64 DJ Skarzynski, G Ferreira-Dias and K OkudaEffects of prostagland<strong>in</strong> F 2a and nitric oxide on the secretoryfunction of bov<strong>in</strong>e luteal cells. J Reprod Dev 50, 411–417.Korzekwa A, Shuko M, Jaroszewski J, Izabela Wocawek-Potocka, Okuda K, Skarzynski DJ, 2006: Nitric oxide<strong>in</strong>duces programmed cell dead <strong>in</strong> the bov<strong>in</strong>e corpus luteum:mechanism of action. J Reprod Dev 52, 353–361.Lei ZM, Cheg<strong>in</strong>i N, Rao Ch V, 1991: Quantitative cellcomposition of human and bov<strong>in</strong>e corpora lutea fromvarious reproductive states. Biol Reprod 44, 1148–1156.Levy N, Kobayashi S, Roth Z, Wolfenson D, Miyamoto A,Meidan R, 2000: Adm<strong>in</strong>istration of PGF 2a dur<strong>in</strong>g the earlybov<strong>in</strong>e luteal phase does not alter the expression of ET-1and its type A receptors: a possible cause for corpus luteumrefractor<strong>in</strong>ess. Biol Reprod 63, 377–382.Li H, Wallerath T, Forstermann U, 2002: Physiologicalmechanisms regulat<strong>in</strong>g the expression of endothelial-typeNO synthase. Nitric Oxide 7, 132–147.Lohse MJ, 1993: Molecular mechanisms of membrane receptordesensitization. Biochim Biophys Acta 1179, 171–188.Mamluk R, Levy N, Ruead B, Davis JS, Meidan R, 1999:Characterization and regulation of type A endothel<strong>in</strong>receptor gene expression <strong>in</strong> bov<strong>in</strong>e luteal cells types.Endocr<strong>in</strong>ology 40, 2110–2116.McCracken JA, Custer EE, Lamsa JC, 1999: Luteolysis: aneuroendocr<strong>in</strong>e-mediated event. Physiol Rev 79, 263–323.Meidan R, Milvae RA, Weiss S, Levy N, Friedman A, 1999:Intra-ovarian regulation of luteolysis. J Reprod Fertil Suppl54, 217–228.Meidan R, Levy N, Kisliouk T, Podlovny L, Rusiansky M,Klipper E, 2005: The y<strong>in</strong> and yang of corpus luteum-derivedendothelial cells: Balanc<strong>in</strong>g life and death. Domest AnimEndocr<strong>in</strong>ol 29, 318–328.Miyamoto A, Shirasuna K, Wijayagunawardane MP, WatanabeS, Hayashi M, Yamamoto D, Matsui M, Acosta TJ,2005: Blood flow: a key regulatory component of corpusluteum function <strong>in</strong> the cow. Domest Anim Endocr<strong>in</strong>ol 29,329–339.Nagata S, 1997: Apoptosis by death factor. Cell 88, 355–365.Nett TM, McClellan MC, Niswender GD, 1976: Effects ofprostagland<strong>in</strong>s on the ov<strong>in</strong>e corpus luteum: blood flow,secretion of progesterone and morphology. Biol Reprod 15,66–78.Neuvians TP, Schams D, Berisha B, Pfaffl MW, 2004:Involvement of pro-<strong>in</strong>flammatory cytok<strong>in</strong>es, mediators of<strong>in</strong>flammation, and basic fibroblast growth factor <strong>in</strong> PGF 2a -<strong>in</strong>duced luteolysis <strong>in</strong> bov<strong>in</strong>e corpus luteum. Biol Reprod 70,473–480.Nishimura R, Sakumoto R, Tatsukawa Y, Acosta T, OkudaK, 2007: Oxygen concentration is an important factor formodulat<strong>in</strong>g progesterone synthesis <strong>in</strong> bov<strong>in</strong>e corpus luteum.Endocr<strong>in</strong>ology 147, 4273–4280.Nishimura R, Komiyama J, Tasaki Y, Acosta T, Okuda K,2008: Hypoxia promotes luteal cell death <strong>in</strong> bov<strong>in</strong>e corpusluteum. Biol Reprod 78, <strong>in</strong> press.Niswender GD, Reimers TJ, Diekman MA, Nett TM, 1976:Blood flow: a mediator of