, Meng X,
- Page 302 and 303:
294 I DobrinskiOkutsu T, Suzuki K,
- Page 304 and 305:
296 N Rawlings, ACO Evans, RK Chand
- Page 306 and 307:
298 N Rawlings, ACO Evans, RK Chand
- Page 308 and 309:
300 N Rawlings, ACO Evans, RK Chand
- Page 310 and 311:
Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 302-
- Page 312 and 313:
304 A Dinnyes, XC Tian and X Yanggr
- Page 314 and 315:
306 A Dinnyes, XC Tian and X YangIn
- Page 316 and 317:
308 A Dinnyes, XC Tian and X YangHo
- Page 318 and 319:
Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 310-
- Page 320 and 321:
312 RC Bott, DT Clopton and AS Cupp
- Page 322 and 323:
314 RC Bott, DT Clopton and AS Cupp
- Page 324 and 325:
316 RC Bott, DT Clopton and AS Cupp
- Page 326 and 327:
318 BK Whitlock, JA Daniel, RR Wilb
- Page 328 and 329:
320 BK Whitlock, JA Daniel, RR Wilb
- Page 330 and 331: 322 BK Whitlock, JA Daniel, RR Wilb
- Page 332 and 333: Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 324-
- Page 334 and 335: 326 CR Barb, GJ Hausman and CA Lent
- Page 336 and 337: 328 CR Barb, GJ Hausman and CA Lent
- Page 338 and 339: 330 CR Barb, GJ Hausman and CA Lent
- Page 340 and 341: 332 C Galli, I Lagutina, R Duchi, S
- Page 342 and 343: 334 C Galli, I Lagutina, R Duchi, S
- Page 344 and 345: 336 C Galli, I Lagutina, R Duchi, S
- Page 346 and 347: Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 338-
- Page 348 and 349: 340 D Rath and LA JohnsonCommercial
- Page 350 and 351: 342 D Rath and LA JohnsonThe Commer
- Page 352 and 353: 344 D Rath and LA JohnsonX- and Y-b
- Page 354 and 355: 346 D Rath and LA JohnsonWalker SK,
- Page 356 and 357: 348 JM Vazquez, J Roca, MA Gil, C C
- Page 358 and 359: 350 JM Vazquez, J Roca, MA Gil, C C
- Page 360 and 361: 352 JM Vazquez, J Roca, MA Gil, C C
- Page 362 and 363: 354 JM Vazquez, J Roca, MA Gil, C C
- Page 364 and 365: 356 CBA Whitelaw, SG Lillico and T
- Page 366 and 367: 358 CBA Whitelaw, SG Lillico and T
- Page 368 and 369: 360 ACO Evans, N Forde, GM O’Gorm
- Page 370 and 371: 362 ACO Evans, N Forde, GM O’Gorm
- Page 372 and 373: 364 ACO Evans, N Forde, GM O’Gorm
- Page 374 and 375: 366 ACO Evans, N Forde, GM O’Gorm
- Page 376 and 377: Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 368-
- Page 378 and 379: 370 JP Kastelic and JC Thundathilsp
- Page 382 and 383: Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 374-
- Page 384 and 385: 376 GC AlthouseTable 1. Potential s
- Page 386 and 387: 378 GC Althousesemen to the domesti
- Page 388 and 389: 380 B Leboeuf, JA Delgadillo, E Man
- Page 390 and 391: 382 B Leboeuf, JA Delgadillo, E Man
- Page 392 and 393: 384 B Leboeuf, JA Delgadillo, E Man
- Page 394 and 395: Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 386-
- Page 396 and 397: 388 N Kostereva and M-C HofmannFig.
- Page 398 and 399: 390 N Kostereva and M-C HofmannMMPs
- Page 400 and 401: 392 N Kostereva and M-C HofmannTado
- Page 402 and 403: 394 P Mermillod, R Dalbie` s-Tran,
- Page 404 and 405: 396 P Mermillod, R Dalbie` s-Tran,
- Page 406 and 407: 398 P Mermillod, R Dalbie` s-Tran,
- Page 408 and 409: 400 P Mermillod, R Dalbie` s-Tran,
- Page 410 and 411: 402 K Kikuchi, N Kashiwazaki, T Nag
- Page 412 and 413: 404 K Kikuchi, N Kashiwazaki, T Nag
- Page 414 and 415: 406 K Kikuchi, N Kashiwazaki, T Nag
- Page 416 and 417: 408 B ObackNumber of publications20
- Page 418 and 419: 410 B ObackReprogramming Ability of
- Page 420 and 421: 412 B Obackstudies have shown that
- Page 422 and 423: 414 B ObackFig. 4. Climbing mount e
- Page 424 and 425: 416 B ObackRenard JP, Maruotti J, J
- Page 426 and 427: 418 P Loi, K Matzukawa, G Ptak, Y N
- Page 428 and 429: 420 P Loi, K Matzukawa, G Ptak, Y N
- Page 430 and 431:
422 P Loi, K Matzukawa, G Ptak, Y N
- Page 434:
Table of Contents Volume 43 · Supp