ovarian function. Biol Reprod 14,64–81.Niswender GD, Juengel JL, Silva PJ, Rollyson MK, McIntushEW, 2000: Mechanisms controll<strong>in</strong>g the function and lifespan of the corpus luteum. Physiol Rev 80, 1–29.Niswender GD, Davies TL, Griffith RJ, Bogan RL, Monser K,Bott RC, Bruemmer JE, Nett TM, 2007: Judge, jury andexecutioner: the auto-regulation of luteal function. ReprodDom Rum<strong>in</strong>ants VII; Soc Reprod Fertil 64, 191–206.Ohtani M, Kobayashi S, Miyamoto A, Hayashi K, Fukui Y,1998: Real-time relationships between <strong>in</strong>traluteal andplasma concentrations of endothel<strong>in</strong>, oxytoc<strong>in</strong>, and progesteronedur<strong>in</strong>g PGF 2a -<strong>in</strong>duced luteolysis <strong>in</strong> the cow. BiolReprod 58, 103–108.Okuda K, Sakumoto R, Uenoyama Y, Berisha B, MiyamotoA, Schams D, 1999: TNFa receptors <strong>in</strong> microvascularendothelial cells from bov<strong>in</strong>e corpus luteum. Biol Reprod61, 1017–1022.Okuda K, Korzekwa A, Shibaya M, Murakami S, NishimuraR, Tsubouchi M, Woclawek-Potocka I, Skarzynski DJ,2004: Progesterone is a suppressor of apoptosis <strong>in</strong> bov<strong>in</strong>eluteal cells. Biol Reprod 71, 2065–2071.Pate JL, 1988: Regulation of prostagland<strong>in</strong>s synthesis byprogesterone <strong>in</strong> the bov<strong>in</strong>e corpus luteum. Prostagland<strong>in</strong>s36, 303–315.Pate JL, 1996: Intercellular communication <strong>in</strong> the bov<strong>in</strong>ecorpus luteum. Theriogenology 45, 1381–1397.Pate JL, 2003: Lives <strong>in</strong> the balance: responsiveness of thecorpus luteum to uter<strong>in</strong>e and embryonic signals. <strong>Reproduction</strong>61(Suppl), 207–217.Pate JL, Landis Keyes P, 2001: Immune cells <strong>in</strong> the corpusluteum: friends or foes? <strong>Reproduction</strong> 122, 665–676.Penny LA, Armstrong D, Bramley TA, Webb R, Coll<strong>in</strong>s RA,Watson ED, 1999: Immune cells and cytok<strong>in</strong>e production <strong>in</strong>the bov<strong>in</strong>e corpus luteum throughout the ooestrous cycleand after <strong>in</strong>duced luteolysis. J Reprod Fertil 115, 87–96.Petroff MG, Petroff BK, Pate JL, 2001: Mechanisms ofcytok<strong>in</strong>e-<strong>in</strong>duced death of cultured bov<strong>in</strong>e luteal cells.<strong>Reproduction</strong> 121, 753–760.Rae MT, Menzis GS, McNeilly AS, Woad K, Webb R,Bramley TA, 1998: Specific non-genomic, membrane-localizedb<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g sites for progesterone <strong>in</strong> the bov<strong>in</strong>e corpusluteum. Biol Reprod 58, 1394–1406.Reynolds L, Redmer D, 1999: Growth and development of thecorpus luteum. J Reprod Fertil Suppl 54, 181–191.Rosiansky-Sultan M, Klipper E, Spanel-Borowski K, MeidanR., 2006: Inverse relationship between nitric oxide synthasesand endothel<strong>in</strong>-1 synthesis <strong>in</strong> bov<strong>in</strong>e corpus luteum: <strong>in</strong>teractionsat the level of luteal endothelial cell. Endocr<strong>in</strong>ology147, 5228–5235.Rueda BR, Tilly KI, Hansen TR, Hoyer PB, Tilly JL, 1995:Expression of superoxide dismutase, catalase and glutathioneperoxidase <strong>in</strong> the bov<strong>in</strong>e corpus luteum: evidencesupport<strong>in</strong>g a role for oxidative stress <strong>in</strong> luteolysis. Endocr3, 227–232.Rueda BR, Tilly KI, Hansen TR, Jolly PD, Hoyer PB, TillyJL, 1997: Increased Bax and <strong>in</strong>terleuk<strong>in</strong>-1b-convert<strong>in</strong>genzyme messenger RNA levels co<strong>in</strong>cide with apoptosis <strong>in</strong>the corpus luteum dur<strong>in</strong>g structural regression. Biol Reprod56, 186–193.Rueda BR, Hendry IR, Hendry WJ III, Fong HW, StormashakF, Slaydenlayden OD, Davis JS, 2000: Decreasedprogesterone level and progesterone receptors antagonistspromote apoptotic cell death <strong>in</strong> bov<strong>in</strong>e luteal cells. BiolReprod 62, 269–276.Sakamoto K, Miwa K, Ezashi T, Okuda-Ashitaka E, OkudaK, Houtani T, Sugimoto T, Ito S, Hayaishi O, 1995:Expression of mRNA encod<strong>in</strong>g the PGF 2a receptor <strong>in</strong>bov<strong>in</strong>e corpora lutea throughout the ooestrous cycle andpregnancy. J Reprod Fertil 103, 99–105.Sakumoto R, Berisha B, Kawate N, Schams D, Okuda K,2000: TNFa and its receptors <strong>in</strong> bov<strong>in</strong>e corpus luteumthroughout the oestrous cycle. Biol Reprod 62, 192–199.Sasahara K, Shirasuna K, Watanabe S, Asahi T, Nagai K,Miyamoto A, 2007: Nitric oxide stimulated by PGF 2a<strong>in</strong>duces the drastic <strong>in</strong>crease of luteal blood flow and has arole <strong>in</strong> functional and structural luteolysis. Biol Reprod 77(Sp. Iss.), 225–225 (Abstract 578).Schams D, Berisha B, 2004: Regulation of corpus luteumfunction <strong>in</strong> cattle – an overview. Reprod Dom Anim 39,241–251.Schams D, Berisha B, Neuvians T, Amselgruber W, KraetzlWD, 2003: Real-time changes of the local vasoactive peptideÓ 2008 The Authors. Journal compilation Ó 2008 Blackwell Verlag
Regulation of Luteal Function 65systems (angiotens<strong>in</strong>, endothel<strong>in</strong>) <strong>in</strong> the bov<strong>in</strong>e corpusluteum after <strong>in</strong>duced luteal regression. Mol Reprod Dev65, 57–66.Shaw DW, Britt JH, 1995: Concentrations of TNFa and P4with<strong>in</strong> the bov<strong>in</strong>e corpus luteum sampled by cont<strong>in</strong>uousflowmicrodialysis dur<strong>in</strong>g luteolysis <strong>in</strong> vivo. Biol Reprod 53,847–854.Shirasuna K, Asaoka H, Acosta TJ, WijayagunawardaneMPB, Ohtani M, Hayashi M, Matsui M, Miyamoto A,2004: Real-time relationships <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>traluteal release amongPGF 2a , endothel<strong>in</strong>-1, and angiotens<strong>in</strong> II dur<strong>in</strong>g spontaneousluteolysis <strong>in</strong> the cow. Biol Reprod 71, 1706–1711.Silva PJ, Juengel JL, Rollyson MK, Niswender GD, 2000:Prostagland<strong>in</strong> metabolism <strong>in</strong> the ov<strong>in</strong>e corpus luteum:catabolism of PGF 2a co<strong>in</strong>cides with resistance of the CLto PGF 2a . Biol Reprod 63, 1229–1236.Skarzynski DJ, Okuda K, 1999: Sensitivity of bov<strong>in</strong>e corporalutea to PGF 2a is dependent on progesterone, oxytoc<strong>in</strong> andprostagland<strong>in</strong>s. Biol Reprod 60, 1292–1298.Skarzynski DJ, Bogacki M, Kotwica J, 1997: Changes <strong>in</strong>ovarian OT secretion as an <strong>in</strong>dicator of corpus luteumresponse to PGF 2a treatment <strong>in</strong> cattle. Theriogenology 48,733–742.Skarzynski DJ, Kobayashi S, Okuda K, 2000: Influence ofnitric oxide and noradrenal<strong>in</strong>e on PGF 2a -<strong>in</strong>duced oxytoc<strong>in</strong>secretion and <strong>in</strong>tracellular calcium mobilization <strong>in</strong> culturedbov<strong>in</strong>e luteal cells. Biol Reprod 63, 1000–1005.Skarzynski DJ, Jaroszewski JJ, Okuda K, 2001: Luteotropicmechanisms <strong>in</strong> the bov<strong>in</strong>e corpus luteum: role of oxytoc<strong>in</strong>,PGF 2a , progesterone and noradrenal<strong>in</strong>e. J Reprod Dev 47,125–137.Skarzynski DJ, Bah MM, Wocawek-Potocka I, Deptua K,Korzekwa A, Shibaya M, Pilawski W, Okuda K, 2003a:Roles of TNFa <strong>in</strong> the regulation of the oestrous cycle <strong>in</strong>cattle: an <strong>in</strong> vivo study. Biol Reprod 69, 1907–1913.Skarzynski DJ, Jaroszewski JJ, Bah MM, Deptua KM, BarszczewskaB, Gawronska B, Hansel W, 2003b: Adm<strong>in</strong>istrationof a nitric oxide synthase <strong>in</strong>hibitor counteracts PGFF 2a -<strong>in</strong>duced luteolysis <strong>in</strong> cattle. Biol Reprod 68, 1674–1681.Skarzynski DJ, Jaroszewski JJ, Okuda K, 2005: Role of TNFaand nitric oxide <strong>in</strong> luteolysis <strong>in</strong> cattle. Domest AnimEndocr<strong>in</strong>ol 29, 340–346.Skarzynski DJ, Woclawek-Potocka I, Korzekwa A, Bah MM,Piotrowska KK, Barszczewska B, Okuda K, 2007: Infusionof exogenous TNF dose dependently alters the length ofthe luteal phase <strong>in</strong> cattle: differential responses to treatmentwith <strong>in</strong>domethac<strong>in</strong> and a nitric oxide synthase <strong>in</strong>hibitor(L-NAME). Biol Reprod 76, 619–627.Sug<strong>in</strong>o N, Telleria CM., Gibori G, 1997: Progesterone <strong>in</strong>hibits20a-HSD expression <strong>in</strong> the rat corpus luteum through theglucocorticoid receptor. Endocr<strong>in</strong>ology 138, 1497–1500.Taniguchi H, Yokomizo Y, Okuda K, 2002: Fas-fas ligandsystem mediates luteal cell death <strong>in</strong> bov<strong>in</strong>e corpus luteum.Biol Reprod 66, 754–759.Towson DH, O’Connor CL, Pru JK, 2002: Expression ofMCP-1 and distribution of immune cells populations <strong>in</strong> thebov<strong>in</strong>e corpus luteum through the oestrous cycle. BiolReprod 66, 361–366.Tsai S-J, Wiltbank MC, 1998: PGF 2a regulates dist<strong>in</strong>ctphysiological changes <strong>in</strong> early and mid-cycle bov<strong>in</strong>e corporalutea. Biol Reprod 58, 346–352.Vonnahme KA, Wilson ME, Li Y, Rupnow HL, PhernettonTM, Ford SP, Magness RR, 2005: Circulat<strong>in</strong>g levels ofnitric oxide and vascular endothelial growth factor throughoutov<strong>in</strong>e pregnancy. J Physiol-Lond 565, 101–109.Watanebe S, Shirasuna K, Matsui M, Yamamoto D, BerishaB, Schams D, Miyamoto A, 2006: Effect of <strong>in</strong>traluteal<strong>in</strong>jection of endothel<strong>in</strong> type A receptor antagonist onPGF 2a -<strong>in</strong>duced luteolysis <strong>in</strong> the cow. J Reprod Dev 52,551–559.Weems YS, Lewis AW, Randel RD, Weems CW, 2002: Effectsof PGE 2 and PGF 2a , trilostane, mifepristone, palmitic acid(PA), <strong>in</strong>domethac<strong>in</strong>, ethamoxytriphetol, PGE 2 + PA, orPGF 2a + PA on PGE 2 , PGF 2a , and progesterone secretionby bov<strong>in</strong>e corpora lutea of mid-pregnancy <strong>in</strong> vitro. Ch<strong>in</strong> JPhysiol 45, 163–168.Weems YS, Randel RD, Tatman S, Lewis AW, NeuendorffDA, Weems CW, 2004: Effects of estrous synchronizationon the response to nitric oxide donors, nitric oxide synthase<strong>in</strong>hibitors, and endothel<strong>in</strong>-1 <strong>in</strong> vitro. Prostagland<strong>in</strong> OtherLipid Med 74, 45–59.Wiltbank MC, Gallagher KP, Christensen AK, Brabec RK,Keyes PL, 1990: Physiological and immunocytochemicalevidence for new concept of blood flow regulation <strong>in</strong> corpusluteum. Biol Reprod 42, 139–149.Wiltbank MC, Shiao TF, Bergfelt DR, G<strong>in</strong>ther OJ, 1995:PGF 2a receptors <strong>in</strong> the early bov<strong>in</strong>e corpus luteum. BiolReprod 52, 74–78.Wright MF, Sayre B, Keith Inskeep EK, Flores JA, 2001:PGF 2a regulation of the bov<strong>in</strong>e corpus luteum endothel<strong>in</strong>system dur<strong>in</strong>g the early and midluteal phase. Biol Reprod65, 1710–1717.Author’s address (for correspondence): DJ Skarzynski, Department ofReproductive Immunology, Institute of Animal <strong>Reproduction</strong> andFood Research of PAS, 10-747 Olsztyn, Poland. E-mail: skadar@pan.olsztyn.plConflict of <strong>in</strong>terest: All authors declare no conflict of <strong>in</strong>terests.Ó 2008 The Authors. Journal compilation Ó 2008 Blackwell Verlag
- Page 2 and 3:
Reproduction in Domestic AnimalsOff
- Page 5 and 6:
Reproductionin Domestic AnimalsTabl
- Page 7 and 8:
Minitüb:ProductsforArtificial Inse
- Page 9 and 10:
Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 1-7
- Page 11 and 12:
Embryo Biotechnologies in Farm Anim
- Page 13 and 14:
Embryo Biotechnologies in Farm Anim
- Page 15 and 16:
Embryo Biotechnologies in Farm Anim
- Page 17 and 18:
Ethical Models for Studying Reprodu
- Page 19 and 20:
Ethical Models for Studying Reprodu
- Page 21 and 22: Ethical Models for Studying Reprodu
- Page 23 and 24: Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 15-2
- Page 25 and 26: Dietary Pollutants as Risk Factors
- Page 27 and 28: Dietary Pollutants as Risk Factors
- Page 29 and 30: Dietary Pollutants as Risk Factors
- Page 31 and 32: Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Supp. 2), 23-30
- Page 33 and 34: Factors Influencing Reproduction in
- Page 35 and 36: Factors Influencing Reproduction in
- Page 37 and 38: Factors Influencing Reproduction in
- Page 39 and 40: Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 31-3
- Page 41 and 42: GH and IGF-I in Cattle and Pigs 33h
- Page 43 and 44: GH and IGF-I in Cattle and Pigs 35h
- Page 45 and 46: GH and IGF-I in Cattle and Pigs 37B
- Page 47: GH and IGF-I in Cattle and Pigs 39R
- Page 51 and 52: Seasonality of Reproduction in Mamm
- Page 53 and 54: Seasonality of Reproduction in Mamm
- Page 55 and 56: Seasonality of Reproduction in Mamm
- Page 57 and 58: Dominant Follicle Selection in Cows
- Page 59 and 60: Dominant Follicle Selection in Cows
- Page 61 and 62: Dominant Follicle Selection in Cows
- Page 63 and 64: Dominant Follicle Selection in Cows
- Page 65 and 66: Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 57-6
- Page 67 and 68: Regulation of Luteal Function 59and
- Page 69 and 70: Regulation of Luteal Function 61bov
- Page 71: Regulation of Luteal Function 63(+/
- Page 75 and 76: Captive Breeding of Cheetahs in Sou
- Page 77 and 78: Captive Breeding of Cheetahs in Sou
- Page 79 and 80: Captive Breeding of Cheetahs in Sou
- Page 81 and 82: Captive Breeding of Cheetahs in Sou
- Page 83 and 84: Non-invasive Monitoring of Hormones
- Page 85 and 86: Non-invasive Monitoring of Hormones
- Page 87 and 88: Non-invasive Monitoring of Hormones
- Page 89 and 90: Non-invasive Monitoring of Hormones
- Page 91 and 92: Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 83-8
- Page 93 and 94: Biotechnology Methods for Preservin
- Page 95 and 96: Biotechnology Methods for Preservin
- Page 97 and 98: Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 89-9
- Page 99 and 100: Genetic Improvement of Dairy Cow Re
- Page 101 and 102: Genetic Improvement of Dairy Cow Re
- Page 103 and 104: Genetic Improvement of Dairy Cow Re
- Page 105 and 106: Nutrient Prioritization and Fertili
- Page 107 and 108: Nutrient Prioritization and Fertili
- Page 109 and 110: Nutrient Prioritization and Fertili
- Page 111 and 112: Nutrient Prioritization and Fertili
- Page 113 and 114: CL-Endometrium-Embryo Interactions
- Page 115 and 116: CL-Endometrium-Embryo Interactions
- Page 117 and 118: CL-Endometrium-Embryo Interactions
- Page 119 and 120: CL-Endometrium-Embryo Interactions
- Page 121 and 122: Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 113-
- Page 123 and 124:
Reproductive Status Assessed by Mil
- Page 125 and 126:
Reproductive Status Assessed by Mil
- Page 127 and 128:
Reproductive Status Assessed by Mil
- Page 129 and 130:
Reproductive Status Assessed by Mil
- Page 131 and 132:
Genetic Aspects of Reproduction in
- Page 133 and 134:
Genetic Aspects of Reproduction in
- Page 135 and 136:
Genetic Aspects of Reproduction in
- Page 137 and 138:
Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 129-
- Page 139 and 140:
Nutritional Interactions and Reprod
- Page 141 and 142:
Nutritional Interactions and Reprod
- Page 143 and 144:
Nutritional Interactions and Reprod
- Page 145 and 146:
Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 137-
- Page 147 and 148:
Developmental Capabilities of Prepu
- Page 149 and 150:
Developmental Capabilities of Prepu
- Page 151 and 152:
Developmental Capabilities of Prepu
- Page 153 and 154:
Reproductive Physiology, Pathology
- Page 155 and 156:
Reproductive Physiology, Pathology
- Page 157 and 158:
Reproductive Physiology, Pathology
- Page 159 and 160:
Reproduction of Domestic Ferret 151
- Page 161 and 162:
Reproduction of Domestic Ferret 153
- Page 163 and 164:
Reproduction of Domestic Ferret 155
- Page 165 and 166:
Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 157-
- Page 167 and 168:
Canine Anoestrus, Oestrous Inductio
- Page 169 and 170:
Canine Anoestrus, Oestrous Inductio
- Page 171 and 172:
Canine Anoestrus, Oestrous Inductio
- Page 173 and 174:
Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 165-
- Page 175 and 176:
The Ethics and Role of AI in Dogs 1
- Page 177 and 178:
The Ethics and Role of AI in Dogs 1
- Page 179 and 180:
The Ethics and Role of AI in Dogs 1
- Page 181 and 182:
Control of Fertility in Females by
- Page 183 and 184:
Control of Fertility in Females by
- Page 185 and 186:
Control of Fertility in Females by
- Page 187 and 188:
Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 179-
- Page 189 and 190:
Controlling Animal Populations Usin
- Page 191 and 192:
Controlling Animal Populations Usin
- Page 193 and 194:
Controlling Animal Populations Usin
- Page 195 and 196:
Recombinant Gonadotropins in Assist
- Page 197 and 198:
Recombinant Gonadotropins in Assist
- Page 199 and 200:
Recombinant Gonadotropins in Assist
- Page 201 and 202:
Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 193-
- Page 203 and 204:
Farm Animals Embryonic Stem Cells 1
- Page 205 and 206:
Farm Animals Embryonic Stem Cells 1
- Page 207 and 208:
Farm Animals Embryonic Stem Cells 1
- Page 209 and 210:
Reproduction in Domestic Buffalo 20
- Page 211 and 212:
Reproduction in Domestic Buffalo 20
- Page 213 and 214:
Reproduction in Domestic Buffalo 20
- Page 215 and 216:
Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 207-
- Page 217 and 218:
Postpartum Ovarian Activity in Sout
- Page 219 and 220:
Postpartum Ovarian Activity in Sout
- Page 221 and 222:
Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 213-
- Page 223 and 224:
Mother-Offspring Interactions 215an
- Page 225 and 226:
Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 217-
- Page 227 and 228:
Reproduction Augmentation in Yak an
- Page 229 and 230:
Reproduction Augmentation in Yak an
- Page 231 and 232:
Reproduction Augmentation in Yak an
- Page 233 and 234:
Follicles and Mares 2251982). Simil
- Page 235 and 236:
Follicles and Mares 227Studies invo
- Page 237 and 238:
Follicles and Mares 229dominant fol
- Page 239 and 240:
Follicles and Mares 231trus, spring
- Page 241 and 242:
Proteins in Early Equine Conceptuse
- Page 243 and 244:
Proteins in Early Equine Conceptuse
- Page 245 and 246:
Proteins in Early Equine Conceptuse
- Page 247 and 248:
Follicular and Oocyte Competence un
- Page 249 and 250:
Follicular and Oocyte Competence un
- Page 251 and 252:
Follicular and Oocyte Competence un
- Page 253 and 254:
Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 245-
- Page 255 and 256:
Fertilization in the Porcine Fallop
- Page 257 and 258:
Fertilization in the Porcine Fallop
- Page 259 and 260:
Fertilization in the Porcine Fallop
- Page 261 and 262:
Mastitis in Post-Partum Dairy Cows
- Page 263 and 264:
Mastitis in Post-Partum Dairy Cows
- Page 265 and 266:
Mastitis in Post-Partum Dairy Cows
- Page 267 and 268:
Mastitis in Post-Partum Dairy Cows
- Page 269 and 270:
Embryo ⁄ Foetal Losses in Ruminan
- Page 271 and 272:
Embryo ⁄ Foetal Losses in Ruminan
- Page 273 and 274:
Embryo ⁄ Foetal Losses in Ruminan
- Page 275 and 276:
Embryo ⁄ Foetal Losses in Ruminan
- Page 277 and 278:
Death Ligand and Receptor Pig Ovari
- Page 279 and 280:
Death Ligand and Receptor Pig Ovari
- Page 281 and 282:
Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 273-
- Page 283:
Lactocrine Programming of Uterine D
- Page 286 and 287:
278 FF Bartol, AA Wiley and CA Bagn
- Page 288 and 289:
Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 280-
- Page 290 and 291:
282 KC Caires, JA Schmidt, AP Olive
- Page 292 and 293:
284 KC Caires, JA Schmidt, AP Olive
- Page 294 and 295:
286 KC Caires, JA Schmidt, AP Olive
- Page 296 and 297:
Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 288-
- Page 298 and 299:
290 I Dobrinskisuccessful also betw
- Page 300 and 301:
292 I DobrinskiCreemers LB, Meng X,
- Page 302 and 303:
294 I DobrinskiOkutsu T, Suzuki K,
- Page 304 and 305:
296 N Rawlings, ACO Evans, RK Chand
- Page 306 and 307:
298 N Rawlings, ACO Evans, RK Chand
- Page 308 and 309:
300 N Rawlings, ACO Evans, RK Chand
- Page 310 and 311:
Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 302-
- Page 312 and 313:
304 A Dinnyes, XC Tian and X Yanggr
- Page 314 and 315:
306 A Dinnyes, XC Tian and X YangIn
- Page 316 and 317:
308 A Dinnyes, XC Tian and X YangHo
- Page 318 and 319:
Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 310-
- Page 320 and 321:
312 RC Bott, DT Clopton and AS Cupp
- Page 322 and 323:
314 RC Bott, DT Clopton and AS Cupp
- Page 324 and 325:
316 RC Bott, DT Clopton and AS Cupp
- Page 326 and 327:
318 BK Whitlock, JA Daniel, RR Wilb
- Page 328 and 329:
320 BK Whitlock, JA Daniel, RR Wilb
- Page 330 and 331:
322 BK Whitlock, JA Daniel, RR Wilb
- Page 332 and 333:
Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 324-
- Page 334 and 335:
326 CR Barb, GJ Hausman and CA Lent
- Page 336 and 337:
328 CR Barb, GJ Hausman and CA Lent
- Page 338 and 339:
330 CR Barb, GJ Hausman and CA Lent
- Page 340 and 341:
332 C Galli, I Lagutina, R Duchi, S
- Page 342 and 343:
334 C Galli, I Lagutina, R Duchi, S
- Page 344 and 345:
336 C Galli, I Lagutina, R Duchi, S
- Page 346 and 347:
Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 338-
- Page 348 and 349:
340 D Rath and LA JohnsonCommercial
- Page 350 and 351:
342 D Rath and LA JohnsonThe Commer
- Page 352 and 353:
344 D Rath and LA JohnsonX- and Y-b
- Page 354 and 355:
346 D Rath and LA JohnsonWalker SK,
- Page 356 and 357:
348 JM Vazquez, J Roca, MA Gil, C C
- Page 358 and 359:
350 JM Vazquez, J Roca, MA Gil, C C
- Page 360 and 361:
352 JM Vazquez, J Roca, MA Gil, C C
- Page 362 and 363:
354 JM Vazquez, J Roca, MA Gil, C C
- Page 364 and 365:
356 CBA Whitelaw, SG Lillico and T
- Page 366 and 367:
358 CBA Whitelaw, SG Lillico and T
- Page 368 and 369:
360 ACO Evans, N Forde, GM O’Gorm
- Page 370 and 371:
362 ACO Evans, N Forde, GM O’Gorm
- Page 372 and 373:
364 ACO Evans, N Forde, GM O’Gorm
- Page 374 and 375:
366 ACO Evans, N Forde, GM O’Gorm
- Page 376 and 377:
Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 368-
- Page 378 and 379:
370 JP Kastelic and JC Thundathilsp
- Page 380 and 381:
372 JP Kastelic and JC Thundathilme
- Page 382 and 383:
Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 374-
- Page 384 and 385:
376 GC AlthouseTable 1. Potential s
- Page 386 and 387:
378 GC Althousesemen to the domesti
- Page 388 and 389:
380 B Leboeuf, JA Delgadillo, E Man
- Page 390 and 391:
382 B Leboeuf, JA Delgadillo, E Man
- Page 392 and 393:
384 B Leboeuf, JA Delgadillo, E Man
- Page 394 and 395:
Reprod Dom Anim 43 (Suppl. 2), 386-
- Page 396 and 397:
388 N Kostereva and M-C HofmannFig.
- Page 398 and 399:
390 N Kostereva and M-C HofmannMMPs
- Page 400 and 401:
392 N Kostereva and M-C HofmannTado
- Page 402 and 403:
394 P Mermillod, R Dalbie` s-Tran,
- Page 404 and 405:
396 P Mermillod, R Dalbie` s-Tran,
- Page 406 and 407:
398 P Mermillod, R Dalbie` s-Tran,
- Page 408 and 409:
400 P Mermillod, R Dalbie` s-Tran,
- Page 410 and 411:
402 K Kikuchi, N Kashiwazaki, T Nag
- Page 412 and 413:
404 K Kikuchi, N Kashiwazaki, T Nag
- Page 414 and 415:
406 K Kikuchi, N Kashiwazaki, T Nag
- Page 416 and 417:
408 B ObackNumber of publications20
- Page 418 and 419:
410 B ObackReprogramming Ability of
- Page 420 and 421:
412 B Obackstudies have shown that
- Page 422 and 423:
414 B ObackFig. 4. Climbing mount e
- Page 424 and 425:
416 B ObackRenard JP, Maruotti J, J
- Page 426 and 427:
418 P Loi, K Matzukawa, G Ptak, Y N
- Page 428 and 429:
420 P Loi, K Matzukawa, G Ptak, Y N
- Page 430 and 431:
422 P Loi, K Matzukawa, G Ptak, Y N
- Page 434:
Table of Contents Volume 43 · Supp